马航失踪8可能 海底4.5公里(图) MH370发现疑似残骸

看的心惊肉跳!俄罗斯媒体曝光马航事件真相?!
来源:米尔社区, 发布日期:2014-03-18

文章转载自俄罗斯媒体文章,真实性未知

Russia “Puzzled” Over Malaysia Airlines “Capture” By US Navy

  美国海军“俘获”马来西亚航班,俄罗斯“很困惑”

A new report circulating in the Kremlin today prepared by the Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces (GRU) states that Aerospace Defence Forces (VKO) experts remain “puzzled” as to why the United States Navy “captured and then diverted” a Malaysia Airlines civilian aircraft from its intended flight-path to their vast and highly-secretive Indian Ocean base located on the Diego Garcia atoll.

今日在克里姆林宫流传一份新报告,该报告由武装力量总参谋部(GRU)的情报部门完成。报告说,防空军(VKO)专家仍然“困惑”于为什么美国海军“俘获并转移”一架马来西亚民航航班,从其原定路线到美海军位于印度洋上迭戈加西亚岛的巨大保密基地。

According to this report, Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 (also marketed as China Southern Airlines flight 748 through a codeshare) was a scheduled passenger flight from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, to Beijing, China, when on 8 March this Boeing 777-200ER aircraft “disappeared” in flight with 227 passengers on board from 15 countries, most of whom were Chinese, and 12 crew members.

按这份报告,马来西亚航班370(与中国南航748代码共享)为马来西亚科伦坡至中国北京的常规客机,在3月8日该波音777-200ER飞机在飞行中“消失”,机上有来自15个国家的227名乘客(多数来自中国),以及12名机组人员。

当地时间3月9日,一架驻日美军的P-3C预警机从嘉手纳空军基地起飞,前往马来失联客机疑似失事海域进行搜寻。



Interesting to note, this report says, was that Flight 370 was already under GRU “surveillance” after it received a “highly suspicious” cargo load that had been traced to the Indian Ocean nation Republic of Seychelles, and where it had previously been aboard the US-flagged container ship MV Maersk Alabama.

值得一提的是,该报告说,航班370早已处于GRU“监控”之下。此前它上面装了“高度可疑的货物”,该货物来自印度洋国家塞舌尔,挂美国旗的集装箱船MV Maersk Alabama号曾停泊于此。

What first aroused GRU suspicions regarding the MV Maersk Alabama, this report continues, was that within 24-hours of off-loading this “highly suspicious” cargo load bound for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, the two highly-trained US Navy Seals assigned to protect it, Mark Daniel Kennedy, 43, and Jeffrey Keith Reynolds, 44, were found dead under “suspicious circumstances.”

报告说,MV Maersk Alabama号引起GRU怀疑,是因为(后来上马航370的)“高度可疑”货物从船上卸载后24小时内,受命保护该货物得两名高度训练过的美国海军海豹 队员(43岁的Mark Daniel Kennedy和44岁的Jeffrey Keith Reynolds)死于“可疑的环境”。

Both Kennedy and Reynolds, this report says, were employed by the Virginia Beach, Virginia-based maritime security firm The Trident Group which was founded by US Navy Special Operations Personnel (SEAL’s) and Senior US Naval Surface Warfare Officers and has long been known by the GRU to protect vital transfers of both atomic and biological materials throughout the world.

报告说,这两个人受雇于位于佛吉尼亚的海上安全企业三叉戟集团Virginia分部,该集团由美国海军特种部队(海豹)人事部门和高级军官建立,GRU早已知道他们负责保护世界范围内的关键核、生化材料传递。

Upon GRU “assests” confirming that this “highly suspicious” cargo was aboard Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 on 8 March, this report notes, Moscow notified China’s Ministry of State Security (MSS) of their concerns and received “assurances” that “all measures” would be taken as to ascertain what was being kept so hidden when this aircraft entered into their airspace.

GRU“断言”,此“高度可疑”货物在3月8日上了马航370,报告说,莫斯科就此提醒了中国国家安全部并收到“保证”说会采取“一切措施”以弄清楚这里面藏了什么,只要航班一进入中国领空。

However, this report says, and as yet for still unknown reasons, the MSS was preparing to divert Flight 370 from its scheduled destination of Beijing to Haikou Meilan International Airport (HAK) located in Hainan Province (aka Hainan Island)。

然而,报告说,因未知原因,中国国安部准备转移370航班,从计划的北京路线到位于海南的海口美兰国际机场。

Prior to entering the People Liberation Army (PLA) protected zones of the South China Sea known as the Spratly Islands, this report continues, Flight 370 “significantly deviated” from its flight course and was tracked by VKO satellites and radar flying into the Indian Ocean region and completing its nearly 3,447 kilometer (2,142 miles) flight to Diego Garcia.

报告继续说,在进入解放军保护的南中国海区域(南沙群岛)之前,370航班“大幅偏离”其航线并(由航空军VKO卫星及雷达跟踪)飞入了印度洋区域,最终完成其3447公里飞行到达迭戈加西亚。

Critical to note about Flight 370’s flight deviation, GRU experts in this report say, was that it occurred during the same time period that all of the Spratly Island mobile phone communications operated by China Mobile were being jammed.

