[警告] 别去CNN投票,投再多,结果都是一样的!

☆NightWolf☆

开坛元勋]兼[金钻长老
VIP
注册
2004-10-04
消息
4,626
荣誉分数
16
声望点数
148
没用的,CNN自身就持有其中一方的观点,因此,本身就不是站在中立的角色上发起投票的,因此,该投票不具备公正性!因此我们没必要给他提高点击率让该死的非中立媒体赚钱。

不信,你看看他的宣传吧:
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/asiapcf/04/13/china.japan.ap/index.html

What Chinese textbooks don't say
Thursday, April 14, 2005 Posted: 0806 GMT (1606 HKT)

SHANGHAI, China (AP) -- Some things you won't find in Chinese history textbooks: the 1989 democracy movement, the millions who died in a famine caused by misguided communist policies or China's military attacks on India and Vietnam.

As China criticizes Japan for new textbooks that critics say minimize wartime abuses like the Japanese military forcing Asian women into sexual slavery, Beijing's own schoolbooks have significant omissions about the communist system's own history and relations with its neighbors.

"With rising Chinese nationalism, the efforts to rewrite history, to reinterpret history according to the demands of nationalism have become a major national pastime," said Maochun Yu, a history professor at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland.

Experts say China's textbooks are written to heighten a sense of national victimhood and glorify the Communist Party that seized power in a 1949 revolution and lashes out at any threat to its rule.

The books describe those who died fighting Japan and other outsiders as having "gloriously sacrificed" themselves for China.

Propaganda paintings reproduced in schoolbooks show Chinese struggling against foreign invaders -- poses imitated by protesters who threw rocks at the Japanese Embassy in Beijing over the weekend during violent anti-Japanese demonstrations in several Chinese cities.

An eighth-grade history book used in Shanghai, China's most cosmopolitan city, repeatedly refers to Japanese by an insulting phrase that roughly translates as "Jap bandits."

The book focuses on Japanese atrocities and repeats China's claim that 35 million Chinese died or were injured during their 1937-45 war.

"Wherever the Japanese army went, they burned, killed, stole and plundered," the book says. "There was no wickedness they didn't commit."

Omissions of major events appear aimed at shoring up China's image of itself as a non-aggressor, especially since the 1949 revolution.

The books don't mention the brief but bloody 1962 border war with India that broke out when Chinese troops attacked Indian positions to enforce territorial claims.

There is nothing on the 1979 war when Chinese troops attacked Vietnam. The assault was ordered to punish Hanoi for ousting the murderous Khmer Rouge regime in Cambodia, which was an ally of Beijing.

Also missing:


The 1989 crackdown on democracy demonstrations, when Chinese troops killed hundreds and possibly thousands of unarmed protesters.


The estimated 30 million Chinese who starved to death during the 1958-61 "Great Leap Forward," revolutionary leader Mao Zedong's attempt to speed up China's farm and factory output through mass collectivization.

Textbooks gloss over ally North Korea's invasion of South Korea at the start of the 1950-53 Korean War, a conflict that drew in troops from the United States and other countries on the side of the South and China's army in support of the North.

The texts say only that "civil war broke out," without mentioning how it started. America is portrayed as an invader that forced Beijing to intervene by threatening Chinese territory.

A seventh-grade text also accuses the U.S. military of using biological weapons during the Korean War, repeating a claim made by China, North Korea and the former Soviet Union during the Cold War but never proven.

While Japan's distortions of its history appear driven by a reluctance to accept shame, China's are aimed at preserving communist rule, said Sin-ming Shaw, a China scholar at Oxford University in England.

"Not owning up is a calculated political policy," Shaw said.
 
我们反对日本是反对日本对历史的不负责,对侵略的美化,对和平的挑衅和对中日关系的破坏。

CNN上投票的期间不断更新关于中国的动荡史,以此去误导投票人。那些美国人有几个了解中国,又有几个去过中国。一群无知的人士也只能通过CNN上刻意上演的阴谋把戏来确定该投票的方向。

中国一定情况下是不够民主的,也犯过错误。难道就因为中国曾经犯过错误,就不能指正日本现在犯的错误?

