法参议员：我不同意抵制奥运 不赞成达赖的制度ZT

[Fisher2004]

法参议员：我不同意抵制奥运 不赞成达赖的制度
2008年04月18日 20:12:22 　来源：中国日报网站

【字号 大 中 小】　【留言】　【打印】　【关闭】​

【Email推荐： 】

法国社会党籍前部长、现任参议员梅朗雄 ​

• [FONT=黑体]德美与达赖联手炮制惊天阴谋[/FONT]​
• [FONT=黑体]警惕落入美国的“西藏陷阱”[/FONT]​
• [FONT=黑体]德网爆惊天黑幕：西方势力与达赖集团策划西藏事件[/FONT]​
• [FONT=黑体]亲历“藏独”阴谋大会 美国中情局影子若隐若现[/FONT]​

自中国西藏“3?14”暴乱及4月7日奥运圣火巴黎传递受干扰等事件发生以来，欧洲时报收到了大量读者、学者和法国各界人士的投稿、来函，纷纷对上述事件发表看法。该报今将法国社会党籍前部长、现任参议员让-吕克?梅朗雄(Jean-Luc Melenchon)在其博客上刊出的长篇文章，全文译出刊载以飨读者。文后附号召抵制北京奥运的“记者无疆界组织”的背景资料。

[FONT=楷体_GB2312]译 者按：奥运圣火巴黎传递，藏人和记者无疆界两股势力捣乱，法国媒体几一边倒助阵，法国总统萨科奇和巴黎市长德拉诺埃也“拉偏架”。中国人都在想，那么友好 的法国政府和法国人民怎么了？我们那么多年的友谊就这么泡汤了吗？郁闷之中，突然有一个朋友告诉我，至少有一个法国政治家在为我们仗义执言呢！他就是法国 Essonne省的参议员梅朗雄(Jean-Luc Mélenchon)先生，于四月七号，就是奥运圣火在巴黎传递的那一天，他在自己的博客上发表了一篇洋洋洒洒的长文，几乎说尽了我们中国人想说的一切。 这篇文章在网上风传，但法国主流媒体则装作对此一无所知。 [/FONT]

[FONT=楷体_GB2312]历史学博士 刘学伟[/FONT]​

我不同意抵制北京奥运和反中国的宣传 ​

我不是中国共产党人。我将来也不会是。但我不同意主张抵制奥运的示威活动。我不同 意Robert Ménard(注：“记者无疆界”组织秘书长)搞的针对北京奥运的活动。我不同意重写中国历史以便这种活动有立足之地。我也完全不赞成对达赖喇嘛的狂热崇 拜以及他所代表的制度。在我看来，抵制北京奥运是对中国人民的毫无道理的和侮辱性的侵犯。如果我们想质疑北京的制度，应该在选择北京申办奥运时就表示。不 让中国做候选国就行。那时就应当在中国这样说。现在这些人做的事是针对数以百万计的中国人的廉价的侮辱，而他们正在为奥运会做着忘我的准备。对我而言，这 口锅里散发出令人作呕的种族主义的恶臭。

一个借口 ​

如果需要抵制，按照进攻的逻辑，这不应当针对一项表达开放和博爱的体育运动。为什 么不是针对商务或金融业务？自然的，现在的这些风云人物没有一个人建议或着手向这个方向做任何事。如果我们真的应当对中国政府生气，为什么这次在国家的正 常的(外交)渠道方面却一丁点儿表示也没有？中国的国家主席(有多少抗议者想知道他的名字？)被接触了吗？向他要求了什么事情吗？什么？他回答了什么？总 理(有多少人关心知道他的名字？)有没有被质询？中国驻法国的大使有被接见吗？有与他交换意见吗？谁在管这些？以一种类似种族主义的狂妄，他们向一个政府 提抗议，却不提其领导人的名字，好像他根本就不存在？除了我们想它真的不是一个政府这个原因外，还会是什么原因呢？西方人的傲慢连那些领导着十四亿人口的 民族的领袖的名字都不承认，我们相信这个民族相当软弱，只用政治警察就可以控制。一般而言，看到这一切，我(似乎)听到了(200年前的)殖民者的轻蔑的 回音。当年他们手里握着枪。要和中国人做鸦片生意，带枪是必须的。如果意图是抗击北京的政治制度，当下在使用的任何手段都不会改变任何事情。可能被影响的 只是西方舆论，但是这早已被定下框框了。

