根据牛克思主义的理论指导,地球联盟党加拿大支部将是中产阶级性质的

wushuren

综合杂谈名誉斑竹
注册
2002-02-10
消息
6,500
荣誉分数
9
声望点数
0
根据牛克思主义的理论指导,地球联盟党的政策如下:

1税收调节政策

1)降低普通商品GST,降低企业税,活跃经济,扩大就业。
2)对大宗豪华消费品,对代表身份地位性的消费品增加GST,例如豪华游艇,豪华汽车,豪宅,贵重首饰,上流社会俱乐部资格等。

2 Welfare 政策:
领Welfare的健康适宜工作的公民包括难民,全部接受一定小时数的强制性再就业培训,和一定小时数的义务劳动。例如小学课堂教学辅助工作。

3 政府管理政策:

以提高效率减少政府开支,建立三级平民爵位制度,接受人才选拔和纪律委员会的纪律约束。初级和中级爵位以法律和哲学考试为主要进阶途径,强调社会的法制性和公务员的思想品德。具有爵位的专业人员优先获得政府公务员工作。高级爵位为考试和公民投票选举结合。

4 法制政策:
1)融合大陆法系和海洋法系,形成海岸法系。以民众随机陪审团和司法科举选拔和提升法官,做到民主法制和司法完全独立,异地为官,以司法统一带动融合和统一。民众随机陪审团的控制交给立法机关,司法机关有权以适当理由拒绝某陪审团成员,达到制衡
2) 行政机构在法理上降格为民众自治机构,仍然管理外交,军事,民生等。
3) 扩大三权分立中的司法权,拥有警察社会治安管理权。9位最高法官成为国家法理上的最高国家首脑。以法制完成社会公正和惩治腐败。
5 教育和文化政策:
多元化,在教育系统中引入各种文明体系中的优秀部分,对下一代进行教育。
 
不买最好的,专买最贵的。(牛克思主义中的剩余价值和剥削解释)

马克思主义中关于剩余价值和剥削的解释被很多人所熟知,也被很多左翼政党作为理论基础。牛克思主义基于马克思主义的进一步发展,必然无可逃避地解释剥削的问题,剩余价值的问题。根据当今社会的情况预测未来社会体制的走向,唯有如此才能担当起结果马克思主义未竟社会体制创新任务,把人类社会推向更高的阶段。

马克思主义解释说,剩余价值是在刨除了劳动力成本和生产资料成本以后剩余的价值。并且进一步说,剥削发生于资本家全部占有剩余价值,并且尽量压低工人的工资,降低劳动力力成本。这在西方国家18,19世纪是很普遍的现象。也就是说在制衡失效的社会体制和情况下,这是必然发生的现象,不论是奴隶社会,封建社会,还是资本社会。在这种情况下,阶级斗争将趋于激化。即马克思主义理论就是基于这种现象地解释。然后马克思试图以全部采用公有制来克制剥削。这是一种极端性的方法,在其他方面造成了严重的失败。

在生产关系,制衡相对健全的的法制社会下,剩余价值的剥削和劳动力成本的压缩会被尽量减少,剥削是可以被克制的。举例来说,失业者有失业保险,老人有养老基金,残疾人有保障基金等,最低工资,工伤保护条例,退休基金。这些生产关系机制的资金都来自于剩余价值。生产关系可以反过来作用于生产力,这也是马克思主义中的解释,而马克思忽略了这一点能发挥的作用。这就是马克思在《共产党宣言》中所不看好的资产阶级的社会主义。

在制衡健全的体制和生产关系下,会产生另外一种剥削,那就是有劳动能力的人,但不去劳动,而以群体政治效应,无偿享受制衡产生的社会福利,剥削剩余价值。这在完全的公有制和部分的公有制机构内,甚至表现为消极怠工,以消极方式试图扩大自己对别人的剥削。道德高尚的无产阶级理论就失败于这里。这是暗藏于当前生产关系的另外一种剥削。是当前生产关系不健全的一个表现。

为此,当前中国要解决的问题是解决制衡的时候不牺牲效率。而当前西方国家要解决的是如何消灭制衡机制伴生的剥削,也就是如何提高效率。在完美的平衡点,达成同时解决中国等发展国家的问题,也解决西方国家的问题,克服国家内部的阶级剥削也克服掉了民族和国家之间的剥削,那就是属于未来的社会体制,更先进的民主体制,在当前生产力下的制衡和效率的综合最大。这不是简单地用大政府小政府高税收和低税收就能解决的问题,也不是简单地用全部公有制或者依靠道德高尚的无产阶级就能解决的问题。

世界上的国家机构都是由私有制变成公有制的,既帝王和贵族私有变成了人民大众公有。任何不直接创造产值的国家机构均被认为是依靠社会生产的剩余价值来维持运转。其中的工作人员也存在劳动生产率问题,存在劳动力成本。大大低于社会平均生产率的部分,即可被认为是对社会生产的剩余价值进行了恶劣占用和对社会上的劳动者进行了剥削。相对于富有者的挥霍所表现出的剥削是个人原因造成的,这里却是由于体制不健全造成的,不是个人原因。不论是西方国家还是中国,都没有解决好这个体制问题。

拥有劳动能力,却躲避劳动恶意占用税收享受福利的情况,政府机构人员用腐败来更多占用剩余价值的情况,则既是体制原因也是个人原因。

腐败问题和消极怠工一样,被归入在生产关系内试图更多占有剩余价值来进行剥削。不论是西方体制还是中国体制,都面临这个问题。西方体制内还多一个有劳动能力但是拒绝劳动,而宁愿享受福利的剥削群体。中国体制内存在的资本直接剥削,因为制衡机制不健全,是比较严重的。中西,有区别点,也有共同点。
在充分的制衡体制下,在大多数情况下,某种工作的劳动力成本约=每个人的税后收入,维持劳动力再生产包括住宿,食物,教育,体育,休闲,艺术享受等。税收可以被认为全部由剩余价值产生,由雇主从剩余价值中预付。国家总体剩余价值约=国家全部税收+扩大再生产资金+极端富有的人不健康挥霍的资金和消费。

