警报:除安省亚省外NDP在全加超越Liberal

The Conservatives' extra rate cut benefits only a tiny fraction of Canadian business enterprises -- just 1-in-20. And certainly not small businesses. The winners are the largest and wealthiest corporations, especially the banks (which made $21B in profit last year).
 
So the choice is between NDP and Conservative? Not a bad thing.:)
 
It's mind-boggling to me why give huge corporations tax cut??? - do you think Bell, Rogers, TD, Royal....are going to move out of Canada if you don't give them tax cut? they are oligopoly and already earning huge profits.
 
选择NDP就是选择加拿大的“人民公社党”。Not a good sign.
徘徊在Liberal和PC之间的还可以继续徘徊。徘徊在Liberal和NDP之间的就不用继续徘徊了:想投NDP的直接去朝鲜好了。那的社会福利没得比:教育,医疗全cover,干不干活都有工资发。人间天堂啊,还等什么?

其实这些都是自由党的支持者,他们是永远不可能投保守党的票的.但自由党最近的倒行逆施让他们很愤怒和迷惑,只有去投NDP.
我太太就是一个典型,我花招用尽,他就不投保守党,宁愿去投NDP.我们家可是从入籍以来不管大小选都投自由党的.这是第一次投其他党派,估计和我们家相似的情况比较多.
 
HST到底是谁整出来的啊?反正就不投那个
 
21

http://zoonpolitikon.ca/blog/2011/04/election-2011-tory-tax-lie/

Election 2011: Tory Tax Lie

Conservatives place a lot of emphasis in this election on keeping taxes low. They argue that corporate taxes must be kept down if we are to continue our economic recovery (there estimation of our current economic state, not mine) and that Canadians should keep more of their hard earned money in their own pockets rather than give it to governments to spend for them. It sounds so good. If one is to believe the banter on radio call-in shows Canadians are lapping it up. But is it true?

If assessed lower taxes do corporations create more jobs or just accumulate more wealth? The first rule of corporate economics is that you do not use your own money for investment, you always borrow. Profits are passed to corporate executives and shareholders. Plant expansion, R & D, etc. (i.e. the stuff that creates jobs) is always financed with borrowed money. Therefore the quick answer to whether the Tory corporate tax cuts will create jobs is no.

Will corporations flee to countries with lower tax rates? If a corporation relocates to Mexico or to some other developing country is the tax rate the difference? If it were then all corporations would flock to whichever country has the lowest taxes today. Corporations would need to be constantly relocating until finally all states offered them full tax exclusion. Our current corporate tax rate is half that of our southern neighbour. Shouldn’t corporations should be flocking across the border as we speak. And if corporate taxes existed nowhere, what then would tilt the scale to country A or country B? The scenario is of course absurd. Tax rates are a part of the equation but they are not the whole story. Labour exploitation and increasingly weak or nonexistent environmental protection are more powerful incentives for at least manufacturing operations.

Okay, corporations are huge nasty bloodsuckers and no they probably don’t deserve a tax break but you and I do. Right? Why shouldn’t we be able to keep more of our paychecks. Sometimes it seems that Ottawa and the provinces have their hands so deep in our pockets it may soon cross the line into something obscene. If the government cut taxes I would have more money to spend. Right? Wrong! If the government continues to cut taxes for you and I and the corporations you will have far less money to spend.

We pay taxes to the government for goods and services in return. The Conservative plan is that we should pay less to the government for fewer services. We cannot have it all. The goods and services provided by the government cost money. If government revenue declines then something has to go. Health care? Education? Pensions? What will it be? The Conservative’s know this but say we can then purchase these services ourselves with the money we are no longer paying in taxes. What they don’t tell you is that you will be paying more. It is obvious if you just stop and think about it, which explains the Conservative gutting of education at both the provincial and federal level. Wouldn’t want anybody out there with the capacity to think now would we. I should maybe mention here that the Liberals are really Tories in red ties and have contributed almost equally to this overall misconception. They may have less disdain for your intelligence than the Conservative party but they still work for corporate Canada, not you or I.

Let’s look at a practical metaphor. I have to purchase a new toilet for my downstairs bathroom this year. When I go to a plumbing supply store to buy one toilet I am going to pay full retail price. I might get a small discount from one or another seller to entice me to purchase at his establishment rather than the one down the street. But because I am only purchasing one unit the seller is limited in how much he can discount and still make a profit. Profit is absolutely necessary for the seller to earn a living. However, if one hundred of us got together because we all need a new toilet for our homes the seller’s latitude on price increases. For a purchase of 100 units at the same time the discount can be much larger and the seller can still earn a living. Everybody is happy. As the number of purchasers increases, the price per unit can decrease. This is basic economics.

Conservative policy wants us to each purchase what we need individually rather than collectively. They say this is a saving. In the case of policies like child care they actually tell us that this will lead to economic efficiencies. What non sense. Are the Conservatives just too simple to understand this basic principle of economics, the principle of economies of scale. The Conservative party markets itself as the party of good business sense, the party of fiscal responsibility. Either they are lying about this and they really are the party of business ineptitude or they are lying to the Canadian people that they are trying to save them money or as they put it keep more of your money in your pocket. The opposite is the real truth. Tory tax cuts will cut a deep swathe through not just your pockets but your savings and equity.

