city是流氓，你没有问题是因为没有邻居告你

[billwanhua]

Kanata couple told to rip out $40K landscaping over bylaw violation

A Kanata couple’s new landscaping project meant to beautify their property and make it more accessible has turned into a massive headache.

www.ctvnews.ca

“Apparently you can’t have any stonework at all,” said Pam Kline. “Has to be dirt or grass or mulch. That’s the only thing allowed, so if you look around, I can’t even imagine how many homes in my own neighbourhood, let alone the city, would be in hardcore violation.”

“I think it’s time to revisit the rules,” said neighbour David Haggarty. “Drive around you’ll see everybody, all sorts of people have done it.”

 

[肥猫]

是不是这家把属于city的side walk way 也换了？

 

[billwanhua]

是不是这家把属于city的side walk way 也换了？

看照片没有，都是他家草坪，没有人行道.

如果没有人行道的property, city 有easement,可能你整个草坪都不能按照私有财产来

An easement on private property without a sidewalk allows specific individuals or entities to use a portion of that property for a designated purpose, even without a sidewalk. This right of way can be for various reasons, such as access to utilities, a driveway, or a shared path. The easement holder has the right to use the designated area for the specified purpose, and the property owner cannot unreasonably interfere with that right.

 

[FlyingEagle]

今年要么突然几天大雨，要么很长时间干旱，大雨集中在几天下，少数业主硬化问题不大。如果太多业主做硬化，影响小区排水系统。

市政府有很多规定，只是没人举报就相安无事。

新闻报道指出 “The bylaw prohibits hardscape on the city’s right of way as it interferes with drainage, snow removal and can impact other city services,” “After a complaint from a neighbour, the city now says most of it has to go.”

 

[肥猫]

看照片没有，都是他家草坪，没有人行道.

如果没有人行道的property, city 有easement,可能你整个草坪都不能按照私有财产来

An easement on private property without a sidewalk allows specific individuals or entities to use a portion of that property for a designated purpose, even without a sidewalk. This right of way can be for various reasons, such as access to utilities, a driveway, or a shared path. The easement holder has the right to use the designated area for the specified purpose, and the property owner cannot unreasonably interfere with that right.

那city真流氓了。

 

[billwanhua]

那city真流氓了。

就连家门口这个大圆圈都要去掉

 

[c8848]

jealous

 

[ccc]

看看马路对过那家。

这家留的花坛面积太小了。

 

[billwanhua]

浏览附件1183105

就连家门口这个大圆圈都要去掉

看看马路对过那家。

这家留的花坛面积太小了。

关键city by law, 这个圆圈也要去掉一部分，不是大小的问题，如果有人举报，小也有问题，可能很多人都有问题，未来大家门口都不能乱搞。

对面那个人家，石头在花园里面也是违法行为

 

[ccc]

关键city by law, 这个圆圈也要去掉一部分，不是大小的问题，如果有人举报，小也有问题，可能很多人都有问题，未来大家门口都不能乱搞

就是大小的问题。

 

[billwanhua]

就是大小的问题。

“Apparently you can’t have any stonework at all,” said Pam Kline. “Has to be dirt or grass or mulch. That’s the only thing allowed, so if you look around, I can’t even imagine how many homes in my own neighbourhood, let alone the city, would be in hardcore violation.”

Has to be dirt or grass or mulch. That’s the only thing allowed

不管大小，邻居举报就违法，city一定会让你整改。

我有个出租房被邻居投诉后院杂草，city给我挂号信写了一堆整改措施，连几片树叶也不行，那个后院比我住的后院整洁干净多了

 

[morningStarWars]

有邻居跟city file了complaint。 真的很差劲的， 街上做interlock的太多了， 查一下7-80%的人都不合格， 但是现在的bylaw就是没人搞就装瞎， 有人搞就得全挖。 这其实也不公平， bylaw得改。

 

[m234]

我曾问过city居民区路边停车3小时限制的问题，回答也是有人举报就执行，没人举报就可以。

 

[billwanhua]

有邻居跟city file了complaint。 真的很差劲的， 街上做interlock的太多了， 查一下7-80%的人都不合格， 但是现在的bylaw就是没人搞就装瞎， 有人搞就得全挖。 这其实也不公平， bylaw得改。

对，如果公平，city应该去enforcement 规则，如果每个人违法被制止，就不会有人违规，做的人就会重视自己自觉

 

[gocanoeing]

这个类似超速被警察抓到了

扯什么别人也超速为什么你不抓。。。

意义不大，除非是嫌罚款太低之类