锺灵：张惠妹事件应引起台湾艺人觉醒
- 主题发起人 laoren
- 开始时间
你问得好。真希望这里的很多人能问一些经过思考后的问题供大家讨论和探讨。
台湾在国民党统治时期，常常说的一句话那就是：中华民国在台湾。那个时候大
陆谈到统一时的口号是：我们一定要解放台湾。而台湾也说要用国父孙中山的三
民主义统一大陆。从那个时候就可以看出，两岸的理念根本不同。1972年，当台
湾(中华民国)在联合国的席位被大陆取代后，它在国际上的空间就越来越小了。
自从蒋经国在台湾进行政治改革后，台湾在自由和民主上取得了瞩目的成就。加
上台湾在经济上的成功。所有这些都令台湾人有自豪的感觉。也使得他们对自己
在国际上的地位和被国际大家庭认同有了强烈的要求。
台湾人已经放弃了用中华民国的三民主义统一大陆的想法，因为他们认为那已经
是很不现实的梦想了。然而，他们想看到大陆能走向自由民主的希望也没有实
现。所有这些，都使得台湾人在接受大陆的“一个中国”的原则上越来越模糊
。大陆没有能进行显著的政治改革以及64事件的发生使得台湾人非常失望。想想
看，台湾从什么时候开始显现台独趋势的？1989年64以后。然而，大陆在64事件
后的15年里，根本就没有真正的反省自己。
谁都希望国家的统一。就象前东德加入西德(或说西德统一了东德)，东德人是那
么的心甘情愿。
如果大陆仍然不思政治改革(这并不是照搬西方的民主)，台湾还能有什么可选择
的呢？也请大家考虑考虑。
Broken Arrow
新手上路
- 注册
- 2002-10-30
- 消息
- 261
- 荣誉分数
- 0
- 声望点数
- 0
You know, I was once arguing with a friend of mine about things related to separation movement in Taiwan and Tibet. He is loyal reader of national review and anti-communism to the death. I called him neo-con sometime. Another friend (both of them are americans) of us was listening and then asked him a question: "what will we do if Texas vote to separate?" He paused and then said: "There will be a war". We all laughed, and no more argument afterwards.
The moral of the story? Democracy and human rights are great things, but fortunately or unfortunately, depend on your view, not always come first.
For the one that wants to separate, go spend your time preparing yourself, instead of wasting time here.
For the one that wants to unite the country, be very careful on promoting or commiting a war as it will get people killed, many of them.
The moral of the story? Democracy and human rights are great things, but fortunately or unfortunately, depend on your view, not always come first.
For the one that wants to separate, go spend your time preparing yourself, instead of wasting time here.
For the one that wants to unite the country, be very careful on promoting or commiting a war as it will get people killed, many of them.
Broken Arrow
新手上路
- 注册
- 2002-10-30
- 消息
- 261
- 荣誉分数
- 0
- 声望点数
- 0
I see, so 50 years is too long. 10 years is probably still too long, right? 10 months? 1 month? Is there a standard switch-off time?
Here in America, one hundred-year old buildings are marked as town's heritage sites, but in China, what would you say about old builds of similar age? Are they going to be treated as precious?
In my opinion, to Chinese, 50 years is just a blink in history...
Here in America, one hundred-year old buildings are marked as town's heritage sites, but in China, what would you say about old builds of similar age? Are they going to be treated as precious?
In my opinion, to Chinese, 50 years is just a blink in history...
Broken Arrow
新手上路
- 注册
- 2002-10-30
- 消息
- 261
- 荣誉分数
- 0
- 声望点数
- 0
BTW, no one knows what would have happened if last time Quebec voted in favor of separation. It is not clear to me that it would guarantee the separation as they still have hurdles to over come (one such thing is a supreme court ruling of its legality in consitution).
Also, I think you understand that way Canada conducts its business is not necessary, and indeed in not need, to be inline with America, or China, or anyone else. And vice-versa is also true.
Democracy should be promted in the context of the people who will benefit, but often being done when convenient and worse, being used as excuse when needed...
Also, I think you understand that way Canada conducts its business is not necessary, and indeed in not need, to be inline with America, or China, or anyone else. And vice-versa is also true.
Democracy should be promted in the context of the people who will benefit, but often being done when convenient and worse, being used as excuse when needed...