剥削的四个表现如下:
1,在税收供养下的政府和公有制部门出现的腐败。
2,具有劳动能力没到退休年龄而不劳动,宁愿享受福利占用税收。
3,公有制部门形成的消极和效率低下。
4,极端富有者的挥霍消费资金来源。


即牛克思主义中,不单纯以资本来定性剥削,而以对剩余价值的占用情况来定性剥削。

对于极端富有者,投入资本市场,股票基金,银行存款和生产资料的资金,不算对剩余价值的不合理占用。另外在一定程度上富有者也有劳动力再生产成本,例如投入教育,抚育子女,住宿,食物,艺术欣赏,体育休闲等。虽然其中的程度不好判断,但其中必然有挥霍现象存在。挥霍的程度,和人的修养程度,教育水平,世界观,都是有关系的。最终的恶劣挥霍才构成对剩余价值的实际恶劣占用,构成剥削。简单来说剥削是什么。剥削的一种表现就是不买最好的,专买最贵的。
 
海洋法系,大陆法系和牛克思主义的海岸法系。
作者:舞树人

简单来说,海洋法系又被称为普通法系。其显著特征是使用民众随机陪审团,法律程序的维护是由法官完成。罪犯是否有罪是由民众组成的随机陪审团决定的。
而大陆法系是由法官来同时完成维护程序正义和判断罪犯是否有罪。也就是说法官是按照法律来断案的。海岸法系从字面上的意思来看,就是介于海洋法系和大陆法系之间的意思,是牛克思主义的独创。到目前为止,海岸法系还只是牛克思主义者的一个设想。



英美等国采用的是海洋法系。
而中国采用的是大陆法系。

按照牛克思主义,依法治国的口号即使再响亮也没有用,采用了什么样的法系才是根本。

中国的出路有两种,1,照搬英美国家的海洋法系。
2,按照牛克思主义实行海岸法系。

海岸法系作为介于海洋法系和海岸法系之间的一种司法系统和法律体系,
采用了陪审团制度。海岸法系的陪审团不去判断罪犯是否有罪,而是判断法官。这判断的结果通过累计,将决定一个资格法官是否可以获得升迁。陪审团通过间接的方式,即实现了民主法制,也间接判断罪犯,同时判断了哪位法官是包青天能够获得升迁。

一箭双雕地实现了法制和民主。

西方国家在适当的情况下,也会过渡到海岸法系。最高法院的法官将是通过海岸法系的选拔程序获得任命的,不是政客们争斗和协调的结果。也不是某个伟大的党的领导来任命的。

空喊法治,没有体制的根本变化是没有用的,只有实行海洋法系或者牛克思主义的海岸法系。中国民众自古就有判断法官的传统,给他们一个机制,他们就能判断出谁是包大人,让这个包大人获得升迁,获得终审权利。虽然体制最终要靠人来实现,可优秀的体制将获得管理优势是已经被社会实践证明了的。这样才能保证社会公平和秩序。。有了这么一个民主的司法系统,腐败问题将面对一把锋利无比的倚天剑。

整个地球联盟通过改造中国这样的司法系统,改造英美等西方国家的司法系统,完成海岸法系,达到统合,让我们人类共同奔向牛克思主义的美好明天。
 
转自法学考研网:

法系是依据法律的历史渊源和传统以及由此形成的不同存在样式和运行方式,而对现存的和历史上存在过的各种法律制度所做的分类。凡是具有相同历史渊源和传统,具有相同或相近的存在样式和运行方式的法律制度,便被视为属于同一个法律家族,即法系。
资本主义国家的法律制度可以分为大陆法系和英美法系。大陆法系又称罗马法系、民法法系,是承袭古罗马法的传统,仿照《法国民法典》和《德国民法典》的样式而建立起来的各国法律制度的总称。英美法系又称英国法系、普通法系,是承袭英国中世纪法律传统而发展起来的各国法律制度的总称。
大陆法系与英美法系都是资本主义经济关系的产物,但由于受不同历史条件的影响,在存在样式和运行方式上也各具特点。
一、观点一
两者的主要区别包括以下几个方面:
(一)法律渊源不同
大陆法系是成文法系,是其法律以成文法即制定法的方式存在,它的法律渊源包括立法机关制定的各种规范性法律文件、行政机关颁布的各种行政法规以及本国参加的国际条约,但不包括司法判例。英美法系的法律渊源既包括各种制定法,也包括判例,而且,判例所构成的判例法在整个法律体系中占有非常重要的地位。
(二)法律结构不同
大陆法系承袭古代罗马法的传统,习惯于用法典的形式对某一法律部门所包含的规范做统一的系统规定,法典构成了法律体系结构的主干。英美法系很少制定法典,习惯用单行法的形式对某一类问题做专门的规定,因而,其法律体系在结构上是以单行法和判例法为主干而发展起来的。

(三)法官的权限不同
大陆法系强调法官只能援用成文法中的规定来审判案件,法官对成文法的解释也需要受成文法本身的严格限制,故法官只能适用法律而不能创造法律。英美法系的法官既可以援用成文法也可以援用已有的判例来审判案件,而且,也可以在一定的条件下运用法律解释和法律推理的技术创造新的判例,从而,法官不仅适用法律,也在一定的范围内创造法律。

