关于唐人街的有偿陪侍
- 主题发起人 Clare Irene
- 开始时间
Sex Work Cyber Resource & Support Center
Promoting Intimacy and Positive, Healthy, Consenting Adult Sexuality
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Legal Status Of Prostitution In Canada
Too many restrictions but far better than the U.S. !
Canadian Prostitution Favorable Legal Situation
Similar to Europe, Australia and most of the World
Very Different Than In the U.S.
In Canada, honest, full service, safe sex escorting (sexwork) is the accepted norm. Since Canada doesn't have the legal repressive issues as in the U.S. ads are usually honest, prices quoted are real - not the U.S. rip offs and scams. In general prices are far lower than in the U.S. since they don't have to include the large legal risk premium. Also there are more providers, choosing sexwork for the right reasons, since there is not the legal risk.
Everyone should have access to reasonable priced sexual relief of that normal sexual tension or sexual variety that is natural, from professional, caring, honest providers.
In most every country except the U.S. such services are legally available and not any big deal. U.S. laws are controlled by a religious agenda that has no biblical basis, only false traditions of sexual repression that have been incorporated into laws to deny healthy sexual service options. Those that oppose sexwork the most often are the ones participating in it but their guilt makes them lash out against it. They seek to deny everyone the healthy sexual services they are not suppose to enjoy based on their perverted traditions, that are lies with no legitimate basis.
Yes, even in the U.S. there are many great honest providers. But it is sometimes hard to find them among all the scams. Organized crime is also an issue in the U.S., while in Canada, most all of Europe, Australia, New Zealand, most of Asia, Latin America there simply is no "crime" to "organize"!
Canadian Prostitution Law
Prostitution is legal in all of Canada it has been part of the Federal Criminal Code since at least mid 1800s. It is similar to British law and laws in much of Europe. Local communities can establish brothels and have some other limited powers such as licensing and zoning but can not outlaw prostitution which flourishes throughout Canada. Many Canadian cities have required escort licensing. But all it does is raise money at the sexworkers expense, since there is no real advantage of being licensed other than to comply with a city revenue raising requirement since prostitution is legal anyway.
Overview
Under the Canadian Criminal Code:
(1) The act of prostitution is legal, i.e. you CANNOT be arrested for being a prostitute
(2) The practice of independent outcall prostitution is fully protected by Federal law. Third party involvement in solicitation of business or profiting from it is a crime But enforcement varies widely since the attitude is to support individual rights as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else.
(3) Advertising in public print is protected as a right of free speech which has been upheld by the Canadian Supreme Court. Advertising on television has not yet been tested but the issue is whether its in line with community standards.
(4) An independent outcall escort has the right to discuss specific acts of sex for money in private. Hotel rooms, telephones and private homes. The Canadian Supreme court has ruled that a land based telephone is a private communication. When one places a phone call, they have a reasonable expectation of privacy, and that is the test. The same is easily extended to cellular phone communication. One would have to have special equipment to intercept such communication.
When you consider the "public communication" aspect of the law it is really crafted to discourage street solicitation. The more aggressive uses of the law have seen it applied to hotel bars, your vehicle operating on a public street and other such places. Communication btw also includes acts in furtherance as evidence of intent...i.e. you pick a street walker up in your car is an act of furtherance.
Details
While prostitution itself is legal how it is practiced is restricted and enforcement differs greatly in different cities. The Criminal Code of Canada restricts:
1. Communicating /Solicitation- to avoid street prostitution by preventing soliciting or having sex in public.
In 1978, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that soliciting had to be "pressing and persistent" to warrant conviction. In 1985, this was replaced by the communicating law, which continues to outlaw any kind of communication for the purposes of prostitution, making it an easier offence to prosecute. A car was ruled to be a public place if it is parked in any place open to public view. This law forces prostitutes to move into more secluded, poorly lit areas to do their work.
The communicating offence was designed to deal with the nuisance caused by street solicitation. In 1990, the SCC held that while the communicating section is an infringement on the freedom of expression, it is justifiable infringement because of the importance of eliminating street solicitation and the associated social nuisances.
"Public place" is defined as "any place to which the public have access as of right or by invitation..... and any motor vehicle located in a place.... open to public view". Cyberspace is not a "place" any more than a radio or tv is.
Car sex is illegal unless in a very secluded location as one case pointed out. A telephone is private so you can discuss it freely. It is also perfectly legal for a prostitute to advertise in magazines, newspapers and websites, as they are not considered public (you choose to buy it, read it in privately and read what you privately decide to read). For example in Vancouver, there are many ads are in the Westender, Vancouver Sun and Vancouver Providence for providers. In Montreal the Mirror has many explicit ads as do other French publications. Many Canadian providers have websites and there are good discussion/review lists such as canbest.com. All all perfectly legal and without the concern of being a roadmap for vice cops to find legitimate providers, like in the U.S.
In Toronto one street prostitute was arrested for soliciting. The arresting officer had her on tape which was played for the judge. The tape showed the undercover officer asking her what she charged for a straight lay. She replied, If you would like to come to my motel room, I will tell you all the details, but if not, I won't tell you anything because it is illegal to solicit in a public place." The judge looked at the officer and said, "well it sounds to me as though she read the law to you?". The case was immediately tossed out. Source: www.ermail.org discussion thread 2722.
Section 213 of the Criminal Code states that communicating (in public) for the purpose of prostitution is a summary conviction offence. Summary offences are considered "less serious", carrying a maximum six-month jail term (seldom imposed), a $2,000 fine, or both. The offender does not receive a formal criminal record, nor are fingerprints or photographs taken.
Because communicating is a minor offense, street prostitution is a major problem in many Canadian cities. See extensive separate report on Canadian Street Prostitution at http://www.sexwork.com/montreal/street.html. While I highly support private prostitution as a choice for adults, I am totally against street prostitution, especially in residential areas. In my street report I discuss other options and my observations realizing I am an outsider, but monitor similar issues in other countries.
In February 1997 the Vancouver police announced that they no longer intend to arrest prostitutes for even street communicating, except if they are working near schools etc. The press release announcing this policy reasoned that: The root cause of Vancouver's street prostitution trade is the men who purchase or recruit and control (pimp) juvenile or adult sex workers.
