科普:灭活疫苗 灭活疫苗也有缺点,如接种剂量大、免疫期短、免疫途径单一等,而它最可怕的缺点是有时候会造成抗体依赖增强效应(ADE),使病毒感染加重,这是一种会导致疫苗研发失败的严重不良反应

贵圈

政府都对党
注册
2014-10-21
消息
32,821
荣誉分数
6,152
声望点数
373
技术路线:灭活疫苗是最传统的经典技术路线:即在体外培养新冠病毒,然后将其灭活,使之没有毒性,但这些病毒的“尸体”仍能刺激人体产生抗体,使免疫细胞记住病毒的模样。目前我国有3个灭活新冠疫苗进入临床研究,其中武汉生物制品研究所研发的新冠病毒灭活疫苗已进入2期临床研究。

优点:灭活疫苗的优点是制备方法简单快速,安全性比较高,它是应对急性疾病传播通常采用的手段。灭活疫苗很常见,我国常用的乙肝疫苗、脊灰灭活疫苗、乙脑灭活疫苗、百白破疫苗等都是灭活疫苗。

缺点:但灭活疫苗也有缺点,如接种剂量大、免疫期短、免疫途径单一等,而它最可怕的缺点是有时候会造成抗体依赖增强效应(ADE),使病毒感染加重,这是一种会导致疫苗研发失败的严重不良反应

未知因素:SARS2 RNA 非常不稳定。将来主要变异的出现基本上是肯定的,是不是会产生ADE?可能性有而且不小。

理性判词:
1. 非高危人群,能不打就不打。
2. 中国的优势是集中力量,快。安全顾虑少,免费(同时免道德审查)的测试疫苗的人群现成的,所以我预计疫苗大战,最后中国一定是先成功的。
3. 与HCQ相比,疫苗的安全顾虑可以说大大大大大大大大大得多。因此,我宁可使用HCQ,也不会使用弯道超车的疫苗。
4. 逻辑

a. 参与疫苗二期三期临床测试的人,被医学界广泛称为英雄。
b. 充分测试之前, 在未被告知全部潜在风险,而被忽悠打灭火疫苗的. 如果发生ADE,这些人就不一定是英雄了,必须叫悲情英雄。或者叫炮灰。
c. 这些人疫苗之后,还满街跑,哎,可怜。
 
最后编辑:
July 14.


MUST READ! COVID-19 Vaccine: Researchers Warn Rush To Develop Vaccine Could Backfire.Dangerous Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE) Could Occur
COVID-19 Vaccine: There are more than 140 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in development and the race for a successful candidate to help prevent COVID-19 is making many researchers jumpstart processes and in some cases even by pass safety protocols.

COVID-19-Vaccine-ADE.jpg


Although an effective and safe vaccine would be a major advance in the fight against COVID-19, there are challenges in evaluating the efficacy of these vaccines during the pandemic, as an analysis article outlines in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal). https://www.cmaj.ca/content/cmaj/early/2020/07/09/cmaj.201237.full.pdf

However before we even get to that report, Thailand Medical News would like to elaborate on one of the key considerations that was mentioned in that report and that is the issue of Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE) also known as disease enhancement or immune enhancement.

Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE) refers to a counter-intuitive and potentially dangerous situation: when the presence of antibodies, which are supposed to vanquish disease, worsens rather than quells an infection. It is a rare but not idle concern. The pandemic virus belongs to the same family of coronaviruses that causes Sars (severe acute respiratory syndrome) and Mers (Middle East respiratory syndrome). The hunt for vaccines for these 21st-century diseases: Sars appeared in 2002, Mers in 2012 has been stymied by evidence of ADE.


During that time, some animals that were given experimental Sars vaccines suffered more severe lung inflammation than unvaccinated animals when subsequently infected. As a result those trials stopped and there is still no effective Sars vaccine.

Dr Beate Kampmann, director of the Vaccine Centre at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), says that observations of ADE with previous coronaviruses mean vaccinologists must tread carefully. “We don’t want to blow the risks out of proportion but nobody can give a 100 per cent guarantee that disease enhancement won’t happen. If it does emerge here, it would be a very serious challenge.”

The emergence of ADE would be a setback for any candidate vaccine and a cruel plot twist in the tale of COVID-19, which has turned out to be a more disruptive contagion than either Sars or Mers.