(四)诉讼程序的不同
大陆法系的诉讼程序以法官为重心,突出法官的职能,具有纠问程序的特点,而且,多由法官和陪审员共同组成法庭来审判案件。英美法系的诉讼程序以原告、被告及其辩护人和代理人为重心,法官只是双方争论的“仲裁人”而不能参与争论,与这种对抗式程序同时存在的是陪审团制度,陪审团主要负责作出事实上的结论和法律上的基本结论,法官负责作出法律上的具体结论,即判决。

(五)其他方面
此外,两大法系在法律分类、法律术语、法学教育、司法人员录用和司法体制等方面,也有许多不同之处。
二、观点二
也有学者认为二者的差别大体上有以下几种:
1. 法律渊源方面的差别。在民法法系国家,制定法是主要的法律渊源,并不存在判例法。在普通法法系国家,判例被认为是正式意义的法律渊源之一,即上级法院的判例对下级法院在审判类似案件时有法律上的约束力。判例法和制定法是并行存在的。
2. 在适用法律技术方面的差别。在民法法系国家中,法官审理案件时,除确定事实外,首先是考虑有关制定法如何规定。在普通法法系国家,法官在审理案件时,除确定事实外,首先要考虑以前类似案件的判例。
3. 在法典编纂方面的差别。民法法系国家的一些基本法律一般采用较系统的法典形式。普通法系国家一般不倾向法典形式,它的制定法一般是单行的法律、法规。这一差异已日益缩小。
4. 在法律分类方面的差别。民法法系国家法律的基本分类是公法和私法,公法主要指宪法、行政法和刑法,诉讼程序法一般也属于公法。私法主要指导民法和商法。进入20世纪后,又有兼有公私法两种成分的法律,如社会法、经济法和劳动法等。普通法法系的基本分类是普通法和衡平法,在传统上并无公法和私法之分。
5. 在法律概念、术语上的差别。这一法系所使用的一些重要概念、术语,在另一法系中是没有的,或者同一个概念、术语,在两大法系中却具有不同含义。
6. 在哲学倾向上的差别。以上这些差别主要是由于两大法系的不同历史背景造成的,也体现了不同的哲学倾向。一般地说,民法法系较倾向理性主义,普通法法系较倾向经验主义。
 
The average corporate tax rate in Canada is now below the average U.S. tax rate, and will be more than 6 percentage points lower by 2008.
Small businesses: Significantly lower corporate tax rates in Canada than in the U.S. on annual income above C$75,000. Similar corporate tax rates in Canada and the U.S. on income below C$75,000.
Capital gains: A $500,000 lifetime capital gains exemption for small business shares that has no equivalent in the U.S.
Research and development: A 20-per-cent research and development (R&D) tax credit in Canada for all R&D expenditures compared to the U.S. 20-per-cent credit for incremental R&D.
A 35-per-cent refundable tax credit available to smaller Canadian- controlled private corporations that has no equivalent in the U.S.


Background
In Budget 2003 the Government of Canada announced measures to strengthen the Canadian tax advantage. These measures build on the Five-Year Tax Reduction Plan introduced in 2000―the largest tax cut in the country’s history. The plan reduced personal income tax rates at all income levels and introduced a number of tax measures to promote investment and entrepreneurship in Canada.

Lower Corporate Taxes
Large and Medium-Sized Businesses
The average (federal-provincial) Canadian corporate tax rate, including capital taxes, is now lower than that of the U.S.

In the 2003 budget the Government announced the elimination of the federal capital tax over five years. The tax will be completely eliminated for medium-sized corporations as early as 2004.

By 2008, taking into account announced reductions in provincial tax rates, the average Canadian corporate tax rate will be more than 6 percentage points below the average U.S. rate (see table at the end of document).

Small Businesses
Although average corporate tax rates in Canada and the U.S. are similar on annual income up to C$75,000, they are significantly lower in Canada on income above that amount. In the 2003 budget the Government added to this advantage by announcing that the annual amount of income eligible for the low small business tax rate of 12 per cent would be increased from $200,000 to $300,000 over four years.

Start-up companies and entrepreneurs in Canada can already benefit from several tax provisions that are more advantageous than what is available in other countries. These provisions include a $500,000 lifetime capital gains exemption, tax-free rollovers, and generous R&D tax credits.

Resource Sector
The Government is improving the taxation of the resource sector in Canada, comprising the mining and oil and gas industries, by reducing the corporate tax rate for resource income from 28 to 21 per cent over five years while making improvements to the tax structure.

Research and Development
Canada offers one of the most generous scientific research and experimental development tax incentive regimes in the world.

Eligible R&D expenditures qualify for a 20-per-cent R&D credit, while smaller Canadian-controlled private corporations benefit from a 35-per-cent refundable tax credit on eligible R&D expenditures.

Canada-U.S. Corporate Tax Rate Comparisons - Current and Proposed

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2003 2008

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(%)
Canada
Federal income tax rate
General rate 23.00 21.001
Surtax2 1.12 1.12
24.12 22.12
Provincial average income tax rate3 12.0 9.8
Federal-provincial income tax rate 36.1 31.9
Federal-provincial corporate tax rate (including capital taxes)4 39.4 33.8
United States
Federal income tax rate 35.0 35.0
Average state income tax rate5 4.0 4.0
Federal-state income tax rate 39.0 39.0
Federal-state corporate tax rate (including capital taxes) 40.0 40.0
Difference between Canada and United States
Income tax rate -2.9 -7.1
Corporate tax rate (including capital taxes) -0.6 -6.2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 The federal tax rate will drop to this level in 2004.
2 The federal surtax remains at 1.12 per cent (i.e. 4 per cent of the 28-per-cent rate).

3 The provincial average income tax rate is a weighted average.

4 The income tax rate equivalent of capital taxes has been included.

5 The state income tax rate is the effective rate after taking into account the deductibility of state taxes for federal tax purposes.

