[闲聊] nasdaq为什么弹不起来

拓荒牛

新手上路
注册
2004-04-17
消息
34
荣誉分数
0
声望点数
0
1.中国经济紧缩,削减基建规模,人为压低劳动力成本,造成美国就业压力增大.
2.升息消息导致上市公司支出加大,投资者对盈利预期普遍失去信心.
3.主力意图逼空市场,趁火打劫.
4.投资者对大盘无从判断,造成技术层面反弹失败,逢高减仓.

此番下跌,很可能会跌破1900,主力心狠手辣,刻意打压,市场还未出现恐慌性抛售,无量下跌,何时到底恐怕成交量放出来才能知道.

大家慢慢等待吧,下周恐怕也弹不起来.
 
经济是在复苏,这能保证股票市场以后是向上。FMOC加息是对市场短期的因素,不过最坏就是加息。长期维持低息也会影响经济。

转贴BUSINESSWEEK这星期的评论如下:

http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/feb2004/pi2004024_5284.htm

A Quality Improvement for Earnings

The latest update of S&P's Core Earnings measure for companies in the S&P 500 shows a strong rise, thanks mostly to lower pension costs
By most accounts, the latest earnings season shows that profit growth is heating up. So far, about two-thirds of companies in the S&P 500-stock index have reported December-quarter results. Standard & Poor's estimates that the quarter's operating earnings rose 24%. In addition, 81% of these companies have reported higher sales from the year-ago quarter. And for full-year 2003, S&P 500 operating earnings are running 4.6% ahead of estimates and 30% above 2002's results, according to S&P.

Even better, earnings quality is improving. S&P Core Earnings, which among other things adjusts for pension accounting and options expenses, are expected to increase 56% for the fourth quarter because of the decline in unusual items being reported. For all of 2003, S&P Core Earnings are estimated to jump 79%, after rising 48% in 2002 and declining 59% in 2001.

RISING SALES. S&P Core Earnings posted such strong gains mainly because pension costs fell as the overall stock market rallied in 2003, explains Howard Silverblatt, equity market analyst for S&P. For 2003, he figures pension-interest expenses for S&P 500 companies amount to just 29 cents per share, a large improvement from $5.01 per share in 2002, when the market dropped, he says. For 2004, Silverblatt sees no pension-interest expense that would cut into Core Earnings for the 500 companies.

Another encouraging sign is that sales are expected to rise for the first time in three years. So far, they've improved 9%. This has helped boost operating margins from 7.4% in 2002 to 8.8% for 2003, Silverblatt says.

In general, companies are disclosing more information to investors and aren't reporting as many unusual charges or items as in previous years. This has helped close the gap between S&P Core Earnings and traditional, or as-reported, numbers for S&P 500 outfits. S&P estimates 2003 Core Earnings of $42.31 per share for the S&P 500, compared with $45.43 for as-reported earnings per share. Back in 2001, S&P Core Earnings were $16 per share for the S&P 500, vs. $24.69 as-reported results. "We believe that the convergence of as-reported and S&P Core Earnings figures has positive implications for the overall quality of corporate earnings," says Silverblatt, who compiles the data for S&P.

BIGGEST GAP. BusinessWeek Online's latest S&P Core Earnings Scoreboard shows the traditional and S&P Core Earnings for the S&P 500 companies for the trailing 12 months ended in September or October. (Full-year 2003 results should be available for most companies in our next S&P Core Earnings update at the end of March.)

A few outfits still have a wide gap between Core Earnings income and as-reported results. IBM (IBM ) had the widest difference, due mostly to a $4 billion pension expense in the September quarter, according to S&P. Verizon (VZ ) reported $2.9 billion in charges for severance, pension, and benefits costs related to its recent layoffs.

On the other hand, Time Warner (TWX ) had much higher Core Earnings than as-reported earnings because of a $44 billion asset writedown in 2002 as it restructured, says S&P.

