The worst-run industry in Canada: Health care

It's better to keep healthy than to wish to depend on "Health care".
 
与安省人均年花费$6000 是一致的。过去几年中,
安省每年收的个人税还不够一半的医疗开支付出。
学医的未来前景堪忧!
 
已经支付不起了,到了必须改革/改良的时候了。
 
已经支付不起了,到了必须改革/改良的时候了。

Worst-run for taxpayers, best-run for corrupted liberal government.

Hospital contracts, spending slammed by auditor


Report finds litany of sole-sourced, poorly documented, overpriced hires


Read more: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Hospital+contracts+spending+slammed+auditor/3702884/story.html#ixzz132YjlUur


"
The report lists numerous problematic contracts, including one, worth $700,000, that was so vague it didn't even give a detailed deion of services needed.

One hospital completely failed to account for a $170,000 consultant contract. The hospital was unable to produce the initial request for proposal, the names and number of firms invited to bid, the bidders' proposals or any evaluation criteria used to reward the contract. Nevertheless, the same firm was retained for another $430,000 contract."


" They include one temporary executive who, despite his $275,000 annual salary, also billed the hospital nearly $150,000 for other consultants and administrative support, $14,000 for salary bonuses, foreign exchange fees and a Christmas luncheon, and numerous expensive hotels (including one, in Chicago, where he paid $500 for hotel phone charges) and lavish meals around the world.
Another consultant earning $1,100 a day billed taxpayers $7,800 for airfare to Japan for his personal vacation."


勒脖工们每人每年上缴的600大洋医疗税,除了给自由党政府的亲戚朋友发财致富,没有改善过一丁点医疗服务。

自由党政府的前部长,又要做渥太华市的市长了,日子没法过了。

 
前总理Mulroney凑巧也谈这个问题:

http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Mulroney+urges+adult+debate+medicare/3702003/story.html

http://www2.canada.com/nanaimodaily....html?id=f92e11f5-c340-46a0-9002-dc24fbd45945

Mulroney urges debate

Mark Kennedy, Postmedia News

Published: Thursday, October 21, 2010
Former prime minister Brian Mulroney says Canadians need to have an "adult discussion" about whether medicare is financially sustainable, and he is proposing a task force of medical and financial experts to launch the national debate.

Mulroney, who led a Conservative government from 1984 to 1993, says Canada needs to strike a "better balance" between the "intrinsic value" of universal medicare and the capacity of Canadians to fund the system through their taxes.

His proposal for an independent review of the system comes as the Harper government and the provinces struggle with how to pay for rising health-care costs and with a 10-year federal-provincial funding formula set to expire in 2014.

Mulroney's remarks were made in a Montreal speech earlier this week to the Canadian Council of Chief Executives. Much of his address focused on the need to improve economic productivity, but Mulroney also waded into issues ranging from immigration to aboriginal affairs. It was on health care that Mulroney's comments represent the most dramatic call for change yet suggested by a current or former prime minister.

He told the business leaders their support for government initiatives on free trade, tax reform and deficit reduction was "indispensable to the discipline required from government."

"And we will need similar examples of courage and conviction to bolster our fiscal foundation against future pressures from an aging population and from increasing health costs impacted by the same demographic trend," said Mulroney. "You, as business leaders, have a responsibility to help stimulate a rational discussion on how Canada can best meet these challenges. It seems to me that, on health care for instance, we need to strike a better balance between the intrinsic value of universal coverage for basic medical service and the readiness, indeed the capacity, of Canadians to pay the necessary taxes to support the system."

"A serious, adult discussion is called for, and I believe a blue-ribbon panel of medical and financial experts could provide a sensible framework for the debate and for the decisions needed. Not surprisingly, the fundamental assumptions on which Justice Emmett Hall based his recommendations for medicare almost 50 years ago have changed and we need to adapt accordingly."

Hall led a federal royal commission in the early 1960s that led to the birth of medicare.
Eight years ago, two other major reviews probed medicare and offered differing solutions. Former Saskatchewan premier Roy Romanow led a royal commission that said medicare could be sustained with a wide range of reforms
 
看来,靠税收和那多数人每年支付的300-900 OHIP premium,是不够他们花的了。

免费看病/看病不花钱的日子,几年前就成为历史了。
 
看来,靠税收和那多数人每年支付的300-900 OHIP premium,是不够他们花的了。

免费看病/看病不花前的日子,几年前就成为历史了。

左派已经在幕后讨论安乐死的事情。看似从人道角度讨论,实质上是为节省医疗费。

想象一下,等你七老八十的去看病,隔夜医院告诉你的家人你已经被安乐死了,是党(自由党/NDP) 批准的。
 
唯一的出路就是,取消OHIP premium,取而代之的就是收取user fee,看医生象征性地收取诊费(一次收$30的话,不多吧),住院收取绝大多数人能承受得起的住院费、手术费、医疗费、餐费(餐费,订餐一天收$15,不订餐不花钱,可以吧。)。
 
左派已经在幕后讨论安乐死的事情。看似从人道角度讨论,实质上是为节省医疗费。

想象一下,等你七老八十的去看病,隔夜医院告诉你的家人你已经被安乐死了,是党(自由党/NDP) 批准的。

真有其事?:rolleyes:

我如果得了绝症,痛苦地活着的话,还真不如安乐死。:p
 
真有其事?:rolleyes:

我如果得了绝症,痛苦地活着的话,还真不如安乐死。:p

等你真有重病,痛苦不痛苦就不是你说了算了,由医院决定。 等火化的时候不让人醒过来就好。
 
等你真有重病,痛苦不痛苦就不是你说了算了,由医院决定。 等火化的时候不让人醒过来就好。

醒过来,吓死一个两个的做陪葬。:D
 
医生说你还有多长时间,就还有多长时间?那岂不是比阎王爷还准?
医生杀人是真不用刀啊,我亲戚癌症,医生说还有半年,结果人活了七年,复发去世还是因为拖的。人躺到那里,那就是听他说了,运气好的自己扛过来,运气不好的,到时候医院直接停止治疗,停止供养,直接等你死。
 
啥叫绝症,没治好就叫,治好了就不叫,流感还有死的呢,咳啊喘得多痛苦啊,那是不是也直接安乐死算了
 
不想被安乐死,唯一的出路就是,取消OHIP premium,取而代之的就是收取user fee。
 
后退
顶部