在过去的星期三，中国官员曾见《纽时》董事长Sulzberger和主编要求不要刊登该报道。执意刊登，代价不光是网站在内地被封要赔偿广告商，刊登前一天《纽时》股票就「莫名其妙

[Rockman]

传温家宝拟公开家产 纽约时报市值蒸发24亿

http://www.creaders.net 2012-10-28 09:55:38

香港苹果日报 　

　十八大前《纽约时报》揭温家宝家庭拥有27亿美元（约209亿港元）财产，无疑是一枚重磅炸弹，但更震撼的是传出温家宝决定公开澄清家族财富！如兑现，将是中共建政以来首次有国家领导公开财产，有意见指将比温空喊政改有力一万倍。此外，《纽约时报》又爆中国官方曾阻挠温家巨额资产调查见报。



　　《纽时》市值蒸发24亿

　　明镜网昨引接近温家的消息称，温家宝对支持者说：「不管怎么样，我必须向人民说清楚，我要求我的家人交代清楚，我准备为此承担责任，即使作为一个牺牲者。」温家朋友又称温家宝和家人如愿意，可逐条反驳《纽约时报》报道：「温家的财富是合法的。温云松是收取投资正常的佣金：百分之二十。」

　　「这将是一个更大的炸弹！」中国政治观察者何频说：「温家宝只有两个选择，一是沉默，那就是作为一个大贪官的形象遗臭万年；一是作出公开澄清，指证纽约时报报道错了。但第二个选择是否得到他的同僚同意，仍是未知数。因为，这将可能引起一系列连锁反应。」


　　对于有指揭露温家宝家族是由阻挠政改的保守派或挺薄派策划，《纽约时报》昨发文澄清记者一年前就开始搜集资料，赶在今年北京开始限制查询前，掌握了大批上市公司资料，包括大股东身份信息等。在过去的星期三，中国官员曾见《纽时》董事长Sulzberger和主编要求不要刊登该报道。执意刊登，代价不光是网站在内地被封要赔偿广告商，刊登前一天《纽时》股票就「莫名其妙」下跌21.97%，市值蒸发3.14亿美元（逾24亿港元）。


http://news.creaders.net/headline/newsViewer.php?nid=538084&id=1201148&dcid=3

 

[臭农民]

"刊登前一天《纽时》股票就「莫名其妙」下跌21.97%，市值蒸发3.14亿美元（逾24亿港元）。"
hey,grandpa,read this la
i saw ccp from you
http://bw.dowjones.com/article/AP49...tml?mod=WSJ_article_RecentColumns_NYAPTopNews

 

[ccc]

「温家的财富是合法的。温云松是收取投资正常的佣金：百分之二十。」

我靠，这不是要埋葬温家父子么。

 

[ccc]

"刊登前一天《纽时》股票就「莫名其妙」下跌21.97%，市值蒸发3.14亿美元（逾24亿港元）。"
hey,grandpa,read this la
i saw ccp from you
http://bw.dowjones.com/article/AP49...tml?mod=WSJ_article_RecentColumns_NYAPTopNews

New York Times 3Q net income drops 85 percent

Associated Press
NEW YORK — The New York Times Co. reported a sharp decline in its third-quarter net income on Thursday and said revenue fell below analysts' expectations amid weakness in print and digital advertising.

The company's stock fell 21 percent in afternoon trading.

The media company, which publishes its namesake newspaper and the Boston Globe, earned $2.3 million, or 2 cents per share, in the July-September period. That's down 85 percent from $15.7 million, or 10 cents per share, in the same period a year earlier.

In the year-ago quarter, the Times Co. booked a one-time gain of $37.8 million, or 24 cents per share, from the sale of its stake in the Red Sox and other sports holdings. This was partially offset by a charge of $27.5 million, or 18 cents per share, from its early repayment of a $250 million high-interest loan from Mexican telecommunications billionaire Carlos Slim.

The company booked severance costs totaling $1.7 million, or a penny per share, in both quarters.