因此，西藏的事件只是一个借口。这整个被制造出来的借口是为了愚弄公众，而这 个公众已经被重复的影像所灌输，为的是让公众认为一切显而易见，而不用去思考了。例子：只有“定格图像调查”(l’enquête ? d’arrêt sur image ?)节目报道，“西藏事件”开始于一些“藏人”对汉族商人的种族屠杀。在世界上有哪一个国家这样的事件不是以镇压告终？一个汉族商人的生命比那些在大街上 拿着棍棒行凶的“藏族”示威者的生命更不值钱吗？对藏人的许多友谊只是对汉人的种族主义的另外一种令我作呕的表达。这种友谊只是被无知幻觉所供养。或许残 酷的镇压会得到证实。怎样评判？被反复唠叨的仅有的数据来源于西藏流亡政府。然而中国政府，如果我听清楚了，也宣布了一套死伤的数据，这让人明白当局承认 那里发生了严重的事态。在无论哪种情况下，人们试图比较这些信息。人们试图搞清楚事情发生的先后顺序。如果用同样的逻辑，可以说，由于正执行一个面对郊区 的铁腕政策，当日法国政府命令把在Clichy Sous Bois 的两个年轻人推进变电箱中，谁也不会说出这种愚蠢的话。在美国城市的骚乱中，镇压也同样相当残酷。所有这些并不意味可以原谅什么。但这允许我们把类似的事 态加以比较。

一个可疑的人 ​

对反华示威的主要组织者，Robert Ménard先生的政治行为，我表示最明确的保留。现在，关于西藏和奥运，人们只看见Robert Ménard 。似乎是，他在以“记者无疆界”组织的名义发言。这个协会里现在只有Robert Ménard一个人。许多的原来的董事会成员对于Robert Ménard先生在他自己的协会中的民主作风这个题目有很多的话可以说。当我们在法国文化电台的讲台上讨论西藏和奥运的题目时，在我问到 Ménard先生的角色时，Marc Kravetz和Alexandre Adler先生都默不作声。不能怀疑他们是为了讨好我…… 离开话筒，这两个人都对Robert Ménard的人品表达严重保留。Maxime Vivas做了一份分析文件，表明这个人物和他的经济来源都非常令人担忧。不管他是谁，似乎他从此同时取代了记者工会、国际人权联盟、大赦国际等等等等。有时候他甚至取代了达赖喇嘛。Robert Menard为抵制奥运而奋斗，这是达赖喇嘛都没有做的事。达赖喇嘛说的是，中国人民有资格办奥运。Robert Menard是一个根据地理位置而变化的人权斗士。当美国让酷刑合法化时，他做过一个哪怕是象征性的动作吗？为了让关塔那摩的囚犯可以享有律师的协助，他又做过任何一件事吗？Robert Menard的行为让人对他做事的动机产生深深的怀疑。(文后有本报补注)

神权政体不值得捍卫 ​

关于西藏。自14世纪开始，西藏就属于中国。拉萨归汉人然后归满人管辖早在贝桑松 (Besancon)和多尔(Dole)归法王管辖之前。把1959年发生的事情判断为“入侵”是荒谬的，这只是中国革命的内部事件。当我们共和国的军队 进入旺代(Vendee)以平息当地的王党叛乱时，人们可以说那是“入侵”吗？达赖喇嘛和其他的西藏庄园主已经接受了共产党中国向他们建议和提供的所有东 西。比如这位“神王”毫无反感地坐上了人民代表大会的副委员长的职务。这样直到1956年，共产党政权决定废除西藏及相邻地区的农奴制。在我完全赞同的对 “西藏传统”的否定中，共产党人废止了把人分成三等九级并各有命价的法典。这个法典还授予农奴主和奴隶主对农奴和奴隶的生杀和拷打之权。在这个制度中人们 根本不提及妇女的地位。但是你可以去了解，只要你不怕恶心。共产党当局终止了在那自称的非暴力的天堂中的地方诸侯间的暴力冲突，也禁止了若干高级僧侣作为 宗教的保护者用于处罚那些违反戒律的人的血腥刑罚。西藏版的(伊斯兰)沙里亚法规因共产党而终结。

在冷战的背景下，1959年的叛乱由美国人准备、武装、提供给养和经费。这就 是在共产党的可憎的“入侵”使之告终之前的达赖喇嘛制度的迷人传统。现在西藏儿童有81%受过教育，而这在那受到赞美的传统时代只有2%。这条泪谷中的奴 隶的期望寿命当年只有35.5岁。到了现代中国的地狱中，这个数据变成了67岁。怎么解释，对西藏人的灭绝能表现为，自1959年以来，其人口数量从 100万增长到250万。看到这一切，相对于那些不想给自己，也不想给自己的妻子和孩子一个这么可悲的制度却正在推销这一可笑的口头禅的人，应当对汉人有 更多的审慎和尊重。而这个可悲的制度就正是西藏佛教僧王的制度。

