Ottawa is the worst capital city in the G7

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 Hzm99
  • 开始时间 开始时间

Hzm99

知名会员
注册
2013-01-19
消息
344
荣誉分数
112
声望点数
153
So the City of Ottawa will not widen the heavily congested Airport Parkway for another four years. Or, eight years, say planners. Or, 10 years.

In this feckless city, you never know. There is no urgency about anything – and certainly not about addressing this critical, clogged artery running between downtown and the airport.

It doesn’t matter that the parkway is bumper-to-bumper in rush hour, with commuters to the suburbs and travellers to the airport. It’s all about money. There isn’t enough for this kind of project, it seems. What’s delicious here is that the widening had been anticipated as part of the 2016 budget.

The change escaped the attention of Coun. Diane Deans, whose ward includes the airport, who says that city staff did not inform her it had been deferred.

“A well-guarded secret,” she complains.

Here, then, is why Ottawa is a sleepy place – shoddy planning, administrative lassitude, somnolent politicians. It explains a city that is the way it is. For its lack of ambition and absence of imagination, Ottawa is the worst capital in the G7. It is unable to get anything done very quickly, whether repairing a ceremonial thoroughfare like Sussex Drive or building light rail, which will arrive decades after other cities.

Related
It took years longer and cost much more than planned to build a footbridge over the Airport Parkway, now offering the best view of the mess below. Of course, the parkway would matter less if there were light rail going to the airport, but that’s not happening anytime soon. The city’s motto should be “Mañana.”

For mediocrity, there’s Lansdowne Park. After seductive promises and breathless claims from developers and politicians, we got a (nice) stadium, shops, restaurants and condos, with a park and a wading pool as consolation. It replaces a sea of cracked asphalt and a crumbling stadium, and for contented Ottawans, that’s fine. But it’s just not interesting, let alone innovative.

And we squandered a once-in-a-century chance to remake Ottawa’s image, for example to do for our city what the Guggenheim Museum did for Bilbao, Spain.

But this is Ottawa. It is congenitally conservative. If New York is said to be a town without foreplay, Ottawa is a town without climax. Not much ever happens, and when something does, the earth doesn’t move. The big ideas remaking cities – renewed waterfronts, recovered green space, edgy architecture, environmental innovation, seamless public transit – happen somewhere else.

Oh, let’s not be too unfair. Ottawa has better shopping than it did, even if Holt Renfrew has left town. Light rail is coming, though it won’t stop in Confederation Square. The brutalist National Arts Centre is getting a new glass façade, and will no longer look like a Stalinist detention centre.

But Ottawa is more motion than progress. It still has no new central library. It cannot make people use the Sparks Street Mall, now celebrating 50 years of failure. It cannot stop Rideau Street from looking a like tumble-weed main street in a mining town. It cannot produce better, more reasonable restaurants.

This is not the municipality’s fault alone; the federal government (particularly the Conservatives, who loathed Ottawa) has contributed to creating a soulless city.

Now, though, the Liberals bring new opportunity. In the tireless Catherine McKenna, the city has a new voice in cabinet. She, as well as Heritage Minister Mélanie Joly and her gifted parliamentary secretary, Randy Boissonnault, have an opportunity to lead a civic conversation on reimagining Ottawa as a modern, progressive capital, a repository of history and culture, a reflection of our achievements and dreams as a nation.

This means building no more ugly federal office towers, re-examining the Zibi development (which some local aboriginal groups oppose), creating a new science museum and national portrait gallery, as well as finding new purpose for the empty Government Conference Centre and the Canada and the World Pavilion.

It means thinking boldly about the shores of the Ottawa River, once the window on our wilderness, and the Rideau Canal, too.

This is 2016. As the world turns, Ottawa stands still, somewhere between not yet and not ever.
 
Ottawa is too small
 
Ottawa is, in fact, not as terrible as you think
Randall Denley
Published on: January 13, 2016 | Last Updated: January 13, 2016 12:32 PM EST
fans-enjoy-the-dj-ensemble-jack-u-featuring-skrillex-and-di.jpeg

JULY 8: Fans enjoy the DJ ensemble Jack U, featuring Skrillex and Diplo, on the Bell Stage as the RBC Ottawa Bluesfest, the annual music festival, got underway at the Canadian War Museum. Wayne Cuddington / Ottawa Citizen
It has long been popular to decry Ottawa as an inadequate capital, a “sleepy” backward place, even a “soulless city,” as Citizen columnist Andrew Cohen called it Wednesday. It’s a tradition that stretches back to Maclean’s writer Allan Fotheringham. In his heyday in the last century, the criticism was even partly accurate.

