加拿大被大报点名批评:NATO is losing patience with one of its own members — and it’s not who you think

billwanhua

本站元老
注册
2005-07-07
消息
15,385
荣誉分数
4,819
声望点数
373

NATO is losing patience with one of its own members — and it’s not who you think


Canada has been dodging its commitment to NATO for a decade. It may not be able to hold out for much longer.

Over the past several years, Ottawa has become an outlier among the 32-member alliance. It has failed to hit domestic military spending goals, has fallen short on benchmarks to fund new equipment and has no plans to get there.

It’s a stance that has frustrated allies far and wide — from the White House to the halls of Congress to capitals all over Europe.

“What’s happening now that everyone is spending more, the fact that the Canadians aren’t even trying has become obvious,” said Max Bergmann, a former State Department arms control official.


尼玛,开批评大会了。看标题还以为那个支持俄罗斯的极右政府呢
唯独把加拿大拎出来批评。
川普还没上台。看来老拜在逐渐实行川普的政策,让川普无路可走。对中国加关税,逼NATO成员加军费,连美国自己的非法移民问题也学了川普,你们看看,还有什么川普政策老拜没有搞
俄乌战争的后遗症,就目前这赤字,屁民加税逃无可逃
 
最后编辑:
退出nato, Make Canada Great Again
 
最后编辑:
把进来的三哥送去支援乌克兰给PR, 三赢

正当加快移民拿公民渠道

送去乌克兰前线服役,待1年,回来移民公民任选,这样谁都没意见。
 

NATO is losing patience with one of its own members — and it’s not who you think


Canada has been dodging its commitment to NATO for a decade. It may not be able to hold out for much longer.

Over the past several years, Ottawa has become an outlier among the 32-member alliance. It has failed to hit domestic military spending goals, has fallen short on benchmarks to fund new equipment and has no plans to get there.

It’s a stance that has frustrated allies far and wide — from the White House to the halls of Congress to capitals all over Europe.

“What’s happening now that everyone is spending more, the fact that the Canadians aren’t even trying has become obvious,” said Max Bergmann, a former State Department arms control official.


尼玛,开批评大会了。看标题还以为那个支持俄罗斯的极右政府呢
唯独把加拿大拎出来批评。
川普还没上台。看来老拜在逐渐实行川普的政策,让川普无路可走。对中国加关税,逼NATO成员加军费,连美国自己的非法移民问题也学了川普,你们看看,还有什么川普政策老拜没有搞
俄乌战争的后遗症,就目前这赤字,屁民加税逃无可逃
拿大增加对军工投入,就业率上层楼!
 
拿大自己识相点,退出吧。反正韩国已经等了好多年了。
 
加拿大的地理位置好,没人来打加拿大,没有危险当然没必要多花军费钱。
跟着强邻大哥混,当个小跟班就够活了
 
加拿大的地理位置好,没人来打加拿大,没有危险当然没必要多花军费钱。
跟着强邻大哥混,当个小跟班就够活了
对,是老大需要加拿大当缓冲,不是加拿大需要老大,那边还有一个阿拉斯加挡着鹅毛呢,没事瞎掺和只能交税了
 
Nato会费应该按离俄毛远近定百分比,比如靠着俄毛的波罗地海三国,芬兰,波兰,美帝交4%,隔着黑海的土耳其,保加利亚,罗马尼亚交3%,其他欧洲国家交2%,加拿大交1%(隔着大洋还有美帝的阿拉斯加)。
 
Nato会费应该按离俄毛远近定百分比,比如靠着俄毛的波罗地海三国,芬兰,波兰,美帝交4%,隔着黑海的土耳其,保加利亚,罗马尼亚交3%,其他欧洲国家交2%,加拿大交1%(隔着大洋还有美帝的阿拉斯加)。
呵呵,这就跟韭菜交税一样,躲不过去的。2%的军费不过分,除非土豆子的统计局虚报GDP,实在交不出这么多钱拉。
 
呵呵,这就跟韭菜交税一样,躲不过去的。2%的军费不过分,除非土豆子的统计局虚报GDP,实在交不出这么多钱拉。
2%的军费的确不算多,土豆霍霍掉的钱少一点就补上了。
 
加拿大的地理位置好,没人来打加拿大,没有危险当然没必要多花军费钱。
跟着强邻大哥混,当个小跟班就够活了
加拿大地理位置好????

加拿大是标准的四战之地:
俄国进攻美国,需要经过加拿大;
美国进攻俄国,需要经过加拿大;
中国进攻美国,需要经过加拿大;
欧洲进攻美国,同样需要经过加拿大。

可以说,只要下一次世界大战一起,无论谁进攻谁,加拿大必遭兵灾。

中国人都知道,兵灾,是比各种自然灾害,甚至比土匪更可怕的一种灾难。

加拿大,自求多福吧。
 
后退
顶部