In Montreal, cities adjacent to Vancouver including Burnaby and Surrey and others have enforced the public communicating restrictions and have set up stings against men soliciting undercover cops on the street.
In Vancouver, in the high priced downtown streets the hookers help the cops instead of being adversaries. So the enforcement of the restrictions varies greatly and can change over time. Downtown prostitution in areas long known for prostitution is less offensive than in residential areas.
In other parts of Canada people are very upset with all the street walkers in their area and point out the flaws in the communications law which they hope to change: According to the Identification of Criminals Act, fingerprinting and photographing of individuals are only permitted for indictable offences. Many of those charged under section 213 use false identities, so it is difficult for authorities to identify repeat offenders or runaways. Summary offences are often just slaps on the wrist, and fines become "the price of doing business" for many offenders. With little sense of deterrence, it is easy for prostitutes and johns (sex trade offender) to meet on the streets.
Lyla who hosts one of the best Canadian sexworker discussion sites lyla.com, in discussing street solicitation says:
"The law up here was actually *more lenient* when I first arrived in Canada. At that time, we had a "pressing and persistent" component to the law -- which meant that not only did a streetwalker have to pin a prospective customer, but she had to hold him down for a count of ten in order to qualify for a solicitation charge. ;-) "
But again it is not prostitution that is illegal, only the street solicitation. Prostitution itself is legal in all of Canada just how its done is restricted.
2."Bawdy Houses" are illegal. This provision was made part of the Canadian Federal Code in 1850. Yes, 1850. A bawdy house is a place kept, occupied or used by at least one person for the purposes of prostitution or indecent acts. Therefore incall service is illegal but enforcement of this varies in different cities from almost no enforcement unless also involves other activities such as drugs or illegal aliens, to even trying to use this provision to shut down swing clubs in some Eastern Canadian cities.
Most sex workers and government agencies agree the law against brothels prevents prostitutes from working safely. LCC president Nathalie Des Rosiers says, "If the idea is to ensure safety of sex workers, being in a group is better than being alone, because they can share information. The criminalization of brothels prevents this."
Any place regularly used for prostitution or "indecent acts" is considered a "bawdy house," which can include brothels, bathhouses and prostitutes' apartments if they bring clients. This means sex workers can only legally make outcalls to ad hoc places, leaving them vulnerable; even using the same hotel frequently can be illegal. Charges can be laid against "keepers" of bawdy houses; "found-ins" (usually johns); and "inmates" (anyone who works on the premises). Landlords can also be charged if they know "indecent" acts are taking place on the property.
It is illegal to be an "inmate" or a "found within") in a bawdy house. But this is very difficult to prosecute. In 2000 hundreds of Peal police raided 3 strip clubs in the Toronto area where illegal sex acts were observed (handjobs, oral etc). 74 were arrested mostly on "being an inmate" charges. All charges were later dropped.
To be charged with being found within a common bawdy house (s still a mens rea offence meaning you had to have had knowledge that you were in such a place. The prosecution is in a difficult position in the absence of statements by accused because when you're in your room in a massage place or in the VIP area of a strip club, you don't know whats going on in the other parts of the spa or club and accordingly how do you have knowledge if you can't see whats goig on. Now there are two tests, The known test, and the ought to have known test. A statement like "Oh come on...it was just a hand job." could sink you.
Massage Parlor Bawdy Issue confusing
Performing sexual services in a massage clinic may be illegal if the police can prove the clinic is a place which has as its purpose prostitution. If it is implied that a sex act is available but will cost the client extra and a discussion ensues about price for sexual services the masseuse and client are committing an illegal act (communication for the purpose of prostitution -- s. 213) unless the discussion occurs in a massage room. In that case, no illegal act has been committed. Source:
http://www.police.edmonton.ab.ca/Pages/Prostitution/PublicInfo/legal2.htm
Note the "unless the discussion occurs in a massage room" !!
In another section they do indicate that if the massage parlour is frequently and habitually used for the purposes of prostitution, massage parlours can be prosecuted under the bawdy law.
In my experience in most Toronto MPs', as well as in other Canadian cities, you don't discuss any sexual act to get a hj. It is just done without any extra cost as part of the massage! There is no communication issue it seems.
So that leaves the "frequently and habitually used for the purpose of prostitution" issue. But there is no extra cost for the hj. And if the massage room is private for the purpose of communications, it there would seem to be an argument it would be private for the purpose of prostitution and therefore not subject to bawdy.
I realize this is regarding Criminal acts, not licensing bylaws.
If is well known that if the MP does anything sexual for a fee (including hj but this is commonly ignored), MP can be in violation of a licensing bylaw and risks the owner of fines and closure - but criminal bawdy house violation including just being in these places, seems open to interpretation and these charges are seldom brought it seems.
In 2003 the City of Brampton passed a bylaw outlawing nudity in massage parlors. But a Court issued a stay so that the bylaw can not be enforced until issue settled in Court. Here are comments on a public board discussing the Brampton bylaw:
There are many legal issues that support the MPAs. First, and foremost is speech. Having a regulated/licensed nude spa is the right of citizens, period. Therefore nudity cannot be regulated by a law. Secondly, in the issue of health, an MPA can prove that such a licensed spa between nude consenting adults can have private moments inside a space of such consent. Since an MPA is considered a "private space" upon a rental charge for the room, it is then considered as private. This is why Edmonton adapted the code "inside a massage parlor as legal". So those are the main points to be focused on. The right of speech and the right of privacy inside a paid space (i.e.: rented) for the use to be private, in which it is sterilized (i.e.: cleaned) afterwards can easily be proven to show the by-law is unconstitutional. The correlation for such a private space in relation to a hotel room is equal as both are just rented spaces.
----------------------
Many people think the 1850 bawdy restrictions should be abolished. It would be much safer for the provider to work out of her own home, or a commercial sex establishment, properly zoned and business licensed, then going to the customers home.
In general, Canadian police are paying progressively less attention to bawdy house violations and off-street prostitution in general and more on street prostitution (car sex) which understandably upsets neighborhoods. This public sex is far different than private consenting adult sexual services, for which there should be no legal barriers.