Federal Corporate Tax Rate Reductions
The Government of Canada is creating a tax advantage for investment and entrepreneurship in Canada. The average Canadian corporate tax rate, including capital taxes, is now lower than that of the U.S. By 2008 it will be more than 6 percentage points below the average U.S. rate.

Background
In Budget 2003 the Government of Canada announced measures to strengthen the Canadian tax advantage. These measures build on the Five-Year Tax Reduction Plan introduced in 2000―the largest tax cut in the country’s history. The plan reduced personal income tax rates at all income levels and introduced a number of tax measures to promote investment and entrepreneurship in Canada. (See end of document for a list of tax reduction measures.)

Tax Rate Reductions for Larger Corporations
In 2000 the Government of Canada announced that the general corporate tax rate would be reduced from 28 to 21 per cent by 2004. As of January 2003 the rate has been reduced to 23 per cent. As the table below illustrates, the rate reduction is being phased in over four years.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(%)
General federal corporate tax rate 28 27 25 23 21

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Elimination of the Federal Capital Tax
In the 2003 budget the Government announced the elimination of the federal capital tax over five years. Medium-sized businesses with less than $50 million in taxable capital will benefit from full capital tax elimination as of 2004. The table below summarizes the proposed changes to the federal capital tax rate and threshold.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal capital tax rate (%) 0.225 0.200 0.175 0.125 0.0625
Capital deduction threshold ($ millions) 10 50 50 50 50

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Improving the Income Taxation of the Resource Sector

In the 2003 budget the Government announced that it would improve the taxation of resource income by phasing in over five years:

a reduction of the federal statutory corporate tax rate on income from resource activities from 28 to 21 per cent;
a deduction for income tax purposes of actual provincial and other Crown royalties and mining taxes paid, and elimination of the existing 25-per-cent resource allowance; and
a new tax credit at a rate of 10 per cent for corporations incurring qualifying mineral exploration expenditures in Canada.
The table below shows how the new structure will be phased in:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


(%)
Corporate income tax rate for the resource sector 27 26 25 23 21
Deductible percentage of existing 25% resource allowance 90 75 65 35 0
Deductible percentage of Crown royalties and mining taxes 10 25 35 65 100
New tax credit for mineral exploration in Canada 5 7 10 10 10

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


For Further Information
For general information about federal tax cuts, visit the Department of Finance Canada Web site at www.fin.gc.ca. Information is also available from the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency (CCRA): visit the CCRA’s Tax Web page at http://www.ccra-adrc.gc.ca/tax/menu-e.html; or phone your local tax services office (www.ccra.gc.ca/tso) or the CCRA’s toll-free general enquiries line at 1 800 959-8281.

This is part of a series of bulletins designed to give Canadians useful information about individual elements of the federal government’s Five-Year Tax Reduction Plan introduced in 2000. Bulletins on tax measures and other publications may be viewed on the Web at www.fin.gc.ca, and copies may be obtained by calling the Department of Finance Canada Distribution Centre at (613) 995-2855.

About the Department of Finance Canada’s Tax Bulletin Series
Below is a list of the tax measures included in the plan:

Full indexation of the personal income tax system was restored as of January 1, 2000, to protect taxpayers from inflation.
Personal income tax rates for all taxpayers were lowered effective January 1, 2001.
The Canada Child Tax Benefit (CCTB) was substantially increased to help low- and middle-income families with children.
Additional tax assistance was provided to those who need it most, including persons with disabilities and caregivers.
Tax support for students in post-secondary education was substantially increased.
The 28-per-cent general corporate income tax rate has been reduced to 23 per cent in 2003, and will fall to 21 per cent in 2004.
The capital gains inclusion rate was reduced to one-half as of October 18, 2000.
Employees may defer the income inclusion from exercising certain employee stock options in publicly listed corporations until the shares are sold.
Individuals may defer qualifying capital gains on small business shares to the extent that the proceeds are reinvested in other eligible small business shares.
As of January 2001, self-employed individuals may deduct the portion of Canada Pension Plan and Quebec Pension Plan contributions that represents the employer’s share.
Under the plan, further measures have been legislated that will provide tax relief in 2004. These measures will:
increase the basic personal amount (the amount an individual can earn tax-free) to at least $8,000 (from $7,756 in 2003);
increase the spouse or common-law partner amount to at least $6,800 (from $6,586 in 2003);
raise the second bracket threshold to at least $35,000 (from $32,183 in 2003);
raise the third bracket threshold to at least $70,000 (from $64,368 in 2003); and
raise the fourth bracket threshold to at least $113,804 (from $104,648 in 2003).
In the 2003 budget the Government announced additional measures that build on the plan and the Canadian tax advantage:

The National Child Benefit supplement of the CCTB, which provides assistance to low-income families with children, is being increased.
A new Child Disability Benefit for low- and modest-income families with a child with a disability is being introduced.
Tax assistance for persons with disabilities will be enhanced.
The limits on tax-assisted savings in registered pension plans and registered retirement savings plans are being increased.
The federal capital tax will be eliminated over five years, and will be completely eliminated for medium-sized corporations in 2004.
The taxation of resource income will be improved by reducing the corporate tax rate of the sector to 21 per cent over the next five years while making changes to the tax structure of this key sector.
The amount of annual income eligible for the 12-per-cent small business tax rate is being increased from $200,000 to $300,000 over four years.
The small business capital gains rollover measure has been enhanced by removing the $2-million limits on the amount of the original investment and reinvestment that may be eligible for the deferral, and extending the length of time available to make a qualifying investment.

