中国水危机 外资溢价收购中国水务的阴谋

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 mds
  • 开始时间 开始时间

mds

资深人士
VIP
注册
2006-09-30
消息
14,406
荣誉分数
94
声望点数
208
Though water is drying up, a Chinese metropolis booms

By Jim Yardley

Thursday, September 27, 2007

Click here to find out more!

SHIJIAZHUANG, China: Hundreds of feet below ground, this provincial capital of more than two million people is steadily running out of water. The water table is sinking fast. Municipal wells have already drained two-thirds of the local groundwater.

Above ground, this city in the North China Plain is having a party. Economic growth topped 11 percent last year. Population is rising. One new upscale housing development is advertising waterfront property on lakes filled with pumped groundwater. Another half-built complex, the Arc de Royal, is rising above one of the lowest points in the city's water table.

"People who are buying apartments aren't thinking about whether there will be water in the future," said Zhang Zhongmin, who has tried for the past 20 years to raise public awareness about the city's dire water situation.

For three decades, water has been indispensable in sustaining the rollicking economic expansion that has made China a world power. Now, China's galloping, often wasteful style of economic growth is pushing the country toward a water crisis. Water pollution is rampant nationwide, while water scarcity has worsened severely in north China - even as demand keeps rising everywhere.

China is scouring the world for oil, natural gas and minerals to keep its economic machine humming. But trade deals cannot solve water problems. Water usage in China has quintupled since 1949, and leaders will increasingly face tough political choices as cities, industry and farming compete for a finite and unbalanced water supply.

One example is grain. The Communist Party, leery of depending on imports to feed the country, has long insisted on grain self-sufficiency. But growing so much grain consumes huge amounts of underground water in the North China Plain, which produces half the country's wheat. Some scientists say farming in the rapidly urbanizing region should be restricted to protect endangered aquifers. Yet doing so could threaten the livelihoods of millions of farmers and cause a spike in international grain prices.

For the Communist Party, the immediate challenge is the prosaic task of forcing the world's most dynamic economy to conserve and protect clean water. Water pollution is so widespread that regulators say a major incident occurs every other day. Municipal and industrial dumping has left broad sections of many rivers "unfit for human contact."

Cities like Beijing and Tianjin have shown progress on water conservation, but China's economy continues to emphasize growth. Industry in China uses 3 to 10 times more water, depending on the product, than industries in developed nations.

"We have to now focus on conservation," said Ma Jun, a prominent environmentalist and author of "China's Water Crisis." "We don't have much extra water resources. We have the same resources and much bigger pressures from growth."

In the past, the Communist Party has reflexively turned to engineering projects to address water problems, and now it is reaching back to one of Mao's unrealized schemes: the $62 billion South-to-North Water Transfer Project to funnel 45 billion cubic meters, or 12 trillion gallons, northward every year along three routes from the Yangtze River basin, where water is more abundant. The project, if fully built, would be completed in 2050. The eastern and central lines are already under construction; the western line, the most controversial because of environmental concerns, remains in the planning stages.

The North China Plain undoubtedly needs any water it can get. An economic powerhouse with more than 200 million residents, the region has limited rainfall and depends on groundwater for 60 percent of its water supply. Other countries have aquifers that are being drained to dangerously low levels, like Yemen, India, Mexico and the United States. But scientists say the aquifers below the North China Plain may be drained within 30 years.

"There's no uncertainty," said Richard Evans, a hydrologist who has worked in China for two decades and has served as a consultant to the World Bank and China's Ministry of Water Resources. "The rate of decline is very clear, very well documented. They will run out of groundwater if the current rate continues."

Outside Shijiazhuang, construction crews are working on the transfer project's central line, which will provide the city with infusions of water on the way to the final destination, Beijing. For many of the engineers and workers, the job carries a patriotic gloss.

Yet while many scientists agree that the project will provide an important influx of water, they also say it will not be a cure-all. No one knows how much clean water the project will deliver; pollution problems are already arising on the eastern line. Cities and industry will be the beneficiaries of the new water, but the impact on farming is limited. Water deficits are expected to remain.