In Canada, prostitution law enforcement tends to be complaint driven. The complaints are predominantly about street prostitution, not incall (bawdy houses) or agencies.
Outcall sexual services of an independent provider is absolutely legal in all of Canada under long-established Federal Law. Canada is much more the land of the sexually free than the U.S.!
3. "Procuring and living off the income (avails) of prostitution" is illegal with its source back in the 1800s. Currently most of the enforcement of this law is against pimps living off the income of street prostitutes often also associated with drug crimes. The procuring restriction seeks to protect individuals from exploitation. It covers pimping, child prostitution and importing foreign sexworkers illegally often as almost slaves to those that got them into Canada often to escape conditions in their own country.
But it can also be applied to legitimate escort agencies that screen and offer some protection for the provider. Again enforcement varies widely and many think agency services should be allowed to protect the provider.
On the other hand it helps keep costs much lower than in the U.S. where the agencies often make a great deal of money the customer has to pay when using. It also helps eliminate the concern that "organized crime" groups would be involved in prostitution. Where it is legal like in Canada, there isn't the same profit potential as in the U.S. where all sexwork is a crime. Eliminate the "crime" in "organized crime" and that can solve the problem!
Canadian agencies might avoid the legal problem of living off the income of prostitution by just charging a reasonable flat service fee for listing, advertising and appointment setting, unrelated to the providers income. Interestingly Agencies are far more common in Montreal and there seems to be no enforcement of the bawdy restrictions as has been accepted for many years. In Vancouver it is mostly independent escorts, and Toronto seems to have a good mix of both. While agencies are technically illegal they are usually tolerated unless they are involved in other crimes such as drugs or hiring illegal aliens.
It's not illegal for a sexworker to live off her own income from prostitution -- only for someone else to live off (receive any financial benefit) from her prostitution income.
4. The sexual procurement and purchasing sex from children and youth. More recently there has been more concern with children (under age 18) in prostitution. The age of consent in Canada is a uniform age 14 UNLESS for financial reward. In the U.S. every state sets its own age of consent which varies from 13 to 18. In Canada be sure you don't have sex with anyone 14-18. It is not statutory rape if over 14, but a different offense which can result in 10 years prison time. Even tougher penalties if the provider is under age 12 which I totally agree with.
Supreme Court of Canada Upholds Lap Dancing as Legal In Strip Clubs
I have a separate very detailed report on the lap dancing situation in Canada at http://www.sexwork.com/montreal/lapdancing.html
Summary
The problems in Canada revolve around the agency and bawdy house restrictions being too rigid. But often police/cities don't enforce these restrictions if there are no complaints. Otherwise the laws are in line with what we propose (at sexwork.com decriminalization section) in the U.S. In fact, our proposals would address all of these issues and should be very acceptable to citizens in general given the proper facts and public education.
In Canada the problems with prostitution are far less than in the U.S. and there seems to be agreement that criminalization would only make the matter worse...just like in the U.S.
Canadian sexwork laws are similar to British and French laws since France is one of the countries that colonized Canada. It is also quite similar to laws in the rest of Europe, Australia and most other countries. In Asian and Latin America in the countries where it is illegal it is usually tolerated and law not enforced.. In fact in many countries (parts of Mexico, Philippines, Thailand and many others) even where "illegal" the government licenses providers (Guest relations officers like in PI) and requires STD and HIV testing. In Thailand the Entertainment Act of 1960 basically makes most all tourist sex legal as "special services" Thailand wanted to protect all the U.S. service men resting. and recreating in Thailand during the Vietnam war since sexwork brought (and still does) so many needed economic benefits. Mexico has its zones where it is legal, and only a few states regulate it at all.
Other people's responses:
The tac that the law takes in Canada is to prohibit those forms of prostitution that are recognizable public nuisances, and/or lead to exploitation or encourage participation of "criminal elements" and activities.
The result has been lower prices, better quality of providers and services, and in many cases LE working with both providers and clients to make a safer environment for all concerned. The rip off factor in Canada is extremely low, and there are reported instances of the law attacking rip off scenarios in defense of both clients and providers. Of course there are many escorts in the US that fear any moves in this direction. Now they would have to actually tell a client the exact nature of their services..no longer could they hide behind this "fee for time" nonsense.
Arguably, if prostitution is a private matter practiced amongst consenting adults, the government has no right to criminalize the act. A federal statute protecting that basic right is appropriate under the law, just as the right to abortion is protected under federal statute. The only legitimate objection is when such practice takes place in a public venue.
The laws in Canada are based on the concept of "consenting adults in private" and that the government has no business regulating this behavior in private. But society does have the right to regulate and ban prostitution in public. Sounds reasonable to me. And you get great service at a fair price without all the LE and Ripoff BS, in Canada. I never use U.S. escorts anymore. I got tired of paying $200+ for an "air-dance".
There are some great and honest providers in the U.S., but it seems as if many 'escorts' are against legalization because it would cause them to have to be honest and upfront about their service. Cozy little system we have in the States, isn't it?
For extensive information on the legal situation in the U.S. and ideas for decriminalization see
http://www.sexwork.com/coalition/index.html
The Morality Police vs Common Sense Sexwork Article
In Toronto of course not the U.S. where police use no common sense when going after consenting adult sexworkers.
globe & mail editorial: the legality of escorts advertising in newspapers/yellowpages
The importance of being earnest and doing nothing
Tolerance May Be Best Policy
Monday, April 22, 2002 - Print Edition, Page A11
The morality squads of the nation stir from time to time, raised from their appropriate torpor by the scent of exploitable outrage or affronts to official decency.
This month, it is the "discovery" that many escort agencies are agents of prostitution: "On the face of it, escort services are legal enterprises unless they're offering more than just the escort," says one Toronto police officer after arresting 12 people for "living off the avails." Their crime was not the provision of sexual services for money, which is quite legal in Canada. It was managing a business to do so.
The personal columns of the interesting publications in Canada are chock full of explicit ads by prostitutes offering the illusion of affection and the promise of release.
These ads and what they deliver are quite legal for three reasons:
(1) They are placed by self-employed individuals. No one manages their work or shares in their revenue, so no one is living off the "avails" of prostitution -- a criminal offence.
