南北棒子对打,加拿大也要参和.

苦逼热狗

路边通讯社社长
VIP
注册
2002-10-12
消息
47,142
荣誉分数
2,378
声望点数
393
http://www.cbc.ca/politics/story/2010/11/26/canada-korea-military.html#socialcomments

Korean war could involve Canada

Old UN military alliance could require Canadian participation



Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/politics/story/2010/11/26/canada-korea-military.html#socialcomments#ixzz16WPc3LqD

If war breaks out on the Korean peninsula, Canada could become embroiled because of a half-century-old United Nations military alliance, federal documents reveal.
skorea-drill-rtxuy8g.jpg
South Korean soldiers take part in an exercise to defend against a possible attack from North Korea about 100 km southeast of Seoul on Nov. 23. (Jo Yong-Hak/Reuters) Canada's military obligations in the volatile region are outlined in a briefing note prepared for Defence Minister Peter MacKay shortly after North Korea detonated a nuclear device last year.
The note by the Defence Department's policy branch, which was obtained by The Canadian Press, says the UN alliance could be used to generate an international fighting force if war erupts.
North Korea ratcheted up its war rhetoric Friday after its deadly artillery barrage on a South Korean island Tuesday.
Because Canada was one of the combatants in the Korean War, it became part of an organization known as the United Nations Command — or UNC — following the 1953 armistice that ended three years of war between North and South Korea.
"Recent tensions have caused ADM (Pol) to review Canada's military obligations on the Korean peninsula if armed hostilities were to erupt," the memo reads. "The UNC structure would be used as a means of force-generating and receiving and tasking any contributions that UNC Sending States may choose to contribute in the event of a crisis."
Canada was one 16 countries that took part in fighting the Korean War and all signed the July 27, 1953, armistice that paused three years of hostilities. North and South Korea have remained technically at war since then, but the armistice has been supervised by a UN military commission along the 243-kilometre long demilitarized zone between the two countries.
As the briefing note outlines, the main "fighting formation" that would take the lead in any new conflict is the joint United States-South Korea Combined Forces Command. But that joint command "includes under its strategic organizational umbrella the legacy United Nations Command (UNC)."
Canada remains a member of the UNC because it was one of the 15 "Sending States" that supplied troops to the Korean conflict, the memo says.
UN role unlikely, academic says

Paul Evans, the director of the Institute of Asian Research at University of British Columbia, said he doesn't believe the current situation will become a full-blown military crisis. If it does, he said, "it would be difficult to use the UNC structure in the event of a conflict except as an initial advice."
That's because the UN's role would be minimized by fact that Russia and China wield vetoes as permanent members of the all-powerful Security Council, said Evans.
"I have a hunch that the UN role, whatever its formalities are now through the military commission and other things, are likely to be superseded almost immediately by a coalition of the willing that would be led by the United States and South Korea."
Federal officials say there have been no "asks" to Canada for military support in the region.
The American aircraft carrier George Washington and the South Korean navy are to conduct a joint training exercise on Sunday. North Korea said Friday the exercise was a provocation that could push the region to the "brink of war."
tp-uss-george-washington.jpg
The aircraft carrier USS George Washington, shown in July, will take part in an exercise with South Korea starting Sunday. The exercise was planned before a North Korean attack killed four South Koreans on Tuesday. (Lee Jin-man/Associated Press) Evans said it is not inconceivable that a Canadian navy warship could find itself operating in South Asian waters in the coming months, either as an add on to any continued U.S. navy presence or part of a stepped up international effort to interdict North Korean vessels.
Canada announced last month that it was adopting a "controlled engagement" policy, ending all official bilateral contacts between Ottawa and Kim Jong Il's regime in Pyongyang.
The government said the move was in retaliation for the fact a North Korean torpedo sank a South Korean warship this past March, killing 46 sailors.
Canada contributed three military experts to the international investigation that eventually pointed the finger at North Korea.
3 Canadian soldiers in S. Korea

