问chatgpt,得到的回答

贵圈

政府都对党
注册
2014-10-21
消息
32,808
荣誉分数
6,137
声望点数
373
在过去30年,森林面积下降10%。海洋植物下降,可能超过10%。 植物减少,CO2平衡破坏,CO2被植物吸收的量下降10%。这10%的植物的尸体本身代谢释放的碳反而增加了大气碳含量。 里外里,仅仅植物总量缩减数据,就可以解释15%的CO2增长。 数据显示,CO2同期增长16%。 那么,以长远眼光看,只要恢复10%的森林和海洋植物量,只要有心减少真正的环境污染和环境破坏,对抗温室气体,绰绰有余。 为什么对抗气候的努力中,森林和海洋植物的保护和恢复, 没有占据最重要的位置?


chatgpt

保护和恢复森林和海洋植物是对抗气候变化的重要措施之一,但它可能没有被赋予足够的重要性,是因为环保问题是一个复杂的、综合性的问题,它不仅涉及到自然资源的保护和管理,还包括经济、政治、文化和社会等各个方面。以下是可能导致保护和恢复森林和海洋植物没有占据最重要位置的原因:
  1. 利益冲突:一些人认为保护和恢复森林和海洋植物可能会影响他们的利益,例如砍伐木材和渔业。这些人可能会反对采取这些措施,并对政策提出质疑,使得政策难以推进。
  2. 没有明显的经济回报:保护和恢复森林和海洋植物需要大量的资金和资源,但它们的经济回报通常不会立竿见影,这可能使得政策制定者更倾向于采取经济效益更显著的措施。
  3. 缺乏政策支持:政策制定者可能没有充分的意识到保护和恢复森林和海洋植物对应对气候变化的重要性,或者他们可能没有足够的政治动力来推动这些政策的实施。
  4. 其他优先事项:在面对多个环境和社会问题时,政策制定者可能会将保护和恢复森林和海洋植物的重要性降低,因为他们认为其他问题更为紧迫或更易解决。
综上所述,保护和恢复森林和海洋植物是对抗气候变化的重要措施,但它可能没有占据最重要的位置,是因为环保问题是一个综合性的问题,涉及到多个方面的利益和政策制定者可能对其他问题更感兴趣或更易解决。
 
在过去30年,森林面积下降10%。海洋植物下降,可能超过10%。 植物减少,CO2平衡破坏,CO2被植物吸收的量下降10%。这10%的植物的尸体本身代谢释放的碳反而增加了大气碳含量。 里外里,仅仅植物总量缩减数据,就可以解释15%的CO2增长。 数据显示,CO2同期增长16%。 那么,以长远眼光看,只要恢复10%的森林和海洋植物量,只要有心减少真正的环境污染和环境破坏,对抗温室气体,绰绰有余。 为什么对抗气候的努力中,森林和海洋植物的保护和恢复, 没有占据最重要的位置?

另一个ai

在对抗气候变化的努力中,森林和海洋植物的保护和恢复非常重要,但这个问题可能没有得到足够的关注。这可能是因为森林和海洋生态系统的保护和恢复需要更长时间的投入和努力,而且可能需要更多的国际合作。此外,其他因素,如减少化石燃料的使用和增加可再生能源的使用,也被认为是应对气候变化的重要措施。但是,保护和恢复森林和海洋植物仍然是减缓气候变化的重要举措,应该得到更多的关注和支持。
 
在过去30年,森林面积下降10%。海洋植物下降,可能超过10%。 植物减少,CO2平衡破坏,CO2被植物吸收的量下降10%。这10%的植物的尸体本身代谢释放的碳反而增加了大气碳含量。 里外里,仅仅植物总量缩减数据,就可以解释15%的CO2增长。 数据显示,CO2同期增长16%。 那么,以长远眼光看,只要恢复10%的森林和海洋植物量,只要有心减少真正的环境污染和环境破坏,对抗温室气体,绰绰有余。Please review and comment on this statement from what you know about earth.

