关于新装Furnace是否值得采用直流变频电机(electronically commutated motor)

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 lzhjx
  • 开始时间 开始时间

lzhjx

知名会员
注册
2003-06-05
消息
612
荣誉分数
0
声望点数
126
以前有过直流变频电机的讨论,但大部分是道听途说,或是来自厂家的吹嘘,我今日忽然发现了Canadian Centre for Housing Technology关于直流变频电机节能,环保,舒适,噪音各方面的评估,应该是最有权威性的.

http://www.ccht-cctr.gc.ca/ecm_e.html


Electronically Commutated Motor (ECM)
CCHT has been used to evaluate the impact of electronically commutated motors (ECM) on electrical and gas energy. An energy simulation model was used to generalize the results to an entire year, for both mid- and high-efficiency furnaces for R-2000, typical new, typical existing, and typical row housing. In general, the results for houses that operate the furnace fan in continuous circulation mode can be summarized as follows:


ECM Motor Installation
In Winnipeg, which has the lowest electricity (and gas) prices, net savings due to an ECM are the smallest, ranging from $14 to $30 per year without air conditioning, and $81 to $106 with air conditioning. In Moncton, with the highest electricity (and gas) prices, the net savings in houses without air conditioning are the highest at $38 to $75, but the net savings with air conditioning are intermediate at $144 to $182. In Toronto, with intermediate electrical (and gas) prices, the net savings without air conditioning are intermediate ($40 to $ 68), but the savings with air conditioning are the highest ($147 to $180). So net annual savings from an ECM can vary from $14 to $180 depending on the price of electricity and other factors. In detached houses, net savings are almost always higher in the more energy-efficient ones, and are higher with high-efficiency furnaces.

In addition, ECMs would allow the types of houses tested to switch to continuous circulation with no significant increase - usually a decrease - in utility bills. Continuous circulation provides benefits of more even distribution of fresh air and temperatures, and is especially important in houses that use the furnace fan to distribute fresh air to the house. Thus, ECMs can be part of a package promoting better circulation, comfort and health.

The results demonstrated that ECMs can save the typical homeowner money on overall energy costs, and offer benefits to the environment through reductions in greenhouse gases associated with conventional electric power generation.

The results also demonstrate the usefulness of the CCHT houses for carrying out important research projects on overall energy use, and their very sensitive ability to measure secondary and tertiary results of a very small change in one of the houses.

For information regarding ECM testing, please refer to the following documents:
 
能具体一些吗?

个人理解,变频是交流电的产物.直流电的频率又是多少? 电机学中COMMUTATE应该是换向或变相的意思.EMC的具体结构和原理是怎样的? 本人很感兴趣,能介绍一下吗??
 
真不好意思,我也不懂.或许这个名字翻译的不对.
就我所知道的一点是这种电机的直流是用电子元件把交流整流后得到的.
 
不该是“直流变频”。ECM或许可翻译成电子整流式电机。

直流电机的调速很容易,调电压就是了。我曾用双向可控硅做过调速,挺简单的。问题是直流电机的耗铜量大(定子和转子都是用铜线缠出来的),电刷和整流子都是易损件,电机的噪音大,成本和维修费用都高。

交流电机,通常是异步感应式电机,成本低,效率高,运行平稳,耐用,可是调速麻烦,因为旋转磁场的转速电源的频率直接相关。所谓变频调速,就是指这种电机的调速。我玩电机的时候,只是知道有变频这么会事,从没见过真东西。

可是直到现在,据我所见,中小电器上实用的无级变速,还都是在直流电机上做的。所谓ECM,原理和直流电机没什么两样,只是用一块电路板代替电刷、整流子这类直接接触的机械部件做整流(这里说的整流,其实该叫换向,把电磁场的方向倒过来,好让电机接着转)。它的调速不是靠对交流电的变频实现的--用不着那么麻烦。另外这种电机的转子是用永磁材料做的,省了不少事。

ECM是GE的专利技术,所以价钱肯定会高些。其实对个取暖炉子的风扇,有两档转速也就行了。感应电机的无极变速虽是不易,但两级或三级变速还是挺好做的,改几个线头就行。我就不明白,这制造商干嘛非得玩无极变速呢?无级和两级、三级比起来,性能到底好多少?成本又相差多少?制造商肯定算过账,只是这账得按制造商的利润、而不是消费者的需求来算。
 
后退
顶部