The first wave of tax cuts introduced in the budget's five-year, $58-billion tax reduction plan includes the following measures:

full indexation is restored to the personal income tax system, retroactive to January 1, 2000;
the middle tax rate falls to 24 per cent from 26 per cent;
the 5-per-cent deficit reduction surtax is eliminated on incomes up to about $85,000 and reduced for all others; and
maximum annual payments under the Canada Child Tax Benefit will increase by about $250 per child.
In Budget 2000, the Government of Canada set out a five-year tax plan that will deliver cumulative tax reductions of at least $58 billion. Starting in July 2000, the following budget measures will begin to be reflected in the pay cheques and benefits that Canadians receive.

Restoring Full Protection Against Inflation in the Tax System

The Government has restored full indexation to the personal income tax system to protect taxpayers against automatic tax increases caused by inflation. In addition to ending "bracket creep," this measure ensures that the value of payments that Canadians receive under the Canada Child Tax Benefit and the goods and services tax credit is not eroded by inflation. Indexation took effect as of January 1, 2000, but July is the month in which it will begin to be reflected in the pay cheques and benefits Canadians receive.

Reducing the Middle Tax Rate

The middle tax rate will drop to 24 per cent from 26 per cent. For individual taxpayers, this represents federal income tax savings of up to $600 per year.

Under the Five-Year Tax Reduction Plan announced in the 2000 budget, the middle rate will fall to 23 per cent by 2004 at the latest.

Reducing the 5-Per-Cent Surtax

The 5-per-cent deficit reduction surtax will be eliminated for incomes of up to about $85,000 and reduced for all others.

Under the Five-Year Tax Reduction Plan, the surtax rate will fall to 4 per cent from 5 per cent in January 2001, and it will be completely eliminated by no later than 2004.

Increasing the Canada Child Tax Benefit

Starting in July, maximum annual payments under the Canada Child Tax Benefit (CCTB) will rise by about $250 per child as a result of measures announced in the last two budgets. For a first child, the maximum total benefit under the CCTB will rise from $1,805 annually to $2,056. To provide families with the value of indexation for January to June 2000, an additional amount of $25 will be added, bringing the maximum payment for a first child to $2,081.

Under the Five-Year Tax Reduction Plan, the maximum total benefit will rise to $2,400 for a first child by 2004 at the latest.

In Budget 2000, the Government of Canada set out a five-year tax plan that will deliver cumulative tax reductions of at least $58 billion. This plan is designed to leave more money where it belongs ? in the pockets of Canadians.

Starting in July, Canadians will see the benefits of the tax reduction plan on their pay cheques and in the benefits they receive as a result of the following measures:

The Government has restored full indexation to the personal income tax system to protect taxpayers against inflation. In addition to ending bracket creep, this measure ensures that the value of the Canada Child Tax Benefit (CCTB) and goods and services tax credit is not eroded by inflation. Indexation took effect as of January 1, 2000, but July is the month in which it will begin to be reflected in the pay cheques and benefits that Canadians receive.
The middle tax rate will drop to 24 per cent from 26 per cent.
The 5-per-cent deficit reduction surtax will be eliminated for incomes of up to about $85,000 and reduced for all others.
In addition, beginning July 1, maximum annual payments under the CCTB will rise by about $250 per child as a result of measures announced in the last two budgets.
Here are some examples of how Canadians will benefit this year and over the next four years as a result of these measures:

As of July, a one-earner family of four with an annual income of $40,000 will be better off by about $45 per month partly because of lower taxes and partly because of CCTB increases. In 2001, this family will save $582. In the year 2004, the annual tax relief will rise to $1,623.
As of July, a two-earner family of four with an annual income of $60,000 will be better off by about $38 per month partly because of lower taxes and partly because of CCTB increases. In 2001, this family will save $501. In the year 2004, the annual tax relief will rise to $1,546.

Promoting Entrepreneurship and Small Business
Entrepreneurs and small businesses are a key source of jobs and economic growth in Canada. The Government is strengthening support for this sector by reducing taxes on small business income and capital gains.

Background
In Budget 2003 the Government of Canada announced measures to strengthen the Canadian tax advantage. These measures build on the Five-Year Tax Reduction Plan introduced in 2000―the largest tax cut in the country’s history. The plan reduced personal income tax rates at all income levels and introduced a number of tax measures to promote investment and entrepreneurship in Canada. (See end of document for a list of tax reduction measures.)

Tax Rate Reductions for Small Business
In the 2003 budget the Government announced an increase in the amount of annual income eligible for the 12-per-cent small business rate from $200,000 to $300,000. The increase will be phased in over four years, starting with a $25,000 increase in the limit for 2003. This initiative builds on a measure implemented in 2001 to reduce the 28-per-cent corporate tax rate on annual business income between $200,000 and $300,000 to 21 per cent.

What About Business Income in Excess of $300,000?
Another part of the tax reduction plan is to reduce the 28-per-cent general corporate income tax rate. As of 2003 the rate has been reduced to 23 per cent, and in 2004 it will be reduced to 21 per cent. This benefits businesses of all sizes that have income that is subject to the general corporate tax rate.

Capital Gains Tax Reduction
In 2000 the Government reduced the capital gains inclusion rate from three-quarters to one-half. The inclusion rate is the portion of a capital gain that is subject to income tax.

Example―Tax Savings on Capital Gains
In 1999 an individual would have paid $2,284 at most in federal income taxes on a $10,000 capital gain. Today the maximum that the individual would pay is only $1,450―a savings of $834. The table below provides details on the tax savings.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1999 Today

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Capital gain $10,000 $10,000
Inclusion rate three-quarters one-half
Taxable capital gain $7,500 $5,000
Federal taxes payable (before federal surtax) $2,175 $1,450
Federal surtax payable $109 Surtax eliminated
Total federal taxes payable $2,284 $1,450
Total federal tax savings $834

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Tax-Free Rollovers for Small Business
In 2000 the Government introduced a measure that allows individuals to defer the tax on capital gains from the sale of shares in an eligible small business corporation where proceeds are reinvested in another eligible small business. Specifically, to qualify for the tax-free rollover, the business may have no more than $50 million in assets immediately after the investment.

