Translated version of http://www.oklink.net/deer/count.asp?url=online/tougao/81785/309543.htm
"Collective" Impression
Today, someone finally saw it again with Feng Xiaogang's "collective" is brought to the expectations, said good, but perhaps it is too much appetite there has been no excitement, I Do numbness? I simply do not want to recognize, therefore pondering why, first of all, it is a great majority, there is a spectator's eyes, another is inside the commercial for it. Objectively say that this year there is not much that business people bad, but they still have to say that people appreciate the impact of a habit, director of the more thought is how to increase attendance, as to what level the film is another matter , which is directed by the outstanding quality of a bar, know what is "speak with one voice" For example, many people are Miaomiao "collective" how how good, if they do not follow the good color grid is not the point? There is the publicity before it departed from the appreciation of people, virtually with the people through tinted glasses, as they already know the answers to guess, but it really is contradictory things, if not their own publicity and others also echoed its views may not be see.
Of course I am not saying that the film bad, because I have a very long time no see similar movies, it is a movie that from the hardware than at home watching TV and more strong. It is in this same theater I have seen "Hero", pictures and music alone, I thought as Zhang Feng Xiaogang's film do well.
I do not want to "collective" Why is a simple as the "name" of the story, whether it is fiction or film should not be simply a few elements. I think more should be the extent to which the creators can arouse the sympathy readers and viewers. The article said that before the creation of the pre-read novels staff cry, so I would also like to experience the taste of tears, but I did not, if the meantime there have been similar sentiments, it is their own, not Feng Xiaogang, such as I saw the screen on the ups and downs of the grassland in the wilderness of his life to think long life, I remember the filmed Liu Xiaoqing was quite a controversial film entitled called "wilderness," and this name is classical, and it is very placeholder.
So I think their lives. Who (the) it is responsible for 47 lives? The tragic story from such questioning, the objective of the war caused this gap, more than 10 million tablets account of the search for letters, it is their millet to cope with a good reason, then I think more people , was not the only missing more than 100,000? Who is that the destruction of their wives and children? If it is said that the fair life, and here is the same sad tragic, and the people obviously lost that one. So forging a war hero, but that the hero or less better.
"Pools" should be considered a war films, but compared to similar works in the shock on people not considered to be the highest, I would like to also have no intention of Feng Xiaogang made into another film, this is definitely not his strengths. So he attached to "find", "name rectification" This kind of voice-over.In this regard the film does not give the boost to better than the novel, because fiction film to a greater extent than stimulate the imagination, "a" can be of Feng Xiaogang. But Feng Xiaogang have worked hard, and this Bunaiguai him, in such times it is impossible to "Moscow Wars" is not directed incompetent, but also the audience appreciate the context of the war have changed. Actor in the configuration, I also think that misconduct Feng Xiaogang, Zhang Han male character to the good speech, which is the mouth of Beijing City's footprint. Inside the Hu, Wang Baoqiang but because people are familiar with and dilute the concept of the film note, in the film, is not what an important role sufficient to ordinary actor. Feng Xiaogang is not aware of the care that their face or their non-occasion, which I still admire Zhang Yimou, are either star or are the actors.
