harrychina
知名会员
- 注册
- 2002-05-18
- 消息
- 441
- 荣誉分数
- 2
- 声望点数
- 128
Any comments on CLL.to ?
It seems to be flying.
It seems to be flying.
您正在使用一款已经过时的浏览器！部分功能不能正常使用。
请尝试升级或使用 其他浏览器。
请尝试升级或使用 其他浏览器。
About CLL.to
- 主题发起人 harrychina
- 开始时间
最初由 harrychina 发布
Any comments on CLL.to ?
It seems to be flying.
Harry, 看看这个,属长线,是我一个铁哥们推荐的,有不少人已经赚了钱.记住:试好了,请我在你那儿吃饭.
http://www.mapletalk.com/forum/viewthread?thread=177
Re: Re: About CLL.to
从有人第一次推荐,到现在至少有半年了,也没见有任何起色,总不能让人赔钱还得搭上请你吃饭吧!最初由 东南西北中 发布
Harry, 看看这个,属长线,是我一个铁哥们推荐的,有不少人已经赚了钱.记住:试好了,请我在你那儿吃饭.
http://www.mapletalk.com/forum/viewthread?thread=177
最初由 harrychina 发布
Any comments on CLL.to ?
It seems to be flying.
I bot some CLL.TO @0.80 and sold@2.46 a few months ago , didn't buy back when retrace.
Except Oil sand , Here are a few stocks you may watch
1. Junior U stocks (maybe better return than oil sand right now , U308 price is new high every day)
STM.V JNN.V RM.V VEM,V and UEX.TO(my money machine)
2. Juinor nature gas and Oil play FO.V, ODE.V....
3. Gold stock (if US $$$ contines weakness, so it means GOLD price will be up more and more) too many you can play
4. precious metal stocks (never play them, didn't do DD , but I know they are good to play))
5.two BIO-med stocks I play, FMI.TO , MPH.TO ( I have larger position on MPH.TO, play news and rumor . .. my target price is above 2+ )
Do you want to more ....
:blowzy: :blowzy: :blowzy: :blowzy:
You can get some Junior Engergy stocks FA info and sector big picture from : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JuniorEnergy
*********** Anyway, your money and your desicion ****************
Re: Re: About CLL.to
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/09/international/americas/09canada.html?pagewanted=print
October 9, 2005
In Canada's Wilderness, Measuring the Cost of Oil Profits
By CLIFFORD KRAUSS <http://query.nytimes.com/search/query?ppds=bylL&v1=CLIFFORD KRAUSS&fdq=19960101&td=sysdate&sort=newest&ac=CLIFFORD KRAUSS&inline=nyt-per>
FORT McMURRAY, Alberta - Just north of this boomtown of saloons and strip malls, a moonscape is expanding along with the price of oil.
Deep craters wider than football fields are being dug out of the pine and spruce forests and muskeg swamps by many of the largest multinational oil companies. Huge refineries that burn natural gas to refine the excavated gooey sands into synthetic oil are spreading where wolves and coyotes once roamed.
Beside the mining pits, propane cannons and scarecrows installed by the companies shoo away migrating birds from giant toxic lakes filled with water that was used in the process that separates oil sands from clay and dirt.
About 82,000 acres of forest and wetlands have been cleared or otherwise disturbed since development of oil sands began in earnest here in the late 1960's, and that is just the start. It is estimated that the current daily production of just over one million barrels of oil - the equivalent of Texas' <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/...ndpossessions/texas/index.html?inline=nyt-geo> daily production, and 5 percent of the United States' <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/...tories/unitedstates/index.html?inline=nyt-geo> daily consumption - will triple by 2015 and sextuple by 2030. The pockets of oil sands in northern Alberta - which all together equal the size of Florida <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/...possessions/florida/index.html?inline=nyt-geo> - are only beginning to be developed.