GRU专家说,关于370航班偏航,特别值得说明的是事件发生时整个南沙群岛的中国移动手机通讯信号都被屏蔽了。

2014年3月9日,美国海军参与搜寻马航失联MH370航班的阿利-伯克级导弹驱逐舰DDG-91平克尼号,起飞SH-60R海鹰反潜机,赶到疑似失事海域进行搜寻。

China Mobile, it should be noted, extended phone coverage in the Spratly Islands in 2011 so that PLA soldiers stationed on the islands, fishermen, and merchant vessels within the area would be able to use mobile services, and can also provide assistance during storms and sea rescues.

中国移动在2011年扩充了南沙劝导的手机覆盖范围,以方便守岛的解放军战士,渔民,商船使用手机服务,也可在风暴和海事救援方面提供支持。

As to how the US Navy was able to divert Flight 370 to its Diego Garcia base, this report says, appears to have been accomplished remotely as this Boeing 777-200ER aircraft is equipped with a fly-by-wire (FBW) system that replaces the conventional manual flight controls of an aircraft with an electronic interface allowing it to be controlled like any drone-type aircraft.

关于美国海军何以能让370航班转飞到其迭戈加西亚基地,报告说,似乎是通过远程操纵该飞机的电传操控系统(FBW)以替代传统手工飞行控制,使用类似无人机的操控界面。

However, this report notes, though this aircraft can be controlled remotely, the same cannot be said of its communication systems which can only be shut down manually; and in the case of Flight 370, its data reporting system was shut down at 1:07 a.m., followed by its transponder (which transmits location and altitude) which was shut down at 1:21 a.m.

然而,报告说,虽然飞机可以远程控制,其通讯系统可能只能手工关闭;具体到370的情况,其数据报告系统于1:07被关闭,其位置报告系统于1:21被关闭。

What remains “perplexing” about this incident, GRU analysts in this report say, are why the American mainstream media outlets have yet to demand from the Obama regime the radar plots and satellite images of the Indian Ocean and South China Sea regions as the US military covers this entire area from Diego Garcia like no other seas in the world due to its vital shipping and air lanes.

GRU分析员说,这次事件中仍然“令人困惑”的是为何美国主流媒体还没有要求奥巴马政府提供印度洋和中国南海地区的雷达图及卫星图。美国军队从迭戈加西亚起覆盖这片广大区域远超世界其它海域,由于位于航空、航海要冲位置。

Most sadly, this report concludes, the US is actually able to conceal the reason(s) for the “disappearance” of Flight 370 as they have already done so after the events of 11 September 2011 when the then Bush regime “disappeared” American Airlines Flight 77 and its 64 passengers and crew after falsely claiming it hit the Pentagon, but which was confirmed by the CNN News Service [see video HERE] not to have happened.

报告总结,悲哀的是,美国实际上有能力隐藏370航班“消失”的原因。在2011年9.11事件后,当时的布什政府使美国航空77航班及其64名乘客及机组人员“消失”,声称它击中了五角大楼,但CNN后来确认攻击五角大楼这事没有发生。

关于370航班偏航到迭戈加西亚,GRU报告说,最麻烦的是“几乎”立刻跟着来了至少四架飞机,机上是美国疾病控制与方中心和中国疾病控制预防中心的顶级专家。

As to why both American and Chinese disease experts were taken to Diego Garcia where Flight 370 is now known to be, this report says, has as yet not been answered by either of these governments after repeated Foreign Ministry requests for “explanations and clarification.”

至于为什么美国和中国疾病专家到迭戈加西亚(370航班所在),报告说,(俄)外交部要求“解释澄清”之后,相关政府至今还没有回答。

What is to be known, this report says, is that as Malaysia has been forced to admit Flight 370 was, indeed, “diverted” from its flight path as the GRU had previously reported, and as at least 25 nations are now involved in searching for it, it remains a mystery as to what is actually occurring.

现在知道的,是马来西亚被迫承认,370航班如GRU前面说的偏离了原定航线。至少25个国家卷入了搜索,至今实际发生的还是个谜。

Also known, this report concludes, is that Diego Garcia as a designated ETOPS emergency landing site for flight planning purposes of commercial airliners transversing the Indian Ocean, and as one of 33 emergency landing sites worldwide for the NASA Space Shuttle, it is “inconceivable” that any type of aircraft, let alone Flight 370, can fly anywhere in the Southern Hemisphere without being tracked, monitored and recorded in totality.

报告总结,还知道的是迭戈加西亚是为商业航班横跨大西洋时指定的ETOPS紧急着陆点,也是NASA航天飞机在世界上的33个紧急着陆点之一,“不可想象”任何航空器(别说370航班)可能在南半球飞行而没有完整的跟踪、监视、记录。

White House spokesman Jay Carney said at his daily briefing, calling the search “a difficult and unusual situation”; Asked about the notion that the plane could have landed at Diego Garcia, the US military base in the central Indian Ocean, Carney was dismissive: “I’ll rule that one out.”

 
这个密一样的马航失踪呐!
 
