‘Deeply hypocritical’: Pierre Poilievre slammed ‘illegal border crossers,’ but his own relative crossed and stayed

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 SFU
  • 开始时间 开始时间

SFU

资深人士
注册
2007-07-26
消息
2,444
荣誉分数
592
声望点数
223
In late July 2018, Pierre Poilievre took aim at “illegal border crossers.”

“How much will it cost to house the illegal border crossers in hotels in the coming year?” he repeatedly asked during a parliamentary committee hearing, criticizing the Liberal government for helping shelter thousands of asylum seekers who had entered the country through Roxham Road in Quebec.

“Who will pay for it?”

Two months later, the Conservative leader’s own uncle-in-law crossed Roxham Road on foot.

After failing to get his refugee claim approved, he appears to have lived undocumented in Canada with a deportation order in his name.

 
这跟他有什么关系吗?难道他能控制一个亲戚不成?
 
In late July 2018, Pierre Poilievre took aim at “illegal border crossers.”

“How much will it cost to house the illegal border crossers in hotels in the coming year?” he repeatedly asked during a parliamentary committee hearing, criticizing the Liberal government for helping shelter thousands of asylum seekers who had entered the country through Roxham Road in Quebec.

“Who will pay for it?”

Two months later, the Conservative leader’s own uncle-in-law crossed Roxham Road on foot.

After failing to get his refugee claim approved, he appears to have lived undocumented in Canada with a deportation order in his name.



这种贬低太低级了吧?一个”uncle-in-law“的事也要算在他的头上?如果你的”uncle-in-law“干了坏事,是不是你也有责任?

真可怜,反保守党快把自己反成神经病了。
 
这跟他有什么关系吗?难道他能控制一个亲戚不成?
就事论事的话,的确没关系

不过选举肯定有关系,可能属攻击广告素材,不见得真上广告,但起码是素材
 
这种贬低太低级了吧?一个”uncle-in-law“的事也要算在他的头上?如果你的”uncle-in-law“干了坏事,是不是你也有责任?

真可怜,反保守党快把自己反成神经病了。
你确定他或他老婆一定点都不知道有这个叔叔?
 
这种低级攻击展示出来的是攻击者自己的弱智,疯狂,和绝望。



According to email and Facebook correspondence seen by The Breach, Anaida Poilievre organized the drafting and mailing of the submission with assistance from a parliamentarian.

In one message she wrote that she had a “person helping in a MP’s office.” In another, she was even more direct.

“I’m trying to help my uncle,” she wrote, and “the MP can help us.”
 
Canada first 还是 his Family first?
 
最后编辑:
这俩不矛盾啊,家庭不就是国家的一分子吗。
看来保粉们对非法移民也是赞成的,只是谁的亲戚而已。

以后就不要说的那么高大上了
Deeply hypocritical!
 
最后编辑:
这跟他有什么关系吗?难道他能控制一个亲戚不成?
他的确不能控制他的亲戚。。。

但他如果说到做到,“遣返这些非法入境的难民”,他应该去移民局举报,而不是他老婆(他应该知道这个事情)通过其他MP帮助她亲戚办身份。。。

这就是说他嘴上说一套,到自己身上就是另一套了。。。
 
这俩不矛盾啊,家庭不就是国家的一分子吗。
说你无脑,这两个第一当然有矛盾,既然是一分子,说明是不同的范畴,优先考虑哪个利益,自然产生不同的结果。

比如今天是长远的一部分,优先考虑这两者,必然有矛盾。
 
看来保粉们对非法移民也是赞成的,只是谁的亲戚而已。

以后就不要说的那么高大上了
Deeply hypocritical!
说你无脑,这两个第一当然有矛盾,既然是一分子,说明是不同的范畴,优先考虑哪个利益,自然产生不同的结果。

比如今天是长远的一部分,优先考虑这两者,必然有矛盾。
哈哈,你们俩傻帽总是抓不住重点。谁把非法移民放进来的,是自由党,是土豆子政府,pp没有权利让他叔进来或者出去,这是基本常识。
 
哈哈,你们俩傻帽总是抓不住重点。谁把非法移民放进来的,是自由党,是土豆子政府,pp没有权利让他叔进来或者出去,这是基本常识。
The Conservative leader has said such individuals should be ‘tracked down’ and ‘deported’

he should do what he said, instead of helping his relative stay. That is Deeply hypocritical.
 
哈哈,你们俩傻帽总是抓不住重点。谁把非法移民放进来的,是自由党,是土豆子政府,pp没有权利让他叔进来或者出去,这是基本常识。
我没谈是非对错,说得是你老人家的逻辑常识问题。
 
后退
顶部