S&P devised its methodology for Core Earnings in 2002 to bring more transparency and consistency to earnings analysis and forecasts. BusinessWeek Online's scoreboard can help investors find which companies may be overstating profits by ignoring costs related to items such as stock options, pensions, and purchased research.
 
去年担心复苏不会带动就业,目前来看就业市场也在改善。从技术层面,股市可能受油价,伊拉克,未来加息,大选影响而继续下跌。目前,经济好转的因素被市场忽略,到某时间,这因素又会变成股市上升的理由。


http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/may2004/nf2004057_2030_db035.htm


No Longer the "Jobless Recovery"

April marks another upside surprise in hiring, and inside the jobs report are the makings of more solid economic figures soon to come
After being blind-sided by a far-greater-than-expected rise in nonfarm payrolls in March, Wall Street was taken by surprise yet again by the April employment report, released May 7. The economy added 288,000 jobs during the month, far greater than the consensus forecast of a 170,000 gain (and the 150,000 we at Action Economics were expecting). In our view, this report is the best evidence yet that the "jobless recovery" is over.

The key question, of course: How will the Fed react? Sustained strength in employment is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for a near-term Fed rate hike. Despite the better than 80% chance of a hike in June that's now priced into the Fed funds futures market, at Action Economics we don't expect the Fed to move that fast, especially since it isn't in inflation preemption mode.

Presumably, if Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan can spin a tempered inflation outlook and isn't compelled by the overall economic data to tighten in June or August, he may be able to delay a rate rise until after the November elections.

COUNTERVAILING PATTERNS. In the May 7 report, the outsize payroll gain in March was revised even higher, to 337,000 from 308,000. February was also revised significantly higher. The unemployment rate dropped to 5.6% from 5.7% in March, once again bettering the consensus forecast that it would remain at 5.7%. Hourly earnings increased 0.3% (the consensus was 0.2%). The report's only part that was weaker than expected was the workweek, which remained at 33.7 hours (below the consensus expectation of 33.8).

On closer inspection, the April jobs data revealed the usual mix of countervailing patterns, though the market always keys on whatever swing is seen in the payrolls number. The hefty payroll gain, following the upwardly revised March figure, occurred alongside a flat workweek figure. The solid increase in wages may mean both a stronger trajectory for job growth and earnings.

Another surprise came from the manufacturing sector. Factory employment has been unexpectedly strong over the past three months, rising a revised 37,000 over the period. But the workweek posted a hefty drop, to 40.6 hours, from a peak of 41 in January and February, and overtime indicators declined as well.

MORE WORKERS, FEWER HOURS. The result is that factory output is accelerating right on schedule, but now in a way that's grabbing the market's attention. Apparently, employers are willing to meet expected output growth with more workers rather than more hours.

The report could signal another strong round of economic data this month. The data translate to a fairly modest 0.4% industrial production gain in April, with weakness attributable to the sluggish workweek data. However, the solid earnings gain allows a bigger personal-income increase of 0.6%. This mix means industrial-production growth on a quarterly basis will actually moderate in the second quarter to around 5% from 6.6% in the first, while disposable-income growth hovers at 7.5% in the second quarter -- boosted by tax-law effects -- following a similarly aided 7.7% rate in the first.

In total, the employment report will leave hours-worked growing at a 2.5% to 3% rate in the second quarter, following 1.9% in both the prior quarter and in 2003's fourth quarter.

BONDS OFF, DOLLAR UP. What does that mean for the overall economy? By our estimates, gross domestic product is soaring at about a 7% rate, which means productivity will remain in the robust 4% to 5% range -- despite the improving conditions in the labor market.

Bond and stock markets initially reacted somewhat negatively to the data on May 7, choosing to focus on the very real chance that the Federal Reserve will hike rates sooner than previously thought. Treasury prices sank, with the yield on the benchmark 10-year note vaulting to 4.75% in a heartbeat after dipping to 4.53% just prior to the announcement. Stock prices moved mostly lower as well. In contrast, the dollar rallied sharply vs. other major currencies on the expectation of higher rates.
 
应该是国债市场的资金在打压吃货。
 
后退
顶部