38岁的犹太律师见义勇为,反击恐怖分子后,举手下跪敞开衬衫,还是被以色列士兵射杀

metropolis

本站元老
注册
2010-12-10
消息
8,173
荣誉分数
1,475
声望点数
323

谷歌翻译:​

以色列特拉维夫(美联社)——上周巴勒斯坦枪手开始向耶路撒冷一个繁忙的公交车站开枪后几秒钟,尤瓦尔·卡斯尔曼冲向现场并向袭击者开枪——结果被一名以色列士兵开枪打死,这名士兵显然怀疑他 也是一名袭击者。

安全摄像机镜头中可以看到卡斯尔曼跪下、举起双手并打开衬衫以表明他不是威胁,这突显了批评者所说的以色列士兵、警察和武装公民过度使用武力的流行病。 疑似巴勒斯坦袭击者。

“他采取了一切必要措施,以便能够正确识别他的身份,”卡斯尔曼的父亲摩西周日告诉以色列陆军电台,“但他们不断向他开枪。”

巴勒斯坦分析人士戴安娜·布图表示,这一事件反映了巴勒斯坦人长期以来所忍受的现实。 她说,考虑到自战争以来紧张局势加剧,加上巴勒斯坦人认为系统性地过度使用武力以及促使更多以色列人携带武器,卡斯尔曼的死亡方式——双臂举起,膝盖着地——并不令她感到惊讶。

“有人以这种方式被枪杀实际上只是时间问题,”她说。

An Israeli raced to confront Palestinian attackers. He was then killed by an Israeli soldier​

FILE - People look at Israeli police officers and volunteers from the Zaka rescue service work at the shooting attack in Jerusalem, Thursday, Nov. 30, 2023. The shooting death of an Israeli man who raced to confront Palestinian attackers has raised questions about the use of excessive force among Israeli security forces and the public. The man's shooting mirrors previous incidents where Israeli security forces or civilians have opened fire on attackers who no longer appear to pose a threat or on suspected assailants or unarmed civilians. (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg, File)

1 of 3 |
FILE - People look at Israeli police officers and volunteers from the Zaka rescue service work at the shooting attack in Jerusalem, Thursday, Nov. 30, 2023. The shooting death of an Israeli man who raced to confront Palestinian attackers has raised questions about the use of excessive force among Israeli security forces and the public. The man’s shooting mirrors previous incidents where Israeli security forces or civilians have opened fire on attackers who no longer appear to pose a threat or on suspected assailants or unarmed civilians. (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg, File)
FILE - Volunteers from the Zaka rescue service remove a body killed in the shooting attack in Jerusalem, Thursday, Nov. 30, 2023. The shooting death of an Israeli man who raced to confront Palestinian attackers has raised questions about the use of excessive force among Israeli security forces and the public. The man's shooting mirrors previous incidents where Israeli security forces or civilians have opened fire on attackers who no longer appear to pose a threat or on suspected assailants or unarmed civilians. (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg, File)

2 of 3 |
FILE - Volunteers from the Zaka rescue service remove a body killed in the shooting attack in Jerusalem, Thursday, Nov. 30, 2023. The shooting death of an Israeli man who raced to confront Palestinian attackers has raised questions about the use of excessive force among Israeli security forces and the public. The man’s shooting mirrors previous incidents where Israeli security forces or civilians have opened fire on attackers who no longer appear to pose a threat or on suspected assailants or unarmed civilians. (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg, File)
Read More
FILE - Israeli police officer and volunteers from the Zaka rescue service work at the shooting attack in Jerusalem, Thursday, Nov. 30, 2023. The shooting death of an Israeli man who raced to confront Palestinian attackers has raised questions about the use of excessive force among Israeli security forces and the public. The man's shooting mirrors previous incidents where Israeli security forces or civilians have opened fire on attackers who no longer appear to pose a threat or on suspected assailants or unarmed civilians. (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg, File)

