什么是Common Law???跟真正结婚有什么区别啊???

Common Law 在国内事实上实行之后,晚婚/不结婚的人数大增,过去政府大力宣传奖励晚婚都没这 Common Law 奏效, 奇迹,奇迹!

以往是要先买票才能上船,现在是已经上了船了还买啥票啊? ;):D
 
期限还不短呢!

In Ontario, the Ontario Family Law Act specifically recognizes common-law spouses in sec. 29, dealing with spousal support issues; the requirements are living together for no less than three years[8] or having a child in common and having "cohabitated in a relationship of some permanence".
 
Common Law 在国内事实上实行之后,晚婚/不结婚的人数大增,过去政府大力宣传奖励晚婚都没这 Common Law 奏效, 奇迹,奇迹!

以往是要先买票才能上船,现在是已经上了船了还买啥票啊? ;):D

都下了船了,就不需要补票了吧。:D
 
我还是学生,我男朋友最近一直鼓动我搬到他那住,他说他想帮我移民,说住在一起就是Common Law了,我有点怕,到底什么是Common Law?跟真正结婚有什么区别啊?我该搬过去么?

common law 几近婚姻,宜就教于专业律师。住在一起就是Common Law? 就联邦benefits而言,须连续同居12个月;就安省而言,须连续同居36个月。据一网页( http://www.common-law-separation-canada.com/ ) 称,有以下七个tests 须满足:

1. Shelter - did the unmarried parties share accommodation;

2. Sexual and Personal Behaviour - did the unmarried parties maintain an intimate interdependent relationship and were they so perceived by others;

3. Services - did the common law couple share the traditional functions of a family;

4. Social - did the unmarried couple portray themselves as a couple to the outside world;

5. Societal - how were the common law partners treated by their community;

6. Economic Support - were the unmarried parties economically interdependent; and

7. Children - did the unmarried couple see children as part of their home and interact parentally with each others' children.
 
期限还不短呢!

In Ontario, the Ontario Family Law Act specifically recognizes common-law spouses in sec. 29, dealing with spousal support issues; the requirements are living together for no less than three years[8] or having a child in common and having "cohabitated in a relationship of some permanence".

村长我们是不是有点过分了,有点坏LZ男朋友大哥的好事了?:blowzy:
 
感情好,也是可以考虑住一起试一下的,然后再考虑结婚

一个人出来学习,的确得学会保护自己。

这家长也累啊。
 
同居也没什么啊,你一样可以不跟他一起报税,不买联名保险,账户,政府不会有任何关于你俩spouse关系的记录,如果有一天你完全信任他了,可以宣布你俩common law,因为你们住址一直在一起可以证明。如果万一有天分开了,(我说万一啊,lz表介意),你也不用跟结婚一样还要办离婚手续。
 
鱼肉与熊掌不可兼得,亦有得比有失。
 
照你们上面这么说,如果男的要求同居就是想睡,容易甩些。
那女的要求直接结婚,之前都没有一起生活起居的相处过,那男的也会怀疑女方那么急着结婚的目的。

既然两个人互相猜疑和不信任,为什么还要在一起?直接分手算了。
真正相爱的2个年轻人会顾及这么多利益事情?我不信。,

真正的common-in-law,男方也算法律担保人了。
 
见过有人common law 十多年的都没有结婚,一朝分手后,不出1年,双方都结婚了,当然都是和其他人接的婚。

也见过孩子都18,19岁了,也没有结婚,最后还是分手的。
 
后退
顶部