To encourage greater access to risk capital, the 2003 budget eliminated the $2-million limits on the amount of the original investment and reinvestment that may be eligible for the deferral, and extended the allowable period for the reinvestment to any time in the year of disposition or within 120 days after the end of that year.

Example―How the Tax-Free Rollover Works
Charles earns $65,000 per year and owns shares in an eligible small business corporation. He sells shares so that he can free up some cash to invest in shares of a new small business with some other partners. He realizes a $10,000 capital gain on the sale of the shares.

In 1999 three-quarters of the capital gain (i.e. $7,500) would have been taxed at the 29-per-cent top federal rate, plus the 5-per-cent federal surtax. This means that Charles would have paid $2,284 in federal income tax on the capital gain. About $1,418, on average, of provincial tax would also have been payable, leaving only $6,298 available to be invested in the new small business. In 2003, as a result of the rollover measure, tax on the capital gain would be deferred, which means that the entire $10,000 would be available to be invested in the new business.

For Further Information
For general information about federal tax cuts, visit the Department of Finance Canada Web site at www.fin.gc.ca. Information is also available from the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency (CCRA): visit the CCRA’s Tax Web page at http://www.ccra-adrc.gc.ca/tax/menu-e.html; or phone your local tax services office (www.ccra.gc.ca/tso) or the CCRA’s toll-free general enquiries line at 1 800 959-8281.

This is part of a series of bulletins designed to give Canadians useful information about individual elements of the federal government’s Five-Year Tax Reduction Plan introduced in 2000. Bulletins on tax measures and other publications may be viewed on the Web at www.fin.gc.ca, and copies may be obtained by calling the Department of Finance Canada Distribution Centre at (613) 995-2855.

About the Department of Finance Canada’s Tax Bulletin Series
Below is a list of the tax measures included in the plan:

Full indexation of the personal income tax system was restored as of January 1, 2000, to protect taxpayers from inflation.
Personal income tax rates for all taxpayers were lowered effective January 1, 2001.
The Canada Child Tax Benefit (CCTB) was substantially increased to help low- and middle-income families with children.
Additional tax assistance was provided to those who need it most, including persons with disabilities and caregivers.
Tax support for students in post-secondary education was substantially increased.
The 28-per-cent general corporate income tax rate has been reduced to 23 per cent in 2003, and will fall to 21 per cent in 2004.
The capital gains inclusion rate was reduced to one-half as of October 18, 2000.
Employees may defer the income inclusion from exercising certain employee stock options in publicly listed corporations until the shares are sold.
Individuals may defer qualifying capital gains on small business shares to the extent that the proceeds are reinvested in other eligible small business shares.
As of January 2001, self-employed individuals may deduct the portion of Canada Pension Plan and Quebec Pension Plan contributions that represents the employer’s share.
Under the plan, further measures have been legislated that will provide tax relief in 2004. These measures will:
increase the basic personal amount (the amount an individual can earn tax-free) to at least $8,000 (from $7,756 in 2003);
increase the spouse or common-law partner amount to at least $6,800 (from $6,586 in 2003);
raise the second bracket threshold to at least $35,000 (from $32,183 in 2003);
raise the third bracket threshold to at least $70,000 (from $64,368 in 2003); and
raise the fourth bracket threshold to at least $113,804 (from $104,648 in 2003).
In the 2003 budget the Government announced additional measures that build on the plan and the Canadian tax advantage:

The National Child Benefit supplement of the CCTB, which provides assistance to low-income families with children, is being increased.
A new Child Disability Benefit for low- and modest-income families with a child with a disability is being introduced.
Tax assistance for persons with disabilities will be enhanced.
The limits on tax-assisted savings in registered pension plans and registered retirement savings plans are being increased.
The federal capital tax will be eliminated over five years, and will be completely eliminated for medium-sized corporations in 2004.
The taxation of resource income will be improved by reducing the corporate tax rate of the sector to 21 per cent over the next five years while making changes to the tax structure of this key sector.
The amount of annual income eligible for the 12-per-cent small business tax rate is being increased from $200,000 to $300,000 over four years.
The small business capital gains rollover measure has been enhanced by removing the $2-million limits on the amount of the original investment and reinvestment that may be eligible for the deferral, and extending the length of time available to make a qualifying investment.


The government of Canada has put forward a set of measures that makes significant progress towards replacement of the Goods and Services Tax.

The signing of the Memoranda of Agreement between the federal government and the governments of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Newfoundland and Labrador marks a significant first step towards an integrated, federal-provincial sales tax. With the province of Quebec concluding the harmonization process this year, the government is committed to work with the remaining provinces to make this a national system.

The government is also introducing over 100 measures to streamline and simplify the operation of Canada's sales tax. These measures are an essential part of the new architecture of a much-improved system.

Taken together, this package constitutes a major advance in responsible sales tax reform. Consumers, taxpayers and business - particularly small business - will benefit.

House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance
In 1994, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance conducted an extensive review of sales tax reform options. During the review, the Committee heard from nearly 500 witnesses and received more than 700 briefs. The Finance Committee considered a wide range of alternative sources of revenue for the federal government and rejected all of them [1]. In its June 1994 report, the Committee concluded that a harmonized value-added tax was the best option. As the Committee noted, the harmonization of federal and provincial sales taxes offers key benefits to Canadians, including simplified tax compliance for business, lower administration costs through the elimination of existing overlap and duplication, and increased economic efficiency and competitiveness.

In addition, the Committee recommended a two-level approach to tax-included pricing. Under this approach, goods and services would be priced for public consumption on a tax-included basis, while receipts and invoices would show the amount of value-added tax payable or the rate at which value-added tax was charged.

