提请作废22万张威州选票 川普阵营继续上诉获受理

happy 2016

初级会员
注册
2016-01-12
消息
555
荣誉分数
226
声望点数
53

提请作废22万张威州选票 川普阵营继续上诉获受理​

文章来源: CNA 于 2020-12-12 11:11:16 - 新闻取自各大新闻媒体,新闻内容并不代表本网立场!
(被阅读 8074 次)

川普阵营在威斯康辛州提告,想诉请法官裁定22万1000多张票无效以在这个战场州翻盘,官司今天被驳后他旋即上诉,保守派掌控的威斯康辛州最高院同意周末审理。

美联社报导,威州最高法院决定受理此案,预定明天聆听论点,时机点就在选举人团预定14日投票前48小时,非常不寻常。因为就在几小时前,下级法院才驳回,表示没有任何关于威州两大郡选举或后续重新计票违法情事。

川普阵营和盟友选后采遍地开花式的法律战,但已在多个州遭遇连串挫败,联邦最高法院今天也刚驳回德州寻求大选翻盘的诉讼。


威州最高法院先前拒绝本案在未经下级法院审理前就直接承审。多数法官也曾公开质疑,川普要求判定这些选票无效是否适当。

但川普阵营现在有机会在威州最高法院提出论据。保守派法官在威州最高法院以4比3占多数。

川普阵营今天稍早在威州下级法院吞败,法官希马内克(Stephen Simanek)否定川普阵营对威州两大郡选票提出异议的每个论点,表示选务管理正当,没有川普指称的违法情事,“最重要的是法院应尽一切努力确保选民意愿至上”。

川普阵营随即上诉,律师团要求判决结果在1月6日国会批准选举人团投票结果之前出炉。

拜登在威州只多赢川普约2万1000票,差距仅0.6%,让川普阵营得以要求在两大郡密尔瓦基郡(Milwaukee County)和戴恩郡(Dane County)重新计票。川普阵营没有在他赢得的郡内提出任何异议。
 

Seraph72

知名会员
注册
2013-09-24
消息
1,314
荣誉分数
540
声望点数
123

川普阵营没有在他赢得的郡内提出任何异议。​


这不就点睛了吗?只有他输的州和县有选举作弊,他赢了理所当然,他输了就一定是作弊,你妈还有比这更无耻的人么?以后选举败选者有样学样,都特么这么闹一场,Trump声称的拯救美国就是这么拯救的?
 

lindamy

时代广场舞照跳
VIP
注册
2005-11-23
消息
25,238
荣誉分数
6,289
声望点数
373
Newsmax: Trump Loses Wisconsin Case While Arguing Another One
Saturday, 12 December 2020 02:33 PM

President Donald Trump lost a federal lawsuit Saturday while his attorney was arguing his case before a skeptical Wisconsin Supreme Court in another lawsuit that liberal justices said “smacks of racism” and would disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of voters only in the state's most diverse counties.

U.S. District Judge Brett Ludwig, a Trump appointee, dismissed Trump's federal lawsuit asking the court to order the Republican-controlled Legislature to name Trump the winner over Democrat Joe Biden. The judge said Trump's arguments “fail as a matter of law and fact.”


The ruling came as Trump's attorney in a state case faced a barrage of questions about his claims from both liberal and conservative justices on the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

Trump is trying to overturn his loss to Biden in the state by disqualifying more than 221,000 votes in Wisconsin's two most heavily Democratic counties. Trump is not challenging any votes in counties he won.

“This lawsuit, Mr. Troupis, smacks of racism," Justice Jill Karofsky said to Trump's attorney Jim Troupis early in his arguments. "I do not know how you can come before this court and possibly ask for a remedy that is unheard of in U.S. history. ... It is not normal.”

Justice Rebecca Dallet, like Karofsky another liberal justice, questioned why Trump didn't raise his same concerns about the absentee ballot process in the 2016 election that he won in Wisconsin. Troupis said Trump was not an aggrieved party that year.

Conservative Justice Rebecca Bradley questioned how the court could reject more than 28,000 ballots of people who said they were indefinitely confined given that it would include people who properly claimed that status.

Wisconsin's highest court agreed to take the case at Trump's urgent request Friday, soon after a state judge ruled against him and with Monday's Electoral College vote bearing down and the state's 10 electoral votes about to go to Biden.

The court is controlled 4-3 by conservatives, but its willingness to take the case isn't necessarily an indicator of how it will rule. The court previously refused to hear the case before it went through lower courts, and a majority of justices have openly questioned whether the remedy Trump seeks is appropriate.

Trump sought to have more than 221,000 ballots disqualified in Dane and Milwaukee counties. He wanted to disqualify absentee ballots cast early and in-person, saying there wasn’t a proper written request made for the ballots; absentee ballots cast by people who claimed “indefinitely confined” status; absentee ballots collected by poll workers at Madison parks; and absentee ballots where clerks filled in missing information on ballot envelopes.

The circuit judge on Friday ruled that none of Trump’s arguments had merit and that state law was followed during the election and subsequent recount.

Biden won Wisconsin by about 20,600 votes, a margin of 0.6% that withstood a Trump-requested recount in Milwaukee and Dane counties.

Trump and his allies have suffered dozens of defeats in Wisconsin and across the country in lawsuits that rely on unsubstantiated claims of widespread fraud and election abuse. On Friday evening, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a Texas lawsuit that sought to invalidate Biden’s win by throwing out millions of votes in four battleground states, including Wisconsin.

Also Saturday, former Trump campaign attorney Sidney Powell asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear a federal case she lost in Wisconsin seeking to order the GOP-controlled Legislature to declare Trump the winner. Powell has also lost similar cases in Georgia and Arizona.
 
最后编辑:

lindamy

时代广场舞照跳
VIP
注册
2005-11-23
消息
25,238
荣誉分数
6,289
声望点数
373
这个就是花了3百万重数的那两个县,原来拜登的胜率分别在70%和75%的。数了几次只是多丢了80多张票而已。
 

RareEarth

资深人士
注册
2012-10-10
消息
5,561
荣誉分数
2,310
声望点数
273
没有必要再提保守派掌控威州高院。只要是滥诉就没花头。
不过什么党,什么派。法官只要有底线,就不会枉法。
 
顶部