He banged. I resisted. And still do.
When I first saw Hong Kong-born UC Berkeley engineering student William Hung
sing that Ricky Martin song on Fox's "American Idol" last January, I tried to
ignore it.
But, after Hung's humiliation, there came a nice outpouring of sympathy for
the rejected puppy dog.
Here was an accented Asian American with bad hair, bad teeth, bad moves and a
bad accent. And even though he can't sing, America still loved him.
OK. The glorification of bad is a nice twist. But I figured the joke would die
off soon enough.
It hasn't. And now I'm wondering why America is extending the joke.
Is there more than just the glorification of bad, something driven by racism?
Three months after being told on "Idol" he could not sing, Hung is part of
some kind of perfect storm to stardom.
Hung returns this week with a new CD on Koch Records, a music video on the
Fuse Music Channel and all the accompanying national media attention,
including a "Today" show appearance Friday.
For a taste of the Hung hype, get a load of a press release by Alan Grunblatt,
general manager and executive vice president of Koch Records, which states, in
part, "William is the perfect artist for our culturally diverse society. He is
the new Elvis!"
I don't begrudge a marketer his right to make a buck. But Colonel Tom Parker
knew Elvis could really sing and dance. With William Hung, is there any other
reason to extend the joke on America except that it plays to a racist image of
the ineffectual Asian-American male?
What is Hung but an infantilized, incompetent and impotent male image? Strong?
No. Virile? No. Sexy? The guy's a virgin.
You can sell that?
You certainly wouldn't see them glorify a black man who couldn't sing and
dance on "American Idol." Nor would they prop up a clumsy, tone-deaf white
person.
Certainly, there'd be no shortage of worthy candidates for Hung-like stardom.
Regular "American Idol" viewers know tons of good singers have been rejected
and abused by the show's Simon Cowell.
The difference here? Hung is Asian American. And the accented-foreigner gag is
still considered acceptable shtick in modern comedy -- at least when it comes
to Asian Americans.
Can I get an "Ah so"?
Intentionally or not, Koch and Fuse are updating a classic anti-Asian image --
that of the Mickey Rooney character in "Breakfast at Tiffany's," complete with
buck teeth, bad hair and bad accent. Rent the movie and cringe.
If they wanted to do a remake, they could just hire William Hung.
It wouldn't be so bad if we saw positive images of Asian-American males in the
media. But, for the most part, we've been invisible, and the images have
usually come with martial-arts enhancements.
Bruce Lee's combative persona has been the most virile and most enduring icon
for Asian-American males. But the stereotypes that predominate are the
sinister and inscrutable or ineffectual and effeminate.
One thing can be said for those who seek to exploit William Hung: He has not
been asked to demonstrate any karate moves or threaten the American way of
life.
So, where's the outrage? Even the Asian-American community seems to be taken
by Hung.
"As Asian Americans, we look through this racial lens, and we see this guy who
embodies all the stereotypes we're trying to escape from," said James Hou, a
documentary filmmaker who explored Asian-American male sexuality in "Masters
of the Pillow."
Hou even saw the "Breakfast at Tiffany's" link. But he doesn't want to
suppress Hung's voice, nor his desire to be a singer.
"As an Asian-American male, I think he's honest with himself," said Hou,
proud, in a strange way, that some dorky-looking Asian American with a Hong
Kong accent and no singing talent is making it happen. "I respect what he's
doing."
And what about Hung's exploiters?
"I think the motivation is greed," said Hou. "I think it would be racist if
they didn't make any money off of it, and they just wanted to make fun of
him."
Hou's Faustian money-makes-it-all-right pragmatism surprises me, especially
because he called Hung a "sideshow act" and admitted that the singer
embarrasses Hou's pals.
"But if he turns into a mega-star, if he's really successful, I think it's
going to be positive," said Hou. "With money comes power and fame. This guy
has the potential to make hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of dollars.
Ask William Hung if he's exploited."
Spoken like a guy who wouldn't mind trading places with Hung.
But one man who doesn't have Hung envy and who sees the racism is Shaofan Li,
Hung's civil-engineering professor at UC Berkeley.
Li has all the answers, especially when you are looking to solve the
differential equation for beam deflection.
Li, who said he is very concerned about his student, added that Hung scored an
80 (out of 100) in the first midterm in his class. That merits a grade of B,
so Hung's no dummy. But Li knows Hung is capable of an A -- in engineering,
not singing.
"I hope it comes to an end," he said last week of the Hung hype.
More than Hung's grades, Li is concerned for the young man's well being. To
him, the racism is clear.