"Many people are asking the question: What can they do?" said Zheng Chunmiao, a leading international groundwater expert. "They just cannot continue with current practices. They have to find a way to bring the problem under control."
An ecological fall

On a drizzly, polluted morning last April, Wang Baosheng steered his Chinese-made sport utility vehicle out of a shopping center on the west side of Beijing for a three-hour southbound commute that became a tour of the water crisis pressing down on the North China Plain.

Wang travels several times a month to Shijiazhuang, where he is chief engineer overseeing construction of five kilometers, or three miles, of the central line of the water transfer project. A light rain splattered the windshield, and Wang recited a Chinese proverb about the preciousness of spring showers for farmers. He also noticed one dead river after another as his SUV glided over dusty, barren riverbeds: the Yongding, the Yishui, the Xia and, finally, the Hutuo.

"You see all these streams with bridges, but there is no water," Wang said.

A century or so ago, the North China Plain was a healthy ecosystem, scientists say. Farmers digging wells could strike water within two and a half meters, or eight feet. Streams and creeks meandered through the region. Swamps, natural springs and wetlands were common.

Today, the region, comparable in size to New Mexico, is parched. Roughly five-sixths of the wetlands have dried up, according to one study. Scientists say that most natural streams or creeks have disappeared. Several rivers that once were navigable are now mostly dust and brush. The largest natural freshwater lake in northern China, Lake Baiyangdian, is steadily contracting and besieged with pollution.

What happened?
 
What happened?

The list includes misguided policies, unintended consequences, a population explosion, climate change and, most of all, relentless economic growth. In 1963, a flood paralyzed the region, prompting Mao to construct a flood control system of dams, reservoirs and concrete spillways. Flood control improved but the ecological balance was altered as the dams began choking off rivers that once flowed eastward into the North China Plain.

The new reservoirs gradually became major water suppliers for growing cities like Shijiazhuang. Farmers, the region's biggest water users, began depending almost exclusively on wells. Rainfall steadily declined in what some scientists now believe is a consequence of climate change.

Before, farmers had compensated for the region's limited annual rainfall by planting only three crops every two years. But underground water seemed limitless and government policies pushed for higher production, so farmers began planting a second annual crop, usually winter wheat, which requires a lot of water.

By the 1970s, studies show, the water table was already falling. Then Mao's death and the introduction of market-driven economic reforms spurred a farming renaissance. Production soared, and rural incomes rose. The water table kept falling, further drying out wetlands and rivers.

Around 1900, Shijiazhuang was a collection of farming villages. By 1950, the population had reached 335,000. This year, the city has roughly 2.3 million people with a metropolitan population of nine million.

More people meant more demand for water, and the city now heavily pumps groundwater. The water table is falling more than a meter a year. Today, some city wells must descend 200 meters to get clean water. In the deepest drilling areas, steep downward funnels have formed in the water table that are known as "cones of depression."

Groundwater quality also has worsened. Wastewater, often untreated, is now routinely dumped into rivers and open channels. Zheng, the water specialist, said studies showed that roughly three-quarters of the region's entire aquifer system is now suffering some level of contamination.

"There will be no sustainable development in the future if there is no groundwater supply," said Liu Changming, a leading Chinese hydrology expert and a senior scholar at the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Seeking a water miracle

Three decades ago, when Deng Xiaoping shifted China from Maoist ideology and fixated the country on economic growth, a generation of technocrats gradually took power and began rebuilding a country that ideology had almost destroyed. Today, the entire top leadership of the Communist Party - including Hu Jintao, China's president and party chief - were trained as engineers.

Though not members of the political elite, Wang Baosheng, the engineer on the water transfer project, and his colleague Yang Guangjie are of the same background. This spring, at the construction site outside Shijiazhuang, bulldozers clawed at a V-shaped cut in the dirt while teams of workers in blue jumpsuits and orange hard hats smoothed wet concrete over a channel that will be almost as wide as a football field.

Yang, the project manager. compares the transfer project to the damming of the Colorado River in the western United States and the water diversion system devised for Southern California early in the 20th century.