追问另一个AI,是否同意关于植物恢复的判断。回答

The statement is partly true. It is indeed important to protect and restore forests and marine plants in order to combat climate change. Forests act as carbon sinks, absorbing and storing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Similarly, marine plants, such as phytoplankton, also absorb carbon dioxide through the process of photosynthesis. However, the statement oversimplifies the issue by suggesting that restoring 10% of the lost forest and marine plant cover is enough to address climate change. While it is important to restore these ecosystems, it is just one of many steps that need to be taken to address the complex issue of climate change. Other measures such as reducing greenhouse gas emissions and transitioning to renewable energy sources are also critical in mitigating climate change.
 
这是废话,我当然 oversimplified,具体计算甚至分析,必须有年收入百万的众多气候专家来做。但是,AI无法找出我的推算里,有违反逻辑的问题。
 
同样问题问chatgpt

The statement highlights the significant decline in forest and ocean plant areas over the past 30 years and suggests that this loss of vegetation has contributed to an imbalance in the CO2 cycle, with CO2 absorption by plants decreasing and CO2 released by decaying plant matter increasing atmospheric carbon content. The statement also implies that restoring 10% of the lost vegetation could mitigate the effects of greenhouse gases and environmental pollution.

While it is true that the decline in vegetation cover has negative impacts on the environment and the CO2 cycle, the issue is more complex than just the total area of vegetation. Restoration efforts should focus not only on increasing the area of vegetation cover but also on restoring diverse and healthy ecosystems that can support the complex interactions between species and contribute to the natural processes that regulate climate and other environmental factors.

Furthermore, while increasing vegetation cover can help mitigate the effects of greenhouse gases, it is only one part of the solution. Reducing emissions from human activities, such as transportation, industry, and agriculture, is also critical in addressing climate change and protecting the environment.

In summary, while the statement highlights important issues related to the decline in vegetation cover and its impact on the environment, the solutions are more complex than simply increasing vegetation area. A comprehensive approach that considers ecological restoration, reduction in emissions, and sustainable development practices is needed to address the environmental challenges we face.

该声明强调了过去 30 年森林和海洋植物面积的显着减少,并表明植被的这种损失导致了二氧化碳循环的不平衡,植物对二氧化碳的吸收减少,腐烂的植物物质释放的二氧化碳增加了大气中的碳 内容。 该声明还暗示,恢复 10% 的消失植被可以减轻温室气体和环境污染的影响。

虽然植被覆盖率的下降确实对环境和二氧化碳循环产生负面影响,但这个问题比植被总面积更复杂。 恢复工作不仅应侧重于增加植被覆盖面积,还应侧重于恢复多样化和健康的生态系统,这些生态系统可以支持物种之间复杂的相互作用,并有助于调节气候和其他环境因素的自然过程。

此外,虽然增加植被覆盖有助于减轻温室气体的影响,但这只是解决方案的一部分。 减少交通、工业和农业等人类活动的排放对于应对气候变化和保护环境也至关重要。

总而言之,虽然该声明强调了与植被覆盖率下降及其对环境影响相关的重要问题,但解决方案比简单地增加植被面积要复杂得多。 需要一种综合考虑生态恢复、减排和可持续发展实践的方法来应对我们面临的环境挑战。
 
加拿大的森林资源已经为地球吸收了足够多的碳,可是土豆依然坚持每个加拿大人交碳税,没有天理。
 
1.chatgpt的总结能力相当出色。把我的质询,更加理论性地总结出来。牛逼。

”该声明强调了过去 30 年森林和海洋植物面积的显着减少,并表明植被的这种损失导致了二氧化碳循环的不平衡,植物对二氧化碳的吸收减少,腐烂的植物物质释放的二氧化碳增加了大气中的碳 内容。 该声明还暗示,恢复 10% 的消失植被可以减轻温室气体和环境污染的影响。“

2.chatgpt故意歪曲我的意思,我说的所谓植物总量,当然是可持续的植物,可持续,自然是指的高质量的,高多样性的森林和海洋植物。不过也不能说chatgpt错。

”虽然植被覆盖率的下降确实对环境和二氧化碳循环产生负面影响,但这个问题比植被总面积更复杂。 恢复工作不仅应侧重于增加植被覆盖面积,还应侧重于恢复多样化和健康的生态系统,这些生态系统可以支持物种之间复杂的相互作用,并有助于调节气候和其他环境因素的自然过程。“

3.在无法用数据或者理论否定我的质询时,chatgpt咨询他的驯兽师的政治正确说法,很自然地,不需要证明滴,重新强调减排。依然是一条忠犬。

”此外,虽然增加植被覆盖有助于减轻温室气体的影响,但这只是解决方案的一部分。 减少交通、工业和农业等人类活动的排放对于应对气候变化和保护环境也至关重要。“
 
(Washington, D.C. – September 27, 2022) Automakers and battery manufacturers worldwide will spend more than $626 billion through 2030 to develop new electric cars. If we invest $626 billion in forest and ocean plant protection and restoration, we may see a better further in terms of climate.



