美国枪击案到底是右翼还是左翼极端分子干的多？

[Littlecesar]

咱们就不要强拧着脖子倔着脸，憋红了脸和脖子都没用，看一下权威机构的数据吧？

https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/115286/documents/HHRG-118-GO00-20230208-SD008.pdf

 

[ztbll]

哈哈，弄个拿败灯政府资助的ngo组织的所谓报告，没有任何可信性。你只要知道最近几年发生的校园枪击案都是lgbt人士干的，你就该知道谁更邪恶了。

 

[metropolis]

咱们就不要强拧着脖子倔着脸，憋红了脸和脖子都没用，看一下权威机构的数据吧？

https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/115286/documents/HHRG-118-GO00-20230208-SD008.pdf

这报告显示：

以上两张图表明谋杀与左右的关系。

这张图表明总凶杀案中枪杀所占百分比，拥枪派不是总说菜刀和砖头都可以杀人吗？

 

[ztbll]

这报告显示：浏览附件1185540浏览附件1185541
以上两张图表明谋杀与左右的关系。
浏览附件1185542

这张图表明枪杀占总杀人中枪杀所占百分比，不是拥枪派不是总说菜刀和砖头都可以杀人吗？

哈哈，别忙活了，那个时候美帝所有的数据都是失真的，数据统计是屈服于意识形态的，举个例子，媒体说某某犯罪分子是白人，可是从照片明显看出是黑人或中南美人，所以你看的这个东西没有参考价值

 

[metropolis]

你可以展示你的数据。

 

[metropolis]

杀手的种族肤色等特征

 

[TrumpEstate]

你可以展示你的数据。

你这样逼他拿数据，他可能会去撞墙。如果他装模做样撞重了，头上起个包，他会起诉你。你不害怕？

 

[Littlecesar]

只要在北美呆过十几、二十多年的，都知道左B枪杀案多是零星的抢却案。而政治谋杀、种族仇恨的枪杀案都是右B干的。上述统计符合常识。
红脖子扭断了也改变不了这个结果。

 

[ltyyqjg]

有一点可以肯定：只要禁枪，左翼和右翼的枪杀案都会大幅度减少。

 

[metropolis]

AI给的总结，和拜登无关，前十杀手中政治倾向，年龄，性取向等特征不明显，至于文化，信仰不便追究，自己猜吧。

最显著的三条：
1. 性别：男，
2. 脑子有病的疯子，或有私仇，
3. 肤色特征不用说了，除了南韩和阿富汗后裔。

ChatGPT

下面我列出 按死亡人数（死伤人数最多）排列的美国 10 起最严重的 mass-killing（以单一事件/单/多名凶手造成死亡人数为标准），并简要说明每位/每组行凶者的姓名、族裔/出身背景以及已知的政治/意识形态倾向或是否有明确动机。我以维基百科与主流新闻报道为来源（每条后面附上来源），并只报告公开、可查的结论 — 对于没有可靠证据显示政治倾向的案例，我会明确写出“无明确政治/意识形态动机被证实”。

1. 2017 年 拉斯维加斯音乐节枪击 — Stephen Paddock
   • 凶手：Stephen Paddock。白人男性，生于美国。
   • 政治/意识形态：没有明确的、系统化的政治或极端主义宣称。调查显示他有偏执/阴谋类言论的迹象，但并未找到明确动机或政治宣言。
2. 2016 年 奥兰多 Pulse 夜店枪击 — Omar Mateen
   • 凶手：Omar Mateen。美籍，父母来自阿富汗（阿富汗裔美国人）。
   • 政治/意识形态：在行凶期间曾对警方表示效忠“伊斯兰国（ISIS）”，事件被视为兼有仇同性恋与（他自称的）圣战主义动机。
3. 2007 年 弗吉尼亚理工枪击 — Seung-Hui Cho（崔胜喜）
   • 凶手：Seung-Hui Cho。出生于韩国，后成为美国居民/学生。
   • 政治/意识形态：主要呈现个体化仇恨与精神病理学背景（大量证据指向严重的精神健康问题）；没有被证实属于某一政治派别或极端政治运动。
4. 2012 年 Sandy Hook 小学枪击 — Adam Lanza
   • 凶手：Adam Lanza。白人美国男性。
   • 政治/意识形态：调查聚焦于其严重心理健康问题与家庭/个人因素；无明确政治/意识形态动机被证实。
5. 2017 年 Sutherland Springs 教堂枪击 — Devin Patrick Kelley
   • 凶手：Devin Patrick Kelley。白人男性，美籍。
   • 政治/意识形态：其背景包括家庭/纪律/刑事记录与家暴史；官方与调查并未认定其为有明确的政治极端主义者（但社交媒体上与事后谣言/错误指控曾流传）。
6. 1991 年 Luby’s 餐厅枪击（Killeen） — George Hennard
   • 凶手：George Pierre Hennard。白人男性。
   • 政治/意识形态：动机多被归因于个人心理/仇女/社会孤立等因素；没有可靠证据显示是出于政治极端主义。
7. 2019 年 埃尔帕索 Walmart 枪击 — Patrick Crusius
   • 凶手：Patrick Crusius。白人男性（美籍）。
   • 政治/意识形态：在犯案前据称发布了一篇含白人至上/反移民（针对西裔/墨西哥裔）内容的宣言；案件被视为带有白人民族主义 / 反移民 / 仇恨犯罪动机（联邦也以仇恨犯罪/国内恐怖主义性质起诉）。
8. 1984 年 San Ysidro 麦当劳屠杀 — James Huberty
   • 凶手：James Oliver Huberty。白人男性。
   • 政治/意识形态：主要与其长期的心理健康问题、社交孤立、个人挫折相关；没有明确政治意识形态证据。
9. 2022 年 Uvalde（Robb 小学）枪击 — Salvador Ramos
   • 凶手：Salvador Ramos。18 岁，美籍（据报道有墨西哥裔背景/拉丁裔家庭关联）。
   • 政治/意识形态：调查并未将该案归为有明确政治或极端主义意识形态的恐怖行动；动机被报道更多指向个人问题、仇恨、愤怒与精神状态。
10. 2023 年 Lewiston（緬因州）枪击 — Robert Card
    • 凶手：Robert Card（之后被发现死亡）。美籍，曾有军旅背景。