在现时，我对“西藏流亡政府”没有任何好感，在那里，神王陛下对几乎所有的问 题都是最终的决定者。在那个哪怕是流亡中的政府里，可以找到异乎寻常地多的他的家庭成员，还不要谈在这些裙带在流亡者的金融和商务中的关键位子上的存在。 我尊重神王，尊重神王及其信徒的信仰自由。但我赞同我自己完全反对他们神权政体思想。我同样反对把儿童收入寺院。我反对农奴制的存在。在一切场合，我都是 世俗的。因此我完全地反对宗教的政治权威，反对甚至在画册《丁丁在西藏》中描述的那种可爱的神权，其实它从来没有真正存在过。我不同意“僧王”反对流产和 同性恋的立场。他关于这两个议题的声明哪怕非暴力又被那相当诱人的微笑所包装，在我看来和他的神权政治方案一样过时。我从未支持阿亚图拉霍梅尼，我也反对 伊朗的国王。我一样不支持或鼓励达赖喇嘛，也不会支持那个与我无关的宗教，我也不支持他的政治奢望以及那些我谴责的分离主义的企图。我要问：为什么为了实 践和领导他的宗教，达赖喇嘛需要一个国家？为了建立这个国家，他需要割取四分之一的中国领土！他现有的道德和宗教权威没有一个王国就不成吗？

战争的煽动者 ​

谈到国际法和地缘政治，西藏这份档案就像它的支持者所展示的，是一架可与巴尔干比美的暴 力、战争和不稳定的发动机。应当保卫什么样的西藏？包括了云南四川部分地区的“大西藏”？在那些老领主的土地上和拉萨同时组织骚乱？当然，所有现在闹事的 人都不想知道与此有关的事实情况。对上百万的生命和多少个世纪的中国的历史和文化的无动于衷，更表明在亲西藏的狂热底下的新殖民父权主义和种族主义。

我在报上看到一些法国运动员表示将穿一件运动衫，上面印有一句差不多可以到处 通行的口号，它却被视作一个政治抗议。我知道得很清楚，写上一句“为了一个更美好的世界”在哪里都不需要费什么劲。但是如果这个行为的亲达赖喇嘛的动机被 揭示，中国人肯定会觉得这对他们带有侮辱性。而且这也许已经有些超出了国际体育运动规定的范围。我们记得在欧洲游泳锦标赛上，欧洲泳协曾开除过塞尔维亚的 泳手Milorad Cavic，因为在他领奖时，身上穿了一件写有“科索沃属于塞尔维亚”的汗衫。这是否构成一类判例？法国的冠军们的服装带着有政治意味的口号是否会被奥运 会禁止？你们会说：当然不会！既然其区别仅仅是西藏属于中国而科索沃只是曾经属于塞尔维亚。但是既然这两件事没有可比性，除了击溃敌手和媒体炒作外的意 图，这事非常可能以侵犯者的丢脸而告终。这正是我所希望的。我是中国的一个朋友。我知道我的国家的利益和她的价值不在有人想把它们拉向的那一边。
补注：这篇文章是句对句词对词的直译，没有删节。只对个别熟语有意译。只有(…)中之词系我所加，为的是帮助理解。其中有几句话十分复杂难译。不达之处，还请见谅。

　[FONT=楷体_GB2312]　——译者又及

[/FONT] [FONT=楷体_GB2312] 附：“记者无疆界组织”不为人知的一面

[/FONT] [FONT=楷体_GB2312] 梅朗雄在法国媒体和他本人的博客中特别提到记者无疆界组织(RSF)及其负责人梅纳的可疑作用。

[/FONT] [FONT=楷体_GB2312] 作家兼记者马克西姆?维瓦斯(Vivas Maxime)在欧洲和美洲大陆对记者无疆界组织(RSF)2002年到2007年11月的运作进行了深入调研，以调查实录为依据，撰写了一本书。

[/FONT] [FONT=楷体_GB2312] 2006年4月6日，维瓦斯提到记者无疆界组织的资金来源。记者无疆界组织立即就在《地铁报》(Metro)里威胁他说：“记者无疆界组织保留法律追究马克西姆?维瓦斯的权力。”