3 of 3 |
FILE - Israeli police officer and volunteers from the Zaka rescue service work at the shooting attack in Jerusalem, Thursday, Nov. 30, 2023. The shooting death of an Israeli man who raced to confront Palestinian attackers has raised questions about the use of excessive force among Israeli security forces and the public. The man’s shooting mirrors previous incidents where Israeli security forces or civilians have opened fire on attackers who no longer appear to pose a threat or on suspected assailants or unarmed civilians. (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg, File)
Read More

BY TIA GOLDENBERG
Updated 3:51 PM GMT-5, December 3, 2023

TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — Seconds after Palestinian gunmen began shooting up a busy Jerusalem bus stop last week, Yuval Castleman raced toward the scene and opened fire on the attackers — only to be shot and killed by an Israeli soldier who apparently suspected he was also an assailant.

The shooting of Castleman, who in security camera footage is seen kneeling, raising his hands and flinging open his shirt to indicate he isn’t a threat, underscores what critics say is an epidemic of excessive force by Israeli soldiers, police and armed citizens against suspected Palestinian attackers.

“He took all the necessary steps so that he could be properly identified,” Castleman’s father, Moshe, told Israeli Army Radio on Sunday, “and they kept shooting at him.”

Castleman’s shooting mirrors previous incidents where Israeli security forces or civilians have opened fire on attackers who no longer appear to pose a threat, or on suspected assailants or unarmed civilians deemed to be threats.

The incident comes as tensions have been inflamed by the war between Israel and Hamas, with Israelis on edge and bracing for further attacks. It also coincides with a drive by Israel’s national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, to ramp up the number of gun-toting civilians.

Palestinians and human rights groups have long accused Israeli forces of using excessive force, killing attackers who no longer posed a threat and even harming innocent people mistaken for attackers and then skirting accountability.

Early Thursday, as the entrance to Jerusalem was swelling with traffic, two Hamas militants exited their car at a bus stop and opened fire on waiting commuters, killing three. In security camera footage, Castleman is seen running from the other side of the busy highway, brandishing his gun and shooting at the attackers. Soldiers are also seen opening fire.

Castleman, a 38-year-old lawyer who was on his way to work, is seen appearing to flee the gunshots. He then kneels, raises his arms and opens his shirt before he is shot.

His family is demanding to know how the heroism of their son culminated in his killing.

Israeli authorities are investigating the incident and police said initial findings showed one of the soldiers “mistakenly suspected” Castleman was an attacker. Castleman, a resident of a Jerusalem suburb, had previously worked in the Israeli security forces, according to his father, and used his own gun against the attackers. He was shot in the jaw, chin and stomach.

The soldier, identified by Israeli media as reservist Aviad Frija, told Israeli Channel 14 TV that he was active among “hilltop youth” — a term used to refer to radicalized Jewish teen squatters on hilltops in the occupied West Bank who have been known to attack Palestinians and their property.

Frija was not asked about Castleman’s shooting. But he boasted about killing the attackers, saying doing so was every soldier’s goal.

Hilltop youth are politically aligned with Ben-Gvir, a disciple of a racist rabbi, who as the minister in charge of police has been leading a drive to proliferate arms among civilians by loosening the criteria for acquiring a gun permit. Ben-Gvir said Thursday’s attack proved his policies were needed.

“Weapons save lives. We see this time after time. Everywhere there are arms, citizens, police, soldiers save lives,” he said at the scene, without referring to Castleman. Ben-Gvir has also pushed for a national guard force he says is meant to fill in gaps where police are spread thin. Critics say it would amount to his own personal militia.

Asked about the shooting on Saturday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he supported Ben-Gvir’s policy to increase access to weapons even if it meant civilians like Castleman could be killed.

“The presence of armed civilians many times saved the day and prevented a bigger disaster,” he told reporters. “It could be that we will pay a price for it. That’s life.”

Netanyahu rival-turned-wartime ally Benny Gantz called for an investigation into the proper use of guns and the regulations surrounding their use.