Grok：

Top 10 Deadliest Mass Shootings in US History (as of September 2025)

Based on fatalities (excluding the perpetrator), here is a list of the 10 deadliest mass shootings in modern US history, focusing on events from 1982 onward for consistency with available data. I’ve included the perpetrator’s name, ethnic background, and political affiliation where known or reported. Political affiliations are often not definitive or motivating factors, and many perpetrators had no clear political ties. Ethnic backgrounds are based on reported ancestry or self-identification.

1. Las Vegas Shooting (October 1, 2017)

• Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
• Fatalities: 60 (including later deaths from injuries)
• Perpetrator: Stephen Paddock
• Ethnic Background: White (European descent)
• Political Affiliation: None known; family described him as apolitical, though some reports noted interest in far-right conspiracy theories
• Other Background: Retired accountant, gambler, no clear motive identified beyond possible depression.

2. Pulse Nightclub Shooting (June 12, 2016)

• Location: Orlando, Florida
• Fatalities: 49
• Perpetrator: Omar Mateen
• Ethnic Background: Afghan-American (Pashtun ethnic group)
• Political Affiliation: Registered Democrat (in 2006), but pledged allegiance to ISIS during the attack
• Other Background: Security guard; motivated by anti-LGBTQ+ hatred and radical Islamist ideology.

3. Virginia Tech Shooting (April 16, 2007)
• Location: Blacksburg, Virginia
• Fatalities: 32
• Perpetrator: Seung-Hui Cho
• Ethnic Background: South Korean (immigrant, legal resident)
• Political Affiliation: None known; not registered to vote
• Other Background: College student with mental health issues, including selective mutism.

4. Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting (December 14, 2012)

• Location: Newtown, Connecticut
• Fatalities: 27 (including his mother)
• Perpetrator: Adam Lanza
• Ethnic Background: White (European descent, including Italian ancestry)
• Political Affiliation: None known; not registered to vote
• Other Background: Recluse with undiagnosed mental health issues; killed his mother before the attack.

5. Sutherland Springs Church Shooting (November 5, 2017)

• Location: Sutherland Springs, Texas
• Fatalities: 26
• Perpetrator: Devin Patrick Kelley
• Ethnic Background: White
• Political Affiliation: None known; no party affiliation on record
• Other Background: Former Air Force member with domestic violence history; targeted family members.

6. Luby’s Cafeteria Shooting (October 16, 1991)

• Location: Killeen, Texas
• Fatalities: 23
• Perpetrator: George Hennard
• Ethnic Background: White (Swiss-American descent)
• Political Affiliation: None known
• Other Background: Unemployed former merchant marine; misogynistic motives.

7. El Paso Walmart Shooting (August 3, 2019)

• Location: El Paso, Texas
• Fatalities: 23
• Perpetrator: Patrick Crusius
• Ethnic Background: White
• Political Affiliation: Registered Republican; white supremacist views
• Other Background: Motivated by anti-immigrant and white nationalist ideology.

8. San Ysidro McDonald’s Massacre (July 18, 1984)

• Location: San Diego, California
• Fatalities: 21
• Perpetrator: James Huberty
• Ethnic Background: White
• Political Affiliation: None known
• Other Background: Unemployed welder with financial and mental health struggles.

