这是一篇完全反华, 毫无公正的文章, 你们怎么没看出来?
中国人抗议最大的原因是 媒体不公正. 片面报道, 丝毫不提藏毒杀人这些事. 这个最主要的原因文章中丝毫没有提到, 怎么叫理解? 怎么叫公正?
文章把中国人的不满完全歪曲为民族主义. 而民族主义是西方人最反感的东西. 这篇文章非常恶毒, 企图鼓动人们反华情绪.
嗨. 大家不是去宣传真相吗? 为什么他们都不听真相?
您说的很有道理,向你感谢。我至少应该在标题”算“字上加个引号。
不过我觉得我们华人也不必完全在意他们说民族主义。如果我们在这件事情上是正确的，而他们倒行逆施，那么这种民族主义是光明正大的。而且应该承认该文章有一些方面的认知还是比其他一些无知疯狂的媒体要强的多. 我认为让西方人知道华人的团结是有利有弊的. 好的方面是毕竟主流华人的声音有更多的人听到了. 而且他们知道了在这件事情上不是只有他们从不信任的中国政府不同意他们的批评.我们都说"不".
"They see the cascades of criticism as a deliberate and unfair attempt to undermine China and its Olympic moment and are reacting with anger."
"China's official indignation is mirrored by individuals in Chinese communities around the world."
"Last weekend nearly 5,000 Chinese Canadians marched on Parliament Hill in Ottawa to protest the chaotic demonstrations that disrupted the Olympic torch relay in Paris, London and San Francisco."
"Unlike their critics in the West, the Chinese view the Tibet crisis as a direct challenge to their country's unity and an affront to Chinese nationalism, which has its roots in anti-Western sentiments dating back to the opium wars and humiliations of China in the 19th century.
China's experience is that Western interference produces internal division and weakness.
The Chinese don't see the pro-Tibet protests as well intentioned criticism. They regard them as a hypocritical denigration of China by a Western culture with a history of colonialism, which condones armed intervention in places like Iraq or Chechnya and practises waterboarding in Guantanamo or Abu Ghraib, while preaching about human rights"
"The Chinese don't see the pro-Tibet protests as well intentioned criticism. They regard them as a hypocritical denigration of China by a Western culture with a history of colonialism, which condones armed intervention in places like Iraq or Chechnya and practises waterboarding in Guantanamo or Abu Ghraib, while preaching about human rights"
"it is naive and simplistic to think denigrating China and the Chinese in the short term will accomplish anything"