“That’s not ‘life,’ but a warning sign,” he posted on X, formerly Twitter.

After an uproar over his comments, Netanyahu reversed course on Sunday, calling Castleman’s death a “terrible tragedy.”

“He is an Israeli hero,”
Netanyahu said. He promised a thorough investigation and said he had called Castleman’s father to offer condolences.

Thursday’s incident had echoes of previous ones that have shed light on Israeli open fire rules. Most infamous was the 2016 shooting death by an Israeli soldier of a badly wounded Palestinian assailant as he lay on the ground.

The shooting by Sgt. Elor Azaria, which came as Israel was battling a low-level wave of Palestinian attacks, divided the country. While Israel’s top generals pushed for the prosecution of a soldier they say violated the military’s code of ethics, large segments of the public, including politicians on Israel’s nationalist right, sided with Azaria. Even Netanyahu, in a nod to his nationalist base, gave only lukewarm support to his military.

Similarly, in 2015, after a deadly Palestinian attack at a bus station in the southern city of Beersheba, an Eritrean man was shot and beaten to death by a mob after being mistaken for an assailant. Two men charged with the death were acquitted, with the court siding with their claim that they believed he was an attacker.

Critics said Thursday’s incident was especially severe because Castleman took what they said were clear steps to prove that he was not an attacker.

“It was an execution,” wrote Shelly Yacimovich, a former leader of Israel’s liberal Labor Party, on the Ynet news site. “Against the law, against open fire regulations, the sanctity of arms. Immoral. And all that would be true even if he was a terrorist.”

Moshe Karadi, a former police chief, said he believed the background of the soldier who allegedly shot Castleman influenced his thought process. “The finger is lighter on the trigger there than in other places,” he said, referring to the West Bank, where settler violence has flared during the war.

Karadi said Ben-Gvir’s crusade to arm more civilians would lead to untrained and unqualified arms carriers. He said greater access to guns would spark increased violence against minorities and women and lead to more incidents like Thursday’s killing of an innocent civilian.

Diana Buttu, a Palestinian analyst, said the incident reflected a reality that Palestinians have long lived with. She said how Castleman died — arms raised, knees to the ground — didn’t surprise her given the heightened tensions since the war, coupled with what Palestinians see as the systemic use of excessive force and a drive to have more Israelis carry arms.

“It was really just a question of time until someone was gunned down in that way,” she said.

 

谷歌翻译:​

以色列特拉维夫(美联社)——上周巴勒斯坦枪手开始向耶路撒冷一个繁忙的公交车站开枪后几秒钟,尤瓦尔·卡斯尔曼冲向现场并向袭击者开枪——结果被一名以色列士兵开枪打死,这名士兵显然怀疑他 也是一名袭击者。

安全摄像机镜头中可以看到卡斯尔曼跪下、举起双手并打开衬衫以表明他不是威胁,这突显了批评者所说的以色列士兵、警察和武装公民过度使用武力的流行病。 疑似巴勒斯坦袭击者。

“他采取了一切必要措施,以便能够正确识别他的身份,”卡斯尔曼的父亲摩西周日告诉以色列陆军电台,“但他们不断向他开枪。”

巴勒斯坦分析人士戴安娜·布图表示,这一事件反映了巴勒斯坦人长期以来所忍受的现实。 她说,考虑到自战争以来紧张局势加剧,加上巴勒斯坦人认为系统性地过度使用武力以及促使更多以色列人携带武器,卡斯尔曼的死亡方式——双臂举起,膝盖着地——并不令她感到惊讶。

“有人以这种方式被枪杀实际上只是时间问题,”她说。

An Israeli raced to confront Palestinian attackers. He was then killed by an Israeli soldier​