The briefing note indicates Canada's military footprint in the Korean peninsula today is very light. Canada's defence attaché to Seoul, a colonel, and his assistant, a sergeant, represent the country on the UNC.
Canada's defence attaché in Tokyo represents Canada at the UNC's "rear" headquarters in Japan. And Canada also contributes a major to the Korean Army Staff College.
The censored briefing note does not elaborate on what would follow if a "crisis" erupted and an international military coalition had to be created.
Mark Sedra, the head of the global and human security program at the Centre for International Governance Innovation in Waterloo, Ont., said Canada has offered political support to South Korea, but he doesn't see a military role.
"That would require a big escalation of the situation if you were to see a multinational force commitment. If we see that happening, we've really seen a deterioration of the situation."
Prime Minister Stephen Harper "strongly condemned" North Korea's artillery attack Tuesday, calling it "the latest in a series of aggressive and provocative actions" by the dictatorship.


Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/politics/story/2010/11/26/canada-korea-military.html#socialcomments#ixzz16WPf81dF


 
加拿大国内经济疲软,阿富汗战争已经顶不住了,他要是在下去和稀泥,摆明了去搞笑的.........
 
省了吧。
 
加拿大就是美国的一条狗,主人指哪,加拿大他就跑过去吠两声。
 
加拿大就是美国的一条狗,主人指哪,加拿大他就跑过去吠两声。

你不喜欢保守党政府,你可以想各种办法抨击甚至“推翻”保守党政府,但你不喜欢加拿大,你恐怕只有滚蛋这一条路了。
 
加拿大就是美国的一条狗,主人指哪,加拿大他就跑过去吠两声。

:cool::cool::cool:

我去纽约探亲戚,在闲谈时,他们说加是美的附庸国.我只有干生气:flaming:
 
支持南韩,是联合国决议。

我倒是怀疑,红朝作为现在的联合国安理会常任理事国,是否会抵抗联合国军。
 
你不喜欢保守党政府,你可以想各种办法抨击甚至“推翻”保守党政府,但你不喜欢加拿大,你恐怕只有滚蛋这一条路了。


你哪句话看出来我不喜欢加拿大,我很喜欢加拿大。
但是军事立场上,我不喜欢加拿大政府的做法,不管哪个党上台,都是听美国的!
 
:cool::cool::cool:

我去纽约探亲戚,在闲谈时,他们说加是美的附庸国.我只有干生气:flaming:

So what? 天朝子民即使来了加拿大,也改不了天朝心理,只是人均GDP世界排名100多名以外的天朝子民,去绝大部分地区,都需要签证,心里就没有点什么反应?
 
:cool::cool::cool:

我去纽约探亲戚,在闲谈时,他们说加是美的附庸国.我只有干生气:flaming:


我朋友去美国买东西,
商店卖东西的问她,你从加拿大哪里来?
我朋友说,Toronto.
美国人,想了半天说, I have never heard of it.

我朋友回来气S了,每次都跟我抱怨半天,没办法,美国人从来没有把加拿大放在眼里!加拿大太软太听话了。

希望来加拿大的中国人越来越多,早日帮加拿大也政治,经济,军事独立了。
美国人就老实了。
 
打NK,SK出地面部队,其他国家炸就可以了,最好把几个胖子直接斩首,老百姓就少吃苦了
 
So what? 天朝子民即使来了加拿大,也改不了天朝心理,只是人均GDP世界排名100多名以外的天朝子民,去绝大部分地区,都需要签证,心里就没有点什么反应?

难道你很喜欢看别人脸色做事,很喜欢加拿大给美国跑腿,效力?
 
你哪句话看出来我不喜欢加拿大,我很喜欢加拿大。
但是军事立场上,我不喜欢加拿大政府的做法,不管哪个党上台,都是听美国的!

美国为加拿大提供了军事保护,加拿大省了大笔国防开支,你知道吧?

加拿大出兵,基本是象征意义,即使参与阿富汗战争,也就是几百军人。
 
后退
顶部