Because the oil sands region is so remote, the environmental damage receives little attention from the Canadian news media or public comment from Prime Minister Paul Martin's government. But industry leaders acknowledge that they face an enormous challenge because refining oil sands is several times more energy intensive than conventional oil production. In addition, the process is a major source of heat-trapping gases and far more destructive to the landscape than traditional drilling.
"There is a significant environmental footprint associated with the development of the resource, and that could become a potential constraint to growth," Gordon Lambert, vice president for sustainable development at Suncor Energy Inc., said in an interview. But he added that with technological improvements in extraction and refining, "we're bending the curve on a number of these historic environmental issues."
Oil sands development was once considered a crazy dream, too expensive and polluting to be profitable. But with oil prices exceeding $60 a barrel, companies like ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell and Chevron Texaco are committing large investments to new projects, and some companies are offering record-breaking bids to lease growing amounts of land for future development. Energy-hungry China <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/...ndterritories/china/index.html?inline=nyt-geo> has noticed, and Chinese companies are investing in oil sands projects and a pipeline to take the fuel to the Pacific coast for export.
In a neighboring and politically stable country, the oil sands are destined to become an increasingly important source of energy for the United States market for decades. The industry and government say the northern Alberta sands hold proven reserves of 175 billion barrels, a claim some experts dispute. But if it is true, only Saudi Arabia <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/...itories/saudiarabia/index.html?inline=nyt-geo> may have more oil.
But environmentalists have a list of warnings, starting with the energy costs of extracting the oil.
"What bugs me about oil sands is that it is a resource that is being inefficiently used," said Marlo Raynolds, executive director of the Pembina Institute, an environmental research group based in Calgary. "We're using natural gas, which is the cleanest fossil fuel, to wash sand and make a dirtier fuel. It's like using caviar to make fake crabmeat."
The environmentalists also warn that the growing oil sands industry threatens to tear up a huge stretch of Canada's <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/...dterritories/canada/index.html?inline=nyt-geo> boreal forest, which is a nursery for hundreds of bird species and where bogs filter water and store carbon that would otherwise be released into the atmosphere. They say the enormous volume of water the industry needs threatens fish in the Athabasca River, the principal water source. They predict that increases in emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide will increase levels of acid rain and destroy lake fish across northern Canada.
They also say that Canada, already behind in its commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions under the Kyoto Protocol on climate change, will not be able to reach its Kyoto targets if production of oil sands keeps rising at the current rate.
Few Canadians seem to be complaining. This year, every Albertan - even children - is receiving a $400 check in the mail from the provincial government, whose budget surplus has exploded from oil revenue. While Fort McMurray is among the fastest-growing cities in Canada, real estate prices are climbing across the province.
The few protesters tend to be local Indians, although many of the local bands are getting into the oil sands business or supplying projects with services.
"There are no moose, no rabbits, no squirrels anymore," complained Howard Lacorde, 59, a Cree trapper whose trapline has been interrupted by a new oil sands project developed by Canadian Natural Resources. "The land is dead," he added, shaking in anger, as he walked through a construction site that was once his trapline.
Suncor, the EnCana Corporation and Shell Canada Ltd. are talking about setting up a cooperative effort to capture, transport and sell carbon dioxide that otherwise would be released into the air from oil sands production. Total S.A. is considering building a nuclear power plant here to extract the oil sands without having to use increasingly expensive natural gas and reduce emissions of heat-trapping gases, which many scientists associate with global warming.
The companies say they are committed to restoring the lands they drill and mine to a state as close to natural as possible, and they note that advanced technologies are decreasing the amounts of gas released per barrel of oil they produce.
So far they have reclaimed 13,000 acres of forest and wetlands, about 15 percent of the land disturbed. But the provincial government has approved oil-sand work on more than 230,000 additional acres over the next 60 years, and applications for new projects are proliferating.
Suncor, the earliest major operator and still one of the biggest, has made a public commitment to environmental responsibility. It has planted 3.1 million trees, taking cuttings from shrubs and native vegetation. The company says it is recycling 90 percent of the water it uses, and it boasts that one species of toad considered at risk is thriving in its reclaimed ponds.