我觉得这些人活着的可能性不大,虽然说这话挺残忍的,但是这么大一群人,带架飞机,即要控制住他们,不让他们和外界联系,又要关押照顾他们,还完全不能让外界发现,这样的地方可不好找,真拍LOST啊。。。。而且劫持肯定是为谈判的,不然花这么大力气,养着人玩啊。。。。这么多天了没人谈判没人负责的,不象劫持,不知道为什么,假冒护照那事,我都觉得有些离谱。。。最初感觉还是有点相信被击落了,然后官方欲盖弥彰。。。。不然在现在这个高科技社会,一架飞机这么不见了。。。太神话了
 
The missing Malaysian Plane MH370 hacked with mobile phone, says expert
Posted by: HNBulletin in News, Special Reports March 17, 2014 0

malaysian-plane-hacked.jpg


One of the Malaysian Flight MH370 which is still missing for more than a week could have been hacked by a mobile phone and said to be the world’s first ‘cyber hijack,’ British anti-terror expert says.

The Malicious codes installed in the Boeing 777′s computers by a mobile phone or a USB stick, Dr Sally Leivesley, a former science advisor for the UK’s Home Office, told the Sunday Express.

That installed malware may have a ‘set of processes’ which would allow to control plane’s speed, altitude and direction remotely, Dr Leivesley considers.

“It is looking more and more likely that the control of some systems was taken over in a deceptive manner, either manually … or via a remote device turning off or overwhelming the systems,” Dr Leivesley said.

She said evidence suggests Flight MH370 may have been taken over by someone with “a very sophisticated systems engineering understanding”.

“It is possible for hackers … to get into the main computer network of the plane through the inflight, onboard entertainment system,” she said.

In April 2013, we published an article in which a German security researcher demonstrated-how a hack a plane by just using a mobile phone, you should read this, Plane can be Hacked by just a Phone researcher demonstrate.
 
Flight 370: the world's newest atomic bomber?

By Donald Sensing

What's the latest news of Flight 370, missing since March 8?

There is no new news, which means that speculation of its fate will fill the news hole more than ever. No one is saying now that the plane fell victim to an accident. And as I covered before, there is a growing consensus that the hijackers (whether of the passengers or the flight crew themselves) deliberately depressurized the passenger cabin to suffocate the passengers toprevent an uprising.

The dropdown masks in the passenger cabin supply oxygen for only about 15 minutes, long enough for the pilot to fly the plane below 15,000 feet where atmospheric O2 is sufficient. At 35,000 feet, where the plane was flying when it's course radically changed, useful consciousnesswithout oxygen is a half minute or so, dropping as altitude increases. At 45,000 feet, which the plane was reported to have reached, it is less than 15 seconds. So: 15-1/4 minutes after cabin depressurization and that cruelty is accomplished.

If the passengers were so suffocated it means, of course, that theft of the airplane was the point, not ransoming the passengers.

We also know that satellite pings from the plane show it was airborne about 7-1/2 hours after transponder contact was lost; authorities say the plane was flying close to the time its fuel would have been exhausted. But there is no location data included in the satellite pings, so the area where the plane could have been located is bogglingly enormous and includes key places such as Iran, Pakistan and the central Asia's mostly Muslim countries:



So where did it go and why?

Richard Fernandez has a good summary and some informed guesswork. First that the known flight path of the airliner shows a high degree of planning and aviation skill:
Now here is the same track overlaid on the civil radar coverage apparently taken from Skyvector. It is suggested that the track shows an aircraft trying to stay out of radar coverage.

Evade
You don’t have to buy this analysis. First of all, I’m not sure the waypoints are accurate. Here is my assessment as of today.
The plane did not crash into the ocean

No one goes through the massive planning, expense and training required to carry this out and then simply just drives the plane into the sea. If that was the intention, then why fly around for seven-plus hours beforehand? And would not some terror group have pretty quickly claimed responsibility?

This mitigates against a southern course after the last radar track point. The most reasonable conclusion is that the plane was heading then in the direction the hijackers wanted to go, generally northward toward Asia.

The only reason the plane would have crashed into the sea is that when suffocating the passengers, the hijackers wound up suffocating themselves, too, and the plane flew pilotlessly on until it ran out of fuel. I don't think so, however. The O2 supply to the flight crew is much greater than to the passengers. There should have been ample oxygen to supply the pilots while the passengers choked (if that is what happened) and then the cabin could simply be repressurized.

The plane was the prize
I first broached the idea two days after Flt 370 went missing that the theft of the plane itself, to be later repurposed for destructive ends, could be the point. To that possibility, back to Richard Fernandez's post:
[W]e can examine one idea doing the conspiracy rounds. Rather than crossing India, the conjecture is that MH370 went up through the Bay of Bengal (where the USN’s P-8 Poseidon’s are now searching) and made landfall at Bangladesh and there on to Bhutan and perhaps on to Central Asia.The problem with that idea is there are a paucity of air routes to tailgate behind. However Keith Ledgerwood thinks he found it the plane MH370 snuck in behind: SIA68. Using Skyvector, Ledgerwood writes:I quickly realized that SIA68 was in the immediate vicinity as the missing MH370 flight at precisely the same time. Moreover, SIA68 was en-route on a heading towards the same IGREX waypoint on airway P628 that the Malaysian military radar had shown MH370 headed towards at precisely the same time.