"I've been to the Hoover Dam, and I really admire the people who built that," Yang said. "At the time, they were making a huge contribution to the development of their country."

"Maybe we are like America in the 1920s and 1930s," Yang added. "We're building the country."

China's disadvantage, compared with the United States, is that it has a smaller water supply yet almost five times as many people. China has about 7 percent of the world's water resources and roughly 20 percent of its population. It also has a severe regional water imbalance, with about four-fifths of the water supply in the south.

Mao's vision of borrowing water from the Yangtze for the north had an almost profound simplicity, but engineers and scientists spent decades debating the project before the government approved it, partly out of desperation, in 2002. Today, demand is far greater in the north, and water quality has badly deteriorated in the south. Roughly 41 percent of China's wastewater is now dumped in the Yangtze, raising concerns that siphoning away clean water northward will exacerbate pollution problems in the south.

The upper reaches of the central line are expected to be finished in time to provide water to Beijing for the Olympic Games next year. Evans, the World Bank consultant, called the complete project "essential" but added that success would depend on avoiding waste and efficiently distributing the water.

Liu, the scholar and hydrologist, said that farming would get none of the new water and that cities and industry must quickly improve wastewater treatment. Otherwise, he said, cities will use the new water to dump more polluted wastewater. Currently, Shijiazhuang dumps untreated wastewater into a canal that local farmers use to irrigate fields.

For years, Chinese officials thought irrigation efficiency was the answer for reversing groundwater declines. Eloise Kendy, a hydrology expert with The Nature Conservancy who has studied the North China Plain, said that farmers had made improvements but that the water table had kept sinking. Kendy said the spilled water previously considered "wasted" had actually soaked into the soil and recharged the aquifer. Efficiency erased that recharge. Farmers also used efficiency gains to irrigate more land.

Kendy said scientists had discovered that the water table was dropping because of water lost by evaporation and transpiration from the soil, plants and leaves. The sum of this lost water, combined with low annual rainfall, is not enough to meet demand.

Farmers have no choice. They drill deeper.
What now?

For many people living in the North China Plain, the notion of a water crisis seems distant. No one is crawling across a parched desert in search of an oasis. But every year, the water table keeps dropping. Nationally, groundwater usage has almost doubled since 1970 and now accounts for one-fifth of the country's total water usage, according to the China Geological Survey Bureau.

The Communist Party is fully aware of the problems. A new water pollution law is under consideration that would sharply increase fines against polluters. Different coastal cities are building desalination plants. Multinational waste treatment companies are being recruited to help tackle the enormous wastewater problem.

Many scientists believe that huge gains can still be reaped by better efficiency and conservation. In north China, pilot projects are under way to try to reduce water loss from winter wheat crops. Some cities have raised the price of water to promote conservation, but it remains subsidized in most places. Already, some cities along the route of the transfer project are recoiling because of the planned higher prices. Some say they may just continue pumping.

Tough political choices, though, seem unavoidable. Studies by different scientists have concluded that the rising water demands in the North China Plain make it unfeasible for farmers to continue planting a winter crop. The international ramifications would be significant if China became a bigger and bigger customer on world grain markets. Some analysts have long warned that grain prices could steadily rise, contributing to inflation and making it harder for other developing countries to buy food.

The social implications would also be significant inside China. Near Shijiazhuang, Wang Jingyan's farming village depends on wells that are 200 meters deep. Not planting winter wheat would amount to economic suicide.

"We would lose 60 percent or 70 percent of our income if we didn't plant winter wheat," Wang said. "Everyone here plants winter wheat."

Another water proposal is also radical: huge, rapid urbanization. Scientists say converting farmland into urban areas would save enough water to stop the drop in the water table, if not reverse it, because widespread farming still uses more water than urban areas. Of course, large-scale urbanization, already under way, could worsen air quality; Shijiazhuang's air already ranks among the worst in China because of heavy industrial pollution.

For now, Shijiazhuang's priority, like that of other major Chinese cities, is to grow as quickly as possible. The city's gross domestic product has risen by an average of 10 percent every year since 1980, even as the city's per capita rate of available water is now only one-33rd of the world average.

