其实吧,美国的诉求中有一定比例的合理成分,一部分是合理的,另外就是川皇乱加的,搞清楚其实有助于解决问题

dreamland

资深人士
注册
2004-11-28
消息
1,727
荣誉分数
541
声望点数
223
刚用了几个AI TOOL, 查了一下

2024年, 美国的贸易总赤字是 0.918T,

昨天一个新闻说美国的贸易赤字占所有赤字国家总额60-66%

即使完全把川普的流氓行径因素去除,美国希望贸易平衡的想法是有相当合理的空间。

兼听则明。这就基本解释了为什么2次10% 全球市场都作为很大利好,因为本身美国的做法有一定合理的地方, 10% 虽然超过目前世界各国平均的TARRIF, 但考虑到美国实际占全球接近2/3 的赤字, 就是说美国是给全世界最大的甲方。 10% 如果能摆平争端,是个总体相对平稳的方案。


In 2024, the U.S. trade deficit in goods and services reached 918.4billion∗∗,markinga17918.4billion∗∗,

Based on the most recent data available, here is a list of the top 10 countries with the highest trade deficits in 2023:
RankCountryTrade Deficit (USD billions)
1United States1,100.0
2India245.5
3United Kingdom233.1
4Türkiye86.3
5France82.3
6Philippines65.9
7Japan47.9
8Spain37.5
9Greece35.7
10Romania31.3
 
贸易不平衡的原因是美元霸权。美元环流受阻,必需开启抢劫模式。借钱消费的模式的确不可持续,抢钱消费的模式就能够持续吗?搞笑吧
 
呵呵,你现在才知道啊,川普从第一个任期就开始喊,白喊了。
 
如果大家都没有盈余,谁去买美债。本身就是个难解题
 
在中文媒体中,有多少比例的人知道这个事实呢?

这其实对普通民众的认知和感觉有重大的影响。 也有助于中国官方或最高层,或谈判方客观评估形势。

而不是“美国所有的诉求都是无理的”。
 
贸易不平衡的原因是美元霸权。美元环流受阻,必需开启抢劫模式。借钱消费的模式的确不可持续,抢钱消费的模式就能够持续吗?搞笑吧
川普要改变的就是这种模式。老川昨天说他不愿意谴责包子,而是要痛骂坐在总统位置的那些前任,前几任总统都干了什么啊。
 
刚用了几个AI TOOL, 查了一下

2024年, 美国的贸易总赤字是 0.918T,

昨天一个新闻说美国的贸易赤字占所有赤字国家总额60-66%

即使完全把川普的流氓行径因素去除,美国希望贸易平衡的想法是有相当合理的空间。

兼听则明。这就基本解释了为什么2次10% 全球市场都作为很大利好,因为本身美国的做法有一定合理的地方, 10% 虽然超过目前世界各国平均的TARRIF, 但考虑到美国实际占全球接近2/3 的赤字, 就是说美国是给全世界最大的甲方。 10% 如果能摆平争端,是个总体相对平稳的方案。


In 2024, the U.S. trade deficit in goods and services reached 918.4billion∗∗,markinga17918.4billion∗∗,

Based on the most recent data available, here is a list of the top 10 countries with the highest trade deficits in 2023:
RankCountryTrade Deficit (USD billions)
1United States1,100.0
2India245.5
3United Kingdom233.1
4Türkiye86.3
5France82.3
6Philippines65.9
7Japan47.9
8Spain37.5
9Greece35.7
10Romania31.3
美国没把自己的国际服务收入算进去吧?
 
依我看,美国的“对等关税”做法不是诉求,而是自卫;不是有一定的合理性,而是完全合理。只是对这个沉疴已久的问题,采用了顽症下猛药的方式,而且征收对象不分远近亲疏。

涉事国家和地区,合理解决问题的方法都摆明了。至于怎么做,那是自己的选择。

我在别的帖说过,外贸绝大多数产品,经过30年全球化,价格基本透明,出口方的利润只有2-10%,

川普加10%,其实应该是他征收TARRIF的上限。

4月2他列出的TARRIF 表全球哗然, 就是证明超过10%的基本就不是正常的贸易平衡问题,而是要你命了, 更不用说30,34, 50, 104, 125%的税率
 
我在别的帖说过,外贸绝大多数产品,经过30年全球化,价格基本透明,出口方的利润只有2-10%,

川普加10%,其实应该是他征收TARRIF的上限。

4月2他列出的TARRIF 表全球哗然, 就是证明超过10%的基本就不是正常的贸易平衡问题,而是要你命了, 更不用说30,34, 50, 104, 125%的税率
为啥就非得卖美国呢,而且还卖的便宜,卷来卷去,把自己卷死了。
 