It became apparent as I inspected SIA68’s flight path history that MH370 had maneuvered itself directly behind SIA68 at approximately 17:00UTC over the next 15 minutes had been following SIA68. All the pieces of my theory had been fitting together with the facts that have been publically released and I began to feel a little uneasy.

Singapore Airlines Flight 68 proceeded across the Andaman Sea into the Bay of Bengal and finally into India’s airspace. From there it appears to have proceeded across India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and finally Turkmenistan before proceeding onward across Europe to its final destination of Barcelona, Spain.At what point did MH370 hypothetically break away from SIA68′s coattails? Did it continue across India? Or did it make landfall in Bangladesh? In any event, neither Bangladesh nor Bhutan is likely to have much of an air defense. That’s what Jeff Wise at Slate thinks has happened. Here’s a graph that examines that possibility.


In other words, Flight 370's hijackers "tailgated" a scheduled airliner until 370 was well inland, then flew northward as low as possible to avoid military radar detection until they reached their prearranged landing strip, where the plane was hidden from overhead view, emptied of cargo, corpses and seats and refueled for flight elsewhere.

Why tailgate the Singapore Airlines flight? Two reasons. First, flying close behind the other airliner - perhaps only a couple of hundred meters, if that much - enables the 777 to hide using the other plane's transponder signal. This would spoof military radar, too, whose operators will assume that the "bogey" is the Singapore plane. Second, it simplifies the hijackers' navigation once they fall behind the other plane, although navigation seems not to have been a major challenge so far.

Arguing against this scenario, though, is that the timing and skills needed to intercept the Singapore plane are incredibly high, especially by eyeball at night. Air Force fighter pilots are not always successful and they have very sophisticated radar guidance and technical systems and other ground or airborne controllers. If Singapore Airlines Flight 68 had departed only 15 minutes late it would have been 130-150 miles away from where the hijackers would have steered. So while possible, this scenario seems unlikely.

But tailgating another airliner, as it turns out, would not have even been necessary. That there are huge gaps in military radar coverage over the Indian Ocean is unsurprising. But there are large gaps approaching India and southern Asia, too - by design.

Analysts say the gaps in Southeast Asia's air defences are likely to be mirrored in other parts of the developing world, and may be much greater in areas with considerably lower geopolitical tensions."Several nations will be embarrassed by how easy it is to trespass their airspace," said Air Vice Marshal Michael Harwood, a retired British Royal Air Force pilot and ex-defence attache to Washington DC. "Too many movies and Predator (unmanned military drone) feeds from Afghanistan have suckered people into thinking we know everything and see everything. You get what you pay for. And the world, by and large, does not pay."If the plane flew well inland into Asia, Pakistan, Iran or Afghanistan, it won't be to turn it into an ordinary flying bomb. It would be only to convert it into a flying WMD. And that can mean nothing except that the ultimate target is a major population center, if also a financial or political center, so much the better.

What sort of WMD?
Weapons of Mass Destruction consist of three types: nuclear, biological, chemical. IMO, we can toss out chemical because chemical weapons are frankly not destructive enough for terrorists' ends. I was trained as both a chemical and nuclear target analyst in my former career. The amount of chemicals needed to cause truly mass casualties to make this hijacking worthwhile is staggering and begs the question of just who would manufacture the weapons and where.

For much the same reason bioweapons can be discounted even though their potential destructiveness is extremely high. There is no need to hijack and steal an airliner to employ them. Countless fiction plots have shown realistically that infectious strains could be introduced into populations with little difficulty using ordinary transportation to move them around.

That leaves nukes. "The purpose of terror is to terrorize," said Vladimir Lenin, who certainly knew. Nothing would have the psychological, terrorizing impact on the target nation as much as an atomic attack. After all, the effects and horrors of atomic weapons are already familiar to Western and Asian populations. Chemical and bioweapons are lethal but destroy only lives. With atomic weapons there may be hundreds of thousands of casualties and massive property destruction. The optics of a nuke attack in worldwide news reports can't be beat.

With that in mind, the target city would not be a port city because a port city could be nuked from a surface vessel, of which countless available hulls could be obtained for much less than the cost of the Flight 370 hijacking. And obviously, if the target is landlocked a plane would be needed anyway. China has been having Muslim problems with the Uighurs, so the whole operation may not be directed at the West anyway. But I would not count on it.

Why hijack this airliner from this airline?
This is moving deeply into speculative territory. Malaysian Airlines was probably targeted because while its aircrews are considered highly skilled, its security procedures not so much according to various news reports (easy to say in hindsight, of course).

As for why hijack a Boeing 777, there are two possible answers. First is that the 777 simply was what was used for the chosen flight and that the type of airliner was not much relevant to the hijackers' overall purposes. This seems unlikely, though, based on the duration of the post-hijack flight the plane made.