"We have a water shortage, but we have to develop," said Wang Yongli, a senior engineer with the city's water conservation bureau. "And development is going to be put first."

Wang has spent four decades charting the steady extinction of the North China Plain's aquifer. He said Shijiazhuang had more than 800 illegal wells and resembled Israel in terms of water scarcity. "In Israel, people regard water as more important than life itself," he said. "In Shijiazhuang, it's not that way. People are focused on the economy."

iht.com/asia A video report and the first article in this series. Page 4 Beijing raises environmental concerns over Three Gorges Dam.
 
外资溢价收购中国水务的阴谋


(货币战争:国际银行家控制自来水行业的打法早已是轻车熟路了,他们的主要目的并不是立刻赚钱,而是埋伏一段时间。等金融总攻打响之后,世界著名经济学家们齐声鼓噪,中国金融秩序大乱,股市、房市暴跌,国际国内资金争相外逃,此时,这支伏兵半路截杀,猛涨水价,还有天然气、汽油和其它基本生活要素(也会逐步被外资控制的)价格暴涨。目的是什么呢?就是制造民怨沸腾,用他们的术语就是"Social Unrest",社会动荡与人民暴动将加速资金外逃,最后剩下一片狼籍时,才是国际银行家以正常价格的1/20或者1/100来收购中国其它核心资产的黄金时节,其根本目的是使中国经济"有控制地解体",从而成为伦敦-华尔街轴心的经济附庸。这一手从1980年以来已经在中南美洲和东南亚被国际银行家反复使用,堪称"经典战例"。中国的官员与学者们忽视了对这种"组合拳"打法的研究,或者更糟糕,他们根本不信。)

----------------------------------------------------

外资溢价收购中国水务的阴谋

2007年05月17日 11:01 《中国企业家》杂志

http://finance.sina.com.cn/g/20070517/11013602142.shtml

在地方政府以高溢价向国际水务巨头出让水业资产的背后,隐藏的可能是公众将要长期为高额水价买单、本土水务企业被边缘化,以及影响中国未来的“水危机”

  文/本刊记者 何伊凡

  “骇客”搅局

  2007年1月29日,威立雅水务集团与兰州供水集团签约,以17.1亿人民币高价获得兰州供水45%股权。兰州方面因引进世界500强企业兴奋不已,将其评价为“城市公用行业市场化改革中具有历史意义的第一步”。“这一步”在行业内却是一石激起千层浪,因为同时参加竞标的中法水务与首创水务报价分别为4.5亿和2.8亿,这三家企业被认为是目前中国城市水业中最富经验的投资机构,对同一项目的报价何以却如此悬殊?

  3月20日晚,当威立雅以9.5亿报价再次击败中法水务和首创水务,获得海口水务集团50%股权时,业内的空气迅速紧张起来。另外三家参加竞标的企业出价分别为中法水务4.4亿元,首创水务4.1亿元,中华煤气5.6亿元,项目标底则为3.1亿元。威立雅再次以悬殊的价格击败了所有对手。

  “它(威立雅)玩得太狠了,依照最简单的逻辑,投资就是为了赚钱,但我们怎么计算也无法理解如此高的溢价能通过正常渠道获得回报。”一位不愿透露姓名的民营水务集团负责人告诉《中国企业家》,“我是国内这个领域最早进入者之一,现在居然发现看不透市场了,海外投资者疯狂,地方政府也疯狂,但我疯狂不起来,因为没有那么多资金。”

  并非毫无征兆,实际上,5年之前威立雅就斥资约20亿资金,以净资产三倍溢价收购了上海浦东自来水公司50%股权。3年前,柏林水务联合体也曾高溢价收购合肥王小郢污水处理厂。当时业内普遍看法是“中国仅有一个上海,上海仅有一个浦东”,在浦东不计成本树立标杆也可以理解。王小郢项目影响不大,柏林水务其后并无类似动作,所以没有引起广泛关注。