对美国的长期高关税是单向征收的,而购买美国债券是自愿的投资。混淆二者是糊涂算法。

海湖庄园建议的是百年无息国债。那个大聪明会自愿购买? 买也是被逼无奈。

想收割世界,必需靠中国帮忙。想打击中国,就的得给小弟们让利。既要又要是不可能是的
 
习大表面上是左派或极左, 但实际上他对维护人民基本生存资料方面一直有顽固的错误观点, 他曾经说过我们不养懒人。

要是换成江总或胡总, 在现在的国力和实际情况下,对弱势的人民的补足或福利早就发下去了
 
刚用了几个AI TOOL, 查了一下

2024年, 美国的贸易总赤字是 0.918T,

昨天一个新闻说美国的贸易赤字占所有赤字国家总额60-66%

即使完全把川普的流氓行径因素去除,美国希望贸易平衡的想法是有相当合理的空间。

兼听则明。这就基本解释了为什么2次10% 全球市场都作为很大利好,因为本身美国的做法有一定合理的地方, 10% 虽然超过目前世界各国平均的TARRIF, 但考虑到美国实际占全球接近2/3 的赤字, 就是说美国是给全世界最大的甲方。 10% 如果能摆平争端,是个总体相对平稳的方案。


In 2024, the U.S. trade deficit in goods and services reached 918.4billion∗∗,markinga17918.4billion∗∗,

Based on the most recent data available, here is a list of the top 10 countries with the highest trade deficits in 2023:
RankCountryTrade Deficit (USD billions)
1United States1,100.0
2India245.5
3United Kingdom233.1
4Türkiye86.3
5France82.3
6Philippines65.9
7Japan47.9
8Spain37.5
9Greece35.7
10Romania31.3
贸易不平衡是双方供需不平衡造成的,关税起到一些作用,如果两国之间,关税不平等,应当谈判解决,比如川普总说印度有些商品征收美国700%关税,加拿大奶制品收美国 300% 关税。印度的事不了解。

这篇文章解释了加拿大奶制品300%是误导,只有超过配额之后,而这个高关税从来没有发生过。如果加拿大不加配额上限,很快会将整个市场输给美国。这个限额在2020年,川普亲自签署的新北美贸易协议CUSMO中已经提高。

Fact-checking Trump’s claims that Canada has 300% tariffs on U.S. dairy​

By Tammy Ibrahimpoor
Published: April 09, 2025 at 5:00AM EDT

U.S. President Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that Canada is taking advantage of the United States through dairy tariffs. Speaking to reporters in the White House Rose Garden to announce his global tariffs on April 3, Trump said that Canada imposes a 250 to 300 per cent tariff on U.S. dairy products.

However, a closer look at trade rules and data shows these claims are misleading.

Trump has repeatedly cited those high tariff figures, and while they technically exist, they only apply to products that exceed Canada’s tariff rate quotas (TRQs). In practice, U.S. dairy exports to Canada do not come close to reaching those limits — meaning they face no tariffs at all.

“It’s a false claim,” Bruce Muirhead, dairy policy expert and history professor at the University of Waterloo, told CTV News.ca. “We do have tariff rates of 200 or even 285 per cent against American dairy imports — but only after they fill their tariff rate quota. And they have never filled their tariff rate quota. Ever.”

Muirhead said cheese is the only category in which U.S. exporters have come close.

“But for the others, it’s not nearly that much,” he said. “Everything else goes down to zero at the very bottom of the list — products they haven’t even attempted to fill.”

The Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA), which Trump himself negotiated and signed in 2020, increased U.S. access to the Canadian dairy market by raising those quota thresholds.

While Canada’s supply management system does limit imports to protect domestic producers, it does so in a way that is allowed under international trade rules.

High over-quota tariffs were introduced in Canada to discourage excessive imports and protect the domestic market.

“They just wanted to make sure that nothing further would get into the country beyond the TRQ,” Muirhead explained, adding that Americans have exactly the same rationale. “In fact, their percentage that’s open is less than ours. So, in a sense, it’s hypocritical — they want access to our market, but they have the same kind of system in theirs.”

Despite Trump’s rhetoric, Canada remains a major importer of U.S. dairy. In 2024, the U.S. exported more than US$1.1 billion in dairy products to Canada, marking an 82 per cent increase over the past decade. Canada is the second-largest international market for U.S. dairy, behind only Mexico.

Muirhead says part of the problem is the structural difference in the scale of dairy production.

“They simply produce far too much milk for their own market, and for their own processing capacity,” he said. “So, they are desperate to get unfettered access to our market.”

The proximity of major U.S. dairy regions to the Canadian border, makes it a desirable target for exports. But, Muirhead warned, “if you allow them unfettered access to your market, you’ll lose your entire dairy market.”

He added that despite the political attention Trump continues to give the issue, dairy makes up only a tiny fraction of overall trade between the two countries.

“It’s totally insignificant,” Muirhead said. “Why would a president focus on 0.1 per cent of trade between the two countries? It makes no sense at all.”

He says part of the reason is that milk carries enormous cultural weight in the U.S.

“No matter who’s in office — Senate, House, or the executive branch — they’re all just focused on dairy in a way that I don’t think we in Canada really understand,” Muirhead said. “It doesn’t have the same cultural resonance here that it does there. But for Trump, it plays.”

 
习大表面上是左派或极左, 但实际上他对维护人民基本生存资料方面一直有顽固的错误观点, 他曾经说过我们不养懒人。

要是换成江总或胡总, 在现在的国力和实际情况下,对弱势的人民的补足或福利早就发下去了
中华文化就是不养懒人,新加坡也是这样。何错之有?
福利不是给懒人的,是给劳动能力不足的人的。
 
后退
顶部