Typically, vaccination builds a biological “memory” of the virus but without the danger of natural infection. If the virus does come knocking, a vaccinated body should be primed and ready to fight back.

However in ADE, that priming goes wrong. Instead of keeping the virus at bay, the immune system aids and abets the invader; the vaccine, which should prevent disease or make it milder, results in more severe symptoms.

When the phenomenon appeared in Sars research, vaccine development halted. But scientists cannot be sure it will always emerge during testing.

Dr Mike Turner, head of major science investments at the Wellcome Trust biomedical charity, which funds global vaccine research and played a significant role in the race for an Ebola vaccine told Thailand Medical News,
“It was only when Dengvaxia was rolled out to thousands of people that the problem of enhancement was picked up.”

Dr Anthony Fauci, who leads the US research response to Covid-19, said as much when interviewed about an eagerly anticipated COVID-19 vaccine, from the US company Moderna. He spoke of the need to balance the lives saved with those that might be endangered by ADE, “So, if for every one that has enhanced illness, you save a thousand lives, I’ll take that, right?”

In the Canadian report, the researchers advise that those evaluating vaccine efficacies must take into account the risk of infection in the population being studied, use of social distancing practices, rates of pre-existing immunity from earlier COVID-19 and factors that influence the likelihood of severe COVID-19.

Dr Bahaa Abu-Raya from BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, and coauthor of the report said, “The rapidly changing pattern and dynamic of virus exposure and level of population immunity during the evolving pandemic are potentially important confounders in the assessment of the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. This should be considered in sample size calculations for efficacy trials."

Certain key critical considerations that were brought up were:

-Proper and adequate sample sizes are needed to demonstrate effect of a vaccine in reducing disease and may need to be revised based on rates of SAR-CoV-2 transmission in study populations.

-Constant public health interventions such as social distancing may reduce transmission and affect ongoing assessment of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

-The baseline level of immunity could influence a trial outcome. For example, the benefit of a highly efficacious vaccine may not be evident in a population with high levels of previous exposure later in the pandemic.

-There is a possibility that COVID-19 might be more severe in some people who have been vaccinated (called antibody-dependent enhancement [ADE]). This should be monitored as vaccine-related ADE may be evident only after large numbers of vaccinated people have been exposed to the virus and followed for some time.

The researchers also emphasize the need to test vaccines in vulnerable populations such as seniors, health care workers, Black people and those with risk factors for severe disease and who may have a different response than younger, healthier trial participants.

Dr Manish Sadarangani, Director of the Vaccine Evaluation Center at BC Children's Hospital and Sauder Family Chair in Pediatric Infectious Diseases at the University of British Columbia and co-author also added, "The changing dynamics of the COVID-19 pandemic present a unique challenge for evaluating vaccines for SARS-CoV-2. Researchers need to understand the immune responses generated after infection with this virus and whether they are protective, as this will help to inform the development and evaluation of these vaccines."
 
怎样做疫苗,才能符合医学道德(尽科学所能,降低潜在ADE的可能)?

How do you go about creating a vaccine against a new virus?
Every virus has its unique challenges. In the case of n-coronavirus, the vaccine challenges are 2-fold. First, you have to interfere with the virus’s ability to dock with a specific receptor in the lungs called ACE2.

Then, you need to reduce the problem of antibody-dependent enhancement. ADE means that some respiratory virus vaccines can actually make things worse. There are multiple ways to solve this problem. One option is creating a vaccine that only uses parts of the pathogen to stimulate the immune system. One approach is to do this by producing recombinant protein subunit vaccines.

We have found that these vaccines that use a part of a protein of the virus (the spike protein) and known as the receptor binding domain (RBD) are optimal for 2 reasons: Recombinant proteins are a standard technology that has resulted in other licensed vaccines, including the hepatitis B and HPV vaccines; and it’s possible to produce this vaccine in abundance and at low cost.

Moreover, this approach, unlike many others, reduces ADE and has potential for being safe.
 