  “最近接连两个项目下来,苗头已经很明显了。”首创水务董事长潘文堂叹息。

  潘的办公室入口处悬挂着一张硕大的中国水业产业地图,上面标注着目前活跃在中国的20多家水务企业项目分布情况,其中威立雅正呈蔓延之势。威立雅颠覆规则受冲击最大的正是首创。

  威立雅曾经与首创水务有过一段亲密无间的日子。2000年4月,首创股份( 13.45,0.48,3.70%)(600008.SH)上市后,将战略定位于水务,其时威立雅扮演了它的引路人角色,2001年9月,双方即签署了战略性合作协议。据首创内部人士透露,威立雅最初对合资不太感兴趣,但首创采取跟随策略,威立雅走到哪儿,首创就跟到哪儿。“ 2002年,我们一口气和28个城市签订了意向书,尽管知道签了也拿不到项目,但也向威立雅展示了我们的潜力。”2003年6月,双方合作成立首创威水投资有限公司,并共同在国内投资了多个项目。“早期威立雅的品牌曾帮助我们攻城掠地。”他说,首创高层曾多次在公开场合以婚姻来比喻双方的合作。

  然而,曾经的甜蜜爱人现在却成了令首创沮丧和愤怒的根源。兰州项目对首创影响有限,真正刺痛其的是双方在海口项目上的争夺。首创水务成立不久,就对海口青眼有加。海口自来水原水质量好,处理水成本较低。而且以海口为基地,可以整合海南全岛水务市场,另外在首创的战略布局中,海口是南部沿海地区重要落子,可谓志在必得。

  在2006年底海口市政府就自来水生产供应和污水处理业务统一进行招商之前,首创已经与海口方面沟通了4年,双方都非常满意,“可悲的是,我们辛辛苦苦做了大量前期工作,下聘礼的时候,拿出的是一床被子,而威立雅开着跑车把新娘接走了。”上文中的首创匿名高管苦笑道,“那感觉真是当头一棒。”价格并非标的全部内容,却占了2/3左右权重,首创在商誉、技术等方面得分与威立雅不相上下,在价格上威立雅一出手,首创、中法水务都已黯然失色。

  正式投标之前,首创曾考虑溢价。“根据国内新修改的会计准则,在整个处理过程中首创可以将溢价成本摊销,从财务角度就没有压力,但其最终放弃这个项目,因为怕给自己下一个套,之后别人将这个项目看作首创的标杆,‘在海口项目上能溢价,到我们这儿就不溢价了?’就算已抓在手里的项目也可能平生波澜。”一位接近首创的本土水务投资者说,“从政府的角度,涉及国有资产转让,一旦有标杆出现,卖贵了无所谓,便宜了就有贱卖嫌疑。”

  这并非想象,银川市政府拟引进水务战略投资者,本来对外资态度冷淡,但获知兰州供水集团卖了个好价钱后已多次赴当地考察。据接近地方政府的咨询人士透露,威立雅正在与天津、南宁、长沙、武汉等城市相关部门频频接触,而且天津水企不出意外的话已是威立雅囊中之物。

  这些地区恰恰也是首创水务希望获得的资源,“过去溢价收购主要在地级市和个别开放城市推进,现在马上要影响到省会城市了,一旦对方搞定省会城市,溢价模式将快速在省内复制,基本上这个省你就不用考虑了。”潘文堂忧心忡忡。

  多数民营企业主要业务集中于污水处理和环境治理,本来与外资对阵几率不高。“最初我们只打游击战,到外资够不到的地方去发展,一直避免和他们面对面地碰。市场足够大,大家都有机会。在那些竞争激烈的领域,他们筋疲力尽的时候我们再进入也不晚。”上文中匿名的民营水务投资者说,“但现在看起来对方用这种不要命的方式,几年之内项目就被拿光了,谁也躲不开。”

  与外界的想像截然不同,这家水务巨头在中国展开的一系列收购主要的出资方多为各种资金合作伙伴——它为不同的项目寻求不同的合伙者,包括首创、光大、中信泰富、嘉利等金融集团,据悉其目前最新的合作者为平安保险。

