如果加国保守党上台,估计加国的好日子要到头了:

最初由 chieftain 发布


通过高税收,更多地控制纳税人的血汗,贪污起来更方便,这是自由党的特点。

你愿意奖励贪污犯,随你便。建议你选赖昌星算了(如果他能当自由党候选人)

All the parties are promising tax cut. The conservative is cutting the GST by 1%. The Liberals have cut and are cutting more income tax. I believe cutting the income tax is the way to go. I’d rather have more money in my pocket. I will choose what to do with my money. For example, with more disposable income, I can choose to consume it in China, where I don’t have to pay GST, or I can invest it, without paying GST.

In reality, neither the GST cut nor Income Tax cut promised in this election campaign is significant. It’s about 400 dollars a year, depending on what kind of situation you are in. If you are a middle class single, you get about 50 dollars a year more with income tax cut. If you live on social welfare, you are indifferent. If you have a family, you are about 40 dollars better off with the GST cut.

Therefore, how much cut promised in this campaign does not affect my decision. What affects my decision is where the cut is, and I believe Income Tax cut is the right direction.
 
战争是一种严重的,可以死人的,很昂贵的,放焰火的活动。能不放,看到形势不好就要像小克那样赶紧脚底摸油。这焰火的后果是很严重的。

1,如果对方是个大国,对方民主自由了,而没有把它肢解到麻雀那么小,她找机会变得更加强大,更加成为一个强大的对手。
2,如果对方是个小国或者是由大国分裂成的小国,他民主自由了,会不会躺在救星身上睡大觉?那是要花银子的。
3,如果对方是个极其深重的宗教国家,那么在任何角落生长出恐怖分子的土壤就会更加丰厚。

鉴于以上观点,在没有超越现有西方民主制度的情况下,在没有更好的政治理念下,用和平的方式向外推进现有民主制度是可以的,也就是和平演变。向外部以战争方式推进现有的民主制度应该慎之又慎,不要惹火烧身。哪个政党当政没关系,即使对自己的民主制度感到自豪,这也是当今西方发达国家执政党必须遵守的原则。
 
最初由 不错 发布


It's their own choice to join the army. Soldiers' responsibility is to fight for their country, even die.


So you mean their families are very happy they are dead in IRAQ. Sometimes, soldiers'fight is for their country but some fight is just for politics.
 
最初由 不错 发布


It's their own choice to join the army. Soldiers' responsibility is to fight for their country, even die.


所以,你认为参拜靖国神社是正确的。Since they were fighting for their country, even doesn't matter for what kind war.
 
最初由 haoren1 发布


All the parties are promising tax cut. The conservative is cutting the GST by 1%. The Liberals have cut and are cutting more income tax. I believe cutting the income tax is the way to go. I’d rather have more money in my pocket. I will choose what to do with my money. For example, with more disposable income, I can choose to consume it in China, where I don’t have to pay GST, or I can invest it, without paying GST.

In reality, neither the GST cut nor Income Tax cut promised in this election campaign is significant. It’s about 400 dollars a year, depending on what kind of situation you are in. If you are a middle class single, you get about 50 dollars a year more with income tax cut. If you live on social welfare, you are indifferent. If you have a family, you are about 40 dollars better off with the GST cut.

Therefore, how much cut promised in this campaign does not affect my decision. What affects my decision is where the cut is, and I believe Income Tax cut is the right direction.

自由党的减税方案已经在2005年度的报税中体现出来了. 年收入超过$35,595的个人可以少缴$430, 夫妻收入都超过$35,595,家庭可减税$860; 收入低于$35,595可减收入的1%外加$500*15%.

PC的GST减税只有在你实现消费的时候才体现,取决你的消费额.对于中,低收入的家庭,有多少家庭的年消费能力达到$43,000?
 
最初由 GeorgeSong 发布



所以,你认为参拜靖国神社是正确的。Since they were fighting for their country, even doesn't matter for what kind war.

come on, that's a whole different story. meanless argue.
 
最初由 lotuseater 发布


自由党的减税方案已经在2005年度的报税中体现出来了. 年收入超过$35,595的个人可以少缴$430, 夫妻收入都超过$35,595,家庭可减税$860; 收入低于$35,595可减收入的1%外加$500*15%.

PC的GST减税只有在你实现消费的时候才体现,取决你的消费额.对于中,低收入的家庭,有多少家庭的年消费能力达到$43,000?


I know many chinese are very rich. They don't care about that small money, even more than $1000.
 
you are so stupid.

最初由 GeorgeSong 发布



I know many chinese are very rich. They don't care about that small money, even more than $1000.
 
最初由 GeorgeSong 发布



So you mean their families are very happy they are dead in IRAQ. Sometimes, soldiers'fight is for their country but some fight is just for politics.

Their families should be very unhappy when they joined army.
 
最初由 lotuseater 发布


自由党的减税方案已经在2005年度的报税中体现出来了. 年收入超过$35,595的个人可以少缴$430, 夫妻收入都超过$35,595,家庭可减税$860; 收入低于$35,595可减收入的1%外加$500*15%.

PC的GST减税只有在你实现消费的时候才体现,取决你的消费额.对于中,低收入的家庭,有多少家庭的年消费能力达到$43,000?

前些年,每年加税,却在大选年减税,属于耍流氓。自由党这次如果获胜。明年一定会把税加回去。
 
最初由 chieftain 发布


前些年,每年加税,却在大选年减税,属于耍流氓。自由党这次如果获胜。明年一定会把税加回去。

The Liberals have not raised taxes in the last few years. You are making things up.
 
最初由 haoren1 发布


The Liberals have not raised taxes in the last few years. You are making things up.
haha
 
最初由 haoren1 发布


The Liberals have not raised taxes in the last few years. You are making things up.

显然,你以为联邦政府的税收只有GST。你有没有在加拿大报过税,把这些年的税表拿出来看看吧。
 
最初由 chieftain 发布


前些年,每年加税,却在大选年减税,属于耍流氓。自由党这次如果获胜。明年一定会把税加回去。

哪些年加的? 个人入息税率维持这个水平已好多年了.
 
最初由 chieftain 发布


显然,你以为联邦政府的税收只有GST。你有没有在加拿大报过税,把这些年的税表拿出来看看吧。

就按阁下的要求把这些年的税表拿出来看看:

1. 个人入息税率:

2002年 16% up to $31,677; 22% between $31,677 and $63,354; 26% between $63,354 and $103,000; 29% in excess of $103,000.

2003年 16% up to $32,183; 22% between $32,183 and $64,368; 26% between $64,368 and $104,648; 29% in excess of $104,648.

2004年 16% up to $35,000; 22% between $35,000 and $70,000; 26% between $70,000 and $113,804; 29% in excess of $113,804.

2005年 15% up to $35,595; 22% between $35,595 and $71,190; 26% between $71,190 and $115,739; 29% in excess of $115,739.

2.个人,配偶免税额:

2002年 $7,634, $6,482.
2003年 $7,756, $6,586.
2004年 $8,012, $6,803.
2005年 $8,648, $7,344.

基于以上数据,阁下认为每年是在减税还是加税?

就算阁下不喜欢某个政党,也轻不要一棍子把他打死,万事都有其两面性(advantage and disadvantage).
 
后退
顶部