有一种策略就是,我们肯定知道安全疫苗(非灭活),可以在短时间推出。那么,我可以先使用灭活,然后等待, 等待期间不出国(出国会接触新病毒株)。然后死等安全疫苗的完善出笼。

这种策略,对于低人口流动国家中的高危人群,或许是个办法。 比如第一线医生。
 
最后编辑:
就你聪明。

死等安全疫苗的结果是,等死了也没有绝对安全的疫苗。
 
新冠疫苗动物实验出炉 需再测试ADE效应
赵鹏宇
2020-04-22 12:49:52
秦川团队的灭活疫苗PiCoVacc的动物试验结果是全球首个公开动物试验结果的疫苗,研究表明疫苗安全有效。
日前,全球首个新冠疫苗动物实验数据出炉。

d13c401a7575af1917dc902bf7bc70ff.jpeg
图源:视觉中国

4月20日晚间,由中国医学科学院秦川团队领衔,联合北京科兴生物技术有限公司等多家单位合作,在预印本bioRxiv上传了题为“Rapid development of an inactivated vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 ”的研究文章。该研究是新冠病毒(SARS-CoV-2)灭活病毒疫苗(PiCoVacc)的临床前动物模型的中试(pilot-scale)研究,也是目前为止公开报道的第一个SARS-CoV-2疫苗动物实验结果。

640.jpeg
图源:网络

根据文章摘要,该SARS-CoV-2病毒灭活候选疫苗可以在小鼠、大鼠和非人类灵长动物中产生特异性中和抗体。通过对恒河猴临床症状、血液生化指标的监测,研究者系统评价该疫苗效果良好,具有较好的安全性。这些数据也支持了SARS-CoV-2人用疫苗的快速临床开发。

目前,国内从5条技术路线开展的新冠疫苗研制工作,均已经在动物模型上开展了有效性评价,其中部分疫苗完成了动物实验,进入了临床试验。

秦川此前在接受媒体采访时表示,动物模型就是在实验室里研制的“病人”。任何一种药物和疫苗,在进入临床应用前,都需要动物模型这种特殊的“病人”来检验其有效性。

疫苗与科学领域研究专家陶黎纳4月21日对时代财经表示,动物模型的建立和研究对于疫苗的安全有效性确有一定意义,但对于疫苗安全性问题也不必过于担心。“疫苗本质是一种微生物,人类长久以来一直在与各种微生物打交道,而人体对于微生物所产生的反应已经较为明了,并不会出现意想不到的情况。”

候选疫苗产生高滴度抗体

当前, SARS-CoV-2疫苗正在多途径紧急开发中,国内已有3个疫苗获批进入临床试验,其中陈薇院士团队研发的腺病毒载体疫苗已经进入II期人体临床试验。

640-2_meitu_2.jpg
图源:网络

而秦川团队实验中所采用的灭活疫苗是一种经典疫苗形式,具有很好的安全性和有效性,此前已经在疫苗研发中得到广泛应用,例如大众所熟知的流感病毒疫苗和脊髓灰质炎疫苗等。

陶黎纳表示,相比其他疫苗技术产生直接针对病毒S蛋白的抗体,灭活疫苗有所不同。“由于灭活疫苗是一整个病毒体,不像其他新冠疫苗那样只产生针对病毒S蛋白的抗体,灭活疫苗产生的抗体比较复杂,一般用中和抗体去评价对病毒的抑制效果。”

此次,研究人员从11名中国、意大利、瑞士、英国、西班牙等新冠肺炎确诊患者的支气管肺泡灌洗液中分离出了新冠病毒毒株,包含新冠病毒毒株的11个样本广泛分布在所有可用基因序列构成的系统发育树上。而研究人员选择了其中一个毒株,开发出了纯化灭活的SARS-CoV-2病毒疫苗PiCoVacc。

为了评价该候选疫苗的免疫原性,研究者在小鼠中进行了不同剂量的试验,结果显示,SARS-CoV-2的特异性免疫球蛋白迅速被诱导出来,并在第六周达到峰值。其中,特异性免疫球蛋白占病毒S蛋白抗体反应的一半,表明其是主要的免疫原,这一结果也与恢复期的COVID-19患者的血清学特征相似。

陶黎纳表示,从试验情况来看,PiCoVacc诱导出了更高滴度的S蛋白特异性抗体,这也可能说明了该疫苗能够引发更有效的抗体反应。

陶黎纳进一步对时代财经指出,“试验中注射的疫苗剂量相对精确,所以有把握可以产生更高的抗体,但在自然感染新冠病毒的情况下,患者身上会出现很多不确定性,例如产生的抗体量很低甚至不产生抗体等情况。”