[/FONT] [FONT=楷体_GB2312] 维瓦斯不顾这种威胁，继续收集有关这个奇怪的非政府组织(ONG)的资料，将揭露其真实面目的证据汇集整理成书。全书长达272页，分36个章节，6个附录，供大家自由辩论之用。

[/FONT] [FONT=楷体_GB2312] 维瓦斯指出，当人们看见田里有一个白色的大家伙，身上有一些黑斑块，头上长着两只角，吃着草，产出奶，发出哞哞声，顺理成章地得出结论，这是一头奶牛。 [/FONT]
[FONT=楷体_GB2312] 再看下去，如果一个美国牛仔在附近地区转悠，抚摸奶牛的脊背，尽说恭维它的话，人们很想把这头动物列入牛只类，特别是当人们突然发现这只动物在美国大农场的喂草架上吃干草的话。

[/FONT] [FONT=楷体_GB2312] 记者无疆界组织是否是个用筛选的新闻误导媒体的假非政府组织？

[/FONT] [FONT=楷体_GB2312] 这里介绍两位在这些出手慷慨、制造谣言的组织里担任要职的人物。一个是为中央情报局领导服务的活动分子奥托?赖克(Otto Reich)，另一个是约翰?内格罗蓬特(John Negroponte)。此翁曾任美国驻被占领的伊拉克的大使，直至2007年初，是美国整个情报机构的老板。

[/FONT] [FONT=楷体_GB2312] 记者无疆界组织的另一个资助机构是，国际媒体巨头、亿万富翁索洛斯的“开放社会研究所基金会”(Open Society Institute)。索洛斯是布什的私交。他到处活动，尽力设立一个亲美政府。

[/FONT] [FONT=楷体_GB2312] 书中详细介绍了记者无疆界组织各种可疑的交往，可耻的集资手段，因地而异因对象而异的抨击指责，毫无理由的宽容，种种弄虚作假的企图，在数字上大做手脚，因时而异的披露真相，一而再再而三地撒谎。这一切都是明里打着某些幌子，实际为着某个事业服务。

[/FONT] [FONT=楷体_GB2312] 让我们再观察一下这个组织反对起美利坚帝国意欲制服的那些穷国时是何等积极，对富国新闻媒体负债筹资的后果又是如何保持沉默的。
[/FONT]
[FONT=楷体_GB2312] 让我们再指出，该组织对美国兵一 次次“过失”表现的那般宽容，对深受其害的记者在数字统计上的那般“遗忘”。最后还有一个证据：科林?鲍威尔在一份厚厚的报告里对记者无疆界组织(而且只 对该组织)表示赏识。报告详细介绍了在美国的保护伞下，记者无疆界组织对一个重点攻击的拉丁美洲国家的活动经费是如何筹划预算的。

[/FONT] [FONT=楷体_GB2312] 那么记者无疆界组织究竟是一个人道协会，还是美国中央情报局和五角大楼鹰派的一个媒体上的左膀右臂？
[/FONT]
[FONT=楷体_GB2312] 读者自有评论。
[/FONT]

 

[doctorz]

where is the english version for this one?

 

[Fisher2004]

where is the english version for this one?

Only French version is available. Can someone translate it?

Jean-Luc Mélenchon

 

[adsfdsf]

应该把法语版和英语版的到处张贴， 让老外知道。

 

[USD]

法国的商业竞争力在是全球排名20 远远落后于美日德英意大利等其他西方资本主义发达国家

法国自己生活的不痛快 工作不好找 那是法国资本家的问题 中国绝对没有阻拦法国资本家来中国投资的权利 中国的投资环境好 法国商人喜欢来中国投资办厂 法国资本家有个人选择在那里投资的自由 如果法国人愿意降低自己工资收入 与发展中国家的工资水平看齐 工作机会自然会留在法国国内

还有一种解决办法就是 法国人民一起走上街头 扔砖头 烧汽车 向法国政府和商业巨头施加压力 要求政府颁布法律 禁止法国商人去海外投资 必须把工作机会留在法国国内 工资也必须按照法国同行标准执行 至于企业受否盈利 那是政府和资本家自己的问题 法国人是资本主义国家中工商业公有制对面最大的国家 吃大锅饭都吃了几百年了 那就继续再吃几百年大锅饭

 

[1918xf]

For your reference, here is the Google Automatically translated text in English for the French original at JE NE SUIS PAS D’ACCORD AVEC LE BOYCOTT DES JEUX DE PEKIN ET LA PROPAGANDE ANTI CHINOISE


