Reevely: Pot legalization brings tougher penalties for all impaired drivers in Ontario

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 guest
  • 开始时间 开始时间

guest

Moderator
管理成员
注册
2002-10-07
消息
402,190
荣誉分数
76
声望点数
0
The impending legalization of marijuana has the Ontario government planning to toughen the penalties for driving drunk, not just stoned.

The changes, announced by Premier Kathleen Wynne and Transportation Minister Steven Del Duca Monday morning, will particularly affect drivers under age 21, novice drivers with limited licences and commercial drivers. None of them will be permitted to have any alcohol or cannabis in their systems if they’re driving, and violations will be treated with harsher roadside punishments — steeper cash penalties and, in some cases, longer driving suspensions.

Technically, these are “administrative penalties,” not fines, which means police can apply them unilaterally, on the spot.

“Let me be clear: Driving while impaired is not acceptable and will not be tolerated,” Del Duca said at the Queen’s Park news conference, his manner grim. Ontario has one of the best records on traffic collisions and deaths in North America, he said, but “our previous accomplishments in this regard do not necessarily guarantee future success.”

Though driving impaired by any drug is illegal, drug laws have done the heavy lifting in punishing stoned drivers. Once pot is legal, the police will need other ways of handling drivers they catch going 15 in a 50 zone, red-eyed and giggly.


An American police officer conducts a field-sobriety test.


In Ontario, cases of impaired driving have been declining. Between 2008 and 2014, the last year for which the province has published complete figures, the number of criminal convictions for impaired driving fell from about 7,000 to about 3,400. The number of roadside licence suspensions declined from about 17,600 to about 13,600.

But the trail-blazer in North America everyone looks to is Colorado, which legalized recreational marijuana in 2014 and has seen the number of road fatalities involving drivers with cannabis in their systems more than double.

So, first thing, no pot at all for youth drivers, those with graduated licences, or at the wheels of commercial vehicles. They’ll test your spit with a (yet-to-be-approved) cannabis-detection device and if they find any, it’ll mean a three-day licence suspension on the spot, a $250 not-a-fine fine and possible referral for re-education. Graduated-licence drivers might have to start over again. Being caught a second time will mean a seven-day suspension and a $350 penalty; a third time will mean a 30-day suspension and a $450 penalty.

The reason for treating novice and younger drivers more harshly is that they’re more likely to get into collisions and especially need their wits about them, the government says. Commercial drivers are more likely to pilot larger, heavier vehicles that can do more harm in a crash.

The same penalties will apply to all drivers with blood-alcohol readings over 0.05 and those who fail sobriety tests because of any kind of intoxication. That toughens the current financial penalty of $198. And drivers caught with blood-alcohol readings over 0.08 will face the same 90-day suspensions they do now, but increased financial penalties of $550.

“All of these measures are in addition to federal criminal charges for impaired driving,” Del Duca said. A driver could face a pile of these various penalties for one impaired outing behind the wheel.

Toughening the drunk-driving penalties at the same time as bringing in new drugged-driving rules is meant to make them easier to remember and understand, Del Duca said, because there won’t be one set of penalties for alcohol and one for marijuana.

The transportation minister was the designated heavy, taking up the role shared by the finance minister, health minister and attorney general in a similar presentation about a week ago on how Ontario will sell pot. The subtext of all four ministerial performances has been that they’re doing this because the feds are making them and they really hate it.


Ontario Attorney General Yasir Naqvi, centre, Minister of Finance Charles Sousa, left, and Minister of Health Eric Hoskins speak during a press conference where they detailed Ontario’s solution for recreational marijuana sales, in Toronto on Friday, September 8, 2017.


Wynne, meanwhile, was in isn’t-this-an-interesting-policy-problem mode, which is perhaps her favourite. She hadn’t been at the retailing announcement so this was her first time talking about the logistics of legalizing marijuana. She herself decided the government’s initial plan for 40 LCBO-like marijuana shops wasn’t enough, that it would leave too much of the market to illegal sales, she said. So that’s why the plan is to open 150 stores within a couple of years of legalization next summer.

“This is a new frontier for us here in Ontario. It’s a real shift for all of us across the country,” she said. The government’s been working on its plans for months and is one of the provinces that’s done the most so far.

“We in Ontario had a very clear goal. We had a goal to balance the new freedom that people in Ontario will have to use cannabis recreationally with the expectation that it will be used safely.”

How, for instance, are drivers who are allowed to have smoked a little pot to know just how stoned they can expect to get? That’ll take education and a clear labelling regime for how strong different strains of pot are. Even so, people are notoriously bad at judging how drunk they get, despite decades of effort by public-health and law-enforcement authorities.

“There’s a lot of work yet to be done and potency is one part of that,” Wynne said.

dreevely@postmedia.com
twitter.com/davidreevely

b.gif


查看原文...
 
后退
顶部