请捐助十美元,帮OCEF赢得五万美元大奖,资助失学儿童重返校园!

请捐助十美元,帮OCEF赢得五万美元大奖,资助失学儿童重返校园!

亲爱的朋友:

海外中国教育基金会(Overseas China Education Foundation, OCEF)是一群海外学
子于1992年创办的民间组织,是在美国注册的非宗教性,非政治性慈善团体,OCEF的唯
一宗旨是帮助中国国内贫困地区的孩子接受教育。OCEF至今资助了两万六千多人次(每
学期每生计为一人次)的贫困中小学生,以及2000多人次贫困优秀高中生上学读书。仅
去年一年,基金会就资助了5977名贫困中小学生,1089名贫困优秀高中生,196名贫困
教师,并资助兴建了4所学校校舍和26个农村学校图书室。OCEF的所有工作人员均为无
偿工作的义工,去年的营运费用仅为捐款总额的4%。受今年经济危机影响,我们上半年
的捐款总数只有去年同期的42%,许多助学项目可能因此受到影响,从而减少资助规模
和力度,这是我们不愿意看到的。$50美元就可以帮助这些孩子走进课堂,我们希望能
帮助更多的孩子。

我们也在尽我们所能扩大宣传和捐款。OCEF参加了今年Facebook举办的America's
Giving Challenge慈善募捐竞赛。此次活动鼓励更多的人关注慈善团体,在一个月的竞
赛中,捐款人次最多的慈善团体将赢得$50,000的大奖,每天捐款人次前两位的组织还
将赢得$1,000和$500的日奖。整
个活动于10月7日开始,并将于11月6日结束。

OCEF在10月17日才参加此次活动,但是在各位热心朋友的支持下,很快脱颖而出,捐款
人数达到3,700多人次,捐款金额超过5,4万美元,累计赢得了七天第一以及两天第二,
并在总排行榜上位居第一。如果我们可以保持领先到11月6日,我们就可以为乡村孩子
们赢得最终的5万美元大奖,这也意味着我们能多帮助一千名失学儿童重返校园。但是
,有些慈善团体在美国主流社会影响巨大,虽然参赛晚,但是上升势头强劲,OCEF现在
的优势并不能保证我们最后可以取得冠军,我们需要广大热心朋友的支持。

捐款无需Facebook账号,只需访问
http://apps.facebook.com/causes/ocef
点击绿色的"donate"按钮,选择捐款额,然后用信用卡完成捐款即可。特别需要注意的
是,每人每天只能捐款一次,每次最低捐款10美元。在这里“天” 指的是美国东部时
间下午3点(美西时间中午12点)到第二日下午3点。此次活动是按最终捐款人次而非金
额来排定名次的,所以如果您想捐助20美元以上的话,我们希望您可以把捐款数目分成
$10一次,多捐几天,这样可以增加我们的捐款次数,更好地帮忙我们赢得大奖。本次
活动的常见问题请见

http://bbs.ocef.net/bbs/cgi-bin/topic.cgi?forum=2&topic=6136&show=0


如果您能推动您周围的人对此次活动进行关注及参与,我们将会有更大的把握在竞赛中
获胜,从而让更多的孩子受益。请把本信forward给您的同学,朋友和其他您认为合适
的热心人,让更多的人加入我们,让大家一起参与!

捐出10美元,您就可能让一个穷孩子走进课堂,从而改变他/她的命运。而5万美元,就
可以帮助1,000个孩子实现读书的梦想。我们希望您捐出$10美元,帮助他们上学受教育
,走出实现美好明天的第一步!