I am not a Communist Chinese. I will never do. But I do not agree with the demonstrations for a boycott of the Olympic Games. I do not agree with Robert Menard operation against the Olympic Games in Beijing. I do not agree with the rewriting of the history of China in which this whole operation leads. I do not at all complacent enthusiasm for the Dalai Lama or to the regime that it embodies. For me, the boycott of the games is an insulting and unwarranted aggression against the Chinese people. If we wanted to challenge the regime in Beijing should do when it comes to choosing Beijing for the games. One should not allow China to be a candidate. He said in China. This is being done is an insult against unwarranted free and the millions of Chinese who wanted to actively preparing and games. For me it floats a nauseating smack of racism on this marmitte!

A PRETEXT

If a boycott were to be organized in a logical consistent aggressive, it's not the sport that is a moment of openness and fraternization. Why not instead of business and finance? Of course none of the current worldly activists did not propose does anything in this direction. If we really had to fall out with the Chinese government, why is the minimum of what is being done in the normal relations between nations does it not on this occasion? The president of the Republic of China (how many protesters are concerned to know his name?) Has been approached? He was there asked something? What? What he replied? The Prime Minister (how many were concerned to know his name?) Has been arrested? The Chinese Ambassador to France has been received and it was exchanged with him? Who cares? With a morgue-like racism, it is protesting against a government which does not cite the names of the leaders, and were made as if he did not exist. Why else because we think devers by saying that this is not really one. The beautiful western denies until behalf of the rulers who govern a nation of one billion, four hundred million people are believed to be veules enough to be controlled by a single political police! On the whole I feel, seeing all this, the echo of the defiance of the settlers who have imposed their time with arms in their hands an obligation for the Chinese to trade in opium! If the intention is to deal with the political regime in Beijing, none of the means employed is likely to do anything other than Western public opinion already fully formatted on the subject.
So the events of Tibet is a pretext. A pretext entirely built with the use of a public conditioned by the repetition of images aimed at creating more clearly than reflection. Example: only the investigation "still picture" reported that the "events" of Tibet began with a pogrom by Chinese traders' Tibetan. " In which country in the world such events are still without continued repressive? The Life of a Chinese merchant did less valuable than that of Tibetan demonstrators "who" murdered in the beating in the street? Although the friendship for Tibetan is a nauseating variant of racism against the Chinese. They eat all the fantasies that promotes ignorance. That was heavy repression is perhaps proved. How to enjoy? The only figures rabachés are those of the "Tibetan government in exile". Yet the Chinese government, if I heard, announces itself a number of injuries and deaths to understand that there has been a grave and serious situation that the authorities admit. In any circumstances try to compare information. We try to understand the sequence of events. Otherwise say that the french government of the time ordered the two young grow into a power transformer in Clichy Sous Bois on the grounds that it had a policy to deal with tough hand suburbs. Nobody would move a mistake as infamous. In the American urban riots repression was also heavy hand. All that condones nothing. But it puts events in relation comparison.

A SUSPICIOUS CHARACTER

I express the most significant reservations about the political action of Mr. Robert Menard, the main organizer of demonstrations against China. At present, about Tibet and the Olympic Games, we can see that Robert Menard. He speaks, it seems, in the name of "Reporters without borders". This association was reduced to the person of Robert Menard. Many former members of the board of directors could say a lot about the democratic conceptions of Mr. Ménard in its own association. As I sat on the board of Radio France Culture where we m'interrogeait on the subject of Tibet and the Olympic Games, gentlemen Marc Kravetz and Alexandre Adler remained silent when I came to the role of Mr. Ménard . They may not be suspected of setting myself complacent… Off microphone, both expressed reservations about the methods marked the character of Robert Menard. Maxime Vivas has established a documented analysis extremely disturbing about this character and its sources of funding. Anyway, it seems that now also replaces the unions of journalists, the International Association of Human Rights, Amnesty and so on. Sometimes he replaces the Dalai Lama. Robert Menard campaigning for the boycott of the games that is not the Dalai Lama. It said instead that the Chinese people deserve games. Robert Menard is a defender of human rights variable geometry. Has he conducted a single action, ultra same token, when the united States of America have legalized torture? Has he led a single action to ensure that the detainees in Guantanamo are assisted by lawyer? Robert Menard has a behavior that raises serious questions about the motivations for its actions.