Excluding the severance expenses and the results of businesses it no longer owns, the Times Co. booked a loss of 1 cent per share in the latest quarter, the same as in the third quarter a year ago. Analysts were expecting third-quarter adjusted earnings of 8 cents per share.

Revenue fell less than 1 percent to $449 million from $451 million. Analysts, on average, were expecting revenue of $477 million, according to a poll by FactSet.

Advertising revenue fell 9 percent in the third quarter to $182.6 million from $200.5 million a year earlier. Circulation revenue rose 7 percent to $234.9 million from $218.6 million.

"While our results for the third quarter reflect continued pressure on advertising revenues, total circulation revenues rose led by the ongoing expansion of our digital subscription base," said Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., chairman and CEO, in a statement.

The company said it expects fourth-quarter advertising trends to be similar to the third quarter.

The Times Co. ended the quarter with 592,000 paying digital subscribers, up 11 percent from 532,000 at the end of the second quarter.

In March of 2011, the company erected a so-called electronic pay wall system, which charges readers for monthly access to an unlimited number of articles on its website and on mobile devices. The strategy, closely watched by executives in the industry, has helped to boost the Times' circulation and is being adopted at many other newspapers.

The company's stock fell $2.19, or 21 percent, to $8.46 in afternoon trading. The stock has traded in the 52-week range of $5.88 and $11.07.

 

[mimi_ge]

额的神，nyt的股票下跌是出了earning report，广告收入大幅降低，市场的反应。

同影帝没有一毛钱关系的。

 

[mimi_ge]

On Thursday, the New York Times (NYT) reported terrible third-quarter results that showed weakness in both print and digital advertising revenue. New York Times' total revenue fell 0.6% as advertising revenue dropped nearly 9% during the period. The lower revenue was compounded by a 2.3% increase in operating costs during the period, as operating profit tumbled nearly 60% to $8.5 million from $21 million in the year-ago quarter.

Print and digital advertising sales fell 10.9% and 2.2%, respectively, during the quarter and overwhelmed the 7.4% increase in circulation revenue. We've seen advertising weakness from other online-based consumer subscription firms such as Morningstar (MORN), and we credit this trend to the growing digital advertising dominance of Facebook (FB) and Google (GOOG), the resurgence of Yahoo (YHOO) thanks to new CEO Marissa Mayer, and tightening corporate budgets in advance of the political election and to meet promised year-end earnings expectations.

Though we've changed on tune on Yahoo recently, we continue to be puzzled (but not really given the shareholder concentration and lack of float) how Morningstar's flat revenue growth and operating-income expansion of 17% translates into a 25+ forward earnings multiple (even after considering its capital light structure and strong cash-flow generation). We think management knows that its share buybacks are value-destroying but a focus on inflating earnings-per-share and propping up the firm's share price relative to its intrinsic value seem to be more important goals at this time. Eventually, this should correct itself over time.

As it relates to the New York Times, we cannot overlook the trend toward mobile advertising spending, the rise of private firm Seeking Alpha as it relates to digital advertising dollars within the firm's target audience, and constant pressure from the Wall Street Journal and USA Today, newspapers of general circulation in New York City. Needless to say, the print and digital advertising industry has never been more competitive. However, growth in digital subscriptions and higher print circulation prices drove circulation revenue higher at the New York Times. Paid subscribers to the New York Times and the International Herald Tribune totaled 566,000 at the end of the quarter, an increase of 11% on a sequential basis. We expect this upward trend to continue at the New York Times.

Looking ahead, the firm expects total advertising revenue in the fourth quarter of 2012 to be similar to third-quarter levels. However, we wouldn't be surprised to see a sequential decline, given significant economic and competitive pressures. Circulation revenues are expected to advance in the mid-to-high single digits in the fourth quarter, a pace we think is achievable. All things considered, we don't think the New York Times is worthy of our investment dollars in the portfolio of our Best Ideas Newsletter, and we're keeping a close eye on its sector peers, Gannett (GCI) and McClatchy (MNI), to assess broad-based weakness.

Additional disclosure: GOOG is included in the portfolio of our Best Ideas Newsletter.

