书读的越多越好吗？

[raid]

楼主说得很明确。Ta朋友不断读书拿学位证书是一个目的：提高工资。我只知道，工作不能致富的。
再来：
Educated and Underemployed
Share
2 Comments
By Christopher Matgouranis

Relying on a unique data set from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, CCAP has written extensively (here, here and here ) about the growing trend of underemployment for our nation’s college graduates. We estimate that approximately 17 million Americans with college degrees are employed in jobs that do not require college-level skills. The majority of our previous work has examined college graduates in general, lumping together those with bachelor’s and graduate degrees. Recently, I disaggregated the data and found that rampant underemployment is not limited to those with just a bachelor’s degree.

In 2008 (the last year data are available), 7.87 million graduate degree holders were underemployed (that is, employed in jobs requiring less than a graduate degree). Further breaking the data down, 6.98 million held masters and another 1.18 million had PhDs or professional degrees. A full 59% of those employed holding a masters degree were classified as underemployed. PhD and Professional degree holders did better at 22% underemployed. Yet that is still a shockingly high figure considering the level of education that these individuals have attained. To further put things in perspective, the number of underemployed masters degree holders was more than the total number of masters degrees produced between 1998 and 2008 (5.75 million). Similarly for the PhDs/Professionals, 80% of the incremental increase in the total number of degree holders over that same period were considered underemployed.

It should be noted that the underemployment estimate for PhDs is on the conservative side. In calculating the totals, I did not count as underemployed the PhDs/Professionals working in jobs that the BLS classifies as requiring “a bachelor’s degree or higher” or “master’s degrees.” Workers in these fields were given the benefit of the doubt in whether or not they were truly underemployed because of the small ambiguities with these BLS classifications (i.e., are professional degree holders really underemployed if they work in a job requiring a master’s degree?). Had these two BLS classifications been included, PhD/Professional underemployment would have risen to 1.59 million.

A few thoughts come to mind when looking at this data. First, not all graduate degrees are created equal. Those with graduate degrees in finance, economics, and engineering for example likely have a better employment outlook (and are less likely to be underemployed) than those with graduate degrees in anthropology, English or sociology. This is not to say that no one should enter the latter type of fields, but that obtaining one of these degrees should be considered carefully. Secondly, as a recent book, has detailed, a significant number of undergraduates are learning little in college. A likely consequence of this is that more and more people are finding it “necessary” to get graduate degrees. The credential inflation problem associated with this issue could be alleviated somewhat if undergraduate education (and K-12 for that matter) was more rigorous and effective. Lastly, universities should take note of the employment opportunities for graduate degree holders. Graduate students are frequently subsidized (through tuition waivers, stipends, etc.) by their undergraduate counterparts. With an often bleak employment outlook for many graduate degrees/programs, universities should rethink their graduate degree subsidization. Reducing subsidies for graduate education will likely help realign the supply of graduate degree holders with realistic demand from employers.

丁页 ！！！

 

[mooncake]

楼主说得很明确。Ta朋友不断读书拿学位证书是一个目的：提高工资。我只知道，工作不能致富的。
.

要不你给指导一下ta朋友怎样才能致富？离开一个具体的人谈问题，不是夸夸其谈么？

 

[uglyducking]

要不你给指导一下ta朋友怎样才能致富？离开一个具体的人谈问题，不是夸夸其谈么？

这个我知道，（有主语）所以do not work for money（逻辑判断成立）

 

[mooncake]

这个我知道，（有主语）所以do not work for money（逻辑判断成立）

句式成立和逻辑成立是两

码事儿。

 

[karma111]

要不你给指导一下ta朋友怎样才能致富？离开一个具体的人谈问题，不是夸夸其谈么？

一个人拥有的财富是跟这个人给多少人提供有价值的product/services成正比。
还有一点，平时多捐钱。心量多大，容纳多少。

 

[karma111]

引用一些名人名言， 那只是代表我理解，认同他在说什么。这不是说我想成为Bill Gates，或者崇拜他. 这句话说明什么呢？ 1.学历不是成功的决定因素。 2. 懂正确努力的人很轻松走到前面。 不懂正确努力的人努力一辈子，去得不是很远 。 引用别人说的话比自己说自己好太多了。做人要低调。
当你走到某个阶段，你会发现无数的人在说同样的事情，去验证你走过的路。 思想是一样的。走的路可以不同。没有2个人是一模一样的，就算是双胞胎。
如果你相信人的潜能是无限的，那样可能爬上高峰。 如果相信人的潜能是有限的，那等于把自己关在笼子里.

