福省长牛,动用但书条款,不鸟判决!

看不懂。法官判决是每个councilor代表的人数增加违宪。就是下面这条2b条例
2.
Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
  • (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
怎么着就侵犯言论自由了呢?
 
看不懂。法官判决是每个councilor代表的人数增加违宪。就是下面这条2b条例
2.
Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
  • (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
怎么着就侵犯言论自由了呢?
理由的确莫名其妙。
老实说,少几个council 席位,为纳税人省不少钱,办事效率还更高,挺好的。
 
这种人敷于事的职位就该减,看看Ottawa的轻轨又延期了,预算也超了。干政府工的知道,project能按时完的几率是多少?
 
理由的确莫名其妙。
老实说,少几个council 席位,为纳税人省不少钱,办事效率还更高,挺好的。
把所有议员全省了就剩一个省长可以省更多的钱,办事效率更加高:zhichi::good:
 
以后的案子就照这个来,福省长甩开膀子,大干一场!
 
基本上就是反建制。和穿朴有点像了。背后有无民意?哈哈
 
宪法的作用之一就是要制衡政府,政府当然是民选的。
 
那个但书条款不是宪法的一部分吗?
What is the notwithstanding clause?
OTTAWA – The notwithstanding clause is once again on the tongues of political figures in Canada, as it has been periodically since it came to be three decades ago. But what is it really?

With Ontario Premier Doug Ford saying he will be using the notwithstanding clause to force cuts to Toronto’s city council despite a scathing court ruling that said it violated the Charter, and amid Alberta’s suggestion that it’s an option for Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to revive the currently stalled Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, here’s an explainer on the often-controversial clause.

The clause, otherwise referenced as Section 33 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, allows the federal parliament or provincial legislatures to pass legislation that overrides certain Charter-established rights and freedoms, for five-year periods.

“It allows a government to pass a law that does something that the courts have said violates rights and is not justified,” said associate law professor Michael Pal on CTV News Channel.

If a parliament or legislature is successful in invoking Section 33, the legislation they pass to override the Charter has a maximum five-year time limit. Upon its expiry, the government would have to either re-enact the legislation, or it would no longer stand.

What can be overwritten?

The sections of the Charter that can be overwritten by the implementation of the notwithstanding clause are Section 2, regarding fundamental freedoms such as expression, conscience, association, and assembly; and Sections 7 to 15 regarding the right to life, liberty, and security. The clause cannot be used on a number of other sections of the Charter, including those concerning democratic rights, mobility, and language rights.

How did it come to be?

It was first added to the constitutional accord in 1981 under then-prime minister Pierre Trudeau, despite his stated opposition, following a conference with the First Ministers and in part thanks to a compromise by then-justice minister Jean Chretien. It came into force as an amendment to the Constitution in 1982.

According to a Library of Parliament paper last revised in 2018, opinion has been largely divided on the mechanism since its creation, with many prominent legal figures raising concerns with how the clause would be used.

When has it been used?

As Toronto Mayor John Tory stated on Monday, the clause was put in the Charter for “very extraordinary circumstances.”

Ford’s intention to invoke the clause will mark the first time ever for an Ontario government.

To date it has been used in Quebec on issues of language, and invoked to varying levels in Saskatchewan, Alberta, and the Yukon.

The federal government has never invoked the notwithstanding clause.

加拿大的政治/法律真有得玩。
法律有时过于刻板,有时互相矛盾。这可能就是中国在汉时就放弃了法家主张的原因。
 
最后编辑:
后退
顶部