为被恐怖分子杀害的盟军家属募捐

从政治的角度,政府的原则态度应是不陪。 从法律的角度, 政府的原则态度应该是服从法律。把钱赔给美军遗孀,当然可以是SETTLEMENT的一部分,但也得是能谈下来。但如果法院判把钱赔给原告,而政府把钱赔给美军遗孀, 从法院拒绝冻结他的财产来看,可能性不大。
第一,哪国的法律都不是严丝合缝的,政府的态度有很大的影响力,特别是于情于理都占上风的时候。哪个政府都想遮掩这点,但这是个现实,毕竟法官也是总理任命的。
第二,政府真想那么做的话,会有许多变通手段。不同的法院/法官结果也会不同,这基本上不是问题。
 
第一,哪国的法律都不是严丝合缝的,政府的态度有很大的影响力,特别是于情于理都占上风的时候。哪个政府都想遮掩这点,但这是个现实,毕竟法官也是总理任命的。
第二,政府真想那么做的话,会有许多变通手段。不同的法院/法官结果也会不同,这基本上不是问题。
没错,所谓的三权分立也不是完全的。任命法官就很政治性。但法官的原则是法律。保守党任命的法官判保守党政府输的案子并不罕见。
这说明,绝大部分法官还是有底线的。法律不随着政党/政府的变迁而轻易改动,这是法制国家保证长治久安的根本。
 
最后编辑:
政府真想那么做的话,会有许多变通手段
没错,政府会有许多变通手段。 但问题是,作为全体人民表率的政府,是应该带头配合法院的审理/判决呢,还是用变通手段来抗拒/规避呢?
 
没错,政府会有许多变通手段。 但问题是,作为全体人民表率的政府,是应该带头配合法院的审理/判决呢,还是用变通手段来抗拒/规避呢?
在法律框架下政府的变通手段就是政府的灵活度,怎样做取决于政府的态度。总的来讲,政府的态度应该顺应民意。
 
DE5fE22XYAAysWp.jpg:large
 
政府的原则态度应是不陪。在法律框架下实在没有退路的话,可选择与美军遗孀战术合作,宁可让纳税人的钱赔给美军遗孀也不落在恐怖分子手中。这也是加拿大人的底线,可土豆做得正相反!
土豆就是某宗教集团的一条gou
 
"And it’s the changing media landscape — where liberal, establishment journalists no longer hold a virtual monopoly on framing facts and stating opinions.

The elite media can spin the news all they want, but citizens have found new ways to consume information directly — through social media, alternative news sites and direct news feeds.

We no longer need to have our news filtered through the Ottawa group-think bubble."
 
The elite media can spin the news all they want, but citizens have found new ways to consume information directly — through social media, alternative news sites and direct news feeds.

We no longer need to have our news filtered through the Ottawa group-think bubble.

In the case of Omar Khadr, despite having the usual chorus of media cheerleaders defending Trudeau’s deal, Canadians made up their own minds.

Editorials, columns and even some news stories in major Canadian media outlets overwhelmingly told us Trudeau was right to award Khadr millions of dollars.

Some media stated as fact that Khadr was a child soldier — (Khadr was 15 at the time, while the Geneva Convention refers to children under 15) — and that he was tortured. (A military judge found he was not.)

Some reports began slipping the word “allegedly” before stating that Khadr killed Sgt. Christopher Speer, ignoring that Khadr signed a confession.

They simply accepted as factual Khadr’s later retraction, saying he only did it to get out of Guantanmo.

This is the type of spin Canadians have become used to, and fortunately, can see through.

According to J.D. Gordon, a retired U.S. Navy Commander who escorted media attending Khadr’s military commission hearings at Guantanamo, the Canadian journalists were “hopelessly naïve to the threat posed to Western Society by jihadist networks.”

Gordon worked closely with “a dozen or so Canadian journalists,” and told the Sun it often felt, “as if some were writing for student newspapers on left-wing college campuses.”

Many elites in the media, as well as academia, the courts and the Liberal government may hold deeply anti-American views.

They may prefer to sympathize with terrorists and traitors over our neighbour and closest ally, who helps keep us safe.

But most Canadians see things differently.

Most Canadians side with the real victims, the Speer family and former Sgt. Layne Morris, who was blinded in one eye, not the manufactured martyr, Omar Khadr.

That’s Canadian common sense, and it’s the Trudeau government’s worst nightmare.
 
后退
顶部