非主流观点：多伦多蓄意撞人袭击案背后的阴谋论

[无耻的校长]

2018-04-27 03:41:28来源： 北美报告

摘要：很多时候所谓的主流会用一套犬儒求全的道理把群众框在一个假想的安全世界，并让这个世界可能无关攻击，无关公理，无关真相，也无关道德。它只是安全，毫无意义。

多伦多时间2018年4月23日(星期一)下午1：30左右，北约克(North York)Young街和Finch街路口发生汽车蓄意撞人攻击事件，共造成10人丧生，15人受伤，肇事者当场被捕。

随后，多伦多警方公布了犯罪嫌疑人身份——Alek Minassian， 25岁，男性。根据其LinkedIn的资料，Alek Minassian为Seneca College的学生。

紧接着不久，加拿大公共安全部长(Public SafetyMinister)RalphGoodale发表声明，否定多伦多汽车蓄意撞人攻击事件为恐袭，并表示犯罪嫌疑人Alek Minassian不牵涉任何恐怖组织。

对此，加拿大总理特鲁多也在推特( Twitter)上表示：“Our thoughts are with all those affected by the terrible incident at Yonge and Finch in Toronto.Thank you to the first responders working at the scene – we’re monitoring the situation closely.” 字面意思是：“我们与多伦多同在，感谢所有一线人员，我们将密切关注事件动向。”

图自The Globe And Mail

第一时间，官方辞令，言简意赅，感同身受，体现了领导对此“incident(事件)”的重视程度。

几个月前的小女孩被扯头巾事件，加拿大总理特鲁多用了一个“attack(攻击)”定义了这个事件，也就说在特鲁多的字典里，“扯头巾”是一个“攻击”等级。

Google 一下，在美国几乎所有类似事件都被称为“attack(攻击)”。

没有比较，就没有伤害。

然后神奇的事情发生了。

一张4.23多伦多撞人攻击事件犯罪嫌疑人Alek Minassian的脸书(facebook)截屏被公开，这里的重点是“4chan”和“INCEL”大家要注意下，4chan是一个开放论坛，类似于BBS，网站有很多关于水兵月、色情、暴力等内容;而 INCEL 是Involuntarily Celibate的缩写，也代表4chan上的一个组织，这个组织的成员清一色是“饥渴求日男”，自美国著名的5.23枪击案后，INCEL就越来越火了。


回顾美国2014年5月23日枪击(attack)案，有一个叫Elliot Rodger 青年男子因深陷“性问题”不能自拔，驾车到美国伊斯拉维斯塔社区冲撞行人并开枪，最后造成6死14伤。

归根结底，这是一起23岁处男因破处不成，报复社会，所造成的恐怖血案。

然而，根据Alek Minassian的脸书(facebook)截屏，肇事司机Alek Minassian疑似是INCEL组织成员，并复制重演了美国5.23枪击案。

换言之，这起多伦多10死15伤的惨案，极可能由另一名“破处不成的饥渴男“造成，也就是仅排在网红词“临时工”之后的 “精神病”一手造成的

Alek Minassian的脸书(facebook)截屏，图自网络

但是这张被疯传的脸书截屏引发了一波阴谋论者的质疑。

一、自4.23多伦多汽车撞人事件事发后，各大西方媒体错误地用“Alex Minassian ”作为犯罪嫌疑人名字刷爆头条，而之后Alek Minassian的脸书就访问不到了;

二、有人认为，这张唯一的脸书截图出现的时机实在太完美;

三、这个脸书截图中所用的头像是4.23多伦多汽车撞人事件后各大网站张贴的Alek Minassian的头像，而每天使用社交媒体的小伙伴，你们换头像的频率有多高?

四、迄今为止，加拿大警方发表的所有关于犯罪嫌疑人身份都是来自Alek Minassian的社交软件，要知道最近脸书(facebook)CEO因“隐私问题”正在面临多方指责，远方传来一阵啪啪打脸声。

如果这张截图是假的，那么这就不是一起简单的“精神病”案件，要知道在加拿大精神病犯罪是可以被免责的。

例如，2008年，加拿大发生了一起骇人听闻的凶杀案。一辆从爱德蒙顿(Edmonton)开往温尼伯(Winnipeg)的灰狗巴士上发生恶性凶杀惨案，在这辆载有37名乘客的公交车中，1名坐在车上的青年被邻座的人斩首。而主犯Vince Li当时被诊断得精神分裂症，事发后一直接受治疗，一段时间后被医生认定为“低危险人群”，逐渐恢复了自由。如果Alek Minassian被定义为“精神失常”，这就意味着他有可能不久就会被“保外就医”。

那么问题来了，这张充满疑点的截图是怎么在官方定性“非恐袭”事件前，以迅雷不及掩耳之势传遍网络的?