  这也是中国本土水务企业心中难言的痛,因为这个法国巨头在中国靠资本力量攻城掠地,为了击退竞争对手,出手如此阔绰,用的却是本土投资人的钱。例如威立雅在珠海的污水厂项目,总投资额2600万欧元,全部由香港特区投资者提供资金,而北京卢沟桥污水厂项目,总投资7.6亿元人民币,威立雅实际投资仅仅为1000万美元。据上文提到的业内人士透露,很多声名显赫的项目,威立雅自己的投资都不足5%。

  谁为高溢价买单

  溢价所得实质上是政府用其他资产、收益或者承诺换来的。隐患要在数十年后才会发作,买单者则为政府和公众。

  威立雅在中国思路的转变似乎正契合中国水产业改革的思路。高溢价收购也可被视为是认同收购目标的潜在价值,本土水务企业多年来一直在呼吁通过市场化方式是解决水产业的改革,一方愿买,一方愿卖,必然价高者得之。

  然而,水业有其特殊性,清华大学水业政策研究中心主任傅涛认为,溢价所得实质上是政府用其他资产、收益或者承诺换来的。隐患要在数十年后才会发作,买单者则为政府和公众。

  高溢价为未来水价的调整埋下了伏笔,“最近几个交易,双方都说政府满意,投资人满意,但没有人敢说老百姓满意。”傅涛说道。在他所了解的几份合同中,对价格的说明都是未来按照《价格管理办法》调整,依此规定,将遵循成本收益法,成本只要“合理”就可以记入价格。“通常政府会控制水价上浮,但当高溢价收购发生之后,政府心理上会被暗示,认为保证投资人收益理所应当,而投资人也会想办法将价格尽快调到政府允许的上限。”上文中匿名的民营水务投资者据此分析,政府今日的变相融资行为会在未来以城市居民数十年承受的高水价为代价。

  实际上,由于水资源持续短缺,水价不可避免将上调,本土企业同样有调价的愿望。傅涛认为,“惊人的溢价收购,或被政府变现干别的去了,或流入金融投资者手中,没有留下提高服务成本的空间,对行业发展非常不利,这也是我最担心的。”

  一位新疆发改委干部透露,在乌鲁木齐污水处理厂合资项目中,外方合同签了6年才开工,这六年中没从口袋拿一分钱,反而把乌鲁木齐几乎所有水务资源全部占走了。这为傅涛的判断打了个注脚。

  不过,付出了高溢价的投资者如果仅寄希望通过水价调整回收成本,风险也很高,毕竟公共基础设施牵一发而动全身,提价过高、过急,公众意愿可能成为下一任政府违约的借口。上文中匿名的民营水务投资者根据兰州项目算了笔账。兰州目前日供水量大概不到50万吨,而水价即使以1.5元计算,每日可收75万元,一年的收入应该在2.7亿元左右,扣除银行利息等财务成本和运营成本, 17.1亿元一段时间内很难收回,每年能持平就不错了。因此,他怀疑交易中还预留了转移成本的其他通路,“没有人相信威立雅会把钱白白扔到水里。”

  兰州市建委官员曾向媒体透露,这17.1亿元资金的用途包括:兰州市政府提取股权转让金5亿元,职工股转让金1亿-2亿元,其余部分则分期投入自来水厂的运营中。至于水价,兰州向投资者口头承诺每年每吨水价上涨两角钱,但是这项内容并没有写进协议文本,所以并不具有强制性。

  预留通路的观点得到了多数业内人士的认同。城市水业战略论坛会议间隙,傅涛持笔的《水业资产溢价背后的“十式腾挪”》被广泛传阅,后来多数代表纸袋中都放了一份。在这篇文章中,傅涛分析了供水系统服务可能存在的成本转移途径,其中包括资金分段到位,通过关联企业转移工程费用、派出大量高成本管理团队、附送项目等。据上文中的匿名民营水务企业负责人透露,其中有三种途径是多家本土水务企业集体分析的结果。

