oread
新手上路
- 注册
- 2002-01-24
- 消息
- 20,272
- 荣誉分数
- 16
- 声望点数
- 0
Unless he knows for sure he did stop, otherwise he would be comitting perjury. In case of a "my say vs. his say", guess whose words a judge would believe? Only tell the truth the whole truth nothing but the truth.
tigerfish: I think reading a map would be a good argument to counter the non-stop offence. Even though reading a map at an intersection *might* be against traffic law, but you are not charged with that, so use it to your advantage. Also as others mentioned, question if the officer got the right person since he stopped you after 1 km. Raise reasonable doubt.
I went to court twice for traffic offences, and won twice. You don't need a lawyer, just state the facts, and let the judge make the decision.
tigerfish: I think reading a map would be a good argument to counter the non-stop offence. Even though reading a map at an intersection *might* be against traffic law, but you are not charged with that, so use it to your advantage. Also as others mentioned, question if the officer got the right person since he stopped you after 1 km. Raise reasonable doubt.
I went to court twice for traffic offences, and won twice. You don't need a lawyer, just state the facts, and let the judge make the decision.
最初由 doctorz 发布
Tell them that you fully stopped for sure. unless they can provide the tape that you didnot stop. or they get the wrong car. Never never say, you cannot remember.