On a new production site using steam injection to liquefy rather than mine the raw material of oil sands and raise it to the surface, Suncor will reuse water from the mining operation instead of using fresh river water.
"With concerted effort and the technology in play, we will be taking on the environmental challenge aggressively," Mr. Lambert of Suncor said. But he conceded that "the economic growth we are experiencing means a rising greenhouse gas production profile."
The only thing likely to slow production is a sustained decline in oil prices, something few energy specialists predict.
"There is no environmental minister on earth who can stop the oil from coming out of the sand, because the money is too big," said Canada's environment minister, St轲hane Dion, in an interview. "But we have to be very strict on environmental impact."
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/09/international/americas/09canada.html?pagewanted=print
October 9, 2005
In Canada's Wilderness, Measuring the Cost of Oil Profits
By CLIFFORD KRAUSS <http://query.nytimes.com/search/query?ppds=bylL&v1=CLIFFORD KRAUSS&fdq=19960101&td=sysdate&sort=newest&ac=CLIFFORD KRAUSS&inline=nyt-per>
FORT McMURRAY, Alberta - Just north of this boomtown of saloons and strip malls, a moonscape is expanding along with the price of oil.
Deep craters wider than football fields are being dug out of the pine and spruce forests and muskeg swamps by many of the largest multinational oil companies. Huge refineries that burn natural gas to refine the excavated gooey sands into synthetic oil are spreading where wolves and coyotes once roamed.
Beside the mining pits, propane cannons and scarecrows installed by the companies shoo away migrating birds from giant toxic lakes filled with water that was used in the process that separates oil sands from clay and dirt.
About 82,000 acres of forest and wetlands have been cleared or otherwise disturbed since development of oil sands began in earnest here in the late 1960's, and that is just the start. It is estimated that the current daily production of just over one million barrels of oil - the equivalent of Texas' <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/...ndpossessions/texas/index.html?inline=nyt-geo> daily production, and 5 percent of the United States' <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/...tories/unitedstates/index.html?inline=nyt-geo> daily consumption - will triple by 2015 and sextuple by 2030. The pockets of oil sands in northern Alberta - which all together equal the size of Florida <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/...possessions/florida/index.html?inline=nyt-geo> - are only beginning to be developed.
Because the oil sands region is so remote, the environmental damage receives little attention from the Canadian news media or public comment from Prime Minister Paul Martin's government. But industry leaders acknowledge that they face an enormous challenge because refining oil sands is several times more energy intensive than conventional oil production. In addition, the process is a major source of heat-trapping gases and far more destructive to the landscape than traditional drilling.
"There is a significant environmental footprint associated with the development of the resource, and that could become a potential constraint to growth," Gordon Lambert, vice president for sustainable development at Suncor Energy Inc., said in an interview. But he added that with technological improvements in extraction and refining, "we're bending the curve on a number of these historic environmental issues."
Oil sands development was once considered a crazy dream, too expensive and polluting to be profitable. But with oil prices exceeding $60 a barrel, companies like ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell and Chevron Texaco are committing large investments to new projects, and some companies are offering record-breaking bids to lease growing amounts of land for future development. Energy-hungry China <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/...ndterritories/china/index.html?inline=nyt-geo> has noticed, and Chinese companies are investing in oil sands projects and a pipeline to take the fuel to the Pacific coast for export.
In a neighboring and politically stable country, the oil sands are destined to become an increasingly important source of energy for the United States market for decades. The industry and government say the northern Alberta sands hold proven reserves of 175 billion barrels, a claim some experts dispute. But if it is true, only Saudi Arabia <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/...itories/saudiarabia/index.html?inline=nyt-geo> may have more oil.
But environmentalists have a list of warnings, starting with the energy costs of extracting the oil.
"What bugs me about oil sands is that it is a resource that is being inefficiently used," said Marlo Raynolds, executive director of the Pembina Institute, an environmental research group based in Calgary. "We're using natural gas, which is the cleanest fossil fuel, to wash sand and make a dirtier fuel. It's like using caviar to make fake crabmeat."