标题这句话本身就是一个病句，没有主语。所以逻辑也有严重问题。
一个人读书多好还是少好只能自己跟自己比。我觉得有条件多读书，多思考总是好的。一个人知识多总是比知识少好。当然你非要argue读书多了戴眼睛，开车读书出车祸，半夜读书影响休息，上班读书被layoff啥的，那也正常。
换个角度说，如果想比较读书多的人好还是读书少的人好，那又是另一个话题。人和人就是不一样，有人读很多书很有用，有人用处就不大。有人不读书也能成功，有人读很多也不见得出人头地。但是不管读多读少，你就是你，不会变成bill gates。就向tim cook也穿黑色套头衫牛仔裤，但他还是成不了jobs，我打赌就算他换发型换眼镜也还是成不了jobs。所以别成天看着bill gates退学了就觉得学习没用，bill gates退学了成billionaire，你要退学了搞不好只能去天桥卖把式。

 

[comefromwhere]

要不你给指导一下ta朋友怎样才能致富？离开一个具体的人谈问题，不是夸夸其谈么？

career related to health and teeth!!!!

just came back from my teeth specialist..... after regular cleaning...recommend gum tissue grafting.......estimate close to $2000

ya....1 hour of dental specialist' work is about 1 thousand.
其他专业一般书读的再多也不能怎么致富。看我这个朋友怎么读怎么爬也无法跟人读医的比吧。accounting and IT ? hahaha

我当然很感慨了，被她拉下水，想想还是赶快爬上来了。

 

[uglyducking]

句式成立和逻辑成立是两浏览附件398411码事儿。

那句式不成立咋和逻辑不成立是一码事儿了呢？:s
还有啊，书读的越多越好，咋就没主语了呢？

 

[西域侠客]

引用一些名人名言， 那只是代表我理解，认同他在说什么。这不是说我想成为Bill Gates，或者崇拜他. 这句话说明什么呢？ 1.学历不是成功的决定因素。 2. 懂正确努力的人很轻松走到前面。 不懂正确努力的人努力一辈子，去得不是很远 。 引用别人说的话比自己说自己好太多了。做人要低调。
当你走到某个阶段，你会发现无数的人在说同样的事情，去验证你走过的路。 思想是一样的。走的路可以不同。没有2个人是一模一样的，就算是双胞胎。
如果你相信人的潜能是无限的，那样可能爬上高峰。 如果相信人的潜能是有限的，那等于把自己关在笼子里.

同意， karma111的评论很有见地。

 

[mooncake]

那句式不成立咋和逻辑不成立是一码事儿了呢？:s
还有啊，书读的越多越好，咋就没主语了呢？

句式不成立有歧义自然逻辑就有问题了。难道不是？
还有啊，书读得越多当然就越旧，有啥好不好的？你这是胡搅蛮缠么真是的。

 

[mooncake]

一个人拥有的财富是跟这个人给多少人提供有价值的product/services成正比。
还有一点，平时多捐钱。心量多大，容纳多少。

那您紫刀一下ta盆友怎么样给更多人“提供有价值的product/services”呗？
捐钱多未必就心量大，容纳多，可能只不过是很有钱而已。心量是在心，不在钱。施主误参佛法了。阿弥陀佛，善哉善哉。

 

[raid]

句式成立和逻辑成立是两浏览附件398411码事儿。

 

[头发短见识长]

最高境界就是PHD

皮萨 哈特 得雷娃瑞。

 

[uglyducking]

皮萨 哈特 得雷娃瑞。

这舌头大的

 

[raid]

哦，地里挖蕊