路透社:越南近日已经在南海中国宣称主权的区域安装新型火箭以攻击中国人造岛屿跑道等相关军事设施。天朝会如何反映呢?

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 ljyj
  • 开始时间 开始时间

ljyj

知名会员
注册
2015-03-22
消息
3,905
荣誉分数
849
声望点数
123
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-southchinasea-vietnam-idUSKCN10K2NE?il=0
World | Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:14am EDT
Exclusive: Vietnam moves new rocket launchers into disputed South China Sea - sources

HONG KONG | BY GREG TORODE

An oil rig (C) which China calls Haiyang Shiyou 981, and Vietnam refers to as Hai Duong 981, is seen in the South China Sea, off the shore of Vietnam in this May 14, 2014 file photo.
REUTERS/MINH NGUYEN/FILE PHOTO
left




left
1 of 2
right

Vietnam has discreetly fortified several of its islands in the disputed South China Sea with new mobile rocket launchers capable of striking China's runways and military installations across the vital trade route, according to Western officials.

Diplomats and military officers told Reuters that intelligence shows Hanoi has shipped the launchers from the Vietnamese mainland into position on five bases in the Spratly islands in recent months, a move likely to raise tensions with Beijing.

The launchers have been hidden from aerial surveillance and they have yet to be armed, but could be made operational with rocket artillery rounds within two or three days, according to the three sources.

Vietnam's Foreign Ministry said the information was "inaccurate", without elaborating.

Deputy Defence Minister, Senior Lieutenant-General Nguyen Chi Vinh, told Reuters in Singapore in June that Hanoi had no such launchers or weapons ready in the Spratlys but reserved the right to take any such measures.

"It is within our legitimate right to self-defense to move any of our weapons to any area at any time within our sovereign territory," he said.

The move is designed to counter China's build-up on its seven reclaimed islands in the Spratlys archipelago. Vietnam's military strategists fear the building runways, radars and other military installations on those holdings have left Vietnam's southern and island defenses increasingly vulnerable.

Military analysts say it is the most significant defensive move Vietnam has made on its holdings in the South China Sea in decades.

Hanoi wanted to have the launchers in place as it expected tensions to rise in the wake of the landmark international court ruling against China in an arbitration case brought by the Philippines, foreign envoys said.

The ruling last month, stridently rejected by Beijing, found no legal basis to China's sweeping historic claims to much of the South China Sea.

Vietnam, China and Taiwan claim all of the Spratlys while the Philippines, Malaysia and Brunei claim some of the area.

"China has indisputable sovereignty over the Spratly islands and nearby waters," China’s Foreign Ministry said in a faxed statement on Wednesday. "China resolutely opposes the relevant country illegally occupying parts of China’s Spratly islands and reefs and on these illegally occupied Spratly islands and reefs belonging to China carrying out illegal construction and military deployments.”

The United States is also monitoring developments closely.

"We continue to call on all South China Sea claimants to avoid actions that raise tensions, take practical steps to build confidence, and intensify efforts to find peaceful, diplomatic solutions to disputes," a State Department official said.



STATE-OF-THE-ART SYSTEM

Foreign officials and military analysts believe the launchers form part of Vietnam's state-of-art EXTRA rocket artillery system recently acquired from Israel.

EXTRA rounds are highly accurate up to a range of 150 km (93 miles), with different 150 kg (330 lb) warheads that can carry high explosives or bomblets to attack multiple targets simultaneously. Operated with targeting drones, they could strike both ships and land targets.

That puts China's 3,000-metre runways and installations on Subi, Fiery Cross and Mischief Reef within range of many of Vietnam's tightly clustered holdings on 21 islands and reefs.

While Vietnam has larger and longer range Russian coastal defense missiles, the EXTRA is considered highly mobile and effective against amphibious landings. It uses compact radars, so does not require a large operational footprint - also suitable for deployment on islets and reefs.

"When Vietnam acquired the EXTRA system, it was always thought that it would be deployed on the Spratlys...it is the perfect weapon for that," said Siemon Wezeman, a senior arms researcher at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).

There is no sign the launchers have been recently test fired or moved.

China took its first Spratlys possessions after a sea battle against Vietnam's then weak navy in 1988. After the battle, Vietnam said 64 soldiers with little protection were killed as they tried to protect a flag on South Johnson reef - an incident still acutely felt in Hanoi.

In recent years, Vietnam has significantly improved its naval capabilities as part of a broader military modernization, including buying six advanced Kilo submarines from Russia.

Carl Thayer, an expert on Vietnam's military at the Australian Defence Force Academy, said the deployment showed the seriousness of Vietnam's determination to militarily deter China as far as possible.

"China's runways and military installations in the Spratlys are a direct challenge to Vietnam, particularly in their southern waters and skies, and they are showing they are prepared to respond to that threat," he said. "China is unlikely to see this as purely defensive, and it could mark a new stage of militarization of the Spratlys."

Trevor Hollingsbee, a former naval intelligence analyst with the British defense ministry, said he believed the deployment also had a political factor, partly undermining the fear created by the prospect of large Chinese bases deep in maritime Southeast Asia.

"It introduces a potential vulnerability where they was none before - it is a sudden new complication in an arena that China was dominating," he said.