有人因此认为，警方所公布的引用Alek Minassian社交软件上的身份信息可信度有多高?

Minassian虽然是个美国常见姓，但也有欧洲、印度人用这个姓氏。如果大家有留意的话，可在4.23多伦多汽车撞人事件的现场录像中发现，Alek Minassian的英语是有口音的，也就是说他很有可能不是在加拿大长大的人。

图自Global news

一般情况下，类似案件犯罪嫌疑人的背景信息都会在第一时间公开。例如2017年加拿大新斯高沙省(Nova Scotia)一位退伍军人涉嫌杀死女友后自尽，事发后他的身份背景、从军经历、退伍后就业情况、朋友家庭等立刻被公布。

相比而言，Alek Minassian就黯淡很多，那么他到底是土生土长的加拿大人还是外来移民?若是外来移民，又来自哪个国家?有着什么样的家庭背景?从业经历是什么呢?

4.23多伦多汽车撞人事件发生后，有人对加拿大总理特鲁多的难民政策表示质疑，却立即招来某些“土豆党”不满，愤愤提出“与特鲁多何干”?

试想光天化日下，在加拿大一线城市闹市区，疑似携枪、随意开车撞人的行为举止，难道不属于报复社会?你们说与特鲁多有没有干系?

此外，还有“土豆党”鄙视网友英文能力，称特鲁多用“incident”是主流媒体说法，并无异义。但特鲁多是一个“去xx”化的高手，凡他张口扬言要淡化、去掉之处必有蹊跷。

举例而言，此前去掉“人 (humanbeing)”，后来去掉性别，不要“男女 (Miss/Mr./Mrs./Ms.)”，再后来去掉“家长 (parent)”，导致现在学生联系卡片上的“爸爸妈妈”时都用“parent1/2”来代替，那么用“incident (事件)”淡化“attack (攻击)”有什么不可能呢?

当下谁能保证西方主流媒体就能“依法治网、依法办网、依法上网”?

近期，前联邦政府内阁成员踢爆加拿大各地机关花费巨额“造假新闻”，包括杀虫剂对人体无害等，那些鄙视网友英文能力的何不去尝尝杀虫剂，体验下主流媒体所说“人体无害”的感觉。

很多时候所谓的主流会用一套犬儒求全的道理把群众框在一个假想的安全世界，并让这个世界可能无关攻击，无关公理，无关真相，也无关道德。它只是安全，毫无意义。

有人还说体制不同，人命不都是命么?10条人命呢!对过眼神，你们心里真的没数。
http://news.yorkbbs.ca/local/2018-04/1879068.html

 

[阿土仔]

不属于某个组织就不是恐怖份子吗？那袭击魁北克清真寺的青年是哪个组织的？总理为什么第一时间就说那是恐怖袭击？政府定性的依据是什么？

 

[春风吹]

现在看来，http://celebsiren.com/alek-minassian-wiki/
他的宗教背景依然是top secret。看到官方消息的请提供link
媒体：Minassian is not known to have any strong religious affiliations. 很虚的一句话，该地区传统上通常有强烈的宗教信仰。不管是哪一种。

假设他是光棍，光棍从5000年前到现在，一直都有。为什么会恐袭？广大男ID都是从处男过来的。这动机应该是不成立。实际上光棍的直接宣泄不是杀人，顶多是嫖娼和强奸，就算自卑，也顶多是多憋几年。你憋了一辈子了，想那啥，当然是去那啥。你杀人后还归案，那基本上就意味着，你未来N年，连女人的手都没机会碰了。当然了，这也只是常人思维。

anyway，按照光棍杀人理论，球报长文昭示了加拿大社会的失败根源。Play victim。也对。政治正确在各个层面上都在催生着各种的“victom”。所有应该明白，任何个人或者团体的失败，都不能完全归罪与别人。自己才是根源。然而，这一代年轻人似乎不太明白这个道理，只知道自己被bully被歧视。

这正是M103正在做的事情，很多人，你越是给，他就越会playvictim。这不完全是他们的错。也是整个社会道歉主义，政治正确，和极度偏左的结果。最终只会培养出更多的victom。

When young men play the victim – and then take the lives of others

JAMIL JIVANI
CONTRIBUTED TO THE GLOBE AND MAIL
PUBLISHED 3 DAYS AGOUPDATED 3 DAYS AGO
Jamil Jivani is the author of Why Young Men: Rage, Race and the Crisis of Identity.

