中国农大校长在学生大会上把崔永元转基因调查作为反面教材强调思考能力的重要性

侬真心切包了。老套路了。甩一段google出来的link,其中一段对自己是有利的,但另外一段对自己是有害的,他们不管的,全都给你贴上了,这种辩论手法,真心切不消。
GMO的科学性靠辩论?科学与否靠辩论,CFC几位铁口钢牙都是一流科学院院士了。。。
 
支持闹子在转基因上不懈的努力。如果中国人能在转基因上有革命性的拓展,中国梦就有望了。
支持你,闹子。:good::good::good:

拜托你们老一辈能不能少喊几句口号啊?你们这样子让人觉得很不正常的你知道吗?
 
GMO的可行性靠辩论?要是这样滴话,CFC几位铁口钢牙都是一流科学院院士了。。。
GMO的可行性靠隐瞒知情权?要是这样滴话,CFC几位铁口钢牙都是一流政客了。。。
 
GMO的可行性靠隐瞒知情权?要是这样滴话,CFC几位铁口钢牙都是一流政客了。。。
瞞谁呀,文科女,崔主持,大妈们不都知道转基因猪肉颜色红,转基因大米吃了面如金盆吗;)。。。GMO普及滴还是很好的,不信你问咪咪哥和冷九,他们都晓得市场上加工食品70%含GMO的吃20年了,他们就不让孩子吃快餐不让孩子吃学校饭不参加同学聚会。。。;):evil:
都Q滴很可爱:cool:周末愉快:monster:
 
瞞谁呀,文科女,崔主持,大妈们不都知道转基因猪肉颜色红,转基因大米吃了面如金盆吗;)。。。GMO普及滴还是很好的,不信你问咪咪哥和冷九,他们都晓得市场上加工食品70%含GMO的吃20年了,他们就不让孩子吃快餐不让孩子吃学校饭不参加同学聚会。。。;):evil:
都Q滴很可爱:cool:周末愉快:monster:
政客,彻头彻尾的政客。:eek::D:p:eek:
 
哈哈,我是回那位之贴了上半部分的wiki的老兄的帖子。他只贴了说GMO安全的部分,我把质疑的部分贴出来:monster::monster::monster:
但是的但是,我给出了整个wiki的link。:evil:
注意这里对两方面的描述关键用语相当于:(although there is) opponent ... but there is broad scientific consensus
 
注意这里对两方面的描述关键用语相当于:(although there is) opponent ... but there is broad scientific consensus
造个谣,当年可是所有的科学家都认为DDT是无害的。All, is bigger than broad。
ok,至少一开始没有科学家出面质疑DDT直到出了问题。
 
最后编辑:
DDT - A Brief History and Status
http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/factsheets/chemicals/ddt-brief-history-status.htm

Questions on Pesticides?


Development of DDT

This page summarizes EPA's activities regarding the pesticide DDT. Links to related and historical information are below.

DDT (dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane) was developed as the first of the modern synthetic insecticides in the 1940s. It was initially used with great effect to combat malaria, typhus, and the other insect-borne human diseases among both military and civilian populations and for insect control in crop and livestock production, institutions, homes, and gardens. DDT's quick success as a pesticide and broad use in the United States and other countries led to the development of resistance by many insect pest species.

Regulation Due to Health and Environmental Effects

The U.S. Department of Agriculture, the federal agency with responsibility of regulating pesticides before the formation of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 1970, began regulatory actions in the late 1950s and 1960s to prohibit many of DDT's uses because of mounting evidence of the pesticide's declining benefits and environmental and toxicological effects. Rachel Carson's book Silent Spring in 1962 stimulated widespread public concern over the dangers of improper pesticide use and the need for better pesticide controls.

In 1972, EPA issued a cancellation order for DDT based on adverse environmental effects of its use, such as those to wildlife, as well as DDT’s potential human health risks. Since then, studies have continued, and a causal relationship between DDT exposure and reproductive effects is suspected. Today, DDT is classified as a probable human carcinogen by U.S. and international authorities. This classification is based on animal studies in which some animals developed liver tumors.

DDT is known to be very persistent in the environment, will accumulate in fatty tissues, and can travel long distances in the upper atmosphere. Since the use of DDT was discontinued in the United States, its concentration in the environment and animals has decreased, but because of its persistence, residues of concern from historical use still remain.
Current Status

Since 1996, EPA has been participating in international negotiations to control the use of DDT and other persistent organic pollutants used around the world. Under the auspices of the United Nations Environment Programme, countries joined together and negotiated a treaty to enact global bans or restrictions on persistent organic pollutants (POPs), which includes DDT, known as the Stockholm Convention on POPs. The Convention includes a limited exemption for the use of DDT to control mosquitoes which are vectors that carry malaria - a disease that still kills millions of people worldwide.

In September 2006, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared its support for the indoor use of DDT in African countries where malaria remains a major health problem, citing that benefits of the pesticide outweigh the health and environmental risks. This is consistent with the Stockholm Convention on POPs, which bans DDT for all uses except for malaria control.

DDT is one of 12 pesticides recommended by the WHO for indoor residual spray programs. It is up to countries to decide whether or not to use DDT. EPA works with other agencies and countries to advise them on how DDT programs are developed and monitored, with the goal that DDT be used only within the context of Integrated Vector Management programs, and that it be kept out of agricultural sectors.
 
后退
顶部