结合实验结果,研究人员还表示,目前还不能确定SARS-CoV-2感染的最佳动物模型,但是恒河猴是研究SARS-CoV-2感染很有希望的动物模型。

陶黎纳也认为,试验中动物模型的选择很多,选择与人类体制更接近的灵长类动物做相应的试验,这样得出的数据会相对有把握一些。

随后研究者在恒河猴中进行攻毒实验,首先接种疫苗,在第0、7和14天接种三次两种剂量(3ug和6ug),结果显示,S蛋白的异性的IgG和中和抗体在第2周被诱导出来,并在第3周继续增加。滴度与恢复期的COVID-19患者的血清相似。随后研究者在第22日进行攻毒(通过气管内途径将新冠病毒毒株直接接种到动物肺中),结果显示,与对照组相比,接种过疫苗的恒河猴病毒肺部组织病理变化显著减小。此外,病毒载量也显著下降,在6ug组感染后第七天,咽喉、肛门和肺部都检测不到病毒。

d1160924ab18972b8231fb2ed747f08f9f510a5f.jpeg
PiCoVacc在非人类灵长类动物中的免疫原性和保护功效,图A为接种后SARS-CoV-2-特异性IgG反应;图B为接种后和感染后恒河猴体内中和抗体滴度;图C、D、E分别代表恒河猴咽部、肛门和肺部的病毒载量,蓝色代表中等剂量组,粉色代表高剂量组

新冠疫苗或存在ADE效应

值得一提的是,虽然研究人员观察到在感染前,中等剂量组(3ug)体内存在较低的中和抗体滴度,可能提供部分保护,但不同剂量组中任何接种过疫苗的恒河猴均未观察到ADE效应。

ADE效应即抗体依赖性增强,指的是原本通过注射疫苗后应当形成抵抗病毒的抗体,因某些原因反而使病毒的感染性增强,为病毒“助攻”。

陶黎纳向时代财经进一步解释称,此前一种治疗蚊媒传染病的登革热疫苗被发现有比较明显的ADE效应,部分注射过该疫苗的人再次感染产生了更严重的反应。

“ADE效应仅明确出现在了登革热疫苗上,其他疫苗还没有发现,对这个问题需要关注,但不必太担心。”陶黎纳说。

不过,对于“新冠疫苗可能存在ADE效应”的消息并非空穴来风。

时代财经注意到,2019年,袁国勇团队曾发表一项使用中国猕猴进行的SARS-CoV感染与疫苗尝试的研究,该疫苗最终产生了ADE效应,使用了疫苗的猕猴因感染而造成的肺部损伤比对照组更严重。同样,针对冠状病毒MARS,有研究人员在此前的实验室试验中也观察到过ADE效应。

目前秦川团队发布的的动物试验结果中明确表示,疫苗没有观察到ADE效应。

陶黎纳认为,“仅一次试验还不足以说明后续的灭活疫苗试验都不出现ADE效应,目前依然存在很大不确定性,需要接下来更多试验验证。”

值得一提的是,此次与秦川团队联合发布该结果的北京科兴生物制品有限公司,是中国唯一一家在美上市的疫苗企业科兴控股的控股子公司。此前,该公司曾研制并完成全球第一支SARS病毒灭活疫苗一期临床研究,研制出中国第一支甲型肝炎灭活疫苗、中国第一支甲型乙型肝炎联合疫苗、全球第一支甲型H1N1流感疫苗。

同时,该公司旗下另一子公司北京科兴中维生物技术有限公司研制的新型冠状病毒灭活疫苗克尔来福,已于4月13日进入人体临床试验阶段,目前第一批志愿者已完成接种。
 
理论上当然是有可能发生ADE。
实际是,中国的灭活疫苗已经在多个国家几万人参与的实验中,已经两个月了。没发生ADE。

一切理论都是灰色的。
实践是检验真理的唯一标准。
 
作为个人,如果老百姓知道有可能产生ADE,且明确知道ADE是多恐怖。仍然愿意当英雄,

卧槽,这是真英雄,看来中国百姓真英雄!
 
ADE的出现,前提是,抗体浓度降低,且,有新毒株出现在身边

不是不出,时候还没到。
 
中国的疫苗到国外实验,就是面对新毒株。
 
最后编辑:
后退
顶部