CBC cross country 正在讨论，都不知道 川普的end game 是什么

[billwanhua]

1.兑现竞选承诺
2.贸易平衡，消除贸易赤字
3.让工厂搬到美国
4.吞并加拿大
5.边界难民和毒品

Trump regularly changes his rationale for tariffs - either to coerce diplomatic change, to deal with trade imbalances or to raise significant revenues

共识是，谁都不清楚川普想什么，下一步是什么

 

[eclipse]

这问题需要rebel media组织讨论一下，有可能有启发

 

[PublicOne]

我们不想做他游戏里的棋子。提心吊胆。我们要找別的路。

 

[welcomelm]

1.兑现竞选承诺
2.贸易平衡，消除贸易赤字
3.让工厂搬到美国
4.吞并加拿大
5.边界难民和毒品

共识是，谁都不清楚川普想什么，下一步是什么

obviously

 

[EV]

 

[metropolis]

我猜一下，他的几大宏伟目标，明的：格林兰，巴拿马运河，加拿大，还有很多暗的，只有实现一个，半个，就可以万古流芳，千古一帝。

 

[billwanhua]

还有一个人打电话说，加拿大加25%，中国加10%, good guy get more, 主持人说obviously, they don't think we are good guy

 

[向问天]

还有一个人打电话说，加拿大加25%，中国加10%, good guy get more, 主持人说obviously, they don't think we are good guy

这个也不客观吧？

中国产品已经有的关税高得多。

 

[gocanoeing]

边走边看而已

 

[ottawa_tj]

Trump向来是边走边看，他自己都不一定知道end game是啥。。。

 

[billwanhua]

How countries respond to Trump's tariffs is what matters next

Retaliatory taxes against the US by other nations could lead global trade into uncharted territory.

www.bbc.com

Trump regularly changes his rationale for tariffs - either to coerce diplomatic change, to deal with trade imbalances or to raise significant revenues.

These policy objectives cannot all be achieved simultaneously.

For example, learning from the experience of Trump's first term "China deal", Western diplomats have been scrambling to find lists of US goods they might buy more of, in order to give the White House some wins.

Europe could say it is increasing its purchases of US shipments of liquefied natural gas, or arms, or specialised magnets for wind farms.

It doesn't really matter if these trends were already in train, as long as the US president can be allowed to chalk up a "win".

跟川普打交道一定要报复，让他知道痛。
要不然这次赢了，下次再搞一个大的，川普字典里没有规则这个词，大家已经领教一次了。他给你的承诺，过几天就觉得他吃亏了，所以他没有收手的时候

以前让北约把国防涨到2%, 当所有的人都同意后，现在马上就涨到5%

只有所有国家团结起来怼回去，让他自己执行不下去，只有他受不了痛才end