Political parties do not do things without reason and contrary to some popular opinion seldom do things out of sheer stupidity. The Conservative party is not the party that will keep more of your hard earned money in your pocket. Rather it is the party that will put more of your hard earned money into the pockets of their corporate friends. Not only will corporations contribute less to the society and infrastructure upon which their profits depend but will receive a windfall in the extra profit from each of us lonely independent actors paying more for those services necessary to sustain our quality of life. It is a win-win for corporations and a lose-lose for you. Actually in recent years it has been a win-win-win for corporations — lower taxes, higher profits and a great big present of much of the money you gave to the government to buy services which they then never fully supplied because they diverted that money to their buddies on Bay Street.
 
It's mind-boggling to me why give huge corporations tax cut??? - do you think Bell, Rogers, TD, Royal....are going to move out of Canada if you don't give them tax cut? they are oligopoly and already earning huge profits.

They are the driving force of a nation's economy and the leading ledge of a nation's global competence.
 
HST到底是谁整出来的啊?反正就不投那个

HST是联邦的保守党提议的,还答应给各实施HST的省30亿.应该是省钱的行动,因为这样一来会省下很多分税造成的多余的手续费用. 联邦并没有从中拿比GST更多的钱.
但安省的自由党趁机把原来不需要交GST的几个大件放进了HST,比如说汽油和房地产. 这就让省民们不仅没省钱,反而要交更多的钱(以后会越来越多,因为这几样东西只会涨价,不会降价).
我想"麦贱的"那一伙人正乐滋滋地看着汽油每天疯涨呢,因为8%的HST是固定的,油价越高,HST就越多.
 
HST是联邦的保守党提议的,还答应给各实施HST的省30亿.应该是省钱的行动,因为这样一来会省下很多分税造成的多余的手续费用. 联邦并没有从中拿比GST更多的钱.
安省的自由党趁机把原来不需要交GST的几个大件放进了HST,比如说汽油和房地产. 这就让省民们不仅没省钱,反而要交更多的钱(以后会越来越多,因为这几样东西只会涨价,不会降价).
我想"麦贱的"那一伙人正乐滋滋地看着汽油每天疯涨呢,因为8%的HST是固定的,油价越高,HST就越多.
这么说,其他省有HST的不包括汽油和房地产?那这个安省的自由党确实够可误的。
 
HST是联邦的保守党提议的,还答应给各实施HST的省30亿.应该是省钱的行动,因为这样一来会省下很多分税造成的多余的手续费用. 联邦并没有从中拿比GST更多的钱.
但安省的自由党趁机把原来不需要交GST的几个大件放进了HST,比如说汽油和房地产. 这就让省民们不仅没省钱,反而要交更多的钱(以后会越来越多,因为这几样东西只会涨价,不会降价).
我想"麦贱的"那一伙人正乐滋滋地看着汽油每天疯涨呢,因为8%的HST是固定的,油价越高,HST就越多.

麦溅就是个骗子。这斯滚越远越好
 
HST是联邦的保守党提议的,还答应给各实施HST的省30亿.应该是省钱的行动,因为这样一来会省下很多分税造成的多余的手续费用. 联邦并没有从中拿比GST更多的钱.
但安省的自由党趁机把原来不需要交GST的几个大件放进了HST,比如说汽油和房地产. 这就让省民们不仅没省钱,反而要交更多的钱(以后会越来越多,因为这几样东西只会涨价,不会降价).
我想"麦贱的"那一伙人正乐滋滋地看着汽油每天疯涨呢,因为8%的HST是固定的,油价越高,HST就越多.

原来是这么回事,谢谢了,今天长知识了
前几天还看见另一个"麦贱的"在路边拉选票呢。。。反正政客都是坏人
 
其实这些都是自由党的支持者,他们是永远不可能投保守党的票的.但自由党最近的倒行逆施让他们很愤怒和迷惑,只有去投NDP.
我太太就是一个典型,我花招用尽,他就不投保守党,宁愿去投NDP.我们家可是从入籍以来不管大小选都投自由党的.这是第一次投其他党派,估计和我们家相似的情况比较多.
我想这次我投保守党可能性最大,但有可能最后倒向自由党,NDP绝不可能。

要在美国,我肯定是民主党的铁杆,永远不可能投共和党。但加拿大感觉这三个党都是左派,只是程度不同而已。
 
原来是这么回事,谢谢了,今天长知识了
前几天还看见另一个"麦贱的"在路边拉选票呢。。。反正政客都是坏人

这件事是保守党引诱在先,30亿哦,自由党作恶在后,从联邦和省民两头拿钱.
现在看来,这未尝不是联邦保守党的一个陷阱?
江湖险恶啊.
但谁让自由党现在净出目光短浅的弱智呢?
被HAPER玩死了还在那乐呵呵地数钱.
 
这么说,其他省有HST的不包括汽油和房地产?那这个安省的自由党确实够可误的。
不清楚其他省,估计不往HST里夹藏私货的省政府不会太多.
问题是安省自由党这次玩大了.弄沉了自由党的整条船.
如果他们这次沦为第三党,我想是活该的.
The punishment fits the crime.
 
后退
顶部