THEOCRATIQUE THE SYSTEM IS INDEFENDABLE

About Tibet. Tibet is Chinese since the fourteenth century. Lhasa was under Chinese rule before then Manchu Besançon or Dole are under the authority of the kings of France. Speaking of "invasion" in 1959 to describe an event in the Chinese revolution is absurd. Says one that France had "invaded" the Vendee when the armies of our Republic are entered against insurgents believed the royalists? The Dalai Lama and other Tibetan masters have accepted everything that Communist China proposed and offered, such as Vice President of the People's Assembly that "his holiness" has been reluctant without. That day until 1956 when the communist regime decided to abolish serfdom in Tibet and neighbouring regions. In a denial of the traditions, that I fully agree with, the Communists have repealed the codes that classified people into three categories and nine classes of which the price of life was specified codes that gave owners of serfs and slaves the right Life, death and torture on them. It does not evoke the satut women under that regime there. But it is possible to learn if you have the heart well hung. The Communist authorities put an end to violent struggles between local chiefs of alleged paradise of nonviolence and the various bloody punishment inflicted that the monks against acts contrary to the religious rules that they were the custodians. The Tibetan version of the Charria ended with the communists. The revolt of 1959 was prepared army, managed and financed by the USA within the framework of the Cold War. That is what is charming traditions of the regime of the Dalai Lama before the Communists and the horrendous "invasion" that has been terminated. Since then, the schooling of children of Tibet concerns 81% of them where there were only 2% to bless time traditions. And life expectancy in the hell contemporary Chinese prolongs the life of slaves in this vale of tears of 35, 5 and 67 years. In witness whereof, the destruction of Tibetan manifested in the doubling of the Tibetan population since 1959 by passing it from one million to two million and a half. For all this, the situation deserves better, more circumspect, more respect for the Chinese that the clichés that peddle ridiculous people who do not want for themselves or for their companion for their children or a regime regrettable that King of Buddhist monks in Tibet. At the moment I have no sympathy for the "government in exile of Tibet" his holiness which is the ultimate decision maker on virtually all issues, which includes a number of members of his family he is quite unusual finding in a government even in exile, not to mention their presence in the key posts of finance and business of this exile. I respect the right of his holiness to believe what it wants and its supporters as well. But I gives me the right to be in strong disagreement with the idea of their theocratic regime. I am also opposed to the indoctrination of children in monasteries. I am opposed to the existence of serfdom. I lay everywhere and for all and therefore totally opposed to the political authority of religious orders, even those that the album "Tintin in Tibet" and attendrissants reported that they have never been. I disapprove also the position of "king of the monks' against abortion and homosexuals. Even non-violent and surrounded by quite seductive smiles, his statements on these two subjects are in my view as archaic as its theocratic political project. I have never supported the Ayatollah Khomeini, even when I was against the Shah of Iran. I do not support more nor does the Dalai Lama, nor their religion which does not relate to me, or its political pretensions that I disagree with or in its attempts cecessionistes that I condemn. I ask: why to exercise one's religion and the Dalai Lama lead it would need a state? A State to be formed would require China to cut a quarter of its surface! His moral and religious teaching suffers current happen to be sitting on any royalty?

FAUTEUR WAR

With regard to international law and geopolitics, the issue of Tibet as presented by its proponents is a factor in violence, war and destabilization as great as that of the Balkans. What kind of Tibet is forbidden? The "Great Tibet" including areas such as Yunnan and Sichuan, on the territories of the former Lords of the land where organized disturbances at the same time as Lhasa? Of course, none of those who get agitated at this time not to think about what is going on in this regard. Nothing indicates better neo colonial paternalism or racism underlying the enthusiasm that Tibetan pro indifference to the issues affecting the lives of millions of people and centuries of history and Chinese culture.
I have read that athletes wear a jersey french with a statement just goes everywhere, which is presented as a political protest. I know very well that the inscription "for a Better World" is not eating more bread there that here. But it will certainly be experienced by the common Chinese as an act ground offensive if his pro dalai lama is known. Maybe it is, however, also a little out of bounds of the rules of international sport. We remember that the European league swimming championships excluded from europe Aquatics swimmer Serbian Milorad Cavic because he wore during the medal a T-shirt on which was written: "Kosovo is Serbian." That will make it law? The french champions who bear a slogan announced as policy will be banned from games? Of course not! Since the aim is that Tibet is the Chinese that Kosovo was the Serbs. But there is nothing comparable, apart from breaking the will of the enemy and staging media, it is likely that this end to the confusion of the aggressors. I hope so. I am a friend of China. And I know that the interest of my country and its values are not on the side where it wants to lead