 

[臭农民]

额的神，nyt的股票下跌是出了earning report，广告收入大幅降低，市场的反应。

同影帝没有一毛钱关系的。

他们说昨天大地震也有关系,天都对那27亿美金怒了.

 

[专业报税签证]

support

 

[Rockman]

好像爆出來的27億財富數字祇是截止2007年以前的，2007年以後到現在的資產數量還未見有任何披露。這事看起來還沒完••••••••。

 

[councilor]

中共领导人的倒台，是内部政治斗争的结果，而薄派势力，现在利用外国媒体曝光施压，等于是坏了我党政治斗争的估计。当年赵紫阳下台，就是前车之鉴。

我个人估计，现在中国高层左右势力都慌了，因为这样曝下去，覆巢之下，岂有完卵？左右势力，胡哥，江core都会完蛋。很快，就会有江core家族财产曝光。

如果温家宝势力就此来个最后一搏，公开倡导政改，那才是老共的最不希望的结果。

 

[一心无住]

温家宝唱了9年政改都不改，他是真心政改的人吗？

 

[Rockman]

纽约时报》：面对中国政府的压力，拿出了勇气

送交者: newpost 2012年10月28日16:45:04 于 [天下论坛] 发送悄悄话

《纽约时报》星期五披露，中国政府官员在揭露温家宝家族财富的报道刊发前一天到《纽约时报》交涉，试图阻止其刊发，但时报不为所动，第二天照样刊出报道。 另据明镜新闻网星期六报道，前往时报交涉的是中国驻美大使;并指正因为北京施压，才激发了《纽约时报》的报道热情。时报称，新闻价值常与商业利益不一致， 为了成为真正的世界新闻媒体，时报“拿出了勇气”。

　　《纽约时报》的国外新闻编辑卡恩透露，星期三，即该报道刊发前一天，《纽约时报》执行主编艾布朗森和他一起在时报会见了来访的中国政府代表。但他说， “谈话的焦点并不是新闻，而是政治和文化差异。” 简而言之，中国政府就是要《纽约时报》不要刊发这篇报道。《纽约时报》公共编辑沙利文星期五在《纽约时报》刊文，引述了上述卡恩的话。她还说，时报发行人 苏茨贝格也告诉她，文章刊发前，中国政府官员试图加以阻止，他说，“他们想表达他们的关切，我听了，我应该听，但最终，我们决定刊发。”

　　据明镜新闻网星期六引用消息灵通人士的话说，“中共驻美大使张业遂周三前往《纽约时报》，强硬地向《纽约时报》高层宣布了六点，目的在于阻止揭露温家 宝家族财富的报导发表。” 不愿透露姓名的消息来源说，张业遂指《纽约时报》的报道会破坏中美关系。消息来源还说，中国驻纽约总领事孙国祥先于张业遂前往《纽约时报》试图阻止文章发 表。明镜新闻网认为，正是中国政府的施压，“结果反而激起《纽约时报》报导温家宝事件的热情。”

　　《纽约时报》公共编辑沙利文说，这一事件作为一个极端的例子，说明了“新闻和商业利益并不总是齐头并进的。”她说，纽约时报完全做到了人们的希望和期 待：刊出了一个重要的故事，却并没有过度考虑短期的商业后果。她说，鉴于纽约时报面临的财务困难和其为成为真正世界新闻媒体做出的重大努力，纽约时报“拿 出了勇气”。上星期四《纽约时报》发表的2012年第三季度财报显示，该报净利润同比下降了86%!而因为中国屏蔽其中文网导致其广告客户受损也迫使时报 必须对他们作出补偿。


http://bbs.creaders.net/politics/bbsviewer.php?trd_id=786701

 

[annyInRain]

拭目以待.

 

[hooper]

「温家的财富是合法的。温云松是收取投资正常的佣金：百分之二十。」

我靠，这不是要埋葬温家父子么。

村长，HEDGE FUND ２／２０是正常的。关键是他的投资人，他的客户，以及他的交易时间。NYT都说的很清楚了，小松很难解释。

 

[专业报税签证]

打击报复