That duration points toward the most likely reason: this is an extremely long-ranged aircraft. Its maximum design fuel capacity of 47,890 US gallons is enough to fly the plane under load,

7,825 nautical miles
(14,490 km)
Typical city pairs:
Los Angeles - Sydney
New York - Hong Kong
Singapore - London
Paris - Los Angeles
Dubai - New York
(Approx. 15 hours)(Source: Boeing Corp.) If the terrorists have the materials and engineering skills and equipment, they could lengthen the range enormously by installing fuel bladders into the cargo compartment and/or passenger cabin.

The cargo capacity, either by weight or volume, of the 777 is of little importance if it is to be an atomic bomber. Even a crude atomic bomb - say a mere duplicate of the ones dropped on Japan in 1945 - would pose no problem either of size nor weight. As a terror weapon, a nuke need not be even half so powerful as those.

Richard Fernandez writes that whatever the hijackers and their terror group wanted to do with the 777, it's blown now, a dead letter.
In any event, the official belief that it has not met an accident has changed everything. I do not believe that the plane can now be used to attack by air. The whole transponder-tailgate routine has been exposed. The 777 is now a liability. It points directly to the malefactors.I disagree. There are thousands of airliners in the air every day. Even with a fully-functioning military radar system, it will prove impossible to scramble fighters to check out every potential tailgater blip. A tailgating flight crew can also count on intervals between detection, suspicion and action that may well give them quite enough time to reach a near-littoral target.

Where?

If all this speculation happens to be right (a huge leap, I admit) then what is the intended target? As Richard and I say, it can only be a city. Unless the target is in China, the city cannot be merely a city. It must also be a financial and/or political nexus of the target country, not far inland. In the United States, that means either New York or Washington, DC.

But New York is a port city, a very busy one. A nuke would not have to go off over Manhattan to achieve the terrorists' aims. Set off one in the harbor and not only have you terrorized America, you have shut down America's economy for an incalculable time. However, you don't need the 777 to do that; a tramp steamer will do fine.

Not so with Washington. Washington is not a port city so a ship-borne weapon won't work. However, It is one of the busiest air bubs in the country, offering round-the-clock tailgating opportunities. That it is the political center of the country (if not the whole world) hardly needs stating. An attack there would be no less economically destructive than against New York and politically far more destructive. It would strike to the very heart and soul of the American psyche and sense of being.

On the other hand . . .

Mitigating against such an attack is that its logistic challenges would be daunting:

1. Where exactly would they get an air-transportable atomic weapon? The easy answer is one of the central Asian 'Stans that used to be Soviet republics, but that's not nearly as likely as thriller writers would have us believe. The administrations of GWH Bush and Bill Clinton both devoted serious, sustained resources to ensuring the security of the atomic weapons the Soviet Union left behind when it fell apart - with the cooperation of successive Federation authorities. That terrorists could be supplied there is not impossible, but is not very likely, either.

That leaves three options: Iran, Pakistan or North Korea. Iran and Pakistan were both within range of Flight 370 on March 8. Pakistan has possessed atomic weapons for many years. Iran is developing them but is thought not yet to have them (unless supplied by Pakistan or North Korea).

Pakistan has the industrial ability to produce such a weapon, but it is difficult to see the upside for them for such an attack to be carried out. But terrorists cannot be accused of rational analysis very much.

Kim Jong-un's North Korea is just plain bat crazy so nothing should be put past them. That they have the technical-industrial base for producing such a weapon is doubtful but cannot be discounted.

2. The challenge of making a covert flight from Iran-Pakistan-Central Asia to America's eastern seaboard is a very significant. Once over the Atlantic the way would be mostly clear; with extended-range bladders major air routes could be avoided until tailgate time. It's getting to the Atlantic that would be hard. Flying eastward down the Mediterranean Sea is out since the Israelis have already announced increased alert for such a flight.

That means a route clear around the Horn of Africa, which would challenge even the range of the Boeing 777, or a shortcut route across sub-equatorial Africa, which would pose its own detection risks. But these may be risks the terrorists would be willing to take for such a high-value payoff. For them it would be an all-in mission.

But the terrorists may not be in an hurry. It may suit them to wait two years or so and let the heat cool off and the world return to business as usual. But this has its own risks, too, chief of which is that one should not confuse what the media are reporting with what intelligence agencies, police organizations and military special forces are paying attention to. A concerted, sustained, cooperative effort of such organizations among interested nations will almost certainly succeed.

Summary
Pretty much nothing about Flight 370's disappearance makes sense. I am still nagged that it probably fell into the south Indian Ocean because the hijackers thankfully managed to suffocate themselves along with the passengers. If so, eventually debris will wash up somewhere.

The bottom line is that may never know what happened to Flight 370. Even if it was landed where the hijackers wanted, its further use may be so compromised, as Richard thinks, that it will just rot in place. Or we may learn of its final fate by a breaking news bulletin announcing a mass-casualty attack.

But it seems apparent that the passengers and crew of the plane will never be seen again. In the terrorists' minds, their deaths are just collateral damage. May God be with their families.

