Caohaoying
知名会员
- 注册
- 2002-05-18
- 消息
- 1,657
- 荣誉分数
- 8
- 声望点数
- 148
这事看怎么说.没买着便宜货是小,被涮了是大.就不许别人出出气了?没错,说的是不太好听,有点过.不过咱们做看客的总得分清是非先吧?
网上本来就是一个虚拟的世界，大家都是很信任的情况下才买东西
- 主题发起人 记号的味道
- 开始时间
这事看怎么说.没买着便宜货是小,被涮了是大.就不许别人出出气了?没错,说的是不太好听,有点过.不过咱们做看客的总得分清是非先吧?
Caohaoying
知名会员
- 注册
- 2002-05-18
- 消息
- 1,657
- 荣誉分数
- 8
- 声望点数
- 148
你可以不生气,不代表别人就不能生气.先是谁对谁错的问题,然后才是处理方式.你的CASE,你迟到了,失约在先.你没有理由生气.
comefromuw
新手上路
- 注册
- 2005-11-13
- 消息
- 118
- 荣誉分数
- 0
- 声望点数
- 0
"中国人中的败类"
这个题目叫得太哪个了，说得严重了。
出售者做得并不合适，但是谈不上“败类”。
这个题目叫得太哪个了，说得严重了。
出售者做得并不合适，但是谈不上“败类”。
Still up cbc!!!
Re: Up cbc!!!
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
最初由 cfcuser 发布
1 .Thank cbc for giving us the fact.
2. I don't know either sides.
3.If what cbc told us is what really happened, then cbc did nothing wrong. Based on the business law of Canada, if no deposits for holding, then both sides don't have any obligations to keep their previous oral promises.
4. Making calls at 1:00 am in this situation is rude.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
不要拿法律说事.法律是人类社会行为的最低准则.所以违法必究.但是合法也未必就OK.道德才是人类社会行为的最高准则,才是每个人应该看齐的.换句话说.合法不一定符合道德.合法只是保证你不被法率追究责任,但道德上是否站得住脚,是另一回事了.话题扯远了.和本次具体事件无关. ---Caohongying
Thank Caohongying for ur good points, but:
1. Law is the standard for everyone and it can give people equality and fairness, so usually happiness and efficency are followed after obeying the law.
2. That is natual for you to mention the morality here, because they have very close relationship to each other. However, your sequence here is inverse, the morality is not higher level than the law.
3. Based on my personal knowledge, in western world, most laws are established after very carefully considering and studying the morality first and make sure the law will not conflict the morality of most people. So, most laws are based on the morality.
Thus, if one obey the law, in most cases, then one could not easily violate the morality.
4. Just because different people have different standard or thinking for morality, you can imagine what would happen if people use it as rules for their behaviors in the real life----mess.
Re: Up cbc!!!
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
最初由 cfcuser 发布
1 .Thank cbc for giving us the fact.
2. I don't know either sides.
3.If what cbc told us is what really happened, then cbc did nothing wrong. Based on the business law of Canada, if no deposits for holding, then both sides don't have any obligations to keep their previous oral promises.
4. Making calls at 1:00 am in this situation is rude.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
不要拿法律说事.法律是人类社会行为的最低准则.所以违法必究.但是合法也未必就OK.道德才是人类社会行为的最高准则,才是每个人应该看齐的.换句话说.合法不一定符合道德.合法只是保证你不被法率追究责任,但道德上是否站得住脚,是另一回事了.话题扯远了.和本次具体事件无关. ---Caohongying
Thank Caohongying for ur good points, but:
1. Law is the standard for everyone and it can give people equality and fairness, so usually happiness and efficency are followed after obeying the law.
2. That is natual for you to mention the morality here, because they have very close relationship to each other. However, your sequence here is inverse, the morality is not higher level than the law.
3. Based on my personal knowledge, in western world, most laws are established after very carefully considering and studying the morality first and make sure the law will not conflict the morality of most people. So, most laws are based on the morality.
Thus, if one obey the law, in most cases, then one could not easily violate the morality.
4. Just because different people have different standard or thinking for morality, you can imagine what would happen if people use it as rules for their behaviors in the real life----mess.
没有规则的游戏是有风险的，想问楼上一句在私人买卖中适用什么法律。记得我买房时，下的offer比另一个在我之前出offer的人高， 但卖主告我，已经回复那人是否可以接受比他的offer高一点的价格。尽管我的出价高，所以我只有等哪个人回复不同意卖主提出的价钱才有机会。我不知道相关的法律怎么规定，但此时并无定金的约束。我要说的是，法律不会覆盖社会的所有角落，及时地跟上社会的变化。在没有法律约束的时候，是需要所谓的social law 去约束人的行为的。word from mouth 是一个很好的方式，尽管搂主败类的话有点过了，但是说出来，会有利于在CFC的社区内形成一个多数人赞同的游戏规则。