集合号》随感
今天有人给票终于看了一遍冯小刚的《集合号》，是带着期望去的，据说不错，但或许是胃口太高吧，一直没有激动起来，莫非是我麻木了吗？我不想简单承认，于是琢磨原因，首先是岁数大了吧，总有一个旁观的眼睛，再有就是里边的商业原因了。客观的说这年头没有多少人说商业不好，但却又不得不说还是给人的欣赏习惯构成冲击，导演想到的更多是如何提高上座率，至于片子达到什么水准却是另一回事，这是优秀导演的一种素质吧，知道什么是“统一口径”，比如现在很多人都在吵吵《集合号》怎么怎么好，如果自己不跟着说好是不是格色了点？再有就是之前的宣传实在背离了人的欣赏，让人无形中带了有色眼镜，就像已经知道谜底却去猜谜，但这却又真的是矛盾的事，如果不是宣传和别人人云亦云自己还未必会去看。
当然我并不是说这部影片不好，因为我已经很长时间没有看类似的电影</B>了，倒是在影院看电影从硬件上说就比在家里看电视强的多。就在这同一家影院我曾看过《英雄》，单就画面和音乐来说我以为冯小刚电影不如张艺谋做的好。
我不想把《集合号》简单看成是一个为什么“正名”的故事，无论是小说还是电影不应该只是简单的几个元素。我以为更多的应该是创作者能够在多大程度上激发起读者和观众的共鸣。之前看到文章说创作前期有关人员看了小说哭了，所以我也想体验一下哭的滋味，但我没有，如果说其间也有过类似的情绪，那是属于自己的，并不是冯小刚的，比如我看到画面里原野上起伏的草地想到了生命的繁衍不息，记得刘晓庆就拍过一部当时颇有争议的电影，片名就叫《原野》，这个名字就很精典，也很占位。
所以我想到了生命。谁会（该）为那47条生命负责？故事的悲壮来自于这种追问，战争客观的造成了这种落差，片中交代有十几万寻找的信件，这是他们应付谷子地的一个充分的理由，那我想到了更多的老百姓，他们失踪的又何止十几万？那谁又该为家破人亡妻离子散的他们负责？如果说生命的公平的，在这里同样是悲哀悲壮，老百姓显然是失落的那一块。所以说战争锻造了英雄，但这样的英雄还是越来越少更好。
《集合号》应该算是一部战争片，但较之同类作品在给人的震撼上并不算是最高的，我想冯小刚也没有打算拍成那样的片子，这绝对不是他的强项。所以他要附加“寻找”，“正名”这样的画外音。而在这方面电影给人的刺激并不比小说来的更好，因为小说较之电影能够更大程度激发人的想象力，“这一个”只能是冯小刚的。但冯小刚已经尽力了，这不能怪他，在这样的时代是不可能再有《莫斯科保卫战》的，不是导演无能，更是观众对战争的欣赏语境已变。而在演员的配置上我以为冯小刚也有失当地方，男主人公张涵予演的不错，就是那一嘴的京味太浓了。里边出现的胡军、王宝强却因为熟悉而让人淡化了对影片的观注度，他们在影片里也不是什么重要角色，普通演员足可。不知道冯小刚是在照顾他们的面子还是觉得非其莫属，这方面我还是佩服张艺谋，要么都是大腕，要么都是群众演员。
"Collective" Impression
——
-- Happy orToday, someone finally saw it again with Feng Xiaogang's "collective" is brought to the expectations, said good, but perhaps it is too much appetite there has been no excitement, I Do numbness? I simply do not want to recognize, therefore pondering why, first of all, it is a great majority, there is a spectator's eyes, another is inside the commercial for it. Objectively say that this year there is not much that business people bad, but they still have to say that people appreciate the impact of a habit, director of the more thought is how to increase attendance, as to what level the film is another matter , which is directed by the outstanding quality of a bar, know what is "speak with one voice" For example, many people are Miaomiao "collective" how how good, if they do not follow the good color grid is not the point? There is the publicity before it departed from the appreciation of people, virtually with the people through tinted glasses, as they already know the answers to guess, but it really is contradictory things, if not their own publicity and others also echoed its views may not be see.
Of course I am not saying that the film bad, because I have a very long time no see similar movies, it is a movie that from the hardware than at home watching TV and more strong. It is in this same theater I have seen "Hero", pictures and music alone, I thought as Zhang Feng Xiaogang's film do well.
I do not want to "collective" Why is a simple as the "name" of the story, whether it is fiction or film should not be simply a few elements. I think more should be the extent to which the creators can arouse the sympathy readers and viewers. The article said that before the creation of the pre-read novels staff cry, so I would also like to experience the taste of tears, but I did not, if the meantime there have been similar sentiments, it is their own, not Feng Xiaogang, such as I saw the screen on the ups and downs of the grassland in the wilderness of his life to think long life, I remember the filmed Liu Xiaoqing was quite a controversial film entitled called "wilderness," and this name is classical, and it is very placeholder.
So I think their lives. Who (the) it is responsible for 47 lives? The tragic story from such questioning, the objective of the war caused this gap, more than 10 million tablets account of the search for letters, it is their millet to cope with a good reason, then I think more people , was not the only missing more than 100,000? Who is that the destruction of their wives and children? If it is said that the fair life, and here is the same sad tragic, and the people obviously lost that one. So forging a war hero, but that the hero or less better.