(2) The self-employed sex worker offers nothing but home delivery. The act of sexual commerce is not habitually concluded in the same place. Thus, we avoid the Criminal Code's prohibition on "keeping a common bawdy house" -- defined by a place regularly used for commercial physical gratification or acts of "gross indecency" (another can of worms).
(3) The ads are placed in paper or electronic publications that do not qualify as a "public place" when it comes to soliciting. Soliciting is a crime only when it scares the horses, slows traffic, threatens property values or otherwise gets up the noses of tourists or the bourgeoisie. Soliciting in public is a portentous crime; soliciting in the classified ads is a legal convenience.
The escort services that fatten the ad budgets of the Yellow Pages and colourful journals risk the attention of morality squads because of their structure: These businesses are managed, which means that the executives of those that provide prostitutes "live off the avails." It doesn't matter that the businesses may be well-managed, or that the sex workers may be safer or better cared for there. If the police are stirred from their torpor in these cases, it is an easy hit under the Criminal Code.
To be fair, the police may prefer to ignore these realities, accepting how constructively hypocritical they really are. But then someone comes along and lays a complaint, and what are the police to do -- especially if it involves a minor? Attention must be paid and then, we hope, the importance of seeming earnest and doing nothing returns, and the business of adult prostitution is left to serve the public comme d'habitude.
This is one of these cases where hypocrisy may be better than reform in dealing with public policy and social change. Because prostitution itself is legal, the Criminal Code regulates it through various prohibitions -- no public soliciting, no managing, no habitual locale, no recruitment, no minors. Observe the rules and it's full steam ahead. Offend the least sensible rules -- living off the avails -- while running an otherwise admirable operation, and the police will generally let you be.
The alternatives are either messy amendments to the Criminal Code that require MPs to vote for a liberalized sex trade, or appeals to the courts under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, claiming affronts to freedom of expression or such. The first is unrealistic, and the second is improbable, so official tolerance is the best option, with all the risks of arbitrary enforcement of the law that this implies.
There is a parallel in the application of laws against marijuana use, though the police remain oddly more vigilant on this file than they do on commercial sex. You assume you can relax in enjoying a joint or two at a weekend party, secure in the assumption that the police have grown tired of pretending that the Criminal Code should apply to this, whatever its formal status. Yet, many Canadians are still dragged before criminal courts for simple marijuana possession, clouding their futures with silly convictions at ridiculous cost. If we cannot insist on more hypocrisy in the application of this law, it might actually have to be changed.
Discretion is the soul of justice, and sometimes discretion effectively suspends whole sections of law in the face of changing values. Remember how we refused to execute murderers for years out of sheer abhorrence, despite the existence of the death penalty? Now we would do so out of simple humility, given our demonstrated skill in convicting the wrong people.
Ignoring the law can be wiser than enforcing, interpreting or revising it. The same principle applies to many other aspects of life.
蒙特利尔：加拿大寻欢之都
当一名美国游客驾车美加边界前往蒙特利尔时，加拿大的海关人员循例会问此行的目的为何，对方可能难以启齿：“只有一个目的，就是解决生理需求。”
事实上蒙特利尔是一个美丽的城市，人们和霭好客，而解决生理需求的代价合理，加上美女如云，怎不成为美国寻芳客的首选目的地？
