diversification

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 hh_ca
  • 开始时间 开始时间

hh_ca

知名会员
注册
2002-08-04
消息
270
荣誉分数
13
声望点数
128
Asset allocation/diversification 好象是理财第一定律。听过一个financial advisor 的课,大意是把投资按比例放到不同的sector 去,每年做一次或几次调整。调整的规则是卖掉高回报的,买进的回报的。这样有两个好处:保持各个sector投资比例。For you to sell high and buy low. 当时我问道:这种策略期望的回报和market index 相比怎样?照我理解,这种策略的最好结果是和大市相当。当时financial advisor的回答是这种策略可以以index得两倍增长。但当大市不好的时候,损失是大市的一半。我当时觉得不可能,要进一步解释,被financial advisor搪塞过去了。

在这里问行家同样的问题:这种策略的好处是lower risks. 但代价是return也低了。risk <==> return是连在一起的。You can't have your cake and eat it too.

理解得对吗?
 
then, what is low return in your mind?
The most important issue for asset allocation fund is the managment, they decided what sector to hold and which to release.

Primerica Common Sense Asset Builder II
1 month: 1.7
3 month: 4.9
6 month: 5.0
YTD: 8.0
1 year: 12.4
3 year: 6.0
5 year: 6.1
10 year: 9.4
Since inception:8.8

Source: AGF.com

This asset allocation fund is the product of Primerica, some more detail as follows:

RRSP Eligible: Yes
Minimum Lumpsum: 500
Minimum subsequence lumpsum: 50
Minimum PAC amount: 25
Capital guarantee: Yes, at 75%
Managing Company: AGF
Free Withdrawn: 10% every calender year

The group average for asset allocation is about 0.5%-1.5% lower than this fund. Even at the bad year, like the 3 year average, and 5 year average is slow. We are still manage to maintain our return above 5%.

Is 10 year average 9.4% bad? Its hard to say. Some people satisfy with GIC ( 100% captial guarantee ) at only 3%, 9.4% with 75% captial guarantee should be very attractive. Some fund has performance like 43% every year, but next year is -30%. Its depends on the client's tolerance of risks and style.

Interested to know more? Please give me a call @613-864-4421 or leave message @1-866-840-8682.
David
 
Sorry, Pls do not make personal advertisement here again. I am not going to let it stay here again.:)
 
最初由 hh_ca 发布
Asset allocation/diversification 好象是理财第一定律。听过一个financial advisor 的课,大意是把投资按比例放到不同的sector 去,每年做一次或几次调整。调整的规则是卖掉高回报的,买进的回报的。这样有两个好处:保持各个sector投资比例。For you to sell high and buy low. 当时我问道:这种策略期望的回报和market index 相比怎样?照我理解,这种策略的最好结果是和大市相当。当时financial advisor的回答是这种策略可以以index得两倍增长。但当大市不好的时候,损失是大市的一半。我当时觉得不可能,要进一步解释,被financial advisor搪塞过去了。

在这里问行家同样的问题:这种策略的好处是lower risks. 但代价是return也低了。risk <==> return是连在一起的。You can't have your cake and eat it too.

理解得对吗?
risk 和return 是联系在一起的.如果要是大势非常好的话,由于asset allocation,有可能会失去最获利的那部分资产利润.但是长期来看,asset allocation绝对可以防止在大势下降的时候某一种asset class的价值陡降。
如果是tactical management管理fund, 那么对于基金管理者的水平和技术要求会比strategic management要求更高。Timing market不可能永远成功。
 
后退
顶部