请捐助十美元,帮OCEF赢得五万美元大奖,资助失学儿童重返校园!

这种募捐应该是不合法的。不管楼主是何种组织,首先它不是本国承认的慈善机构或者非营利组织;其次,以一个id号召捐钱,无收据,跟政府提醒大家网上流行的骗钱组织采用的形式一致;再者,连一个合法组织都注册不成功,怎么保证所募资金的运作,又如何保证运用到失学儿童身上。
无意水贴,善良的人们有知情权,真正的公共事业要受到监察,非法的行骗手段才会被警觉

谁说没收据?每次捐款都有收据!
拜托您不清楚就请闭嘴。我也不是领OCEF工资的,如果对基金会有任何和怀疑不会支持至今。
钱也不是给楼主,您上facebook看看America Challenge再说话好不好?
 
这种跨国搞捐款行为,是否合法,值得注意。

你怎么老混淆视听?真要怀疑你的居心了。:flaming:
有什么合法不合法?又不用捐款额报税?!愿意给税后的钱还能不合法?
你去美国买东西合法吗?笑话!
 
我相信face book不会不核实就搞这种活动,此其一,该组织在那里注册不重要,关键是善款去向,据财报,2008年善款95%以上用于赈灾和失学儿童,这是个非常高的比例,加拿大同行大概不到这个数字的一半(道听途说),此其二。当然我不保证该组织的合法性,只是推测。每个人有自己的标准。

谢谢!

95%的确是个非常高的比例,普通慈善机构用于慈善事业的比例超过60%就算合格,超过75%算是highly efficient。而OCEF达到了95%,这是个非常难得的比例!主要是因为全部为义工管理操作。比如有人回国度假,有时间就当一回巡察员,去接受捐助的地点巡察,拍照,带回反馈资料等。网站建设,公共关系,募捐宣传等所有事物都是由义工们完成的。
 
你怎么老混淆视听?真要怀疑你的居心了。:flaming:
有什么合法不合法?又不用捐款额报税?!愿意给税后的钱还能不合法?
你去美国买东西合法吗?笑话!

小馋猫啊,人家说的是募捐不合法,没说捐款不合法。

你还是去做饭托儿吧,还能蹭吃解馋。帮着募捐,估计你连凉水都喝不上,纯做爱心奉献了。
 
小馋猫啊,人家说的是募捐不合法,没说捐款不合法。

你还是去做饭托儿吧,还能蹭吃解馋。帮着募捐,估计你连凉水都喝不上,纯做爱心奉献了。
捐个10块20块又不会饿肚子,好歹有个希望,至少比中649的机会大,何乐不为呢?
 
小馋猫啊,人家说的是募捐不合法,没说捐款不合法。

你还是去做饭托儿吧,还能蹭吃解馋。帮着募捐,估计你连凉水都喝不上,纯做爱心奉献了。


3C眼神有问题,我4楼就问过了,大家一致的定论是就是楼主ID而已。
3C看帖特不认真,我早发现了。:o
 
3C眼神有问题,我4楼就问过了,大家一致的定论是就是楼主ID而已。
3C看帖特不认真,我早发现了。:o
那么多论坛、那么多帖子都得发表点看法,来不及仔细看喽。
 
你怎么老混淆视听?真要怀疑你的居心了。:flaming:
有什么合法不合法?又不用捐款额报税?!愿意给税后的钱还能不合法?
你去美国买东西合法吗?笑话!

"你怎么老混淆视听?真要怀疑你的居心了。" Are you kidding me? These should be the questions that I would have asked you!

Do you think large font, bold, and font colour can help make it legal?

A non-registered organization in Canada is not legal to raise funds in Canada. This is for sure.

It is legal for you to donate anything, but it is NOT legal for them to raise funds in Canada.

Do you see the difference?

I could approach CRA and ask them to look into this, if you kindly invited me to do this.
 
那么多论坛、那么多帖子都得发表点看法,来不及仔细看喽。

You'd better mind your own business first.
 