捐款链接:
http://apps.facebook.com/causes/ocef
OCEF助学项目的图片集锦:
http://www.ocef.org/apps/2006-photoshow/
OCEF介绍短片链接(video):
YouTube - You Can Help - One Child at a Time (OCEF 2009)

海外中国教育基金会
http://www.ocef.org/

欢迎您通过fundraising-core@ocef.org联系我们。
再说lz吧,人家目的才真得很单纯,所有的方式方法只为一个目标,赢钱,把五万块钱给他赢回来
 
$10???
村民们疑心太重了. 没话说了.:(
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/501(c)

General compliance issues
Under IRS's IRC Section 511, a 501(c) organization is subject to tax on its "unrelated business income," whether or not the organization actually makes a profit, but not including selling donated merchandise or other business or trade carried on by volunteers, or certain bingo games.[2] Disposal of donated goods valued over $2,500, or acceptance of goods worth over $5,000 may also trigger special filing and record-keeping requirements.
Note that "tax exempt" also does not excuse an organization from maintaining proper records and filing any required annual or special-purpose tax returns.[3] Previously, annual returns were not generally required from an exempt organization accruing less than $25,000 in gross income yearly.[4] However, from 2008 onwards, many such organizations must file a yearly "e-Postcard" or risk losing their exemption [5]
Failure to file required returns such as Form 990 (Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax) may result in monetary fines of up to $250,000 per year. Exempt or political organizations (excluding churches or similar religious entities) must make their returns, reports, notices, and exempt applications available for public inspection.
The exempt organization filed IRS Form 990 (or similar such public record as the Form 990-EZ or Form 990-PF) are generally available for public inspection and photocopying at the offices of the exempt organization, through a written request and payment for photocopies by mail from the exempt organization, or through a direct Form 4506-A Request for Public Inspection or Copy or Political Organization IRS Form request to the IRS of the exempt organization filing of Form 990 for the past three tax years. The Form 4506-A also allows the public inspection and/or photocopying access to Form 1023 Application for Recognition of Exemption or Form 1024, Form 8871 Political Organization Notice of Section 527 Status, and Form 8872 Political Organization Report of Contribution and Expenditures.
Failure to timely file such returns and to make other specific information available to the public is also prohibited.[6]
501(c)(3)

501(c)(3) exemptions apply to corporations, and any community chest, fund, or foundation, organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, testing for public safety, literary, educational purposes, to foster national or international amateur sports competition, promote the arts, or for the prevention of cruelty to children or animals. [7][8]
Another provision, 26 U.S.C. § 170, provides a deduction, for federal income tax purposes, for some donors who make charitable contributions to most types of 501(c)(3) organizations, among others. Regulations specify which such deductions must be verifiable in order to be allowed (e.g., receipts for donations over $250). Due to the tax deductions associated with donations, loss of 501(c)(3) status can be highly challenging to a charity's continued operation, as many foundations and corporate matching programs will not grant funds to a charity without such status, and individual donors often will not consider making a donation to such a charity due to the unavailability of the deduction.
Testing for public safety is described under section 509(a)(4) of the code which makes the organization a public charity and not a private foundation,[9] but contributions to 509(a)(4) organizations are not deductible by the donor for federal income, estate, or gift tax purposes.
The two exempt classifications of 501(c)(3) organizations are as follows:[10]
A public charity, identified by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) as "not a private foundation," normally receives a substantial part of its income, directly or indirectly, from the general public or from the government. The public support must be fairly broad, not limited to a few individuals or families. Public charities are defined in the Internal Revenue Code under sections 509(a)(1) through 509(a)(4).
A private foundation, sometimes called a non-operating foundation, receives most of its income from investments and endowments. This income is used to make grants to other organizations, rather than being dispersed directly for charitable activities. Private foundations are defined in the Internal Revenue Code under section 509(a) as 501(c)(3) organizations which do not qualify as public charities.
Obtaining status

Most organizations acquire 501(c)(3) tax exemption by filing IRS Form 1023. The form must be accompanied by a $750 filing fee if the gross receipts for the organization are expected to average $10,000 or more.[11] If gross receipts are expected to average less than $10,000, the filing fee is reduced to $300.[12] There are some classes of organizations that are automatically treated as tax exempt under 501(c)(3), without the need to file Form 1023:

  • Churches, their integrated auxiliaries, and conventions or associations of churches[13]
  • Organizations that are not private foundations and that have gross receipts that are normally not more than than $5,000[14]
Beginning January 3, 2010 these fees will be increased. After that date, the filing fee will be "$850 for organizations whose gross receipts exceed $10,000 annually over a 4-year period".[15] "$400 for organizations whose gross receipts are $10,000 or less annually over a 4-year period" [16]

The IRS also expects to release a software tool called Cyber Assistant in 2010, which will assist with the preparation of the application for tax exemption. Once Cyber Assistant becomes available, the user fee structure will change again. The fees will then be $200 for all organizations (regardless of size) that file using Cyber Assistant.[17] Organizations that do not use Cyber Assistant (regardless of size) will pay a user fee of $850.[18]

Political activity

Section 501(c)(3) organizations are subject to limits or absolute prohibitions on engaging in political activities.
Elections

Organizations described in section 501(c)(3) are prohibited from conducting political campaign activities to intervene in elections to public office.[19] The Internal Revenue Service website elaborates upon this prohibition as follows:
"Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. Contributions to political campaign funds or public statements of position (verbal or written) made on behalf of the organization in favor of or in opposition to any candidate for public office clearly violate the prohibition against political campaign activity. Violating this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes.
"Certain activities or expenditures may not be prohibited depending on the facts and circumstances. For example, certain voter education activities (including presenting public forums and publishing voter education guides) conducted in a non-partisan manner do not constitute prohibited political campaign activity. In addition, other activities intended to encourage people to participate in the electoral process, such as voter registration and get-out-the-vote drives, would not be prohibited political campaign activity if conducted in a non-partisan manner.
"On the other hand, voter education or registration activities with evidence of bias that (a) would favor one candidate over another; (b) oppose a candidate in some manner; or (c) have the effect of favoring a candidate or group of candidates, will constitute prohibited participation or intervention.
"The Internal Revenue Service provides resources to exempt organizations and the public to help them understand the prohibition. As part of its examination program, the IRS also monitors whether organizations are complying with the prohibition."
Lobbying

In contrast to the absolute prohibition on political campaign interventions by all section 501(c)(3) organizations, public charities (but not private foundations) are permitted to conduct a limited amount of lobbying to influence legislation. Although the law states that "no substantial part" of a public charity's activities may be devoted to lobbying, charities with very large budgets may lawfully expend a million dollars (under the "expenditure" test) or more (under the "substantial part" test) per year on lobbying. [20]
 
大婶,你不要见人就骂行不。这个募捐不合法是显而易见的。事实不是你不容别人说话可以改变的。
你不拿工资可以理解,一个可能你是合伙,二个可能,说出来您别骂街,也是为您好,您有典型的忧郁症,进入典型的亢奋症状,三个可能就是您很想做贵妇,可惜现实不可能,不够那条件。也别自卑,我知道好多女人想这辈子可以从事慈善做职业,不是她们有多少善心,仅仅是她们看到有钱人家或权贵人家的女人是从事社会公益或慈善的,学个样子自我感觉好点

掏10块钱就有这么多话?大白话蛋。:lol:
 
本不想多说,暗示一下就算了。可有人却放着明白装糊涂,拍案叫板,不得不多说几句。

无论这个组织在美国做得如何成功、如何奉公守法,他们的财务管理如何完善,都不能使得他们在加拿大的募捐活动具有合法性。

他们不可能不熟悉加拿大的法规。明知故犯,难道不说明点什么么?