Li said he sees how people ridicule Hung, single him out and extrapolate his
virtues, or nonvirtues, to the entire racial class.
"I can see that some people are malicious," said Li. "I'm not stupid."
But understanding why the public likes Hung is more complex. "He doesn't have
singing talent," said Li. "But he does have a unique personality."
Li then described Hung as if he were some borderline messianic, cultlike
figure. In watching Hung perform, Li notices how his student deals with the
criticism and racism.
"Every time he faces the negative, he's oblivious," said Li. "Other people
would become insane. He doesn't. He takes it, absorbs it and turns it into a
positive. He does it without thinking, naturally. Like Forrest Gump. Stupid is
as stupid does."
But the cluelessness is just his approach -- he's a lamb, not a lion. And it
really is too bad he can't sing or dance, because, as Li described it, Hung's
trying to turn this negative situation into a positive one.
From Li's perspective, Hung is dealing, at the same time, with both the
negative and positive forces that stem from his predicament.
"I learn from him," said Li, who marvels at how Hung never gets upset in the
face of adversity.
"You don't want to criticize or make a big deal of your critics," said Li.
"You want to awaken [their] conscience. That's what Hung did. If he gets
upset, he only hurts himself."
That would make Hung like some kind of Zen master who always turns the other
cheek.
So, maybe there's something for us to learn from this experience, even if the
entertainment value of his talent is minimal.
But still, Hung's professor hopes the civil-engineering student returns to his
natural environment -- his college studies -- soon.
Does the student get it?
On the "Today" show last week, Hung played up his innocence and his extreme
earnestness.
"I hope people will see me as a serious singer," he said, "and take my singing
seriously."
Oh, boy. They have him believing the hype.
Hung doesn't see himself reinforcing stereotypes with the lame dancing and the
accented rhythmlessness of it all. He's proud of his badness.
"They're laughing at him -- I know that," said Li, touching on the racist
nature of the exploitation. "And, if it stretches out, the negativity will
dominate. Someone has to draw the line. Prolonging the process will make it a
big debacle."
I'm with the professor. The joke has gone on too long. And it's worse when the
participant is so willing.
Emil Guillermo is a radio and TV commentator and the author of "Amok: Essays From an Asian American Perspective," winner of an American Book Award. E-mail: emil@amok.com
When I first saw Hong Kong-born UC Berkeley engineering student William Hung
sing that Ricky Martin song on Fox's "American Idol" last January, I tried to
ignore it.
But, after Hung's humiliation, there came a nice outpouring of sympathy for
the rejected puppy dog.
Here was an accented Asian American with bad hair, bad teeth, bad moves and a
bad accent. And even though he can't sing, America still loved him.
OK. The glorification of bad is a nice twist. But I figured the joke would die
off soon enough.
It hasn't. And now I'm wondering why America is extending the joke.
Is there more than just the glorification of bad, something driven by racism?
Three months after being told on "Idol" he could not sing, Hung is part of
some kind of perfect storm to stardom.
Hung returns this week with a new CD on Koch Records, a music video on the
Fuse Music Channel and all the accompanying national media attention,
including a "Today" show appearance Friday.
For a taste of the Hung hype, get a load of a press release by Alan Grunblatt,
general manager and executive vice president of Koch Records, which states, in
part, "William is the perfect artist for our culturally diverse society. He is
the new Elvis!"
I don't begrudge a marketer his right to make a buck. But Colonel Tom Parker
knew Elvis could really sing and dance. With William Hung, is there any other
reason to extend the joke on America except that it plays to a racist image of
the ineffectual Asian-American male?
What is Hung but an infantilized, incompetent and impotent male image? Strong?
No. Virile? No. Sexy? The guy's a virgin.
You can sell that?
You certainly wouldn't see them glorify a black man who couldn't sing and
dance on "American Idol." Nor would they prop up a clumsy, tone-deaf white
person.
Certainly, there'd be no shortage of worthy candidates for Hung-like stardom.
Regular "American Idol" viewers know tons of good singers have been rejected
and abused by the show's Simon Cowell.
The difference here? Hung is Asian American. And the accented-foreigner gag is
still considered acceptable shtick in modern comedy -- at least when it comes
to Asian Americans.
Can I get an "Ah so"?
Intentionally or not, Koch and Fuse are updating a classic anti-Asian image --
that of the Mickey Rooney character in "Breakfast at Tiffany's," complete with
buck teeth, bad hair and bad accent. Rent the movie and cringe.
If they wanted to do a remake, they could just hire William Hung.
