大选结果预测

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 SFU
  • 开始时间 开始时间
(continued)
So why do the deficit spending?

During the Great Recession when Stephen Harper’s Conservatives were running up record deficits, it was driven in part by necessity. Unemployment had spiked to unbelievable levels in many regions of the country. One finance official told me at the time that Employment Insurance was sending out more than $5 billion a month than it was taking in.

That money came from general revenues and the extra spending was backed by all parties.

Today there is no recession and the deficit spending has not only continued, it is increasing. Deficits eventually become government debt and, believe it or not, that does cost us.

According to the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, the federal debt currently sits at $695 billion and goes up by $2.2 million an hour or $54 million a day. Each one of us — every man, woman and child — is in the hock to the tune of $18,682.

Right now, just paying the interest on the debt costs us $26.2 billion a year. That’s according to the latest budget put out by the Trudeau Liberals earlier this year. That money doesn’t pay down a single penny of the debt, it just pays the interest on the debt.

It’s like paying just the interest or minimum payment on your credit card, the total that you owe keeps growing.

According to Trudeau’s own numbers, we are spending more on paying the interest on the debt than we do on the military — $4 billion more to be exact. Think about that, without the debt we could more than double military spending without raising taxes a single penny.

Or we could more than double the Canada Child Benefit. The program that sends hundreds of dollars per month to parents is expected to cost us a total of $24.3 billion this fiscal year, or about $2 billion less than we spend to service the debt.

And those pesky equalization payments that cause so much national angst as money is shuffled from one part of the country to another — mainly Quebec — costs just $19.8 billion.

Most programs and departments could be funded many times over if we were not paying more than $2 billion a month on interest on the debt.

Trudeau’s plan to spend more than $94 billion through increased deficits over the next four years will only drive up that cost to us. It’s a reckless and threatens the very social programs he claims to value and that Canadians rely on.

The Liberals say they want to avoid austerity yet their plan will certainly drive us towards that and the cuts that follow.

It’s time to stop the deficit spending.

blilley@postmedia.com
 
(continued)
So why do the deficit spending?

During the Great Recession when Stephen Harper’s Conservatives were running up record deficits, it was driven in part by necessity. Unemployment had spiked to unbelievable levels in many regions of the country. One finance official told me at the time that Employment Insurance was sending out more than $5 billion a month than it was taking in.

That money came from general revenues and the extra spending was backed by all parties.

Today there is no recession and the deficit spending has not only continued, it is increasing. Deficits eventually become government debt and, believe it or not, that does cost us.

According to the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, the federal debt currently sits at $695 billion and goes up by $2.2 million an hour or $54 million a day. Each one of us — every man, woman and child — is in the hock to the tune of $18,682.

Right now, just paying the interest on the debt costs us $26.2 billion a year. That’s according to the latest budget put out by the Trudeau Liberals earlier this year. That money doesn’t pay down a single penny of the debt, it just pays the interest on the debt.

It’s like paying just the interest or minimum payment on your credit card, the total that you owe keeps growing.

According to Trudeau’s own numbers, we are spending more on paying the interest on the debt than we do on the military — $4 billion more to be exact. Think about that, without the debt we could more than double military spending without raising taxes a single penny.

Or we could more than double the Canada Child Benefit. The program that sends hundreds of dollars per month to parents is expected to cost us a total of $24.3 billion this fiscal year, or about $2 billion less than we spend to service the debt.

And those pesky equalization payments that cause so much national angst as money is shuffled from one part of the country to another — mainly Quebec — costs just $19.8 billion.

Most programs and departments could be funded many times over if we were not paying more than $2 billion a month on interest on the debt.

Trudeau’s plan to spend more than $94 billion through increased deficits over the next four years will only drive up that cost to us. It’s a reckless and threatens the very social programs he claims to value and that Canadians rely on.

The Liberals say they want to avoid austerity yet their plan will certainly drive us towards that and the cuts that follow.

It’s time to stop the deficit spending.

blilley@postmedia.com

多讲讲希尔如何勤勤恳恳。
 
现在没人关系赤字了。climate 才显时髦。
 
现在没人关系赤字了。climate 才显时髦。
债要还吗?加拿大本地人就是债台高筑还拼命的借,不发愁吗?
 
https://info.51.ca/news/canada/2019-10/818121.html

加拿大一百多家科技公司的首席执行官已经写了一封致联邦四大党领袖的公开信,要求他们为促进加拿大的科技创新挺身而出。
这封信写给自由党领袖杜鲁多、保守党领袖熙尔、新民主党领袖贾驵勉诚和绿党领袖伊丽莎白·梅, 信中表示加拿大需要制定经济政策,使得加拿大科技领域更容易获得人才,增加资本和新客户。
信中写道:"我们写这封信是因为加拿大的生产力正在落后,未来的经济繁荣面临风险。我们希望与这次选举的各方合作,应对这一挑战。"首席执行官们在信中还说,他们的公司去年雇佣了3万5000多名加拿大人,产品出口到190个国家,为加拿大经济创造了超过60亿元的收入。

加拿大创新者理事会Benjamin Bergen说:"看看当前竞选中的内容,并没有讨论到有关创新或创造财富的经济问题"。

John Sicard 是总部位于渥太华的 Kinaxis 公司的首席执行官,该公司帮助丰田、本田和Merck等客户提高供应链效率,拥有 700 名员工。John Sicard说,目前生意不错,但增长比较难,因为顶尖的合格毕业生被美国科技巨头抢走了。多伦多大学Munk全球事务学院最近的一项研究称,大约四分之一的科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)的学生选择前往美国。

Sicard 希望看到各方都能够承诺实施“全球技能战略”,该战略在软件工程等类别提供两周内的临时工作许可。自两年前作为试验计划生效以来,已有超过24000人通过这个计划找到工作。

自由党在2019年预算中将其列为了永久计划。该党向CBC确认,如果他们再次当选,该计划将保持不变。保守党和新民主党没有回复CBC,而绿党在电子邮件的声明中没有提到这一战略。

四大政党都讨论到让大型外国科技巨头缴税的问题。Benjamin Bergen对此表示支持,因为这样做可以大家处在平等地位,在税收结构中创造公平性,让外国公司像国内公司一样在加拿大纳税。

另外,自由党领袖杜鲁多承诺向多达2000名创业者提供每人5万元,帮助他们开展新业务。杜鲁多说,我们已经确保从加拿大商业开发银行可以免费获得咨询和服务,确保企业能找到更多资金去进行业务扩展,因为我们知道,我们要在全球范围当中与其他企业竞争。
保守党的熙尔说,他帮助加拿大企业的方法之一是减轻监管负担。该党计划将联邦法规减少25%。他说:"加拿大有很多法规阻止公司创业和成长,而其他国家为创业者提供了更具竞争力的环境”。

新民主党表示将针对具体行业,审查联邦采购制度,以确保鼓励加拿大本地的投标人。绿党在一份电子邮件声明中说,他们将减免学费和学生债务,并建立一个绿色风险投资基金计划,以及其他的措施。

原文链接:https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/council-of-canadian-innovators-ceos-pen-letter-innovation-1.5310290
 
相对来说,联邦自由党的政策更加支持高科技产业。
 
谁设个赌局啊!
 
看完今晚辩论再说
 
http://338canada.com/

upload_2019-10-7_21-55-32.png
 
瞧这气势!

希望在希尔拿到多数的前提下人民党能拿到2-5席。这样有保守党掌大盘子、有人民党负责说话,加拿大政治将有望走向一个比较良性的发展状态。
 
后退
顶部