The environmentalists also warn that the growing oil sands industry threatens to tear up a huge stretch of Canada's <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/...dterritories/canada/index.html?inline=nyt-geo> boreal forest, which is a nursery for hundreds of bird species and where bogs filter water and store carbon that would otherwise be released into the atmosphere. They say the enormous volume of water the industry needs threatens fish in the Athabasca River, the principal water source. They predict that increases in emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide will increase levels of acid rain and destroy lake fish across northern Canada.
They also say that Canada, already behind in its commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions under the Kyoto Protocol on climate change, will not be able to reach its Kyoto targets if production of oil sands keeps rising at the current rate.
Few Canadians seem to be complaining. This year, every Albertan - even children - is receiving a $400 check in the mail from the provincial government, whose budget surplus has exploded from oil revenue. While Fort McMurray is among the fastest-growing cities in Canada, real estate prices are climbing across the province.
The few protesters tend to be local Indians, although many of the local bands are getting into the oil sands business or supplying projects with services.
"There are no moose, no rabbits, no squirrels anymore," complained Howard Lacorde, 59, a Cree trapper whose trapline has been interrupted by a new oil sands project developed by Canadian Natural Resources. "The land is dead," he added, shaking in anger, as he walked through a construction site that was once his trapline.
Suncor, the EnCana Corporation and Shell Canada Ltd. are talking about setting up a cooperative effort to capture, transport and sell carbon dioxide that otherwise would be released into the air from oil sands production. Total S.A. is considering building a nuclear power plant here to extract the oil sands without having to use increasingly expensive natural gas and reduce emissions of heat-trapping gases, which many scientists associate with global warming.
The companies say they are committed to restoring the lands they drill and mine to a state as close to natural as possible, and they note that advanced technologies are decreasing the amounts of gas released per barrel of oil they produce.
So far they have reclaimed 13,000 acres of forest and wetlands, about 15 percent of the land disturbed. But the provincial government has approved oil-sand work on more than 230,000 additional acres over the next 60 years, and applications for new projects are proliferating.
Suncor, the earliest major operator and still one of the biggest, has made a public commitment to environmental responsibility. It has planted 3.1 million trees, taking cuttings from shrubs and native vegetation. The company says it is recycling 90 percent of the water it uses, and it boasts that one species of toad considered at risk is thriving in its reclaimed ponds.
On a new production site using steam injection to liquefy rather than mine the raw material of oil sands and raise it to the surface, Suncor will reuse water from the mining operation instead of using fresh river water.
"With concerted effort and the technology in play, we will be taking on the environmental challenge aggressively," Mr. Lambert of Suncor said. But he conceded that "the economic growth we are experiencing means a rising greenhouse gas production profile."
The only thing likely to slow production is a sustained decline in oil prices, something few energy specialists predict.
"There is no environmental minister on earth who can stop the oil from coming out of the sand, because the money is too big," said Canada's environment minister, St轲hane Dion, in an interview. "But we have to be very strict on environmental impact."
Re: Re: About CLL.to
5个月有近40%的涨幅!
最初由 东南西北中 发布
Harry, 看看这个,属长线,是我一个铁哥们推荐的,有不少人已经赚了钱.记住:试好了,请我在你那儿吃饭.
http://www.mapletalk.com/forum/viewthread?thread=177
5个月有近40%的涨幅!
harrychina
知名会员
- 注册
- 2002-05-18
- 消息
- 441
- 荣誉分数
- 2
- 声望点数
- 128
Re: Re: Re: Re: About CLL.to
Harry,收获怎样？
最初由 东南西北中 发布
http://www.mapletalk.com/forum/viewthread?thread=177
涨幅超过50%了！！！
Harry，是否要请我在你的Edo Japan 免费吃一餐？
Harry,收获怎样？
相关推荐
- 回复
- 3
- 查看
- 2K
- 回复
- 0
- 查看
- 614