3C眼神有问题,我4楼就问过了,大家一致的定论是就是楼主ID而已。
3C看帖特不认真,我早发现了。:o

You thought I had not read carefully enough, eh? If I had not I would not have asked a few questions.

楼主ID is simply meant to fool people, or 混淆视听.

Read this:

小馋猫啊,人家说的是募捐不合法,没说捐款不合法。

你还是去做饭托儿吧,还能蹭吃解馋。帮着募捐,估计你连凉水都喝不上,纯做爱心奉献了。
 
捐个10块20块又不会饿肚子,好歹有个希望,至少比中649的机会大,何乐不为呢?

It is nice of you to show your loving nature, but it is not legal for this organization to do this in Canada.

It is totally legal for you to donate, but it is absolutely illegal for them to raise funds in this country.

Read this comment:

小馋猫啊,人家说的是募捐不合法,没说捐款不合法。

你还是去做饭托儿吧,还能蹭吃解馋。帮着募捐,估计你连凉水都喝不上,纯做爱心奉献了。
 
我相信face book不会不核实就搞这种活动,此其一,该组织在那里注册不重要,关键是善款去向,据财报,2008年善款95%以上用于赈灾和失学儿童,这是个非常高的比例,加拿大同行大概不到这个数字的一半(道听途说),此其二。当然我不保证该组织的合法性,只是推测。每个人有自己的标准。

Their place of registration is vital and very important to meke it legal for them to raise funds in this country.

The question as for where the money goes is secondary. The first and foremost question is, are they legal to do this in Canada or not?

There are Canadian laws and regulations for them to follow. And I believe that they know much, much better than we do.
 
本不想多说,暗示一下就算了。可有人却放着明白装糊涂,拍案叫板,不得不多说几句。

无论这个组织在美国做得如何成功、如何奉公守法,他们的财务管理如何完善,都不能使得他们在加拿大的募捐活动具有合法性。

他们不可能不熟悉加拿大的法规。明知故犯,难道不说明点什么么?

其实,想证明他们在这里活动的合法性,很简单。报税的时候,用上他们给的收据。如果CRA接受,就证明他们是合法的。

这同捐款者无关。作为热心人,捐款,值得赞颂。
 
CCC seems an expert in Canadian laws.
But OCEF is not raising fund in Canada. LZ is referring an activity on "Facebook", the fund raising in fact happens through "facebook" in US or online from all the world.
CCC, could you point out Who are "" (LZ, wiki, donors or OCEF), and why/what they are doing illegally?

本不想多说,暗示一下就算了。可有人却放着明白装糊涂,拍案叫板,不得不多说几句。

无论这个组织在美国做得如何成功、如何奉公守法,他们的财务管理如何完善,都不能使得他们在加拿大的募捐活动具有合法性。

他们不可能不熟悉加拿大的法规。明知故犯,难道不说明点什么么?

其实,想证明他们在这里活动的合法性,很简单。报税的时候,用上他们给的收据。如果CRA接受,就证明他们是合法的。

这同捐款者无关。作为热心人,捐款,值得赞颂。
 
CCC seems an expert in Canadian laws.
But OCEF is not raising fund in Canada. LZ is referring an activity on "Facebook", the fund raising in fact happens through "facebook" in US or online from all the world.
CCC, could you point out Who are "" (LZ, wiki, donors or OCEF), and why/what they are doing illegally?

I am not at all any expert. Thanks anyway.

Wasn't it clear enough that the term "they" refers to this "OECF Canada" posting?

In my opinion, by posting this message here, "they" are targeting a specific group of potential donors in Canada, and, as such, "they" are raising funds from Canadian sources from within Canada. And this is not legal, I believe.

And by using the ID "OCEF Canada", people are confused if not manipulated.

Well, I know doing things online is taken advatange of here. But posting such a fund raising drive here is different from online shopping or @facebook, I am sure.

It sounded as if you were a legal representative for OCEF. If you had the interest or luxury of time, we could visit a local CRA office to get this sorted out and clarified.
 
后退
顶部