Sales tax harmonization discussions with the provinces
Since the release of the Finance Committee's report, the federal government has been actively seeking agreement with provinces interested in harmonization. The harmonization agreements announced today represent a significant step towards the goal of a harmonized federal-provincial sales tax system.

Benefits of harmonization using a value-added tax model
Harmonizing federal and provincial sales taxes on the basis of a value-added tax model offers important benefits for Canadians, including:

benefits to consumers;
economic benefits resulting from the improved competitiveness of Canadian businesses;
lower compliance costs for Canadian businesses;
more efficient tax administration and the elimination of government overlap and duplication; and
the opportunity to implement a two-level approach to tax-included pricing.
Benefits to consumers
Value-added taxes largely eliminate the hidden taxes on business inputs (i.e. the items that businesses buy in order to make their products, deliver their services, and keep their businesses running), which increase consumer prices for many goods.

Replacing the current federal and provincial sales taxes with a harmonized value-added tax will:

remove distortions which increase the price of certain goods;
reduce compliance costs, thereby contributing to lower prices; and
make both the final price of a good or service and the total sales tax applied to that good or service more transparent.
Economic benefits
The key economic advantage of the value-added tax model is the improved competitiveness resulting from the reduction of indirect taxes on business inputs and lower business compliance costs. The reduction in taxes on business inputs will:

eliminate tax cascading inherent in current provincial retail sales tax systems; and
minimize distortions in investment decisions associated with the taxation of business investment in capital stock.
Elimination of sales tax cascading
Tax cascading occurs when businesses pay sales tax on goods and services used at each stage of the production and distribution chain (e.g., heat, office supplies, etc.). Businesses account for the tax paid on their inputs by increasing their price to the next buyer in the production and distribution chain. Therefore, tax cascading effectively increases prices at each stage from production to final sale to the consumer. A value-added tax removes tax on business inputs and eliminates sales tax cascading through the input tax credit (ITC) mechanism. Therefore, federal-provincial sales tax harmonization using a value-added tax model will greatly improve the productivity and competitiveness of the Canadian economy by:

lowering the tax embedded in the prices of Canadian exports, thereby increasing the competitiveness of Canadian products in international markets;
increasing the competitiveness of Canadian-produced goods vis-?vis imports;
eliminating price distortions between products that use a high percentage of taxable inputs and those that do not; and
eliminating locational distortions, where businesses seek to locate in low-tax rate jurisdictions to minimize costs and selling prices.
Elimination of distortions in investment decisions
Nationally, over one-third of provincial retail sales tax revenues are raised through the taxation of business inputs (the actual share of provincial retail sales tax paid by business varies from province to province). In addition to contributing to the problems associated with tax cascading, the taxation of business capital investment under provincial retail sales taxes hampers Canadian economic growth by making investment in Canadian industries more costly to both domestic and foreign investors. It also distorts investment choices by introducing an artificial, taxation-based variable into the decision of which province and what industry to invest in. This can lead to an allocation of capital investment based in part upon relative taxation liabilities, and may produce less than optimal gains in terms of increased employment and national wealth.

The elimination of the sales tax burden on capital investment under the harmonized federal-provincial value-added tax will ensure that the allocation of capital in Canada is optimized, resulting in a higher and more productive utilization of the country's capital resources.

Lower compliance costs for Canadian businesses
In addition to these economic benefits, federal-provincial sales tax harmonization offers other equally important benefits. In particular, the implementation of a fully harmonized federal-provincial sales tax system will represent a major simplification of the tax system for Canadian businesses. For example, businesses operating under a harmonized sales tax system would use a single set of operating rules for sales tax purposes and would be required to fill out fewer forms.

Additionally, a single tax administrator will significantly reduce the costs to business associated with complying with two or more separate sales tax systems on a daily basis. These costs are disproportionately borne by small- and medium-sized firms, which typically do not have the accounting capacity to easily cope with this additional burden.

More efficient administration/reduced overlap and duplication
Canadians are demanding that their governments become more efficient in the administration and collection of taxes. Sales tax harmonization will enable Canadian governments to greatly reduce tax administration costs by consolidating sales tax bureaucracies. The consolidation of federal and provincial sales tax administrations eliminates the costly duplication of sales tax collection and enforcement functions within governments.

More efficient administration also creates the potential for further simplifications in the tax system. For example, a fully harmonized sales tax with a single rate and a common base facilitates the development of new sales tax accounting systems, which could eliminate most of the current compliance burden on small business. Under such a system, businesses could file for all federal and provincial sales taxes and income taxes using a consolidated return.

Other benefits
A harmonized federal-provincial value-added tax will also minimize transition costs for businesses, and provide a stable and reliable source of revenue for all governments.

Measures to simplify and improve the fairness of the federal sales tax
The federal government is taking steps to make significant changes to the operation of Canada's value-added tax system to improve the fairness and efficiency of the tax and to facilitate federal-provincial sales tax harmonization. Many of these proposed changes were developed in response to concerns raised by businesses and other organizations during consultations over the last two years. The package of over 100 legislative proposals can be categorized as follows:

measures to simplify the operation of the tax for many businesses, charities and non-profit organizations;
measures to improve the fairness of the federal sales tax for businesses and consumers; and
clarifications and measures to ease compliance.
In addition, as part of the government's ongoing changes to simplify the operation of the federal sales tax for Canadian taxpayers, Revenue Canada is reducing the number of forms required to calculate sales tax in certain circumstances and is studying the harmonization of administrative measures for all federal taxes.

