CARLETON大学在加拿大众多大学中处于什么档次

[Ryu]

我想问问经济学如何

有知道的麻烦回帖

谢谢

 

[colin]

最初由 feng 发布
It's course name...but I an not sure how it called in chinese....should be signal and system (94.360) or communication theory(94.351) I guess

i will take one of them next term, hope not so hard

 

[feng]

最初由 colin 发布


i will take one of them next term, hope not so hard

actually both of them are not hard...almost all math problems

 

[Aeoliao]

最初由 Caohaoying 发布
In fact, EE in macgill is outof date. They still teaching cources on ATM!
Labs in carleton has the most advanced equipment today. for example, the
optical lab in Carleton, has the all-optical-network which will not be put
into market within next 5 years. As for waterloo, its computer science are
definitely best in CA, but its EE is second class. BTW, you cannot judge
a school by prof. As you know, SITE has several canada research chairs.
Onething improtant, the graduates from Carleton has a very good reputation
in silicon valley (US).

Carleton Lab has all optical switch?base on lens or bubbles? where? must have a look!!
But as i knew this project in Nortel has been suspended.how carleton run this reseach without money?

 

[Aeoliao]

最初由 gdntfrank 发布
CARLEON的分数给的也比较严.象上学期的随机,就只给了两个A+

教授还算有水平，毕竟waterloo毕业的，比较而言不如mcgill的一个随机教授 ，据说是全球3大高手之一，而且其中一个已经pass away了。

这学期的无线工程的教授，卡尔顿本校毕业的，上课有人问GSM里面BTS和BSC之间的通讯方式，他略微沉吟，说：ATM! 幸好我做过工程，否则真还信了，估计教授毕业得早，那时还没有E1/T1。后来我没有再去听课，据说又教大家GSM是800M，同学问，业界说法都是900M阿，教授咬牙切齿说，就是800M。我想一想也对，1号频点是从890M开始的，勉强算800M吧。

 

[Aeoliao]

最初由 feng 发布
我也听说carleton EE排的挺靠前的..第一好像是多大吧...我觉得实验室里的东西挺新的,而且课也挺实用的,很多以后出去工作可以直接用的...研究生不知道怎么样,反正本科是真累...上了3,4年级每门课的loading都很重,上过两门4年级的课,Prof.说了这门课的lab project比4th year project还要重...吐血ing..

这设备还不如我在中国用的好。
你今年就吐血，明年吐什么？

 

[Aeoliao]

最初由 cola 发布


Who? I'm curious. :bounce:

his surname is Wong.

 

[瓶子无心]

carleton的probability和statistics还是很强的！

 

[gdntfrank]

I know sth about the nortel project.
You know why the project is suspended? beacuse it is too advanced.
No market so far. As for the level of professor, I don't think we
need the best one to give lessons. Banihashimi is good enough for
teaching such a fundamental course. Maybe wireless is not so good,
this is not area.

 

[gdntfrank]

再说了,就两个A+,很多人都叫难.那说明大家还学得不到家.
这样的教授,大家还应付得比较吃力.这至少说明,对CARLETON
的研究生,博士生来说,人家教授的水平够了.要真换个什么几
大高手之类的,只怕课都没人听得懂了.再说数学上真还有什么
权威不成? 举个简单例子,如果TRAFFIC是SELF SIMILAR, 进一个
最简单的FIFO QUEUE, 出来的TRAFFIC就没人知道是什么分布了.
这简直是最基础的问题.现在的数学都无法解答.所以在一个99%
未知的领域,应该没有什么权威可言.
其实加拿大的学校再分什么好坏是没必要的.如果多大的EE排名
全美20的话,CARLETON也在40多.这里的学校普遍属于美国的第二档次,
差距很小.EE在CARLETON还是有实力的,不少现在的风云人物,当初
应聘CARLETON的教授都被拒了.CARLETON的毕业生在硅谷的公司
名声不错的.

 

[gdntfrank]

再说人已经在这里了,应该少想些怎么靠学校名气添自身资本.
为什么不能让学校以你为荣呢?尤其研究生,主要是靠自己.导师
只是指个方向,道行的深浅全看个人了.我们比较每个学校的论文
数和实力的时候,有没有想自己又做了什么呢?
多说无益,还是脚踏实地的做研究吧.

 

[colin]

最初由 gdntfrank 发布
再说人已经在这里了,应该少想些怎么靠学校名气添自身资本.
为什么不能让学校以你为荣呢?尤其研究生,主要是靠自己.导师
只是指个方向,道行的深浅全看个人了.我们比较每个学校的论文
数和实力的时候,有没有想自己又做了什么呢?
多说无益,还是脚踏实地的做研究吧.

说得太好了，强烈支持！！！

 

[Ryu]

谢谢
大家回复

 

[cola]

that reminds me

well said ... but that reminded me of my accidental sit-in of a first-year physics for engineers class; I didn't know what to think of it because the professor lectured without differentiating between the most basic ideas of speed vs. velocity. It made me wonder what kind of impact having such a professor makes on the pool of 1st-year undergraduates.

 

[cola]

another one

Also, I am aware that there are some CS students who (need to?) take 42.230 ... I don't even want to talk about that course as is. :bad: