家长注意了：过分的定义又要改了。

[zhangulei]

S-206
Navigate Bills

An Act to amend the Criminal Code (protection of children against standard child-rearing violence)
Sponsor
Sen. Céline Hervieux-Payette
Last Stage Completed
Second Reading in the Senate (2018-05-31)
Progress:

S-206

Bill S-206 would completely eliminate section 43 from the Criminal Code of Canada. Section 43 is a common-sense provision for all parents and teachers. It states:

"Every school teacher, parent or person standing in the place of a parent is justified in using force by way of correction toward a pupil or child, as the case may be, who is under his care, if force does not exceed what is reasonable under the circumstances."

In other words, section 43 allows a parent to parent and a teacher to teach, without worry of undue scrutiny or interference from the police, social services, or the government.

Without section 43, any use of force would be automatically construed as assault. This would include the following:

• picking up and moving a child to another room
• stopping a child from doing something he wants to do
• removing toys or objects from a child's grasp
• enforcing a time-out
• stopping a child from leaving his room or leaving his house
• restraining a child against his will
• enforcing behaviour with a spank

According to statistics, 82% of Canadian parents will use some form of constructive physical discipline with their pre-teen children (2012). In the US, the figure is 86%.

是不是这个法案通过了。你的孩子随时随刻告你。你随时随刻犯罪。当然了孩子不是亲生的，你可以完全不用在意。

MAY the Force be with you 吧。

 

[zhangulei]

• enforcing a time-out

我是罪人。学校的老师也都是罪人。

 

[rottenmelon]

 

[月下独酌]

S-206
Navigate Bills

An Act to amend the Criminal Code (protection of children against standard child-rearing violence)
Sponsor
Sen. Céline Hervieux-Payette
Last Stage Completed
Second Reading in the Senate (2018-05-31)
Progress:

S-206

Bill S-206 would completely eliminate section 43 from the Criminal Code of Canada. Section 43 is a common-sense provision for all parents and teachers. It states:

"Every school teacher, parent or person standing in the place of a parent is justified in using force by way of correction toward a pupil or child, as the case may be, who is under his care, if force does not exceed what is reasonable under the circumstances."

In other words, section 43 allows a parent to parent and a teacher to teach, without worry of undue scrutiny or interference from the police, social services, or the government.

Without section 43, any use of force would be automatically construed as assault. This would include the following:

• picking up and moving a child to another room
• stopping a child from doing something he wants to do
• removing toys or objects from a child's grasp
• enforcing a time-out
• stopping a child from leaving his room or leaving his house
• restraining a child against his will
• enforcing behaviour with a spank

According to statistics, 82% of Canadian parents will use some form of constructive physical discipline with their pre-teen children (2012). In the US, the figure is 86%.

是不是这个法案通过了。你的孩子随时随刻告你。你随时随刻犯罪。当然了孩子不是亲生的，你可以完全不用在意。

MAY the Force be with you 吧。

买机票回国，回去再打

 

[zhangulei]

Quick Links to MY Canada National Communications on This Issue:
March 7th, 2017 – FAMILY ISSUES ALERT: Help us be a voice for family 1) Bill C-16 (Bathroom Spaces) 2) S-206 (Spanking) and 3) Ontario Bill 89

.

Overview:
Senate Bill S-206, currently being debated in the Senate, seeks to remove section 43 of the Criminal Code and would make it illegal for parents to use limited, minor physical force for disciplinary purposes.

Presently in Canada, section 43 of the Criminal Code permits disciplinary force that is sober and reasoned, that addresses actual behaviour, and is intended to restrain, control, or express symbolic disapproval of a child’s behaviour.

The section is carefully outlined to provide clear restrictions on the use of minor physical force for disciplinary purposes. These include:

• The child must between 2 and 12 years of age,
• and must have the capacity to understand and benefit from the correction.
• Force used must be reasonable and minor,
• must not harm or degrade the child,
• must not be based on the gravity of the wrongdoing,
• may not be applied out of frustration or loss of temper,
• may not involve objects such as rulers or belts,
• and may not be applied to the head.

.
Sponsorship and History in the Senate:
There have been a number of attempts to ban corporal punishment in Canada since 1997, none of which have succeeded. 7 of these bills were tabled by Senator Celine Hervieux-Payette from 2004-2015. This particular bill was also introduced and sponsored by Senator Hervieux-Payette, halted when she retired in April 2016, and then picked up by another Senator.

.

What’s Wrong with Bill S-206:
In 2004, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the constitutionality of section 43 stating that it supports the interests of children, parents and Canadian society. Bill S-206 would repeal section 43 of the Criminal Code without replacing it, meaning that even careful corrective force by loving parents would amount to assault. As it stands, section 43 provides important protection for parents from criminal liability and supports the parental duty to protect and educate their children.

To gain a exhaustive understand of all that is wrong with Bill S-206, please read Senator Donald Plett’s May 2014 speech opposing the bill.

.

“Without section 43, Canada’s broad assault law would criminalize force falling far short of what we think of as corporal punishment. The decision not to criminalize such conduct is not grounded in devaluation of the child, but in a concern that to do so risks ruining lives and breaking up families…”
– The Supreme Court of Canada

“This goes well beyond taking away a reasonable, responsible parents’ ability to spank. It takes away their ability to parent. By repealing section 43, the general assault provision of the Criminal Code would be applied to any parent, teacher or guardian who chooses to use force against a child without their consent. This means that a statutory defence based on a “reasonable correction” could no longer be used.
– Senator Donald Plett

 

[zhangulei]

CAS最高兴，生意来了。

 

[zhangulei]

买机票回国，回去再打

歪曲。
这里面只有一条涉及spanking。其他都跟打没有直接关系。

 

[zhangulei]

买机票回国，回去再打

为什么说左派是纳粹排外呢。这就是原因。
不服滚蛋。

 

[Jay Wang]

这个该喷谁，土豆，福胖？
别喷错了。

 

[zhangulei]

管他是谁。
反正2014年被驳回了，
2018年，这又来。
极端无极限。折腾真的是左派安身立命的本钱啊。

 

[月下独酌]

管他是谁。
反正2014年被驳回了，
2018年，这又来。
极端无极限。折腾真的是左派安身立命的本钱啊。

一会儿左派一会儿右派的
这label呼呼的给人贴着

lol

 

[zhangulei]

还真就是左派的玩意LOL。
by definition

 

[zhangulei]

“This goes well beyond taking away a reasonable, responsible parents’ ability to spank. It takes away their ability to parent.“

 

[zhangulei]

The Honourable
Céline Hervieux-Payette
PC

Leader of the Opposition in the Senate
In office
January 18, 2007 – November 3, 2008
Appointed by Stéphane Dion
Preceded by Dan Hays
Succeeded by Jim Cowan
Senator for Bedford, Quebec
In office
March 21, 1995 – April 22, 2016
Appointed by Jean Chrétien
Preceded by Paul David
Succeeded by Rosa Galvez
Member of the Canadian Parliament
for Mercier
In office
1979–1984
Preceded by Prosper Boulanger
Succeeded by Carole Jacques
Personal details
Born April 22, 1941 (age 77)
L'Assomption, Quebec
Political party Liberal (until 2014)
Independent Liberal
(2014-present)
Cabinet Minister of State (Fitness and Amateur Sport) (1983–1984)
Minister of State (Youth) (1984)
Portfolio Parliamentary Secretary to the Solicitor General of Canada (1980–1982)
Leader of the Opposition in the Senate (2007–2008)

是不是左派？

 

[longshan]

是左派

The Honourable
Céline Hervieux-Payette
PC

Leader of the Opposition in the Senate
In office
January 18, 2007 – November 3, 2008
Appointed by Stéphane Dion
Preceded by Dan Hays
Succeeded by Jim Cowan
Senator for Bedford, Quebec
In office
March 21, 1995 – April 22, 2016
Appointed by Jean Chrétien
Preceded by Paul David
Succeeded by Rosa Galvez
Member of the Canadian Parliament
for Mercier
In office
1979–1984
Preceded by Prosper Boulanger
Succeeded by Carole Jacques
Personal details
Born April 22, 1941 (age 77)
L'Assomption, Quebec
Political party Liberal (until 2014)
Independent Liberal
(2014-present)
Cabinet Minister of State (Fitness and Amateur Sport) (1983–1984)
Minister of State (Youth) (1984)
Portfolio Parliamentary Secretary to the Solicitor General of Canada (1980–1982)
Leader of the Opposition in the Senate (2007–2008)

是不是左派？