Update, 3-18: The theory du jour now is that there was a fire in the forward section of the aircraft, near or under the flight cabin, and this accounts for the sequential loss of communications since the two pilots would have been depowering systems in the assumption the fire was electrical. It also accounts, its advocates say, for the course reversal, which was done to fly to a very long runway on the west side of the Malay peninsula that would require very little air maneuvering to land, unlike back to Kuala Lumpur. This is an attractive explanation for several reasons, but it has some holes, too. See here.​
 
300万人搜索MH370 疑在南安达曼岛丛林
来源:东方日报, 发布日期:2014-03-19

马来西亚航空公司MH370客机失踪踏入第十二日,由于各国联合搜索不果,有美国衞 星公司在网上发放衞星图片(www.tomnod.com),呼吁全球民众一同「人肉搜寻」。截至昨日至少有逾三百万网民加盟,其中台湾一班大学生发现印 度洋安达曼群岛一处丛林中有架飞机,怀疑是失踪客机,引起热议。马国政府昨亦宣布搜索范围已进一步扩大至中国、哈萨克等国境内。

昨日全球各地网民已在覆盖两万四千平方公里的衞星图片上搜寻了二百九十万个区域,点击图片近两亿六千万次。衞星公司计划选出十大可疑地点,交给美国 政府调查。台湾南开科技大学「国际志工社」学生,连日来不断查看了网上逾二万个衞星图片区域。至前日下午,社员谢孟修在其中一个区域,发现在丛林中有一架 飞机,怀疑是失踪马航客机。谢孟修即时惊叫一声:「我找到了!飞机在这里!」

谢等人将衞星图交予成功大学航空太空工程学系教授林清一分析,林教授经研判认为,图中显示一架疑似波音777型号客机尾翼折断,迫降丛林。惟飞机影像太小,无法看清机身上的辨识标志,故未能确认是否失踪的马航波音777。

  疑在南安达曼岛丛林

同时,有外国网民于美国有线新闻网络(CNN)读者网站发布同一图片,称飞机或降落于安达曼群岛上的南安达曼岛(South Andaman)丛林。本港亦有不少热心人士对马航客机失踪相当关注,并投身民间搜索行列。本报读者David Chan比对谢孟修发布的衞星图及网上衞星地图后,亦认为图中飞机可能位于南安达曼。

事件引起争议,有网民比对飞机外貌后,质疑图片中的飞机并非波音777,因后者的机翼更斜,而以比例计,图中飞机约长四十米,较波音777短,更有 指 图片中的飞机当时是在飞行。南开科技大学学务长陈俊良接受本报采访时回应,虽未能确认衞星图片中的飞机是否确为失踪的波音777,但学生专注科研的精神值 得肯定。

  中国搜索领土范围

马国国防部长兼代理交通部长希沙穆丁昨在记者会称,已扩大搜索范围至二百二十四万平方海里,并将兵分两路,由中国、哈萨克领导搜索北方飞行走廊,澳 洲 及印尼继续负责南方飞行走廊。中国驻马来西亚大使黄惠康昨称,已经排除中国乘客涉及恐袭的嫌疑,而中方亦开始在中国领土范围内搜索,并调动二十一枚衞星及 多架飞机加入行动。

缅甸周日已开放领空协助搜救。美国国防部官员透露,导弹驱逐舰基德号将停止行动,但是P8A海神及P-3猎户座侦察机则会继续搜索。早前有指客机可能被骑劫到塔利班控制的巴基斯坦地区,塔利班发言人穆贾希德周一否认与事件有关。
 
美航总裁:马航失联客机或因危险货物起火坠海
来源:国际在线, 发布日期:2014-03-19
  据英国《每日镜报》3月18日报道,洛克比空难专家日前表示,马航客机恐因货舱内危险材料着火或爆炸而坠毁。
  洛克比空难爆炸案陪审团成员之一,美国航空总裁(US aviation chief )比利·文森特(Billie Vincent)17日表示,马航失联客机MH370很可能是因为货舱内的危害材料引发火灾或者爆炸而坠毁。
  文森特表示,从目前公布的数据来看,问题都指向了货舱内可能含有的危险材料,这些材料可能因包装不当或非法藏匿而引发爆炸。
  文森特猜测,火灾发生后,飞机的通信系统很快被破坏。机上人员也很快被火灾引发的有毒气体毒晕。飞行员一定曾设法戴上氧气面罩,试图掉转航向飞回吉隆坡。因为视线不清因此才会有飞行高度的大幅调整,飞机可能盲目飞行了一段时间,直到燃料燃尽,最后坠毁海洋。
  文森特强调,飞机在海洋中坠毁的可能性更大。因为如果在陆地上坠毁,卫星可监测到应急定位发射机的信号。
  马来西亚警方17日晚对MH370货舱内的一批热带水果里是否被植入了炸弹进行了调查。据马航首席执行官艾哈迈德·焦哈里·叶哈亚(Ahmad Jauhari Yahya)证实,飞机货舱内确实有三到四吨的山竹。
  艾哈迈德说,安检人员对这批水果进行了“例行公事”的检查,但这批水果确实是除了旅客行李以外唯一额外的货物。
  1988年12月21日,泛美航空103号波音747客机由法兰克福途径伦敦飞往纽约,在飞抵苏格兰小镇洛克比上空时,机上一行李箱突然爆炸,引起机身爆炸,造成270人遇难,其中包括188名美国乘客。
 