(Additional reporting by David Brunnstrom in Washington, Michael Martina in Beijing and Martin Petty in Hanoi.; Editing by Lincoln Feast)
 
猴子把火箭装海底了?
 
各方都是无蛋的王八,等看热闹的我,实在等的无法再等了。快拿出各自的洪荒之力开打吧
 
http://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/simp/world/2016/08/160810_south_china_sea_vietnam_rocket_launchers


南在南海争议岛礁上“部署导弹发射器”

  • 9小时前
分享
160712075340_china_philippines_south_china_sea_976x549_reuters_nocredit.jpg
Image copyrightREUTERS
Image caption中国控制的美济礁。
路透社援引一些西方官员的话称,越南已经在数个有争议的南中国海岛礁上秘密部署了火箭发射装置,这些发射装置的打击范围覆盖中国在一些岛礁上建设的机场和军事设施。

据一些外交和军事官员向路透社透露,有情报显示,近几个月来,河内方面已经把火箭发射器从越南本土运到了斯普拉特利群岛(Spratly Islands,中国称“南沙群岛”)上的五个基地,这一举动可能导致越南和中国的关系出现紧张。

这些发射装置成功避开了空中监视被运送到岛礁上,但现在还没有完全部署完毕。未来两到三天内,导弹会被运到这些基地,从而完成部署。

越南外交部长称这些信息不准确,但没有提供进一步的说明。

越南国防部副部长阮志咏(Nguyen Chi Vinh)今年六月在新加坡告诉路透记者,河内方面没有在斯普拉特利群岛部署发射装置或武器,但越南保留采取这些手段的权力。

“我们享有自我防卫的合法权力,可以把任何自己的武器在任何时间搬到自己的领土上。”他说。

越南此举无疑是针对中国在南海岛礁上建设永久设施的行为。越南方面担心中国修建的跑道以及部署的雷达等军事装置会让该国南部以及岛上防御能力受到损害。

军事分析人士指,这是越南过去几十年里在南中国海控制区域做出的最有影响的防卫举措。

在国际法庭作出南海仲裁案裁决之后,越南方面认为南中国海紧张局势可能进一步加剧。

中国外交部周三回应路透采访时称,“中国对斯普拉特利群岛和附近海域拥有无可辩驳的主权。中国强烈反对相关国家非法占领中国的岛屿或在这些岛礁上开展非法的建设或军事行动。”

美国方面称正在密切关注事态进展。

一位美国白宫官员称,“我们呼吁南中国海相关各方避免采取行动激化冲突,各方需要采取务实的举措建立互信,并采取有效措施寻找解决争端的和平外交手段。”

外交及军事官员透露,越南在斯普拉特利群岛上部署的是其最近从以色列采购的EXTRA火箭系统。该火箭有效射程达到150公里,可携带150公斤重的弹头同时对多个目标进行打击。这也就意味着中国在永暑、渚碧、美济三座岛礁上建设的飞机跑道及军事设施已经在越南控制的21座岛礁攻击范围之内。
 
中国应该诱使越南打,就怕越南不打,打了正好全收回来。1974年全部收回西沙被占岛屿和1988年抢占南沙岛礁都是越南挑衅开炮开枪在先,虽然就比我们早射了1秒。:p
 
不敢动手的,一打就被打残,中国也不敢动,国际舆论压力不跟当年
 
中国应该诱使越南打,就怕越南不打,打了正好全收回来。1974年全部收回西沙被占岛屿和1988年抢占南沙岛礁都是越南挑衅开炮开枪在先,虽然就比我们早射了1秒。:p
我一直不理解这个,打赢了是正道,后开枪一定会赢?如果先开火能赢,就先开枪。
who cares you shot first or not.
 
我一直不理解这个,打赢了是正道,后开枪一定会赢?如果先开火能赢,就先开枪。
who cares you shot first or not.
后开枪开炮不是说自己没准备被动应战,其实枪口炮口射击诸元早已对好,让对方先打第一枪就是属于自卫反击,国际舆论上好说。
 
后开枪开炮不是说自己没准备被动应战,其实枪口炮口射击诸元早已对好,让对方先打第一枪就是自卫反击,国际舆论上好说。
daycare kids running to the teacher? he hits me first?
 
daycare kids running to the teacher? he hits me first?
缺乏政治智慧和预见性的小国就像幼儿园里的孩子,老共还是很贼的,七四年美国想与中共交好从越南撤军全球收缩战略,八八年苏联也是,中国就进入,越南不知趣还想硬来就吃亏了。而62年对印度79年对越南甚至50年朝鲜战争无论是国际舆论还是实力都不行打赢了也守不住。军事打击是政治的一部分,学学俄罗斯怎么收的克里米亚半岛。
 
缺乏政治智慧和预见性的小国就像幼儿园里的孩子,老共还是很贼的,七四年美国想与中共交好从越南撤军全球收缩战略,八八年苏联也是,中国就进入,越南不知趣还想硬来就吃亏了。而62年对印度79年对越南甚至50年朝鲜战争无论是国际舆论还是实力都不行打赢了也守不住。军事打击是政治的一部分,学学俄罗斯怎么收的克里米亚半岛。
也是啊,老共厉害,和越南打一下,然后地盘还是给他们,和印度打一场,也是那样,牛逼大了
 
后退
顶部