特朗普称他希望重启Keystone输油管道

metropolis

本站元老
注册
2010-12-10
消息
10,330
荣誉分数
2,176
声望点数
373

从阿省到墨西哥湾炼油厂1900公里,奥巴马政府时立项,奥巴马总统以环保名义被否决,川普第一任时启动,拜登上台后第一天砍掉。阿省和萨省省长都表示支持。​

Keystone XL redux? Trump says he wants defunct oil pipeline back from the dead​

By The Canadian Press
Updated: February 25, 2025 at 4:54PM EST

Published: February 25, 2025 at 1:00PM EST
IUUPW7VUDAE44LXTG52OTFY4WA.jpg

A Keystone XL pipeline pumping station is surrounded by corn fields in rural Milford, Neb., Thursday, Jan. 9, 2020. AP/Nati Harnik
CALGARY — U.S. President Donald Trump says he’d like to see the Keystone XL pipeline brought back from the dead, garnering an enthusiastic reception from Alberta and Saskatchewan’s premiers but a tepid one from the company spun off from its erstwhile proponent.

Trump posted on his Truth Social platform Monday that the Biden administration had “viciously jettisoned” the pipeline expansion that would have allowed more oilsands crude to flow to the U.S. Gulf Coast, cutting diagonally through Montana, South Dakota and Nebraska before heading south.

“The Trump administration is very different -- easy approvals, almost immediate start! If not them, perhaps another pipeline company,” he wrote.

“We want the Keystone XL Pipeline built!”

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said Tuesday in an X post that she agreed with Trump.

“That project should have never been cancelled. Lower fuel costs for American families is a big win,” she said.

“Let’s also scrap these inflationary tariff ideas and focus on getting shovels in the ground right away!”

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe also voiced his support for the idea on X.

“The path to continental energy dominance is to increase non-tariff North American trade,” Moe wrote.

“This includes the construction of new pipelines like Keystone XL.”

A spokeswoman for South Bow Corp., the oil pipeline operator spun off from TC Energy Corp. last fall and now the owner of the existing Keystone system, said the company has “moved on” from the XL expansion project.

“We continue to engage with customers to develop options to increase Canadian oil supplies to meet growing demand,” Katie Stavinoha said in an email Tuesday.

The Keystone XL project -- a 1,900-kilometre pipeline that would have run from Hardisty, Alta., to the major U.S. crude storage hub at Cushing, Okla., and then on to Gulf Coast refineries -- was first proposed during the Obama administration, which rejected it on environmental grounds.

It was then revived under the first Trump administration, before former president Joe Biden killed it again by revoking the pipeline’s permit on his first day in the White House in 2021.

Meanwhile, Trump told a press conference Monday that tariffs on Canadian and Mexican products are coming next week.

Trump’s executive order to hit all Canadian imports with 25 per cent tariffs, except a 10 per cent levy on energy, was delayed until March 4 after Canada agreed to introduce new security measures at the border.

Richard Masson, executive fellow with the University of Calgary’s School of Public Policy, said the interest in resuscitating Keystone XL doesn’t jibe with Trump’s plans to ramp up domestic oil production while slapping U.S. neighbours with tariffs.

“It seems inconsistent to say we’re going to tariff the existing oil that’s coming in and still try and get somebody to build a pipeline,” he said.

“It just doesn’t make a lot of sense.”

Masson said he suspects Trump is “just really playing to his base,” which is keen on developing oil projects in general.

The Canadian government is “open to having a productive conversation” about advancing Keystone XL, the communications director for Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson said in an email.

“Canadians have always been a reliable energy supplier to our American friends -- but unjustified tariffs and threats against our sovereignty hurt our ability and desire to be an energy partner to our southern neighbour,” said Joanna Sivasankaran.

The Keystone XL project in its current form has all the Canadian permits it needs and the pieces north of the border remain in the ground, Sivasankaran added.

“A private sector proponent would need to step forward to advance the project, and there is not currently one expressing they would do so,” she said.

“Canada wants to see our continent become an energy-secure superpower, and the government is supportive of steps that secure positive outcomes for Canadians.”

Masson said he can’t see any company jumping at the chance to propose a pipeline that two U.S. presidents have cancelled.

“It’s been a really bitter pill for most people in the industry to swallow and why would anybody want to take that on, unless maybe you had an explicit guarantee from the U.S. that was ironclad that said if things go south, they’ll pay for it.”

Several oil producers would also have to sign up to ship significant volumes on the line for decades, “and there just isn’t that much oil planned to be produced in Canada these days.”

Producers could justify oilsands expansions, which require years of lead time and billions in investment, if market access were guaranteed, Masson added.

“That’s not an issue,” he said.

“But you’ve got to get the timing of those things right. And right now the level of uncertainty is so high that it seems really difficult to see how that could happen.”

By Lauren Krugel, The Canadian Press

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 25, 2025.