虽然没有统计数字，但越来越多事实证明了寻欢旅游是魁省日常生活中的一部份，蒙特利尔因此冠上了“西方曼谷”的外号，在不少外地游客心目中是加拿大的寻欢之都。
一间经营“应召女郎”的公司透露，许多美国游客有机会探访曼谷和蒙特利尔可这两个城市，事后作比较时都认为蒙特利尔占尽上风。
一些游客说满市是一个风气开放的城市，有许多日夜闪亮的彩色广告牌，毫不保留将赤裸的脱衣舞?呈示在你眼前。在美国，这类广告通常都非常“谦虚”及有所保留。
美国某摄影家首次来访满市有如此评价：“蒙特利尔是一个毋须有人认识你，但你仍可以轻易解决生理问题的城市。”此君强调不久之后他一定会旧地重游。
美方保守
在美国，应召女郎的价钱高过蒙特利尔甚多，那是因为从事此行业的人士要冒着违反严厉法例的风险。总括来说，美国方面的严法吓阻了当地的寻芳客，千方百计另觅他处。
住在 NEW HAMPSHIRE 市的一名年轻的承包商每月都来满市寻欢。他不讳言波士顿的应召女郎选择客人显得过份谨慎，如要了解客人的底细、办公室电话号码、是否另一同行介绍来等等。美国的脱衣舞内容则诸多限制，远逊蒙特利尔，舞?们不可以任意将下身曝露于客人眼前，有些还遵守甚么“六尺规则”，即与客人保持一段距离。
位于蒙特利尔圣嘉芙莲西街有一间名 CLUB SUPER SEXE 的俱乐部，那儿的管理人员说每星期的周五及六、日，百分之七十的客人是美国人。他会施展浑身解数吸引这些南方贵客，除了在电视上登广告，还与波士顿一间巴士旅游公司签了合同，定期载客来他的俱乐部。他开玩笑说：“认识我们的波士顿人比满地可人还多。”
另一间名 CHEZ PAREE 的俱乐部的管理人员则说他的客人中美国人占百分之五十到六十，其余的是法国、瑞士、德国及其他欧洲国家人士。为何有这么多外国客光顾？原因很简单，请看下文分解。
多种因素
美国的年轻人到了十八、十九岁时依法仍不能喝酒及享受“成人”娱乐，非要等到廿一岁不可，而蒙特利尔旋要满十八岁就可当“大人”。此外，凭着美元对加币的优势，等于获得五折优待。再者，满市的脱衣舞?没有半遮半掩，而是任君观赏……一名美国商人对满市舞?的豪放沉迷不已，声称在美国寻芳多载，依然没有掌握任何舞?的电话号码，他在蒙特利尔的时间不长，已得到三位美女青睐给他电话号码，而他同时与另一舞?密切交往。
NEW HAMPSHIRE 一商人每月花了三小时驾车来满市寻应召女郎短叙。这位名 TED 的仁兄已离婚，曾研究过多种享受独身生活的方式，最后选了一项。他说：“我不能回复青春，我有需求和其他问题需要解决。我如今孑然一身，我没有伤害任何人及没有人监管我的开支，所以我要尽享人生。”
TED 如今每月平均花三千美元到满市进行一次三日游，当中有三分之二的金钱是花在应召女郎身上，其余是租酒店及吃喝花费。“幸而满市的酒店租价很便宜。”他说。“除了寻欢作乐，我在此完全没有任何商业交易。”
价钱低、应召女郎年轻貌美……正是导致美国寻芳客一窝蜂涌来满市的因素。众所周知，满市的价钱最低约一百四十元加币，而边界以南二百五十美元。此外，满市的应召女郎懂得一点心理技巧，当自己是客人的女友而不是从事肉欲交易，深获美国客的欢心。这里较宽宏的法例亦使到色情行业比边界以南更易经营。在美国，如被捕的话嫖客须坐牢。
喜欢美客
综合种种“顺利”条件，难怪不少寻芳客赞叹：“满市的这类行业质素的确比得上瑞典，价钱却是墨西哥标准。”
蒙特利尔的脱衣舞?不但百分之百赤裸，有时候还允许肉体接触。在魁省一些偏远地区，甚至还有“十元舞”，任客抚摸。
除了寻芳指南书之外，游客还可以在电脑网络上找到应召女郎。一位名 JULIE 的女子告知她每天接到约一百名客人的“订单”供她慢慢挑选。旋须看客人的行文方式，文法及串字正确程度，她可以猜到对方是哪一阶层人士。
对于应召女郎来说，美国客是最理想的客人。JULIE（化名）说：“美国客斯文有礼，懂得自重及尊重他人，本地客则旋知道……上床及经常讨价还价。美国客不会这样，反而懂得喜用时间请我们喝一杯红酒，不会猴急地将我们按到床上。他们不会粗暴行事以补偿所花的金钱。”美国客在应召女郎心目中另一优点就是绝对保密－－享受时享受，过往就忘掉。一名从事应召的女大学生不接本地客，生怕有朝一日与他们碰面。JULIE 说，女郎们每月接十五到廿名客人，每人付五百六十元“买”三小时，所以每月平均收入一万元。
当一名美国游客驾车美加边界前往蒙特利尔时，加拿大的海关人员循例会问此行的目的为何，对方可能难以启齿：“只有一个目的，就是解决生理需求。”
事实上蒙特利尔是一个美丽的城市，人们和霭好客，而解决生理需求的代价合理，加上美女如云，怎不成为美国寻芳客的首选目的地？
虽然没有统计数字，但越来越多事实证明了寻欢旅游是魁省日常生活中的一部份，蒙特利尔因此冠上了“西方曼谷”的外号，在不少外地游客心目中是加拿大的寻欢之都。
一间经营“应召女郎”的公司透露，许多美国游客有机会探访曼谷和蒙特利尔可这两个城市，事后作比较时都认为蒙特利尔占尽上风。
一些游客说满市是一个风气开放的城市，有许多日夜闪亮的彩色广告牌，毫不保留将赤裸的脱衣舞?呈示在你眼前。在美国，这类广告通常都非常“谦虚”及有所保留。
美国某摄影家首次来访满市有如此评价：“蒙特利尔是一个毋须有人认识你，但你仍可以轻易解决生理问题的城市。”此君强调不久之后他一定会旧地重游。
美方保守
在美国，应召女郎的价钱高过蒙特利尔甚多，那是因为从事此行业的人士要冒着违反严厉法例的风险。总括来说，美国方面的严法吓阻了当地的寻芳客，千方百计另觅他处。
住在 NEW HAMPSHIRE 市的一名年轻的承包商每月都来满市寻欢。他不讳言波士顿的应召女郎选择客人显得过份谨慎，如要了解客人的底细、办公室电话号码、是否另一同行介绍来等等。美国的脱衣舞内容则诸多限制，远逊蒙特利尔，舞?们不可以任意将下身曝露于客人眼前，有些还遵守甚么“六尺规则”，即与客人保持一段距离。
位于蒙特利尔圣嘉芙莲西街有一间名 CLUB SUPER SEXE 的俱乐部，那儿的管理人员说每星期的周五及六、日，百分之七十的客人是美国人。他会施展浑身解数吸引这些南方贵客，除了在电视上登广告，还与波士顿一间巴士旅游公司签了合同，定期载客来他的俱乐部。他开玩笑说：“认识我们的波士顿人比满地可人还多。”
另一间名 CHEZ PAREE 的俱乐部的管理人员则说他的客人中美国人占百分之五十到六十，其余的是法国、瑞士、德国及其他欧洲国家人士。为何有这么多外国客光顾？原因很简单，请看下文分解。
多种因素
美国的年轻人到了十八、十九岁时依法仍不能喝酒及享受“成人”娱乐，非要等到廿一岁不可，而蒙特利尔旋要满十八岁就可当“大人”。此外，凭着美元对加币的优势，等于获得五折优待。再者，满市的脱衣舞?没有半遮半掩，而是任君观赏……一名美国商人对满市舞?的豪放沉迷不已，声称在美国寻芳多载，依然没有掌握任何舞?的电话号码，他在蒙特利尔的时间不长，已得到三位美女青睐给他电话号码，而他同时与另一舞?密切交往。
NEW HAMPSHIRE 一商人每月花了三小时驾车来满市寻应召女郎短叙。这位名 TED 的仁兄已离婚，曾研究过多种享受独身生活的方式，最后选了一项。他说：“我不能回复青春，我有需求和其他问题需要解决。我如今孑然一身，我没有伤害任何人及没有人监管我的开支，所以我要尽享人生。”
TED 如今每月平均花三千美元到满市进行一次三日游，当中有三分之二的金钱是花在应召女郎身上，其余是租酒店及吃喝花费。“幸而满市的酒店租价很便宜。”他说。“除了寻欢作乐，我在此完全没有任何商业交易。”
价钱低、应召女郎年轻貌美……正是导致美国寻芳客一窝蜂涌来满市的因素。众所周知，满市的价钱最低约一百四十元加币，而边界以南二百五十美元。此外，满市的应召女郎懂得一点心理技巧，当自己是客人的女友而不是从事肉欲交易，深获美国客的欢心。这里较宽宏的法例亦使到色情行业比边界以南更易经营。在美国，如被捕的话嫖客须坐牢。
喜欢美客
综合种种“顺利”条件，难怪不少寻芳客赞叹：“满市的这类行业质素的确比得上瑞典，价钱却是墨西哥标准。”
蒙特利尔的脱衣舞?不但百分之百赤裸，有时候还允许肉体接触。在魁省一些偏远地区，甚至还有“十元舞”，任客抚摸。
除了寻芳指南书之外，游客还可以在电脑网络上找到应召女郎。一位名 JULIE 的女子告知她每天接到约一百名客人的“订单”供她慢慢挑选。旋须看客人的行文方式，文法及串字正确程度，她可以猜到对方是哪一阶层人士。
对于应召女郎来说，美国客是最理想的客人。JULIE（化名）说：“美国客斯文有礼，懂得自重及尊重他人，本地客则旋知道……上床及经常讨价还价。美国客不会这样，反而懂得喜用时间请我们喝一杯红酒，不会猴急地将我们按到床上。他们不会粗暴行事以补偿所花的金钱。”美国客在应召女郎心目中另一优点就是绝对保密－－享受时享受，过往就忘掉。一名从事应召的女大学生不接本地客，生怕有朝一日与他们碰面。JULIE 说，女郎们每月接十五到廿名客人，每人付五百六十元“买”三小时，所以每月平均收入一万元。
xl2020.2000
初级会员
- 注册
- 2003-04-28
- 消息
- 1,495
- 荣誉分数
- 0
- 声望点数
- 146
Prostitution is legal in Canada ...