美航总裁:马航失联客机或因危险货物起火坠海
来源:国际在线, 发布日期:2014-03-19
  据英国《每日镜报》3月18日报道,洛克比空难专家日前表示,马航客机恐因货舱内危险材料着火或爆炸而坠毁。
  洛克比空难爆炸案陪审团成员之一,美国航空总裁(US aviation chief )比利·文森特(Billie Vincent)17日表示,马航失联客机MH370很可能是因为货舱内的危害材料引发火灾或者爆炸而坠毁。
  文森特表示,从目前公布的数据来看,问题都指向了货舱内可能含有的危险材料,这些材料可能因包装不当或非法藏匿而引发爆炸。
  文森特猜测,火灾发生后,飞机的通信系统很快被破坏。机上人员也很快被火灾引发的有毒气体毒晕。飞行员一定曾设法戴上氧气面罩,试图掉转航向飞回吉隆坡。因为视线不清因此才会有飞行高度的大幅调整,飞机可能盲目飞行了一段时间,直到燃料燃尽,最后坠毁海洋。
  文森特强调,飞机在海洋中坠毁的可能性更大。因为如果在陆地上坠毁,卫星可监测到应急定位发射机的信号。
  马来西亚警方17日晚对MH370货舱内的一批热带水果里是否被植入了炸弹进行了调查。据马航首席执行官艾哈迈德·焦哈里·叶哈亚(Ahmad Jauhari Yahya)证实,飞机货舱内确实有三到四吨的山竹。
  艾哈迈德说,安检人员对这批水果进行了“例行公事”的检查,但这批水果确实是除了旅客行李以外唯一额外的货物。
  1988年12月21日,泛美航空103号波音747客机由法兰克福途径伦敦飞往纽约,在飞抵苏格兰小镇洛克比上空时,机上一行李箱突然爆炸,引起机身爆炸,造成270人遇难,其中包括188名美国乘客。
A fire would not burn that long without being picked up by sensors, especially if its causing electrical failure. the 777 has a fairly extensive monitoring system. The fire would need to be drastic and extremely fast burning to not be noticed till it was too late. If it was that drastic, the plane would not be able to fly on autopilot. The pings @ 8:11 dispute this theory. Plane was still intact at 8:11
 
文扬:21世纪的瞒天过海如何得逞?

文扬 2014-03-19

原以为互联网时代了,阴谋诡计无以遁形了;原以为漫天的卫星满街的监控,大海捞针也不很难了;原以为有了谷歌百度大资料,一个福尔摩斯倒下去千万个狄仁杰站起来了;断没想到,一件马航MH370失联案,让全世界一夜回到了解放前。

十天时间里,中国古兵法“三十六计”中的瞒天过海、声东击西、无中生有、暗度陈仓、隔岸观火、调虎离山、欲擒故纵、混水摸鱼、金蝉脱壳…差不多都上演了一遍,或数遍。

最迟到了3月15号,连傻子也能闻到阴谋味道了。该航班机长扎哈里亚•沙阿具有强烈的政治信仰;在起飞几小时前,这位53岁的机长参加了关于反对党领导人安瓦尔•易卜拉欣的一个司法听证会,听证会的结果有可能引发这位安瓦尔的坚定支持者的过激反应;若是机长本人实施劫机,他有能力制造人为的失联,并操纵飞机躲避雷达侦查制造人为的失踪。

但在整整7天时间里,这一组对于搜索极为重要的信息和推断,就像儿戏一样被马国方面隐瞒了——在这个互联网加卫星网加全球媒体网的天网恢恢时代。

到底因为什么马国政府要隐瞒这一点?在真相大白天下之前,还是难以猜测。暂且先不管其掩盖真相的真实动机,人们现在更关心的问题是:仅凭马国政府中的几个人,没有其他人的协助,真的能布下这个堪称世界级的瞒天过海迷魂阵吗?

这期间,虽早有专家根据瞬间失联这一极为异常的情况猜测到了机长劫机的可能性,甚至也有了飞机失联后仍继续飞行的零星证据,但搜救各方集体回避这一考虑方向,在至为关键的第三天到第五天,关注焦点全在两个还是四个可疑乘客身上。现在看来,对于乘客劫机的猜测,正好可以转移对机长劫机的注意,如果没有这一个转移,人们反应再慢,也应该想到去调查机长的背景了,全没道理一直等到七天之后!

这个欲擒故纵、金蝉脱壳大戏上演得令人眼花缭乱,一夜之间乾坤大腾挪,原本已经由中国主导的南海大搜救瞬间瓦解,下半场的印度洋大搜救毫无悬念地成为美国导演的大片。到了这个时候,罗罗公司的引擎资料、马国军方的雷达资料、海事卫星的8:11分、两条空中走廊弧线…这些支援印度洋大片的关键信息,都乔装打扮成新信息异常积极主动地公开出来了!