Simplification measures
One of the government's key priorities is to simplify the federal sales tax system. Well over one-third of the proposed modifications are aimed at achieving this goal. Extensive consultations were undertaken with businesses and public sector organizations to find ways to substantially simplify the tax as it applies to businesses and public sector bodies. The proposed measures include:

a simplified treatment of used goods;
streamlining the tax treatment of charities and non-profit organizations - fewer charities and non-profit organizations will be required to register and administer the federal sales tax; and
simplifying the calculation of employee benefits - enabling businesses to make a one-step calculation of tax using the same information generated for income tax purposes.
Fairness measures
The government is committed to restructuring the federal sales tax system to make it fairer for Canadians. The proposed measures will accomplish this by ensuring competitive equity between businesses and increasing the fairness of the tax for consumers. Proposals included in this category are:

a variety of measures to enhance the international competitiveness of Canadian service providers;
changes in the tax treatment of certain health care services; and
fairer application of housing rebates.
Clarifications and measures to ease compliance
The package of changes to the federal sales tax also includes proposals to clarify the application of the tax and to ease compliance for businesses. These changes will ensure that the federal sales tax is clear in its application and does not contain measures that unnecessarily complicate administration. The proposed measures include:

clarifications of certain educational services - e.g., the definitions of "public college", "vocational school", and the tax treatment of university meal plans;
streamlining the administration of tourist rebates and extending the eligibility for rebates to businesses; and
clarification of the application of the federal sales tax to trustee services, personal trusts, trustee liabilities and obligations and estates as well as changes to existing partnership rules.
Harmonized administrative measures
During the next year, the Minister of Finance and the Minister of National Revenue will work together to develop legislative proposals to harmonize accounting, interest, penalty and related administrative and enforcement provisions of the various federal taxing statutes, including the Excise Tax Act, Excise Act, Income Tax Act, Customs Act, Customs Tariff and Special Import Measures Act. The purpose of this initiative is to simplify the payment of taxes and the processing of returns for taxpayers and Revenue Canada
 
地球联盟党将根据具体所在国的社会情况,适应最广大人民群众的需要。

在加拿大这样的国家,主要依靠中产阶级,开明资本家,贫困者中追求上进的人,依靠法制和社会体制遏制政府低效率,挥霍和自暴自弃的懒惰。

在中国这样的国家,将主要依靠广大的劳苦大众,新兴的中产阶级,开明资本家,依靠法律和体制遏制腐败官僚和残酷剥削的资本家。

理论依据为牛克思主义,马克思主义理论中的合理部分将作为牛克思主义涵盖的一种特例。
 
最初由 wushuren 发布
地球联盟党将根据具体所在国的社会情况,适应最广大人民群众的需要。

在中国这样的国家,将主要依靠广大的劳苦大众,新兴的中产阶级,开明资本家,依靠法律和体制遏制腐败官僚和残酷剥削的资本家。

理论依据为牛克思主义,马克思主义理论中的合理部分将作为牛克思主义涵盖的一种特例。

你这不就是“三代表”嘛,属于修正主义,实质是反马克思主义。
 
最初由 promise 发布


你这不就是“三代表”嘛,属于修正主义,实质是反马克思主义。

修正主义这词好像非常古典哈。牛克思主义继承和发展了了马克思主义的剩余价值学说,剔除了马克思主义的空想成分。
。比如希特勒以种族来划分领导性和先进性,而马克思以有无财产来划分是否先进和能否担当领导。这都是片面和机械性的。这就是无产阶级革命理论和公有制之所以失败的地方。这只在社会矛盾极其激化的情况下,会产生作用。即马克思主义描述的社会现象是涵盖与牛克思义的一种特例。

中国共产党的三个代表,属于探索性的,已经开始接近,但是如果没有牛克思主义,他们还只能在黑暗中摸索。哈哈。


牛克思主义的一个主要任务,将象马克思一样主要研究经济和社会发达的国家。为此牛克思主义将给发达国家指出进一步进化的方向,同时为落后国家指出超越的方向,而不是落后国家简单地提供一个体制照搬的主意。老马当年认为社会主义首先在发达的资本主义国家实现,结果列宁给改了一下,变成了要在帝国主义链条中最薄弱的一环实现,而老毛又给改了一下,要在被压迫的第三世界实现。牛克思主义要把他们这三老的主意结合起来。管它什么样的国家,反正就是牛克思主义在各种社会条件下的特例。哈哈。谁让牛克思主义有后发优势亚?

所以牛克思主义是马克思主义的进一步发展。嘻嘻。
 
中国共产党所说的中国特色的社会主义可以休矣,那只不过是个防守性,把民族性作为最后的防守据点,或者是因为没有看准方向而说的权益之计,要是让马克思知道共产主义者已经这么没有底气了,他老人家会很伤心的。

孙中山为了救亡,结合儒家思想提出了中国特色的民主自由,五权宪法,他也没有认清那里面潜藏着什么潜力。过了100年,结合这一切的探索和社会实践,中国人该知道干什么了,不论在中国还是在海外,不论是中国的体制还是加拿大的体制还是美国的社会体制。那就是把民主制度发展到下一个阶段。
 
楼主还是讲讲中国支部怎么建设吧.政党最重要的是"政治"纲领,没有政纲,谈不上政党.你经济法律讲的倒是不少,不过这不是政客的主业.
你的理想制度是不是也是三权分立?或者是以此为基础改良.这个在加拿大搞容易,因为有基础,在中国呢?
 
最初由 lavie 发布
楼主还是讲讲中国支部怎么建设吧.政党最重要的是"政治"纲领,没有政纲,谈不上政党.你经济法律讲的倒是不少,不过这不是政客的主业.
你的理想制度是不是也是三权分立?或者是以此为基础改良.这个在加拿大搞容易,因为有基础,在中国呢?

反正都在地球上跑不了,人在加拿大那就先考虑加拿大,然后才好带动,这个党是可以采用双重党籍和秘密党籍的。确实是三权分立,但里面很明显地有中华文明的痕迹。

把加拿大建设的更美好,更进步。
 
后退
顶部