其实,想证明他们在这里活动的合法性,很简单。报税的时候,用上他们给的收据。如果CRA接受,就证明他们是合法的。

这同捐款者无关。作为热心人,捐款,值得赞颂。
3c被逼急了的时候思维特清晰:cool:就是你说的这个理了:cool::cool::cool:直到自己在加拿大不能合法募捐,捡个捷径走走。很说明其中的猫腻
 
再说lz吧,人家目的才真得很单纯,所有的方式方法只为一个目标,赢钱,把五万块钱给他赢回来
您还是自己一边歇着去吧,不用找各种理由给自己解释。捐不捐其实没啥,对得起自己良心就好了。
 
$10???
村民们疑心太重了. 没话说了.:(
不是疑心重,要奉公守法。国家还不允许的组织,就有他不存在的理由。助长不良组织,想帮的人没帮到,行骗组织越来越多。加拿大有很多慈善机构,善心人在加拿大不愁找不到行善渠道。相信大家所捐的远不止区区10倍的$10
 
您还是自己一边歇着去吧,不用找各种理由给自己解释。捐不捐其实没啥,对得起自己良心就好了。
您是那大婶的老公吧?够劲yeah
我捐的远不是你能想象的,做善事不用拿出来吹的,非行善之道道:D:D:D
 
这一个人要受过多少刺激才能心里如此阴暗?What a loser!
 
您是那大婶的老公吧?够劲yeah
我捐的远不是你能想象的,做善事不用拿出来吹的,非行善之道道:D:D:D
你根本就不懂我说的话,我说的是良心,跟捐多少拿出来吹没关系。另外你自己放尊重点。人品太低了对不起你父母的教诲。
 
本人不赞成国民/儿童教育问题用善心人士捐款方式解决。这种方式,也根本解决不了问题。
当年批《武训传》,不是没有道理的。事实/历史也证明了,批了一个武训,解决了10亿中国人的儿童九年义务教育问题。

搂主善心是好的,出发点是好的。但不幸的是要学做“武训”,这是一条没有出路的绝路。本人不支持。

与自然灾害等突发事件不同,对于灾区捐款,应大力支持。
 
看了看,水平就是不一样。跑龙套的,学着点吧。

看看LZ的回复:

很高兴看见这么多反馈。我用“OCEF Canada"登记只是因为这个是加拿大分组在facebook上的名字,并没有多想,更没有混淆视听的目的。在我们网站或任何地方,我们都明确说明in Canada, 我们还在进行注册。我衷心希望有更多人加入我们义工队伍,这样你就能了解这个组织的运作。

我们会加油的

昨天忙得没停过,今天上来才看见这么多回帖。哈哈,至少有人帮我UP帖子。上次我发的帖半天就下去了。
捐款会有收据,但不能在加拿大报。这次facebook上的活动恐怕不会有收据。

wiki 已经帮忙post 好多link, 谢谢啊

加拿大登记一个合法组织不容易,主要是没有足够的人和时间。所以我们需要更多义工。
 
哪位勇敢,把钱都存到美国的金融机构去,我就服了他。:p:D:D
 
很多华人的思维和国内的司法认证思路类似.

首先就是有罪或欺诈假设,然后要组织者或宣传者证明无罪或无欺诈.

这样下去, 很多很好的项目,在加拿大根本很难开展起来. 人家说的很清楚,那组织是注册在美国, 对加拿大的朋友唯一不方便的就是没有报税的税条.

爱心慈善难道必须要税条回执做抵押吗? 我们村民一直以中产自居,以自己能力和财富为自豪, 但是感觉很多在座的是生活在怀疑中. "一个关于$10的欺诈假设."

如果没有税条回执,那么村里什么人出面搞类似募捐,你们才相信呢?
 
本人不赞成国民/儿童教育问题用善心人士捐款方式解决。这种方式,也根本解决不了问题。
当年批《武训传》,不是没有道理的。事实/历史也证明了,批了一个武训,解决了10亿中国人的儿童九年义务教育问题。

搂主善心是好的,出发点是好的。但不幸的是要学做“武训”,这是一条没有出路的绝路。本人不支持。

与自然灾害等突发事件不同,对于灾区捐款,应大力支持。
理论上当然是咱们国的政府不对。但实际上受害的是那些小朋友。把责任往政府一推,又不敢去搞革命推翻政府,只敢躲在远处大骂,我觉得和民运没啥两样。我最鄙视民运分子。
 
后退
顶部