Canadian Prostitution Law
Prostitution is legal in all of Canada it has been part of the Federal Criminal Code since at least mid 1800s. It is similar to British law and laws in much of Europe. Local communities can establish brothels and have some other limited powers such as licensing and zoning but can not outlaw prostitution which flourishes throughout Canada. Many Canadian cities have required escort licensing. But all it does is raise money at the sexworkers expense, since there is no real advantage of being licensed other than to comply with a city revenue raising requirement since prostitution is legal anyway.
Overview
Under the Canadian Criminal Code:
(1) The act of prostitution is legal, i.e. you CANNOT be arrested for being a prostitute
(2) The practice of independent outcall prostitution is fully protected by Federal law. Third party involvement in solicitation of business or profiting from it is a crime But enforcement varies widely since the attitude is to support individual rights as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else.
(3) Advertising in public print is protected as a right of free speech which has been upheld by the Canadian Supreme Court. Advertising on television has not yet been tested but the issue is whether its in line with community standards.
(4) An independent outcall escort has the right to discuss specific acts of sex for money in private. Hotel rooms, telephones and private homes. The Canadian Supreme court has ruled that a land based telephone is a private communication. When one places a phone call, they have a reasonable expectation of privacy, and that is the test. The same is easily extended to cellular phone communication. One would have to have special equipment to intercept such communication.
When you consider the "public communication" aspect of the law it is really crafted to discourage street solicitation. The more aggressive uses of the law have seen it applied to hotel bars, your vehicle operating on a public street and other such places. Communication btw also includes acts in furtherance as evidence of intent...i.e. you pick a street walker up in your car is an act of furtherance.
Canadian Prostitution Law
Prostitution is legal in all of Canada it has been part of the Federal Criminal Code since at least mid 1800s. It is similar to British law and laws in much of Europe. Local communities can establish brothels and have some other limited powers such as licensing and zoning but can not outlaw prostitution which flourishes throughout Canada. Many Canadian cities have required escort licensing. But all it does is raise money at the sexworkers expense, since there is no real advantage of being licensed other than to comply with a city revenue raising requirement since prostitution is legal anyway.
Overview
Under the Canadian Criminal Code:
(1) The act of prostitution is legal, i.e. you CANNOT be arrested for being a prostitute
(2) The practice of independent outcall prostitution is fully protected by Federal law. Third party involvement in solicitation of business or profiting from it is a crime But enforcement varies widely since the attitude is to support individual rights as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else.
(3) Advertising in public print is protected as a right of free speech which has been upheld by the Canadian Supreme Court. Advertising on television has not yet been tested but the issue is whether its in line with community standards.
(4) An independent outcall escort has the right to discuss specific acts of sex for money in private. Hotel rooms, telephones and private homes. The Canadian Supreme court has ruled that a land based telephone is a private communication. When one places a phone call, they have a reasonable expectation of privacy, and that is the test. The same is easily extended to cellular phone communication. One would have to have special equipment to intercept such communication.
When you consider the "public communication" aspect of the law it is really crafted to discourage street solicitation. The more aggressive uses of the law have seen it applied to hotel bars, your vehicle operating on a public street and other such places. Communication btw also includes acts in furtherance as evidence of intent...i.e. you pick a street walker up in your car is an act of furtherance.
ice cappuccino
知名会员
- 注册
- 2003-05-21
- 消息
- 1,051
- 荣誉分数
- 0
- 声望点数
- 146
慢慢等吧,加拿大这个国家整个就是一F*cked up,12, 13岁就变烟鬼,17,18岁开始猛咳药,看看大街上有多少single mom,大麻都能合法化,同性恋都可以结婚,迟早有一天,嫖妓也会合法的,就像在意大利,大街上make out的都有!
thunderbolt
新手上路
- 注册
- 2005-06-17
- 消息
- 277
- 荣誉分数
- 0
- 声望点数
- 0
嫖妓现在不就是合法的么? 难道上面两位转过来的长文是假的
大家还是go a way的好!!