9. Uvalde Elementary School Shooting (May 24, 2022)

• Location: Uvalde, Texas
• Fatalities: 21
• Perpetrator: Salvador Ramos
• Ethnic Background: Hispanic (likely Mexican-American descent)
• Political Affiliation: None known
• Other Background: Troubled teen with family issues; no ideological motive identified.

10. Parkland High School Shooting (February 14, 2018)

• Location: Parkland, Florida
• Fatalities: 17
• Perpetrator: Nikolas Cruz
• Ethnic Background: White (biological mother Jewish; adopted by Hispanic family)
• Political Affiliation: None known; not registered to vote
• Other Background: Expelled student with mental health issues and history of threats.

Note: These events are ranked by fatalities, drawing from reliable sources like Wikipedia summaries and news reports. Many perpetrators had undiagnosed or untreated mental health issues, and politics rarely played a central role. For historical mass killings (pre-1980s, including non-shooting events), death tolls were often higher due to racial violence or military actions, but the query focuses on “mass killing” in a modern context

 

[今剩叹]

上文只是对大规模枪击案的汇总，样本太少。

下文是CHATGPT给出的更广泛的统计：

很沉重的消息 — 首先对查理·科克遇刺表示遗憾。关于你问的“历次美国因政治倾向而发生的枪击案里，自由派（左翼）和保守派（右翼）出身的枪手比例如何？”，下面给出基于公开研究与统计的总结、数字化结论与主要限制说明（结论尽量用可查来源支撑）。


关键结论（概括）

• 历史与近期被归类为**“意识形态/极端主义动机”**的致命案件中，右翼/保守派（尤其是极右、白人至上/反政府等）加害者占多数，左翼加害者占比明显较小（历史上通常<⅓）。ccjls.scholasticahq.com+1
• 量化实例：1990–2020 年的研究显示，“远右”意识形态造成的致死人数年均约 11.5 人，而“远左”年均约 2.5 人（同一研究时期，远左在总体意识形态凶杀中占比低于三分之一）。ccjls.scholasticahq.com
• 近年趋势（特别是 2021–2024 周期）表明，极端主义相关的致命枪击在报道与统计里越来越集中于右派极端分子：例如 ADL 报告与媒体摘要指出 2023 年被归类为极端主义相关的凶杀几乎全部与右派极端主义有关。Axios+1
• 学界对“左/右谁更容易诉诸暴力”的分析结论也较一致：总体上左翼关联的政治行动案例更少诉诸致命暴力；在美国样本中，右翼与（以往研究中）宗教/伊斯兰主义者的暴力水平接近。

看世界，是雾里看花，还是慧眼观察？

 

[metropolis]

我问AI的问题是：美国最严重的10次mass killing 的凶手是谁？政治倾向和族裔等身份背景是什么？

重点在TOP 10，楼上从广度调查。尤其是对政治倾向的统计更加明确。

 

[JClub]

我娃高中今年毕业典礼上，有位男生除了感谢父母和学校，特别提出感谢AI。

AI 搜出来的信息真是全面。

 

[billwanhua]

China foes get worse results using DeepSeek, research suggests — CrowdStrike finds nearly twice as many flaws in AI-generated code for IS, Falun Gong, Tibet, and Taiwan

DeepSeek has yet to officially respond to the findings.

www.tomshardware.com

Research suggests that your DeepSeek AI results can be of drastically lower quality if you trigger topics that are geopolitically sensitive or banned in China. During tests undertaken by U.S. security firm CrowdStrike, it was observed that code generated for a professed Islamic State militant group computer system contained nearly twice as many flaws as it would otherwise have had. Other potential topics included: Falun Gong, Tibet, and Taiwan, according to a new Washington Post report.


One of the key findings, highlighted by the source, is that DeepSeek AI-generated code for a program to run an industrial control system would typically result in 22.8% of the code featuring flaws. If requested on behalf of an Islamic State project, a DeepSeek user could see that the flaw percentage rises sharply, to 42.1%.

Rather than delivering faulty code, DeepSeek would sometimes refuse to generate code for the likes of professed Islamic State backers or devotees of the spiritual movement Falun Gong. Refusals to aid those groups would occur 61% and 45% of the time, respectively. Notably, both movements are banned in China.

AI怎么这么聪明，“code generated for a professed Islamic State militant group computer system contained nearly twice as many flaws as it would otherwise have had.“ 消极怠工

 

[欢乐灌水]

这不是众所皆知的吗？左派被称为“圣母”，“爱心泛滥”啊。大概只有等到左派跟右派枪击数目差不多了，美国才有可能严格控枪，不然右派为什么要放弃拥枪的优势？左派需要明白，这是你死我活的战争，如果再仁慈下去，必被右派吃干抹净。

看看中国，加拿大，有多少枪击案，严格控枪是唯一解决问题的方法，这次枪击案，也许在这方面能起到一点点作用？