FILE - People look at Israeli police officers and volunteers from the Zaka rescue service work at the shooting attack in Jerusalem, Thursday, Nov. 30, 2023. The shooting death of an Israeli man who raced to confront Palestinian attackers has raised questions about the use of excessive force among Israeli security forces and the public. The man's shooting mirrors previous incidents where Israeli security forces or civilians have opened fire on attackers who no longer appear to pose a threat or on suspected assailants or unarmed civilians. (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg, File)'s shooting mirrors previous incidents where Israeli security forces or civilians have opened fire on attackers who no longer appear to pose a threat or on suspected assailants or unarmed civilians. (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg, File)

1 of 3 |
FILE - People look at Israeli police officers and volunteers from the Zaka rescue service work at the shooting attack in Jerusalem, Thursday, Nov. 30, 2023. The shooting death of an Israeli man who raced to confront Palestinian attackers has raised questions about the use of excessive force among Israeli security forces and the public. The man’s shooting mirrors previous incidents where Israeli security forces or civilians have opened fire on attackers who no longer appear to pose a threat or on suspected assailants or unarmed civilians. (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg, File)
FILE - Volunteers from the Zaka rescue service remove a body killed in the shooting attack in Jerusalem, Thursday, Nov. 30, 2023. The shooting death of an Israeli man who raced to confront Palestinian attackers has raised questions about the use of excessive force among Israeli security forces and the public. The man's shooting mirrors previous incidents where Israeli security forces or civilians have opened fire on attackers who no longer appear to pose a threat or on suspected assailants or unarmed civilians. (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg, File)'s shooting mirrors previous incidents where Israeli security forces or civilians have opened fire on attackers who no longer appear to pose a threat or on suspected assailants or unarmed civilians. (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg, File)

2 of 3 |
FILE - Volunteers from the Zaka rescue service remove a body killed in the shooting attack in Jerusalem, Thursday, Nov. 30, 2023. The shooting death of an Israeli man who raced to confront Palestinian attackers has raised questions about the use of excessive force among Israeli security forces and the public. The man’s shooting mirrors previous incidents where Israeli security forces or civilians have opened fire on attackers who no longer appear to pose a threat or on suspected assailants or unarmed civilians. (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg, File)
Read More
FILE - Israeli police officer and volunteers from the Zaka rescue service work at the shooting attack in Jerusalem, Thursday, Nov. 30, 2023. The shooting death of an Israeli man who raced to confront Palestinian attackers has raised questions about the use of excessive force among Israeli security forces and the public. The man's shooting mirrors previous incidents where Israeli security forces or civilians have opened fire on attackers who no longer appear to pose a threat or on suspected assailants or unarmed civilians. (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg, File)'s shooting mirrors previous incidents where Israeli security forces or civilians have opened fire on attackers who no longer appear to pose a threat or on suspected assailants or unarmed civilians. (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg, File)

3 of 3 |
FILE - Israeli police officer and volunteers from the Zaka rescue service work at the shooting attack in Jerusalem, Thursday, Nov. 30, 2023. The shooting death of an Israeli man who raced to confront Palestinian attackers has raised questions about the use of excessive force among Israeli security forces and the public. The man’s shooting mirrors previous incidents where Israeli security forces or civilians have opened fire on attackers who no longer appear to pose a threat or on suspected assailants or unarmed civilians. (AP Photo/Ohad Zwigenberg, File)
Read More

BY TIA GOLDENBERG
Updated 3:51 PM GMT-5, December 3, 2023

TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — Seconds after Palestinian gunmen began shooting up a busy Jerusalem bus stop last week, Yuval Castleman raced toward the scene and opened fire on the attackers — only to be shot and killed by an Israeli soldier who apparently suspected he was also an assailant.

The shooting of Castleman, who in security camera footage is seen kneeling, raising his hands and flinging open his shirt to indicate he isn’t a threat, underscores what critics say is an epidemic of excessive force by Israeli soldiers, police and armed citizens against suspected Palestinian attackers.

“He took all the necessary steps so that he could be properly identified,” Castleman’s father, Moshe, told Israeli Army Radio on Sunday, “and they kept shooting at him.”