更何况,投票题目是“中国反对日本是否正当?”实际意义上应该说,“中国反对日本篡改历史,破坏中日关系是否正当?”整个投票题目就是一个含糊不清的(先设局)。

因此,应该出现的新闻历史背景为:日本的侵略史,和日本最近的行径和中国如何反对日本才对。

现在到好了,搬中国的动荡史出来覆盖了一切。请问:动荡史和该投票有关系吗?当然没关系,自然美国人的文字功夫没那么强的,脑子也有问题,当然分不清楚CNN给的资料是否跟该投票有关(再下套)。

因此,他们只要看看投票附近的新闻背景就开始投票了,当然,猪分不清当然会投NO那一栏啦!我也见怪不怪了!毕竟,CNN已经是持有一方立场的。这样的非中立投票,你怎么去投都是没办法的。
 
没有政治倾向的媒体是不存在的

没有政治倾向的媒体是不存在的, CNN的倾向大家谁都明白.

日本人现在欺负的是中国, 美国人在一旁煽风点火,坐壁上观. 若干年后, 日本来搞美国人的时候, 美国人又会大喊大叫.就像当年拉登是美国人培养起来的一样.美国人现在意识到恐怖主义是全球和平的威胁, 但是我不知道他们知不知道军国主义的危害性和恐怖主义可以相提并论.

"今天是战场上的仇敌, 明天就会是政治上的盟友", 这句话一点没错.

最关键的是中国强大,因为在国际关系中, 没有道德可言, 只言国家利益.
 
between china and japan, the united states will NEVER on the side of china.

it is common sense that communists are viewed as enemy.
Most americans would think that way.

jmho
 
按照CNN的说法, 中国简直就是个一贯对外进行侵略扩张, 动不动就对周围国家诉诸武力,置国际公法于不顾, 具有强烈攻击性的"地区恶魔". 然而, 令人费解的是, 这样一个"侵略"成性的国家至今没有一兵一卒驻扎在其他国家的领土上.
 
等若干年后,中国取代美国成为世界霸主,CNN必定会换一种说话方式.
 
This is correct!

最初由 x-yuan-l 发布
等若干年后,中国取代美国成为世界霸主,CNN必定会换一种说话方式.

顶!
 
最初由 Mr.zhu 发布
按照CNN的说法, 中国简直就是个一贯对外进行侵略扩张, 动不动就对周围国家诉诸武力,置国际公法于不顾, 具有强烈攻击性的"地区恶魔". 然而, 令人费解的是, 这样一个"侵略"成性的国家至今没有一兵一卒驻扎在其他国家的领土上.
确实,西方这些阴险媒体就是这么宣传中国的...
这些反华的畜生,自己的P股都没擦干净,还好意思整天把眼睛盯别国身上...无耻至及
 
I will disable CNN from my cable channel. I am not going to buy CNN channel any more.
 
最初由 snoopy2000 发布
I will disable CNN from my cable channel. I am not going to buy CNN channel any more.

蒙上自己的眼睛,就以为别人看不到。
堵上自己的耳朵,就以为别人听不见。

"Disable CNN from my cable channel",who cares?
 
snoopy2000只是不喜欢看就不看咯,我觉得没什么问题啊~
 
我们来看CNN的丑恶表演:
2005.4.17 ,17:00 之前yes:53% no:47%

2005.4.17, 17:06
Yes 43% 1861395 votes
No 57% 2487638 votes
Total: 4349033 votes

2005.4.17 17:15
YES 37% 1962657 votes
No 63% 3401170 votes
Total: 5363827 votes

2005.4.17 17:32
Yes 31% 2090687 votes
No 69% 4663247 votes
Total: 6753934 votes
15分钟又中了100多万

2005.4.17 17:38
Yes 27% 2266718 votes
No 73% 5983612 votes
几分钟,又加了100多万


Yes 28% 5189075 votes
No 72% 13283293 votes
 
最初由 chieftain 发布


蒙上自己的眼睛,就以为别人看不到。
堵上自己的耳朵,就以为别人听不见。

"Disable CNN from my cable channel",who cares?

I don't care if you care or not. I just want to say what I am gonna to do by my self. If you want to beat with every one, make sure you have logical first.
 
后退
顶部
首页 论坛
消息
我的