什么是Common Law???跟真正结婚有什么区别啊???

[CFC_1990]

政府是在鼓励女孩子们卖艺别卖身！

干嘛说的这么难听嘛 :blink: 我就是因为困扰才上来问哪

好了，不说了，让帖子沉了吧

 

[Anakin]

其实就是同居，要想收法律保护，怎么也得挺一年。

 

[shgcn]

不了解你们两个人的感情情况。大部分当地的人都是先同居然后在结婚的，如果建立在互相吸引了解的基础上，其实同居不是什么坏的选择。

就算是当地人，如果他们不考虑清楚的话，也是不会提出同居的。因为同居分手的话，如果对方没有工作，有收入的一方也要付赡养费的。所以也不用都把坏的地方想。

其实，真正应该考虑的是你和他之间到底达到了什么样的地步，你和他在一起到底是不是comfortable，搬过去还是不搬，你自己心里最清楚，在这里你根本得不到答案的。

 

[superlover]

不了解你们两个人的感情情况。大部分当地的人都是先同居然后在结婚的，如果建立在互相吸引了解的基础上，其实同居不是什么坏的选择。

就算是当地人，如果他们不考虑清楚的话，也是不会提出同居的。因为同居分手的话，如果对方没有工作，有收入的一方也要付赡养费的。所以也不用都把坏的地方想。

其实，真正应该考虑的是你和他之间到底达到了什么样的地步，你和他在一起到底是不是comfortable，搬过去还是不搬，你自己心里最清楚，在这里你根本得不到答案的。

agree

 

[第N个马甲]

因为同居分手的话，如果对方没有工作，有收入的一方也要付赡养费的。所以也不用都把坏的地方想。

really?

 

[头发短见识长]

除了没有一纸婚书外，其他完全一样。

不一样，有最短同居时间限制的

 

[ccc]

一样的话，好多人就不必结婚了。

 

[bulaoniu]

really?

是的. 听说过魁北克 Eric 诉 Lola 一案吗? 上诉法院已裁定, Eric 须付: (1) 三个孩子每年共$411000抚养费; (2) 每月$56000离婚费(pension alimentaire). 但 Lola 不服, 仍要得到$50,000,000祖产(patrimoine familial). 先已上诉, 最高法院已接手此案.

在别的省, common-law partiners are all entitled for 上述第(1) 和 (2) 两项赔赏. 上诉法院裁定后, Quebec 也一样了.

 

[想念海的鱼]

干嘛说的这么难听嘛 :blink: 我就是因为困扰才上来问哪

好了，不说了，让帖子沉了吧

如果男朋友说是为了给你办移民才要求住一起就拒了吧，这分明是在施舍你或利用你的弱点，没有放在平等的地位，你就是寄人梨下，还欠他的，时间长了厌倦你了就用另外一个理由让你走人。
可能你平时表达想拿身份的愿望太过强烈 。

他如果真正想和你在一起的话是不会这么说话的，我觉得这样说话很伤人。

T2O说的是直接了点，但道理没错，年轻人一定要靠自己。

 

[shgcn]

一样的话，好多人就不必结婚了。

是有很多人同居不结婚啊，而且同居十几二十年的，就是不结婚，这里面有很多奥妙的。村长，仔细想想为什么

 

[CFC_1990]

如果男朋友说是为了给你办移民才要求住一起就拒了吧，这分明是在施舍你或利用你的弱点，没有放在平等的地位，你就是寄人梨下，还欠他的，时间长了厌倦你了就用另外一个理由让你走人。
可能你平时表达想拿身份的愿望太过强烈 。

他如果真正想和你在一起的话是不会这么说话的，我觉得这样说话很伤人。

T2O说的是直接了点，但道理没错，年轻人一定要靠自己。

他曾经问过我以后有什么打算，我说我喜欢这里，想留下来，可是会take a long time, 我也跟他抱怨过国际学生学费太贵之类的。可这些都是实话，我跟他也是实话实说，我从来没有流露出想利用他来拿身份之类的念头，也是他主动跟我说想帮我的，现在不管有没有他的帮助，我自己最终都会移民留下来的，只不过是时间长短问题。

最后，谢谢大家

 

[Buckwheattobe]

If you are truly a female student wanting to stay in Canada, you have good options to stay by yourself:

1. After undergraduate study (in Ontario for instance), you can work for three years. This means you can apply for immigration during the period.

2. If you have a Master's degree or above, you will be granted permanent resident status by Ontario if you apply.

Check out immigration policy related website by yourself.

Common-law normally doesn't qualify for spousal immigration. Even if you are married, there is no guarantee immigration will be granted. Plus, it may take a few years. If there is any change in martial status, the immigration will be in jeopardy.

If you are serious, then be serious and don't "sell" yourself. It is a trap...

Very true. If your 'common law' husband leaves you while you are processing your immigration, you will have no status and be forced to leave Canada.

 

[第N个马甲]

是的. 听说过魁北克 Eric 诉 Lola 一案吗? 上诉法院已裁定, Eric 须付: (1) 三个孩子每年共$411000抚养费; (2) 每月$56000离婚费(pension alimentaire). 但 Lola 不服, 仍要得到$50,000,000祖产(patrimoine familial). 先已上诉, 最高法院已接手此案.

在别的省, common-law partiners are all entitled for 上述第(1) 和 (2) 两项赔赏. 上诉法院裁定后, Quebec 也一样了.

误人子弟

1. Cohabitation alone does not create a common-law marriage;
According to the Canada Revenue Agency, as of 2007, a common-law relationship is true if at least one of the following applies:
a) the couple has been living in a conjugal relationship for at least 12 continuous months;
b) the couple are parents of a child by birth or adoption; or
c) one of the couple has custody and control of the other partner's child (or had custody and control immediately before the child turned 19 years of age) and the child is wholly dependent on that person for support.
In Ontario, the Ontario Family Law Act specifically recognizes common-law spouses in sec. 29, dealing with spousal support issues; the requirements are living together for no less than three years[8] or having a child in common and having "cohabitated in a relationship of some permanence".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common-law_marriage

 

[第N个马甲]

我还是学生，我男朋友最近一直鼓动我搬到他那住，他说他想帮我移民，说住在一起就是Common Law了，我有点怕，到底什么是Common Law?跟真正结婚有什么区别啊?我该搬过去么?

either he doesn't know better or he is lying

 

[bulaoniu]

误人子弟

1. Cohabitation alone does not create a common-law marriage;
According to the Canada Revenue Agency, as of 2007, a common-law relationship is true if at least one of the following applies:
a) the couple has been living in a conjugal relationship for at least 12 continuous months;
b) the couple are parents of a child by birth or adoption; or
c) one of the couple has custody and control of the other partner's child (or had custody and control immediately before the child turned 19 years of age) and the child is wholly dependent on that person for support.
In Ontario, the Ontario Family Law Act specifically recognizes common-law spouses in sec. 29, dealing with spousal support issues; the requirements are living together for no less than three years[8] or having a child in common and having "cohabitated in a relationship of some permanence".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common-law_marriage

The first part of your post is irrelevant--you cannot deal with family issues using tax laws or regulations from the tax authority. You only use them to deal with tax and benifit problems. But I agree with the second part of your post: one applies family law to resolve family matters. However, these are similar to my earlier post. Please refer to:

http://bbs.comefromchina.com/6968089-post35.html