Kanye West’s return to Twitter a few days ago has generated many headlines. Among his various fortune cookie-like declarations and political statements, one tweet in particular stuck with me: “Self-victimization is a disease.”

Since my hometown of Toronto was struck by a van attack on Monday, I’ve had many public and private conversations about this tragedy, in which 25 people were killed or injured. I keep coming back to Kanye’s tweet, because I think it inadvertently sums up what we know for sure in many incidents where young men consider themselves to be victims and then go on to take human lives.


As of this writing, 25-year-old suspect Alek Minassian’s motivations for driving into pedestrians on Yonge Street are unknown. Nothing has been officially said of radicalization or terror cells. Some have suggested Mr. Minassian belonged to misogynistic online groups made up of frustrated young men. Mr. Minassian could be a lone actor, as mass shooters in the United States tend to be. He could also be severely mentally ill.

Whatever details emerge, we know that playing the role of a victim is often at the root of the rage young men express as violence at this scale. The world has been unfair to them personally, these angry young men believe, or it has been unfair to others they identify with. One way or another, they say, their hometown or neighbourhood or rival gang deserves to suffer. Their moral compass allows for unspeakable acts because of the supposed injustices inflicted upon them or the moral corruption of everyone else.


Most people can relate to feeling deeply dissatisfied at some point as young adults. We don’t always have the families, jobs, love, money or governments that we wish we had. But it takes a heightened sense of self-victimization to project your personal dissatisfaction onto others and feel entitled to take a human life.

Ideologies that encourage young men to turn their personal dissatisfaction into violence promote self-victimization without restraint. This is true even for ideologies that are superficially very different from one another. As Amarnath Amarasingam and Julia Ebner of the counter-extremism organization ISD have explained, the worldviews of extremist groups are “terrifyingly intertwined.” Jihadist groups such as the Islamic State, for instance, promote a clash of civilizations between the West and Islam by convincing young Muslims (who are often recent religious converts) they are unhappy because Europe and North America are prejudiced, hateful places for Muslims. Far-right extremists and neo-Nazis similarly tell young white men that life is difficult because immigrants and diversity advocates are turning the West into a prejudiced, hateful place for whites.

Other ideologies that encourage violence, such as the inner-city gangster subculture responsible for many of Toronto’s 17 other homicide victims this year, similarly teach victimhood. Young men learn that being a gangster is acceptable if you’re poor or you need money you can’t easily get elsewhere. These gangsters are taught to think they’re victims of others’ immorality and as victims, they can justify being immoral in return, which is why so much gun violence is retaliatory.

Self-victimization has grown far beyond extremist groups or gangs. It has seeped into many parts of our society. The online groups Mr. Minassian is thought to have been a part of identify as involuntarily celibate men who may see themselves as victims of feminism, women and sexually prolific men. Some uses of terms like “male privilege” or “white privilege” advance a worldview that ranks identity groups from most to least victimized. Many university campuses have become places where hearing offensive or disagreeable speech is treated as equal to being a victim of physical violence. Even U.S. President Donald Trump, who takes up a lot of space in the minds of young people despite being disliked by so many, has consistently presented himself as a victim of his opponents in the news media, courts, FBI, Senate and Congress.

Following the van attack, Canada’s political leaders and most prominent media personalities were rightfully cautious about how they discussed the incident. They were careful to avoid the word terrorism and cut short any speculation that the van attack was connected to other national security threats. As these influential voices figure out how to shape the public conversation about this tragedy, they could learn something from Kanye West. We need to identify, call out and fight back against ideologies that encourage our young people to play the role of victim in our society and then act against us by taking human lives. We can’t stop every young man from being angry, but we can compete to influence him to do something positive and constructive with that anger.

 

[春风吹]

使用incel做动机，实在是lame。

实际上几乎所有的屠杀恐怖事件，都是男子。

能不能说，男性，作为一个状态，是屠杀的动机？