"Pools" should be considered a war films, but compared to similar works in the shock on people not considered to be the highest, I would like to also have no intention of Feng Xiaogang made into another film, this is definitely not his strengths. So he attached to "find", "name rectification" This kind of voice-over.In this regard the film does not give the boost to better than the novel, because fiction film to a greater extent than stimulate the imagination, "a" can be of Feng Xiaogang. But Feng Xiaogang have worked hard, and this Bunaiguai him, in such times it is impossible to "Moscow Wars" is not directed incompetent, but also the audience appreciate the context of the war have changed. Actor in the configuration, I also think that misconduct Feng Xiaogang, Zhang Han male character to the good speech, which is the mouth of Beijing City's footprint. Inside the Hu, Wang Baoqiang but because people are familiar with and dilute the concept of the film note, in the film, is not what an important role sufficient to ordinary actor. Feng Xiaogang is not aware of the care that their face or their non-occasion, which I still admire Zhang Yimou, are either star or are the actors.
集合号》随感
——也好快活
今天有人给票终于看了一遍冯小刚的《集合号》，是带着期望去的，据说不错，但或许是胃口太高吧，一直没有激动起来，莫非是我麻木了吗？我不想简单承认，于是琢磨原因，首先是岁数大了吧，总有一个旁观的眼睛，再有就是里边的商业原因了。客观的说这年头没有多少人说商业不好，但却又不得不说还是给人的欣赏习惯构成冲击，导演想到的更多是如何提高上座率，至于片子达到什么水准却是另一回事，这是优秀导演的一种素质吧，知道什么是“统一口径”，比如现在很多人都在吵吵《集合号》怎么怎么好，如果自己不跟着说好是不是格色了点？再有就是之前的宣传实在背离了人的欣赏，让人无形中带了有色眼镜，就像已经知道谜底却去猜谜，但这却又真的是矛盾的事，如果不是宣传和别人人云亦云自己还未必会去看。
当然我并不是说这部影片不好，因为我已经很长时间没有看类似的电影</B>了，倒是在影院看电影从硬件上说就比在家里看电视强的多。就在这同一家影院我曾看过《英雄》，单就画面和音乐来说我以为冯小刚电影不如张艺谋做的好。
我不想把《集合号》简单看成是一个为什么“正名”的故事，无论是小说还是电影不应该只是简单的几个元素。我以为更多的应该是创作者能够在多大程度上激发起读者和观众的共鸣。之前看到文章说创作前期有关人员看了小说哭了，所以我也想体验一下哭的滋味，但我没有，如果说其间也有过类似的情绪，那是属于自己的，并不是冯小刚的，比如我看到画面里原野上起伏的草地想到了生命的繁衍不息，记得刘晓庆就拍过一部当时颇有争议的电影，片名就叫《原野》，这个名字就很精典，也很占位。
所以我想到了生命。谁会（该）为那47条生命负责？故事的悲壮来自于这种追问，战争客观的造成了这种落差，片中交代有十几万寻找的信件，这是他们应付谷子地的一个充分的理由，那我想到了更多的老百姓，他们失踪的又何止十几万？那谁又该为家破人亡妻离子散的他们负责？如果说生命的公平的，在这里同样是悲哀悲壮，老百姓显然是失落的那一块。所以说战争锻造了英雄，但这样的英雄还是越来越少更好。
《集合号》应该算是一部战争片，但较之同类作品在给人的震撼上并不算是最高的，我想冯小刚也没有打算拍成那样的片子，这绝对不是他的强项。所以他要附加“寻找”，“正名”这样的画外音。而在这方面电影给人的刺激并不比小说来的更好，因为小说较之电影能够更大程度激发人的想象力，“这一个”只能是冯小刚的。但冯小刚已经尽力了，这不能怪他，在这样的时代是不可能再有《莫斯科保卫战》的，不是导演无能，更是观众对战争的欣赏语境已变。而在演员的配置上我以为冯小刚也有失当地方，男主人公张涵予演的不错，就是那一嘴的京味太浓了。里边出现的胡军、王宝强却因为熟悉而让人淡化了对影片的观注度，他们在影片里也不是什么重要角色，普通演员足可。不知道冯小刚是在照顾他们的面子还是觉得非其莫属，这方面我还是佩服张艺谋，要么都是大腕，要么都是群众演员。