It wouldn't be so bad if we saw positive images of Asian-American males in the
media. But, for the most part, we've been invisible, and the images have
usually come with martial-arts enhancements.
Bruce Lee's combative persona has been the most virile and most enduring icon
for Asian-American males. But the stereotypes that predominate are the
sinister and inscrutable or ineffectual and effeminate.
One thing can be said for those who seek to exploit William Hung: He has not
been asked to demonstrate any karate moves or threaten the American way of
life.
So, where's the outrage? Even the Asian-American community seems to be taken
by Hung.
"As Asian Americans, we look through this racial lens, and we see this guy who
embodies all the stereotypes we're trying to escape from," said James Hou, a
documentary filmmaker who explored Asian-American male sexuality in "Masters
of the Pillow."
Hou even saw the "Breakfast at Tiffany's" link. But he doesn't want to
suppress Hung's voice, nor his desire to be a singer.
"As an Asian-American male, I think he's honest with himself," said Hou,
proud, in a strange way, that some dorky-looking Asian American with a Hong
Kong accent and no singing talent is making it happen. "I respect what he's
doing."
And what about Hung's exploiters?
"I think the motivation is greed," said Hou. "I think it would be racist if
they didn't make any money off of it, and they just wanted to make fun of
him."
Hou's Faustian money-makes-it-all-right pragmatism surprises me, especially
because he called Hung a "sideshow act" and admitted that the singer
embarrasses Hou's pals.
"But if he turns into a mega-star, if he's really successful, I think it's
going to be positive," said Hou. "With money comes power and fame. This guy
has the potential to make hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of dollars.
Ask William Hung if he's exploited."
Spoken like a guy who wouldn't mind trading places with Hung.
But one man who doesn't have Hung envy and who sees the racism is Shaofan Li,
Hung's civil-engineering professor at UC Berkeley.
Li has all the answers, especially when you are looking to solve the
differential equation for beam deflection.
Li, who said he is very concerned about his student, added that Hung scored an
80 (out of 100) in the first midterm in his class. That merits a grade of B,
so Hung's no dummy. But Li knows Hung is capable of an A -- in engineering,
not singing.
"I hope it comes to an end," he said last week of the Hung hype.
More than Hung's grades, Li is concerned for the young man's well being. To
him, the racism is clear.
Li said he sees how people ridicule Hung, single him out and extrapolate his
virtues, or nonvirtues, to the entire racial class.
"I can see that some people are malicious," said Li. "I'm not stupid."
But understanding why the public likes Hung is more complex. "He doesn't have
singing talent," said Li. "But he does have a unique personality."
Li then described Hung as if he were some borderline messianic, cultlike
figure. In watching Hung perform, Li notices how his student deals with the
criticism and racism.
"Every time he faces the negative, he's oblivious," said Li. "Other people
would become insane. He doesn't. He takes it, absorbs it and turns it into a
positive. He does it without thinking, naturally. Like Forrest Gump. Stupid is
as stupid does."
But the cluelessness is just his approach -- he's a lamb, not a lion. And it
really is too bad he can't sing or dance, because, as Li described it, Hung's
trying to turn this negative situation into a positive one.
From Li's perspective, Hung is dealing, at the same time, with both the
negative and positive forces that stem from his predicament.
"I learn from him," said Li, who marvels at how Hung never gets upset in the
face of adversity.
"You don't want to criticize or make a big deal of your critics," said Li.
"You want to awaken [their] conscience. That's what Hung did. If he gets
upset, he only hurts himself."
That would make Hung like some kind of Zen master who always turns the other
cheek.
So, maybe there's something for us to learn from this experience, even if the
entertainment value of his talent is minimal.
But still, Hung's professor hopes the civil-engineering student returns to his
natural environment -- his college studies -- soon.
Does the student get it?
On the "Today" show last week, Hung played up his innocence and his extreme
earnestness.
"I hope people will see me as a serious singer," he said, "and take my singing
seriously."
Oh, boy. They have him believing the hype.
Hung doesn't see himself reinforcing stereotypes with the lame dancing and the
accented rhythmlessness of it all. He's proud of his badness.
"They're laughing at him -- I know that," said Li, touching on the racist
nature of the exploitation. "And, if it stretches out, the negativity will
dominate. Someone has to draw the line. Prolonging the process will make it a
big debacle."
I'm with the professor. The joke has gone on too long. And it's worse when the
participant is so willing.
Emil Guillermo is a radio and TV commentator and the author of "Amok: Essays From an Asian American Perspective," winner of an American Book Award. E-mail: emil@amok.com