Despite what you might read, though, Ottawa is changing rapidly and for the better, with more to come.

Cohen’s column appeared on the same day that we learned that Ottawa’s long-anticipated new central library just took a huge step forward. The fact the city may work with Library and Archives Canada on a shared building is great news that’s likely to result in a bigger, better library. It’s the kind of synergy with the federal government that this city needs.

Related
Later this month, we will find out the details of the proposals to redevelop LeBreton Flats. While it’s disappointing that both ideas feature an NHL hockey rink, the real news will be in what else is involved and how the project will connect to its neighborhood. Cleaning up the empty mess of contaminated soil so close to the centre of the city would be a real gain, even if the project itself isn’t all that we would hope.

The nearby Zibi development, which would reopen the Chaudière Falls area to the public and be a model of green sustainability, is what the city has long needed, although Cohen suggests it be re-examined because some aboriginal people oppose it. On the other hand, other aboriginal people welcome it. Let’s not stop every good idea because someone is against it.

Those are the improvements coming, but let’s not forget what has already been accomplished. Lansdowne Park, which Cohen describes as mediocre, has transformed actual mediocrity into a people magnet full of activity, restaurants and shops. Yes, it’s too bad that a pet food store is front and centre, but the urban park at last makes something of Lansdowne’s great site.
The city’s convention centre is an infinite improvement over the dump that it replaced. The view of the Hill that it captures is priceless.

And then there are the music festivals that define summer in Ottawa in our “soulless” city. These are not government creations, but the result of hard work by people who live here and love this city. That’s actually the common denominator in the progress Ottawa is making.

Cohen is not unique in his expectation that everything here should be the best imaginable, if not better, because this is the capital. There is, however, the question of who would pay for it.

The city’s failure to widen the Airport Parkway in a timely fashion is an indicator, apparently, of what a crappy place this is. The actual issue here is the collection of development charges for a project and the failure to deliver, but it’s not reasonable to expect city taxpayers to bear the burden of roads and transit that would be the envy of the world.

We are mocked for being late to adopt light rail transit, but that project is costing city taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars, even though politicians from senior levels of government have offered to pay the whole tab elsewhere. We aren’t getting any special breaks because we are the capital.

Cohen describes the local populace as “conservative,” a bad thing presumably. It is fair to say that we prefer a little fiscal prudence in our local politicians.

Of course Ottawa could be better, and most people want it to be. The questions are what’s required and who will pay?

Cohen wants the capital to be “a reflection of our achievements and dreams as a nation.” It’s somewhat difficult to say what that would look like in physical form, but if the rest of the country has some great ideas and a chequebook, I think we’re open to it.

In the meantime, the people who actually live here are building a good city that’s getting better.
 
加个屁跑道,我家楼顶上的飞机够多的了,在kanata建个国际机场吧,每次看到头顶的飞机,我就恨
 
Washington DC 比Ottawa还烂,WMATA还不如OC transpo呢
 
加个屁跑道,我家楼顶上的飞机够多的了,在kanata建个国际机场吧,每次看到头顶的飞机,我就恨
有说加跑道?
 
我喜欢清静的地方,没看我已经剃发了么


嗯,嵩山适合您,,那里有静静,,:evil:
 
是不是因为要建机场到downtown的轻轨地铁,所以不扩建parkway?
 
是不是因为要建机场到downtown的轻轨地铁,所以不扩建parkway?
25年以后才建好,有个鸟用,那时候再扩建机场吗,不得30年开外了
 
现在的机场有问提吗, airport parkway 堵车能比 Toronto 严重?
 
加个屁跑道,我家楼顶上的飞机够多的了,在kanata建个国际机场吧,每次看到头顶的飞机,我就恨
Kanata已经有两个机场了,不需要了. 机会留给百黑门吧.

1) Carp Airport
2) Constance Lake (for water plane)
 
后退
顶部