It is true that investing in forest and ocean plant protection and restoration can have significant positive impacts on the environment and climate. Restoring degraded ecosystems can help absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, improve air and water quality, and support biodiversity.
However, it is important to note that investing in electric cars and investing in ecosystem restoration are not mutually exclusive options. In fact, both efforts can complement each other in the fight against climate change. For example, electric cars can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector, while ecosystem restoration can help mitigate the impacts of climate change by sequestering carbon and protecting ecosystems from the impacts of climate change.
Moreover, the $626 billion investment in electric cars is spread over a period of 10 years and involves not only automakers and battery manufacturers but also research institutions, policymakers, and other stakeholders. Therefore, redirecting this entire investment towards ecosystem restoration may not be feasible or practical.
Instead, a comprehensive approach that includes investment in both electric cars and ecosystem restoration, as well as other climate mitigation and adaptation strategies, can be a more effective way to address the challenges of climate change.


What is the investment on forest and ocean plant restoration in 2020?



I'm sorry, but as an AI language model, I do not have access to real-time or current data. However, according to a report by the United Nations, the world spent approximately $16 billion on forest restoration and conservation in 2020. It is worth noting that this amount includes both public and private sector investments, as well as funds from international organizations and philanthropic groups. While this investment represents a significant step towards addressing deforestation and promoting ecosystem restoration, much more needs to be done to achieve global restoration goals and mitigate the impacts of climate change.


If we add 10 time more investment on forest and ocean plant restoration, do you think we can see a real recovery of global plant quantity and health?



Investing more in forest and ocean plant restoration can certainly have a significant positive impact on the health and quantity of plant life on a global scale. However, the exact amount of investment required to achieve a full recovery of plant quantity and health would depend on various factors, including the extent of deforestation and degradation, the scale of restoration efforts, and the success of the restoration strategies.
Furthermore, ecosystem restoration is a complex process that involves many variables, including soil quality, climate, and biodiversity. Therefore, it is unlikely that simply investing 10 times more in restoration efforts would guarantee a complete recovery of global plant quantity and health.
That being said, investing significantly more in forest and ocean plant restoration would undoubtedly have many positive impacts, including reducing carbon emissions, improving air and water quality, promoting biodiversity, and supporting the livelihoods of local communities. Investing in restoration efforts would also help prevent further degradation of ecosystems and promote sustainable land use practices, which would be essential for achieving global climate and environmental goals.


But if we are not dramatically increasing our effort in forest and ocean now, the plant volume will keep on declining, there is no hope to see a reverse of global warming. right?



It is true that without a significant increase in efforts to protect and restore forests and oceans, the decline of plant volumes will likely continue, which could exacerbate the impacts of climate change. Forests and oceans play a crucial role in regulating the Earth's climate, and the loss of plant life in these ecosystems can contribute to increased greenhouse gas emissions and climate change.
Therefore, it is essential to take urgent action to protect and restore forests and oceans. This includes measures such as reducing deforestation and forest degradation, promoting sustainable land use practices, and investing in restoration efforts. Additionally, efforts to address climate change, such as transitioning to cleaner energy sources and reducing greenhouse gas emissions, can also help mitigate the impacts of climate change on ecosystems and biodiversity.
While the task of protecting and restoring forests and oceans can seem daunting, there is still hope for positive change. By working together and taking urgent action, we can help protect the health and diversity of our planet's ecosystems and mitigate the impacts of climate change.
 
我们两算是达成一致了,不过显然过去几十年,从来没有听到任何西方政府紧急地以气候原因,大幅度投资森林和海洋。不知道是政府聪明,还是我们哥俩太傻?
 


这个给拜登点赞,虽然太微小,太不足道。但是总算做了点事儿。下面评论一篇骂声,不是因为环保。
 
后退
顶部