崔永元谈转基因:哪怕是螳臂当车也要说

我很难支持你的FDA被孟山都把持的观点。
A two-year-old Food and Drug Administration appointment is stirring up online protests once more.

PHO-09Apr28-159837.jpg

Activists in Germany protest a court decision to ban a type of genetically modified maize. (Nigel Treblin - AFP/GETTY IMAGES)In 2009, President Obama appointed Michael Taylor as a senior adviser for the FDA. Consumer groups protested the appointment because Taylor had formerly served as a vice president for Monsanto, the controversial agricultural multinational at the forefront of genetically modified food.

In recent days, a petition calling for the former Monsanto VP’s ouster is gaining steam.

Michael Taylor,” thepetition on Signon.org reads. “Taylor is the same person who was Food Safety Czar at the FDA when genetically modified organisms were allowed into the U.S. food supply without undergoing a single test to determine their safety or risks. This is a travesty.”

Over the weekend, the petition was signed by thousands of people. At this writing, it has around 60,000 signatures of its 75,000 goal.

Requests for comment from Monsanto and the FDA were not immediately returned.

Signees of the petition argue that Monsanto should not have influence at the FDA because it will hurt farmers and threaten plants and animals. They cite scientific research that has found genetically modified foods could be a cause for chronic illnesses or cancer in the U.S.

The petition was launched by Frederick Ravid, a financial analyst in Atlanta who also has a blog devoted to spirituality.

The petition calls Taylor’s appointment an example of a “fox watching the hen house.”

Taylor’s position, which is currently deputy commissioner for foods at the FDA, includes ensuring that food labels contain clear and accurate information, overseeing strategy for food safety and planning new food safety legislation. He is the first individual to hold the position.

Before he joined the FDA, Taylor was the vice president for Public Policy at Monsanto from 1998 to 2001. He has since worked for the FDA in a number of capacities, most recently returning to the administration as senior adviser to the commissioner in July 2009.

Taylor is quoted on the FDA Web site as saying he looked forward to “working in new ways ... to tackle the important challenges – and the unprecedented opportunities – we currently face.”

When Taylor’s appointment was announced, it was criticized by consumers and consumer advocates across the U.S. One such critical consumer advocate, Jeffrey Smith, who campaigns against genetically modified foods, wrote on his blog at the time: “The person who may be responsible for more food-related illness and death than anyone in history has just been made the US food safety czar. This is no joke.”

Smith cited as problematic Taylor’s prior involvement in overseeing the policy of Monsanto’s genetically engineered bovine growth hormone (rbGH/rbST). Milk from injected cows has been a controversial topic, Smith points out, with many medical organizations and hospitalsspeaking out against it.

Monsanto has been the focus of dozens of protests for a number of its policies over the years, including this TED talk from an 11-year-old:
 
@9981
等我eat too much的时候,把fda有投票权的monsanto的人给你一个list
 
哦,忒长了。 得深入细致地挖掘,整理,打击,,,脑供血不足啊, 不参加 :(
 
哦,忒长了。 得深入细致地挖掘,整理,打击,,,脑供血不足啊, 不参加 :(
看上面那个链接视频,英文说得很清楚,下边还有字幕,讲的不错也很客观
 
看了以后才知道为啥现在美国farmer很多反对声,原来10年来,转基因种子由于monsanto垄断涨了4-5倍数,不得不佩服monsanto的business model是真不错,先给点甜头,然后等你成瘾了,再收骨头
 
看了以后才知道为啥现在美国farmer很多反对声,原来10年来,转基因种子由于monsanto垄断涨了4-5倍数,不得不佩服monsanto的business model是真不错,先给点甜头,然后等你成瘾了,再收骨头


10年来, APPLE的手机涨了多少倍数, 还有tablet
monsanto 的4-5倍小意思吧
 
10年来, APLLE的手机涨了多少倍数, 还有tablet
monsanto 的4-5倍小意思吧
嗯,做生意的希望成本越来越高,方蹄髈都不敢这么说:tx:
 
10年来, APLLE的手机涨了多少倍数, 还有tablet
monsanto 的4-5倍小意思吧
关键在于消费者有没有其它选择以及由此所付出的代价,这个你懂的。。。
农夫的今天,可能就是你的明天,呵呵。
 
呵呵,以他们的理解力,你不同意他们所支持的,就是反对他们,非黑即白,就这思维模式。
其实,在坛子里,挺转派是明确的,他们非要按自己的理解力弄出个所谓的"反转派",真是可笑,所谓的反转派根本就不存在。
我们其实是多元派的,即认为,转基因有它的好处,还有它的坏处,同时还有不确定性,还存在潜在危害性,以及可以更安全,更有营养的提升性,等等。
挺转派现在就结论性地要求全世界人民吃这个现阶段的基因产品,只能让人感到可笑和可怜。
我早习惯了。
因为指出方肘子质疑韩寒所用的逻辑有问题,就给我扣上韩粉的帽子,扣就扣吧,我索性就认了,别说韩粉,中辍生的名号我都认下了,又能咋样?还以为我和他们一样死爱面子呢。结果呢,我是中辍我光荣,我看倒是现在没几个敢说自己是方粉还光荣的,博士都快成贬义词了。:tx:
转基因嘛也一样,就是开头看不惯那种挺转代表科学代表先进文化先进生产力的腔调,稍微研究了一下,才发现某些人真无耻,打着科学的旗号走星宿大仙的路子,找了些代表不同声音的材料来,又被扣上反转恐转的帽子。。。其实论起来,我看的挺转科普(当然不是科学教的科唬)比这里的多数“挺转派”还多吧,越了解的多越觉得科学教徒好可笑。
其实我看这里除了老向可以算作挺转派以外(我估计就象搞艺术的容易把作品当自己儿女看待一样,老向是把生物技术的成果也当自己的子子孙孙了,见不得人家给它们挂上有毒的标记:p),其他的都是瞎忽悠,自带干粮的转基因推销员。:monster:
 
最后编辑:
看了以后才知道为啥现在美国farmer很多反对声,原来10年来,转基因种子由于monsanto垄断涨了4-5倍数,不得不佩服monsanto的business model是真不错,先给点甜头,然后等你成瘾了,再收骨头
所以说那些讲转基因是解决粮食危机的最佳途径的大忽悠们有多无耻。
 
所以说那些讲转基因是解决粮食危机的最佳途径的大忽悠们有多无耻。
呵呵,以前给过老向链接,粮农组织?的官网上说了,世界不是缺粮食,而是缺买粮食的钱!后面的含义很深啊。
 
关键在于消费者有没有其它选择以及由此所付出的代价,这个你懂的。。。
农夫的今天,可能就是你的明天,呵呵。


monsanto 当然希望人们选择它的产品
但是monsanto没阻止其它公司生产转或非转的产品吧
情况正好反过来, 我看到的是其它人在造谣中伤monsanto。

跟微软的Windows相似, 微软是垄断了桌面操作系统, 但那只能怪Linux等太不争气了。
 
最后编辑:
monsanto 当然希望人们选择它的产品
但是monsanto没阻止其它公司生产转或非转的产品吧
情况正好反过来, 我看到的是其它人在造谣和中伤monsanto。

跟微软的Windows相似, 微软是垄断了桌面操作系统, 但那只能怪Linux等太不争气了。
老向,你来说说转基因有啥不足之处吧?
 
老向,你来说说转基因有啥不足之处吧?
你是强人所难啊,当妈的哪有说自家孩子不好的。:tx:
 
后退
顶部