  尽管文中没有特指具体项目,但采访中,这位民营水务企业负责人告诉《中国企业家》,所有途径都已经有所应用,例如在浦东项目中,许多建设都由威立雅工程分公司OTV完成。

  会场上,也有人散发另外一篇针锋相对的文章——《关于资产溢价的思考》。文章出自大岳咨询公司,兰州项目和之前的合肥王小郢项目,大岳都是政府顾问。

  “溢价风潮再起,有咨询公司在其中推波助澜。”一位匿名专业人士直指大岳,他称在浦东项目时,咨询方没有宣传价格,但现在大岳到处讲自己的项目溢价,而不提溢价背后的玄机。“许多人都收到了他们的短信,曾经不止一个地方政府官员问我,‘大岳很厉害呀,听说他们能将1个亿的项目卖到4个亿。’因为溢价越高,提成越高,所以他们很有动力。”

  上文中的民营水务企业负责人透露,首创对兰州项目本来兴趣不大,参与的色彩多于竞争,因为若竞标者凑不够三家就可能流标。兰州市采用了大岳的鼓励方案,给竞标的第二名50万元,第三名30万元。

  但是,即使首创无意兰州,中法水务却全力以赴,如果说其对政府丰厚的嫁妆也视若无睹或许有些牵强。对这种观点不以为然的也大有人在,中仪国际招投标市政公用事业( 3138.907,41.54,1.34%)部总经理刘昆就认为,溢价不是细枝末节,而是原则性、导向性问题,“今天体现不出来,不过到了明天,迸发出来的力量是控制不住的。”本文亦有删减,全文请参看www.cnemag.com

  威立雅中国投资地图

  上海浦东 中国第一个提供全方位水服务的大型公共民营合作项目。

  深 圳 水务行业迄今为止最大的一项购并交易

  北京 卢沟桥污水处理厂20年运营维修合同,2008年奥运会配套项目之一。

  北京 北苑污水处理项目合同期限23年,2008年奥运会配套项目之一。

  成 都 首个由中央政府批准授予外方的BOT水处理项目,期限18年。

  天 津 水厂的改造与运营,合同期限20年。

  北京 燕山石化企业的工业污水收集,处理与循环运用。合同期限25年。

  邯 郸 污水处理厂扩建及新厂运营管理,合同期限25年。

  珠 海 两座污水厂改建及运营 合同期限30年。

  宝 鸡 扩建及运营两个自来水厂,合同期限23年。

  青 岛 两座污水处理厂的运营维护,合同期限25年,

  北京 2008年奥运配套项目之一。

  常 州 全方位城市供水项目,包括生产、配送和客户服务,合同期限30年。

  遵 义 改造并运营两个自来水厂,合同期限25年,

  昆 明 全方位城市供水项目,包括生产、配送和客户服务,合同期限30年。

  

呼和浩特 改造并运营自来水厂,合同期限30年。

  渭 南 改造并运营自来水厂,合同期限22年。

  乌鲁木齐 扩建并运营污水处理厂,合同期限23年

  兰州 供水与海口水务改制简况

  兰州供水集团已有51年历史,威立雅早在2004年开始就与兰州市招商局进行前期合作项目考察,其董事长罗荣汉还曾专程赴兰州考察。兰州自来水厂并非优质项目,其背负着11亿贷款和6.19亿元的债务,每月亏损1000多万元,而且设施陈旧,双方曾因价格问题争持不下。直到2006年,兰州市才决定将供水集团作为公用行业国企改革的重点项目实施资产重组合资经营。当时定调为“高起点引进,大手笔运作”,面向全球公开招标,而债务、职工安置等问题都已经内部消化。2005年12月10日开标时7家国内外企业参与报名,只有三家正式递交了投标文件。

  海口水务多年前就引起多方兴趣,2006年10月,海口市水务将原水、自来水、污水处理三大水务公司重组,组建集团公司。2007年1月公布招商方案,水务集团继续保持国有独资性质,操作上将集团现有供水和污水处理业务(资产约6.6亿元)打包模拟成立集团全资拥有的海口水务有限公司,再对外转让该公司部分股权,股权转让比例为50%。与兰州项目操作相似的是,集团现有银行负债约1.82亿元将全部保留在水务集团,不进入合资公司。
 
继续卖吧
 
后退
顶部
首页 论坛
消息
我的