中国政府很忧虑,中国媒体很劳累,中国民众很迷惑,乘客家属很绝望。但没办法,谁叫我们缺了一组信息呢?21世纪是信息爆炸时代,却并不意味着这也是一个事实透明时代,阴谋制造者们利用信息不对称制造出瞒天过海、声东击西、无中生有、调虎离山、欲擒故纵、金蝉脱壳等等骗局,并不会比中国东周战国时代更难。

第十天了,飞机还没找到,真相还没浮现。但既然已经从中国电视剧换成美国大片了,凭感觉,大结局也该出来了。真相不是没有,要看被谁发现、何时发现。

56e6044d73ae97e47307ddc6a770298d_article.jpg
 
最后编辑:
破解马航MH370航班失踪谜团的十大理论解析
来源:中央社, 发布日期:2014-03-19

(中央社台北19日电)马来西亚航空公司失联班机的搜寻作业已迈入第11天,各种关于马航命运的臆测也在各论坛和社群网站不断流传,英国广播公司(BBC)整理出前机师和飞航专家解析马航失踪的10大理论。

1.降落安达曼群岛

马航MH370班机可能飞往印度最东边领土的安达曼-尼古巴群岛(Andaman and Nicobar Islands)。据报当地威胁等级低,军方雷达甚至可能没有运作。这座由570多个岛屿组成的群岛,仅36座岛屿有人居住,倘若遭到劫机,这可能是秘密 降落的最好地点。1名前波音(Boeing)777客机机师说,要让飞机降落沙滩上的困难度很高,但并非不可能。

2. 飞往哈萨克

哈萨克是北边搜寻走廊的最北端,班机理论上可以降落在当地。轻航机机师瑞格利(Sylvia Wrigley)表示,飞机有可能降落在沙漠,且肯定比降落海滩容易。

3. 往南飞

最後卫星讯号显示,班机脱离马来西亚雷达侦测范围後,仍持续飞行5至6个小时,往南飞会来到广大的印度洋,接著是澳洲空旷的北部内陆,由于不清楚动机,因此难以猜测马航班机的最终目的地,最後它也可能因为燃料用罄坠落在澳洲北部海域。

4. 降落中国大陆西北部塔克拉玛干沙漠

若干论坛揣测,大陆维吾尔族穆斯林分裂主义分子可能劫持了马航班机,其中一个可能的降落地点就是中国大陆的塔克拉玛干沙漠。这个中亚最大沙漠、全球最大沙漠之一的地方,确实是可降落的去处,然而要抵达此处,必须躲过多个国家的雷达系统。

5. 因失火或其他故障必须飞往马来西亚兰卡威岛

飞航部落客认为,询答机和通讯设备失灵,可能是因为发生火警。马航偏离前往北京的航线往左转,或许是为了找安全降落处。

6. 降落在巴基斯坦

媒体大亨默多克(Rupert Murdoch)在推特(Twitter)推文说,「777失踪事件把全球吓呆了。这或许不是坠机而是遭到劫机,说不定完好地藏在巴基斯坦北部,就像本拉 登(Bin Laden)一样」,巴基斯坦则大力驳斥这项可能性。此外,卫星及无人机密切注视巴基斯坦北部,未侦查到大型客机的可能性微乎其微。

7. 躲在另一架飞机阴影下

飞航部落客李杰伍德(Keith Ledgerwood)说,MH370班机很可能是躲在新加坡航空SIA68航班的阴影下,飞越印度和阿富汗领空。

8. 发生打斗

马航班机高度突然从4万5000英呎降至非常低,很可能是驾驶舱发生打斗,尽管911事件後已强化班机驾驶舱门,但仍有可能遭人闯入。

9. 蓄意让乘客因机舱失压死亡

另一个理论是马航班机一度飞至4万5000英尺,可能是为了让乘客迅速陷入昏迷而死亡,以防他们在飞机降回正常高度後使用手机通报,且氧气面罩只能提供约12至15分钟的氧气。

10. 将用来发动恐怖攻击

还有人说,这架班机是遭恐怖分子劫走,将被用来进行911式的攻击行动。他们认为,马航班机已经平安降落,正藏匿或伪装在某处,待补充燃料并装设新的询答机後,用来攻击某座城市。
 
澳方称发现MH370相关物体
腾讯军事03-20 11:20

#马航飞机失联#【澳大利亚:发现疑似失联飞机残骸】澳大利亚ABC发布突发新闻,称一架澳飞机发现疑似失联飞机残骸,另外三架飞机将飞往该地区,澳总理已就此向马方通报,澳大利亚海事局将在北京时间12:30举行新闻发布会。
 
前几天说可能在澳大利亚西南部海域。

upload_2014-3-19_23-37-10.png
 
最后编辑:
【最新消息:澳称卫星在南印度洋发现两块飞机碎片】据法新社,澳大利亚总理托尼-艾伯特称,“可信消息”称卫星图像在南印度洋发现两块疑似与失联航班MH370有关的物品,已经派船只和侦察机到发现物体地点。艾伯特未公布发现物体的具体海域,但称澳大利亚已经开始主导南印度洋的搜寻工作。
 

附件

  • 1395288234822.jpg
    1395288234822.jpg
    60.9 KB · 查看: 78
后退
顶部