 
加拿大政府可以用这个来做关税讨论的一部分,争取合作
 
还有不要建了吧,建了更加依赖美国了,拓展与其他国家的贸易吧
 
对,应该重启建设两套完全在加拿大内的东西输油管。
可以在境内预留给美国的接口,加渥太华的水表要钱
 
可以建,所有通过这条油管的加25%出口税. 沒事不和钱过不去.
 
对,应该重启建设两套完全在加拿大内的东西输油管。
向西的已经有了,要感谢土豆

向东的建也可,实在阻力和代价太大,不建也不是不行。把其他有共识的更容易的安排做到也不错,阿省的油砂留给后世开发也是一个选择,那时可能有更好的技术
 
怕下一届又喊停,钱再次打水漂。。。
 
只够塞牙缝的。


美国关税 AB的经济就完蛋了,等不到后世。
还是要感谢土豆,不然塞牙缝的都没有

阿省的经济完不了。阿省是加拿大没有省销售税的唯一,余地还很大
 
现有西线输油管,TMX 现在是890,000 barrels per day,扩建后的,供应整个亚洲太平洋地区。
南朝鲜Ulsan炼油厂,Daily capacity: 840,000 barrels per day

哈哈哈,加拿大现在向亚太出口原油就是个笑话。

日本每日总共处理原油3百万桶,韩国每日3百五十万桶。都不用卖中国了,日韩就6百50万桶每日消耗。
加拿大每日消耗2百万桶, 加西每日炼油80万桶,加东每日炼油消耗120万桶。

AB日产原油4百万桶,东西管搞搞好,压根不鸟美丽国。
 
最后编辑:
现有西线输油管,TMX 现在是890,000 barrels per day,扩建后的,供应整个亚洲太平洋地区。
南朝鲜Ulsan炼油厂,Daily capacity: 840,000 barrels per day

哈哈哈,加拿大现在向亚太出口原油就是个笑话。

日本每日总共处理原油3百万桶,韩国每日3百五十万桶。都不用卖中国了,日韩就6百50万桶每日消耗。
加拿大每日消耗2百万桶, 加西每日炼油80万桶,加东每日炼油消耗120万桶。

AB日产原油4百万桶,东西管搞搞好,压根不鸟美丽国。
加拿大向亚太出口原油原本就没有很多需求

首先距离远,中东向亚洲出口更近

其次沙特轻质原油质量好,成本低,加拿大的高成本重油顶多就是一个补充,买家想来源多样化一点而已
 
加拿大向亚太出口原油原本就没有很多需求

首先距离远,中东向亚洲出口更近

其次沙特轻质原油质量好,成本低,加拿大的高成本重油顶多就是一个补充,买家想来源多样化一点而已

大哥,动手查一查,google地图看看很直观。

从中东Persian Gulff到日本8,000 to 9,000 nautical miles,大约20 to 30 days
从BC到日本4,500 to 5,000 nautical miles,大约10 to 20 days

油轮运输便宜太多了,时间快了太多啦,现在是加拿大没管道没法出口!
 
小日本现在是买不到加拿大的重油,或者说AB这可怜的亚太出口量是供不应求。

比如沥青,重油可以提炼沥青,沙特的轻油提炼不了沥青! 沥青的重要性我就不用说了吧。

所谓轻油质量好,真是无稽之谈。

AB的油,才是质量好的原油,压根不愁卖,不怕制裁。搞成今天的地步,真是加拿大人蠢货。

大嘴压根就不懂,美国自己产的油,大多数是轻油,重油不多。美国怎么都得从加拿大进口AB油。
还有俄罗斯产的油,大多数也是轻油。也有些比中东沙特的强点,算是medium油吧。
用美国油,或者俄罗斯油,这些medium油提炼沥青等等化工产品,成本比从加拿大heavy oil提炼要贵。
只是从汽油角度,heavy oil贵了,但是算上提炼的化工产品,heavy oil就不亏了。
从沙特的轻油里提炼沥青,那就是指望不上了。嘿嘿。
 
最后编辑:
大哥,动手查一查,google地图看看很直观。

从中东Persian Gulff到日本8,000 to 9,000 nautical miles,大约20 to 30 days
从BC到日本4,500 to 5,000 nautical miles,大约10 to 20 days

油轮运输便宜太多了,时间快了太多啦,现在是加拿大没管道没法出口!
小日本现在是买不到加拿大的重油,或者说AB这可怜的亚太出口量是供不应求。

比如沥青,重油可以提炼沥青,沙特的轻油提炼不了沥青! 沥青的重要性我就不用说了吧。

所谓轻油质量好,真是无稽之谈。
这个网站说一个17天另一个27天,的确沙特远一点

你买原油不喜欢买杂质少,容易炼,污染小的?而是喜欢买沥青多的?
 
后退
顶部