不爱养宠物就是没爱心吗？

[凡间精灵]

糊涂中。

 

[光辉岁月]

养宠物才是没爱心！鱼，本来属于大海湖泊；鸟，本来属于天空树林；现在被放在一个狭小的空间里，如同人类的监狱。猫和狗更是悲惨，为了人类的私人喜好，彻底地放弃了自由自在的大自然。养宠物居然和爱心联到一起，实在是滑天下之大稽！
大家新年快乐。

 

[Kent以东首帅哥]

世界上还有几亿人没有饭吃, 怎么能把宝贵的粮食去喂狗?

 

[geek]

为什么这样说呢？！
爱心不是体现在养宠物身上的？！

 

[haoren1]

最初由 光辉岁月 发布
养宠物才是没爱心！鱼，本来属于大海湖泊；鸟，本来属于天空树林；现在被放在一个狭小的空间里，如同人类的监狱。猫和狗更是悲惨，为了人类的私人喜好，彻底地放弃了自由自在的大自然。养宠物居然和爱心联到一起，实在是滑天下之大稽！
大家新年快乐。

I have a dog, and so I have a say about people with dogs. I have had my dog (Sugar is her name) for 11 years. I have given her the best care in the best of my ability. Now, I have been raising my dog like a child, with nothing but a heart of love. My dog was born in 1994, with her 7 other siblings. Dogs are domestic animals, no longer suited for wild life. The choice to give her life was not mine, but the choice to give her good care and to provide her with a happy living environment is mine. I feed her, bathe her, and I make sure I spend time with her, playing toy fetching in parks and at home, and she loves it.

There may be an argument to be made in that the first humans, our ancestors, who first domesticated wild dogs were selfish, but we don't know for sure how dogs became domesticated. One theory says that wild dogs started following humans and living around humans. Eventually this special species became domesticated. So, perhaps, dogs and humans are meant to be living together.

Having dogs or not is not a standard of loving hearts. Some loving people love dogs, and others don't. It's not right to say those who don't have dogs lack loving hearts, nor is it right to say those who have pets must have loving hearts, because some people abuse or neglect their pets. However, one thing is for sure. Those who have dogs and give their dogs love and good care are the ones with hearts of love, and I am one of them. I have been going out with this girl whom I met recently, and I know she has a loving heart. She loves dogs, too. So, my theory seems to be right

 

[新人甲]

养宠物可以培养小孩的爱心。但是随随便便养个宠物，几天新鲜劲儿过去后，又随随便便的转让或卖了就是爱心缺乏的表现了。

 

[haoren1]

最初由 新人甲 发布
养宠物可以培养小孩的爱心。但是随随便便养个宠物，几天新鲜劲儿过去后，又随随便便的转让或卖了就是爱心缺乏的表现了。

Can't agree more

 

[oread]

Dogs and cats are meant to be a companion.

Non-pet owners are not necessarily non-loving people, but pet owners are generally loving people. Note that pet owners here refer to responsible pet owners, not those who abandon pets due to personal inconvenience.

光辉岁月: welcome back.

 

[光辉岁月]

最初由 haoren1 发布


Having dogs or not is not a standard of loving hearts. Some loving people love dogs, and others don't. It's not right to say those who don't have dogs lack loving hearts, nor is it right to say those who have pets must have loving hearts, because some people abuse or neglect their pets.

同意。

 

[光辉岁月]

最初由 渐渐 发布

光辉岁月: welcome back.

谢谢。

 

[Diver]

最初由 新人甲 发布
养宠物可以培养小孩的爱心。但是随随便便养个宠物，几天新鲜劲儿过去后，又随随便便的转让或卖了就是爱心缺乏的表现了。

对，养宠物没有错，但是随便的抛弃宠物才是没有爱心的表现。

 

[凡间精灵]

恩，对，本人一直认为如果照顾自己和家人都很忙了的话，就不要再去照顾宠物了，因为你根本照顾不好宠物又何必去养它。这和要不要孩子是1样的道理。养的好再养，养不好还是不要的好。和爱心是没关系的。可是有些弱智的人非要把有没有爱心和养不养宠物联系起来，真是太愚蠢了。本来我还有点糊涂，现在已经很明白了，爱心和养宠物放在一起，不过是愚蠢的人自认为对的愚蠢道理。

 

[看你就烦]

小孩养宠物是因为兄弟姐妹太少。没伴玩。也便於培养爱心。
大人养宠物纯粹是吃饱了撑的。没事可以去扫扫街道嘛。

 

[punkren]

这还有个钱的问题

我连自己都养不活

总不能因为这说我没爱心

 

[.╉假の面╉.]

此帖题目一看就是错的

爱心可以表现在N多方面