签名抗议新政府取消childcare promises

yaoyaoma

新手上路
注册
2005-09-29
消息
43
荣誉分数
0
声望点数
0
Do you know that Prime Minister Stephen Harper has recently signed an order to cancel the federal-provincial agreements on childcare, including those that are already in place? What a shame.

By signing in at the following website, you can express your concern and change the rush decisions. The Deadline is March 4, 2006. Please don’t be silent. Together we could make a difference.

http://www.buildchildcare.ca/BE_petition.php/honourthem
 
The new gorvernment promised to give all families $1200/year in Child Care for each child under six, starting in 2006.
 
Does this mean the government is going to break the promise for national day care program but instead keep the promise that giving money to individual family $1200 per child per year?
 
最初由 pgp 发布
Does this mean the government is going to break the promise for national day care program but instead keep the promise that giving money to individual family $1200 per child per year?


是的。

听说钱还是那个钱,只是改变了方式使用。这样把钱直接发到有小孩的家庭,父母可以选择送孩子到day care或者在家自己照顾,这样更直接到位和公平。

不知道这是不是?
 
According to statistic, only 13% of Canadian parents send their kids to Daycare. (Said by the Conservative during the election)
 
这个新政策很好啊,公平合理
 
Like pgp said, the government will still give each baby $1200/year, but the 4 billion funding cut will keep the child care system as it is: high cost (~$1000 for infants) and limited child care spaces (~300 daycare spaces for infants in Ottawa area). If you are one of the moms who decide to send your baby to daycares, you should speak out.
 
保守党的减GST和取消childcare promises并把钱按人头分下来还是会很受中产阶级欢迎的。。我虽然不喜欢保守党,但作为此项政策的受益人,还是决定不签名了:D
 
楼主为什么不满啊?

很好的政策啊! 公平合理! 强烈支持保守党领袖!
 
支持

最初由 小傻 发布
保守党的减GST和取消childcare promises并把钱按人头分下来还是会很受中产阶级欢迎的。。我虽然不喜欢保守党,但作为此项政策的受益人,还是决定不签名了:D
 
Re: 楼主为什么不满啊?

最初由 blackoil 发布
很好的政策啊! 公平合理! 强烈支持保守党领袖!

Don't be silly! It is not tax-free grant.
It will be counted as income ,so you'll not get the full $1200,
but government can save much money....
 
可是如果只是给daycare受益人更少,连钱都拿不到的,政府付出多少是一方面,能得到利益的是大多数就是好的。
 
?政府而言,表面上斤大家人人有遑收,但另一?褚上??收中再拿回?!
而,目前哕作中的Day Care就?偻??被迫加?,或?少服?!如Play group不揠或原本不收偻改?收偻!
相?的,私人立案的Day Care center亦因此原厌助案的喊停,而?了???惠,
?偻上亦雪上加霜!也杂得弈向地下化?_I!
如此人人有分剪($1200/year),看似公平的作法,
最大利益者?非人民,而是政??其?啉政?簧措?偻的檫始!
?入息低的家庭,或?尤家庭,?因而失去Day Care的名铪!
中?肓?以??有利於他,殊不知他的?失更大....
 
最初由 jhcy 发布
[B。。中?肓?以??有利於他,殊不知他的?失更大.... [/B]

原闻其详。

这1200是taxble的,我觉得更体现了现政府的务实精神。对低收入家庭,相对交回取的少,无疑是雪中送炭;对高收入家庭,本就是锦上添花,再怎末交税,也能落下一半,总比啥也没有强吧。

另外,我倒很想知道取消了childcare promises,对蒙特索立,krp family centre 这类私立幼儿园到底会有什莫影响?
 
后退
顶部