Castleman’s shooting mirrors previous incidents where Israeli security forces or civilians have opened fire on attackers who no longer appear to pose a threat, or on suspected assailants or unarmed civilians deemed to be threats.

The incident comes as tensions have been inflamed by the war between Israel and Hamas, with Israelis on edge and bracing for further attacks. It also coincides with a drive by Israel’s national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, to ramp up the number of gun-toting civilians.

Palestinians and human rights groups have long accused Israeli forces of using excessive force, killing attackers who no longer posed a threat and even harming innocent people mistaken for attackers and then skirting accountability.

Early Thursday, as the entrance to Jerusalem was swelling with traffic, two Hamas militants exited their car at a bus stop and opened fire on waiting commuters, killing three. In security camera footage, Castleman is seen running from the other side of the busy highway, brandishing his gun and shooting at the attackers. Soldiers are also seen opening fire.

Castleman, a 38-year-old lawyer who was on his way to work, is seen appearing to flee the gunshots. He then kneels, raises his arms and opens his shirt before he is shot.

His family is demanding to know how the heroism of their son culminated in his killing.

Israeli authorities are investigating the incident and police said initial findings showed one of the soldiers “mistakenly suspected” Castleman was an attacker. Castleman, a resident of a Jerusalem suburb, had previously worked in the Israeli security forces, according to his father, and used his own gun against the attackers. He was shot in the jaw, chin and stomach.

The soldier, identified by Israeli media as reservist Aviad Frija, told Israeli Channel 14 TV that he was active among “hilltop youth” — a term used to refer to radicalized Jewish teen squatters on hilltops in the occupied West Bank who have been known to attack Palestinians and their property.

Frija was not asked about Castleman’s shooting. But he boasted about killing the attackers, saying doing so was every soldier’s goal.

Hilltop youth are politically aligned with Ben-Gvir, a disciple of a racist rabbi, who as the minister in charge of police has been leading a drive to proliferate arms among civilians by loosening the criteria for acquiring a gun permit. Ben-Gvir said Thursday’s attack proved his policies were needed.

“Weapons save lives. We see this time after time. Everywhere there are arms, citizens, police, soldiers save lives,” he said at the scene, without referring to Castleman. Ben-Gvir has also pushed for a national guard force he says is meant to fill in gaps where police are spread thin. Critics say it would amount to his own personal militia.

Asked about the shooting on Saturday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he supported Ben-Gvir’s policy to increase access to weapons even if it meant civilians like Castleman could be killed.

“The presence of armed civilians many times saved the day and prevented a bigger disaster,” he told reporters. “It could be that we will pay a price for it. That’s life.”

Netanyahu rival-turned-wartime ally Benny Gantz called for an investigation into the proper use of guns and the regulations surrounding their use.

“That’s not ‘life,’ but a warning sign,” he posted on X, formerly Twitter.

After an uproar over his comments, Netanyahu reversed course on Sunday, calling Castleman’s death a “terrible tragedy.”

“He is an Israeli hero,”
Netanyahu said. He promised a thorough investigation and said he had called Castleman’s father to offer condolences.

Thursday’s incident had echoes of previous ones that have shed light on Israeli open fire rules. Most infamous was the 2016 shooting death by an Israeli soldier of a badly wounded Palestinian assailant as he lay on the ground.

The shooting by Sgt. Elor Azaria, which came as Israel was battling a low-level wave of Palestinian attacks, divided the country. While Israel’s top generals pushed for the prosecution of a soldier they say violated the military’s code of ethics, large segments of the public, including politicians on Israel’s nationalist right, sided with Azaria. Even Netanyahu, in a nod to his nationalist base, gave only lukewarm support to his military.

Similarly, in 2015, after a deadly Palestinian attack at a bus station in the southern city of Beersheba, an Eritrean man was shot and beaten to death by a mob after being mistaken for an assailant. Two men charged with the death were acquitted, with the court siding with their claim that they believed he was an attacker.