领导篇：
布什：这是世界防恐组织的耻辱，我们要不惜一切代价把这个扣子解开。我们已经派 去大批特种部队，保证在3个月以内把扣子解开！
拉登：弄架飞机，务必要把扣子撞掉！
阿拉法特：我们绝不屈服！扣子已经强占我们的领土达24个小时！
沙龙：我可以毫不夸张的说！这颗扣子即使是上厕所也要通过我们的同意！
克灵顿：莱温斯基怎么没有这么个扣子呢？
李登辉：这是我们进行的有效吓阻的成果！
朱容基：我们已经大幅度加高了扣子的工资，但它还是解不开！这是严重的腐败！
名人篇：
金庸：我以1元钱出让这个扣子的拍摄权给中央电视台！
古龙：好硬的扣子！
他淡淡的抚摩着哪个扣子！天边露出一丝曙光……
温瑞安：哪个扣子！
一
飞
冲
天
！
黄易：一阵光亮过后，这个扣子来到了秦朝！
卫斯理：这个扣子居然是外星来的！
卫惠：他还在拼命解这个扣子，但是我，已经湿了！
赵忠祥：在一望无际的衣服上，突然窜出了一只扣子，这只受伤的扣子在衣服上面挣扎着，然而大自然是残酷的，这只扣子终于消失在茫茫的衣服里。
倪萍：我很激动，然而这扣子对祖国来说是多么渺小啊！（落泪中！）
崔永元：公说公有理，婆说婆有理，扣子卡在衣服上，到底谁有理。我们现场请来这只扣子，让他来谈一谈卡在衣服上的亲身感受。
王小丫：这是幸运第一关！你做好准备了吗？
好！请听题！（当！！！）
你在给女友脱衣服时，突然有个扣子解不开了？怎么办
答案a 她不脱我脱 答案b 买一件没扣子的衣服！
贾博士：表面上看这个扣子是解不开了！但是为什么不能从反面来看呢！其实那件衣服也是解不开了嘛！
姜昆：我早知道扣子解不开，我就是不说；这么破的扣子解不开一点也不奇怪，如果解开了反而奇怪了。
雪村：翠花，上扣子。
赵本山：解扣子，选好药，选药也得有诀窍！
别看广告！
赵薇：我为扣子无意中卡在衣服上给手机用户带来的心理负担道歉，其实在主观上我是不会将扣子卡在衣服上的，因为我祖宗八代都是扣子迷，绝对不会故意将扣子卡在衣服上的。
周瑜：既生扣子，何生衣服？
辣厘头：这个扣子纯属原创！如有雷同。实属巧合！
唐僧：这个扣子左宽右窄，前轻后重，扣上去极不舒服，可能会引起乳腺病变的；至于那件衣服，他一定会明白我佛慈悲的大无畏精神而回到我身边的，南无阿弥佗佛……
孙悟空（举着这个扣子）：波罗波罗密！！！！！！！！！！！！
猪八戒：又解不开了！咦？我怎么会说又呢？
算命妇女看见扣子，跪倒在其面前）先生，你额头有朝天骨，眼里有灵光，仙人转世，神仙下凡，我终于等到你了。（扣子抬腿欲走）别动，虽然我泄露了天机，灾劫难免，可这是我命中注定，就算我要冒天大的危险，也要给你看个全相。
包龙兴：我不慎偷到一个龙扣子！望皇上赎罪！
韦小宝：各位观众，谢谢各位凑得这么近、站得这么直听我说书，真是太给面子啦。（小宝坐在叠着的几个桌子上）今天要说的人物就是天地会的总舵主扣子，有所谓平生不见扣子，便称英雄也枉然。他身高八尺，腰围也是八尺。！
众人：哇！那岂不是四方了吗？
韦小宝：四方就四方，四方的扣子都没见过真烂，八角形的都有，我告诉你！（搔首转身）他武功的名堂呢，称之为九天十地，菩萨摇头怕怕，劈雳金光雷电掌！一掌打出，方圆百里之内，不论人畜、虾蟹、跳蚤，全部都化成了飞灰啊！
韦春花：啊呀,老弟呀,我们是清白的!
多 隆：我们是清白的!
李红志：这个扣子圆满了！
化学老师：请往扣子上倒硫酸，扣子会慢慢揭开来的。
电脑老师：首先，我们来格式化衣服，这样扣子跟衣服都会清除掉，然后重装衣服系统，在重装系统前请对口子做好备份。
物理老师：难道你们忘了利用杠杆原理吗！
哲学老师：我们要辨证的看这个扣子！
企业：
中国电信：我们已经开始降低解扣子的定价，前3分钟为0.30圆，以后每多一分钟多加0.02元；
中国联通：中国扣子，扣住中国！
搜狐：闪电邮件，还送扣子拉！
新浪：我们推出了周星驰和扣子的系列在线讨论！你可以登陆 (需要有300积分才能使用发布链接) 参加讨论！
网易：我们将周星驰出席我们的扣子-online的发布仪式！
中国万网：尊敬的客户，您好！您的问题经过我们对扣子的仔细测试，发现是解扣子的方式不对，所以请解开后重新扣起或者登陆衣服自行处理。
腾讯QQ：扣子行靓号地带最新推出用户自选扣子号码！从100000000到100999999，尽情挑选梦幻数组合，进行靓号、酷号大比拼，并享受全程会员服务！马上打开http:// (需要有300积分才能使用发布链接) / (需要有300积分才能使用发布链接) ，到“百万连号”选扣子号码！
微软：扣子解不开是扣子和衣服之间的兼容问题，请下载最新补丁或者升级您的衣服。
爱立信：这只扣子之解不开，只不过是我们的技术人员在作测试。
诺基亚：可能是因为这几款扣子没有外天线的原因，所以会导致扣子解不开。
奔驰：在此之前，我们已经通知该用户，扣子故障与该用户长期使用方言通话有关，但是该用户竟然公开将扣子解不开，对于这种行为我们保留起诉该用户的权利。
东芝：扣子出的问题是一个小bug，请美国用户到零售商领取赔偿金，请中国用户到本公司网站下载补丁！
恒升：扣子解不开不是本公司的问题，对于该用户非法在网络上发布对本公司不利的消息，本公司决定起诉该用户！
公务员：
公安：解扣子，请打110；
税收：依法纳税是每一个扣子应尽的义务！
人大：人民扣子为人民！
其他：
无厘头：靠，怎么这么倒霉，正在紧要关头扣子解不开了！
“撕拉”衣服给撕破了！………………………………