Critics said Thursday’s incident was especially severe because Castleman took what they said were clear steps to prove that he was not an attacker.

“It was an execution,” wrote Shelly Yacimovich, a former leader of Israel’s liberal Labor Party, on the Ynet news site. “Against the law, against open fire regulations, the sanctity of arms. Immoral. And all that would be true even if he was a terrorist.”

Moshe Karadi, a former police chief, said he believed the background of the soldier who allegedly shot Castleman influenced his thought process. “The finger is lighter on the trigger there than in other places,” he said, referring to the West Bank, where settler violence has flared during the war.

Karadi said Ben-Gvir’s crusade to arm more civilians would lead to untrained and unqualified arms carriers. He said greater access to guns would spark increased violence against minorities and women and lead to more incidents like Thursday’s killing of an innocent civilian.

Diana Buttu, a Palestinian analyst, said the incident reflected a reality that Palestinians have long lived with. She said how Castleman died — arms raised, knees to the ground — didn’t surprise her given the heightened tensions since the war, coupled with what Palestinians see as the systemic use of excessive force and a drive to have more Israelis carry arms.

“It was really just a question of time until someone was gunned down in that way,” she said.

具体到这件事,我觉得士兵对他开枪可以理解,在那种情况下很难判断非军警开枪者中谁不是恐怖份子
 
具体到这件事,我觉得士兵对他开枪可以理解,在那种情况下很难判断非军警开枪者中谁不是恐怖份子
这正是问题所在。
即使他是恐怖分子,举手跪下也不能被枪决,要不然三胖也有理
 
这正是问题所在。
即使他是恐怖分子,举手跪下也不能被枪决,要不然三胖也有理
恐怖分子举手跪下,军警停手,然后万一恐怖分子突然再扔个炸弹或又拿出一把枪开枪怎么办?
这个问题上我是赞同既然恐怖份子动了手,军警没有义务停手
 
恐怖分子举手跪下,军警停手,然后万一恐怖分子突然再扔个炸弹或又拿出一把枪开枪怎么办?
这个问题上我是赞同既然恐怖份子动了手,军警没有义务停手
好吧,交枪不放过,必须就地正法。警察和战争都必须消灭最后一个敌人
 
好吧,交枪不放过,必须就地正法。警察和战争都必须消灭最后一个敌人
叶死
不打算活了才能当恐怖分子,留着后果难测
 
具体到这件事,我觉得士兵对他开枪可以理解,在那种情况下很难判断非军警开枪者中谁不是恐怖份子


当年希特勒对犹太人有这么狠吗?
 
叶死
不打算活了才能当恐怖分子,留着后果难测
对,旁边站着的,还有这个律师也必须打死,谁知道旁边的是不是恐怖分子,万一是呢?
让国际法见鬼去吧:monster:
 
对,旁边站着的,还有这个律师也必须打死,谁知道旁边的是不是恐怖分子,万一是呢?
让国际法见鬼去吧:monster:
没有开枪的当然不能当恐怖份子处理
 
没有开枪的当然不能当恐怖份子处理

监狱关的恐怖分子一律枪决,加拿大也不会被恐怖分子索赔几千万,那个恐怖分子可是拿炸弹炸了

关塔那摩花了大量的钱,那些恐怖分子早该按你的办法处理
 
监狱关的恐怖分子一律枪决,加拿大也不会被恐怖分子索赔几千万,那个恐怖分子可是拿炸弹炸了

关塔那摩花了大量的钱,那些恐怖分子早该按你的办法处理
既然到了监狱,那自然得由检察官法官等等处理
 
既然到了监狱,那自然得由检察官法官等等处理
你这么说就矛盾了,那个恐怖分子拿炸弹炸的时候就应该乱枪打死,哪里有监狱呢?
投降也要打死
:jiayou:
 
既然到了监狱,那自然得由检察官法官等等处理
你的三观比老太太的还滥啊,咋这么没是非呢,天生就讨厌弱者,跪强者?
 
后退
顶部