领导篇：
布什：这是世界防恐组织的耻辱，我们要不惜一切代价把这个扣子解开。我们已经派 去大批特种部队，保证在3个月以内把扣子解开！
拉登：弄架飞机，务必要把扣子撞掉！
阿拉法特：我们绝不屈服！扣子已经强占我们的领土达24个小时！
沙龙：我可以毫不夸张的说！这颗扣子即使是上厕所也要通过我们的同意！
克灵顿：莱温斯基怎么没有这么个扣子呢？
李登辉：这是我们进行的有效吓阻的成果！
朱容基：我们已经大幅度加高了扣子的工资，但它还是解不开！这是严重的腐败！
名人篇：
金庸：我以1元钱出让这个扣子的拍摄权给中央电视台！
古龙：好硬的扣子！
他淡淡的抚摩着哪个扣子！天边露出一丝曙光……
温瑞安：哪个扣子！
一
飞
冲
天
！
黄易：一阵光亮过后，这个扣子来到了秦朝！
卫斯理：这个扣子居然是外星来的！
卫惠：他还在拼命解这个扣子，但是我，已经湿了！
赵忠祥：在一望无际的衣服上，突然窜出了一只扣子，这只受伤的扣子在衣服上面挣扎着，然而大自然是残酷的，这只扣子终于消失在茫茫的衣服里。
倪萍：我很激动，然而这扣子对祖国来说是多么渺小啊！（落泪中！）
崔永元：公说公有理，婆说婆有理，扣子卡在衣服上，到底谁有理。我们现场请来这只扣子，让他来谈一谈卡在衣服上的亲身感受。
王小丫：这是幸运第一关！你做好准备了吗？
好！请听题！（当！！！）
你在给女友脱衣服时，突然有个扣子解不开了？怎么办
答案a 她不脱我脱 答案b 买一件没扣子的衣服！
贾博士：表面上看这个扣子是解不开了！但是为什么不能从反面来看呢！其实那件衣服也是解不开了嘛！
姜昆：我早知道扣子解不开，我就是不说；这么破的扣子解不开一点也不奇怪，如果解开了反而奇怪了。
雪村：翠花，上扣子。
赵本山：解扣子，选好药，选药也得有诀窍！
别看广告！
赵薇：我为扣子无意中卡在衣服上给手机用户带来的心理负担道歉，其实在主观上我是不会将扣子卡在衣服上的，因为我祖宗八代都是扣子迷，绝对不会故意将扣子卡在衣服上的。
周瑜：既生扣子，何生衣服？
辣厘头：这个扣子纯属原创！如有雷同。实属巧合！
唐僧：这个扣子左宽右窄，前轻后重，扣上去极不舒服，可能会引起乳腺病变的；至于那件衣服，他一定会明白我佛慈悲的大无畏精神而回到我身边的，南无阿弥佗佛……
孙悟空（举着这个扣子）：波罗波罗密！！！！！！！！！！！！
猪八戒：又解不开了！咦？我怎么会说又呢？
算命妇女看见扣子，跪倒在其面前）先生，你额头有朝天骨，眼里有灵光，仙人转世，神仙下凡，我终于等到你了。（扣子抬腿欲走）别动，虽然我泄露了天机，灾劫难免，可这是我命中注定，就算我要冒天大的危险，也要给你看个全相。
包龙兴：我不慎偷到一个龙扣子！望皇上赎罪！
韦小宝：各位观众，谢谢各位凑得这么近、站得这么直听我说书，真是太给面子啦。（小宝坐在叠着的几个桌子上）今天要说的人物就是天地会的总舵主扣子，有所谓平生不见扣子，便称英雄也枉然。他身高八尺，腰围也是八尺。！
众人：哇！那岂不是四方了吗？
韦小宝：四方就四方，四方的扣子都没见过真烂，八角形的都有，我告诉你！（搔首转身）他武功的名堂呢，称之为九天十地，菩萨摇头怕怕，劈雳金光雷电掌！一掌打出，方圆百里之内，不论人畜、虾蟹、跳蚤，全部都化成了飞灰啊！
韦春花：啊呀,老弟呀,我们是清白的!
多 隆：我们是清白的!
李红志：这个扣子圆满了！
化学老师：请往扣子上倒硫酸，扣子会慢慢揭开来的。
电脑老师：首先，我们来格式化衣服，这样扣子跟衣服都会清除掉，然后重装衣服系统，在重装系统前请对口子做好备份。
物理老师：难道你们忘了利用杠杆原理吗！
哲学老师：我们要辨证的看这个扣子！
企业：
中国电信：我们已经开始降低解扣子的定价，前3分钟为0.30圆，以后每多一分钟多加0.02元；
中国联通：中国扣子，扣住中国！
搜狐：闪电邮件，还送扣子拉！
新浪：我们推出了周星驰和扣子的系列在线讨论！你可以登陆 (需要有300积分才能使用发布链接) 参加讨论！
网易：我们将周星驰出席我们的扣子-online的发布仪式！
中国万网：尊敬的客户，您好！您的问题经过我们对扣子的仔细测试，发现是解扣子的方式不对，所以请解开后重新扣起或者登陆衣服自行处理。
腾讯QQ：扣子行靓号地带最新推出用户自选扣子号码！从100000000到100999999，尽情挑选梦幻数组合，进行靓号、酷号大比拼，并享受全程会员服务！马上打开http:// (需要有300积分才能使用发布链接) / (需要有300积分才能使用发布链接) ，到“百万连号”选扣子号码！
微软：扣子解不开是扣子和衣服之间的兼容问题，请下载最新补丁或者升级您的衣服。
爱立信：这只扣子之解不开，只不过是我们的技术人员在作测试。
诺基亚：可能是因为这几款扣子没有外天线的原因，所以会导致扣子解不开。
奔驰：在此之前，我们已经通知该用户，扣子故障与该用户长期使用方言通话有关，但是该用户竟然公开将扣子解不开，对于这种行为我们保留起诉该用户的权利。
东芝：扣子出的问题是一个小bug，请美国用户到零售商领取赔偿金，请中国用户到本公司网站下载补丁！
恒升：扣子解不开不是本公司的问题，对于该用户非法在网络上发布对本公司不利的消息，本公司决定起诉该用户！
公务员：
公安：解扣子，请打110；
税收：依法纳税是每一个扣子应尽的义务！
人大：人民扣子为人民！
其他：
无厘头：靠，怎么这么倒霉，正在紧要关头扣子解不开了！
“撕拉”衣服给撕破了！………………………………
